mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
64 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
64 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
From: c3q@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.cyberpunk
|
|
Subject: the NSA KNOWS...
|
|
Date: 6 Dec 91 15:54:13 GMT
|
|
Organization: Cornell University
|
|
|
|
I've been doing some research on data encryption lately, and was led inevitably
|
|
to the Data Encryption Standard (DES). As originally proposed in the '70's (I
|
|
think) the DES had a 128 bit key, and 8 code boxes. The NSA did IBM (the
|
|
originators of the algorithm) a favor by rewriting the code boxes to make them
|
|
"better" (slight cynicism on my part) and then said "might as well reduce the
|
|
key to 64 bits, now that the boxes are so strong". Researchers at Stanford
|
|
have noted mysterious patterns within the code boxes that might be a
|
|
mathematical back-door into breaking the code. In the DES standard there is
|
|
also the proviso that highly classified military, etc. data may/should be
|
|
classified in some other way.
|
|
|
|
Point 2: In a study of the NSA it was revealed that the NSA owns land next to
|
|
every major microwave relay route and down-link inside the US. With the
|
|
scattering inherent in micro-links, this gives them access to 90+% of all data
|
|
traffic.
|
|
|
|
Point 3: The NSA measures its computing power in acres (no joke). They are the
|
|
leading purchaser of latest generation Crays.
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: The NSA can and does read our mail, encrypted or not.
|
|
|
|
Caveat: There is so much data flow, that even with filters that pull out only
|
|
those messages encluding certain key words, any human operators would still be
|
|
incapable of reading any realistic proportion of our mail. Just hope that
|
|
expert systems designed for mail reading aren't developed soon (or haven't been
|
|
developed).
|
|
|
|
Books to read: The Digital Encryption Standard
|
|
Cipher Systems
|
|
Inside the Puzzle Palace
|
|
|
|
Just thought I'd bring home some of the cyberpunk aspects of the world we
|
|
currently live in.
|
|
|
|
Travis J.I. Corcoran
|
|
Cornell '92/'92 (??)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.cyberpunk
|
|
From: ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu (Eli Brandt)
|
|
Subject: Re: the NSA KNOWS...
|
|
Organization: Cult of Loud Loud Sibelius
|
|
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1991 08:41:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <164CCD625.M14661@mwvm.mitre.org> M14661@mwvm.mitre.org writes:
|
|
|
|
>Good points, but does anyone know how the RSA public key algorithm is
|
|
>holding up? It's slow, but fine for precoding email messages, at least
|
|
|
|
It seems to be secure as long as you pick big enough primes -- remembering
|
|
that the NSA has CPU we can only dream of. I strongly suspect that the NSA
|
|
can crack DES. If they can break RSA with considered-secure primes, it
|
|
almost certainly takes them much compute, and they would not be expending
|
|
this kind of effort on *our* messages. I believe PGP, a PC RSA
|
|
implementation, is still available from garbo.uwasa.fi; US users are kindly
|
|
requested to refrain from downloading except for research purposes. It
|
|
uses math owned by PKP, you see.
|
|
|
|
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
|