textfiles-politics/txt_files/theanarc.1

     Recipes for Nonsurvival - The Anarchist Cookbook by William Powell
   <*------------------------------------------------  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    This book has been called a "Manual of terror" by Max Geltman, writing
in National Review (July 22, 1971).  I find this phrase aptly descriptive,
but not in the same sense that Mr. Geltman would have us believe.

    This "cookbook" consists of three basic parts:  an introduction by
Professor Bergman entitled "Anarchism today," and two much longer sections by
William Powell on drug and explosive manufacturing.

    If ever there were an example of Orwellian doublespeak, this is it! 
"Anarchism Today" is basically an interpretation of the philosophic roots of
anarchism, awkwardly coupled with sketchy references to current events. 
Almost all of the intellectuals discussed are from the nineteenth century;
and there is virtually no mention of the writings from 1930 to present.  This
may be expected from someone who appears to have briefly studied the topic
while at college during the 1920's, and thereafter relied only on superficial
newspaper accounts.  Bergman should have been aware of Albert Jay Nock, for
example, and anarchists today are certainly aware of Murray Rothbard, Karl
Hess, etc.

    Bergman considers Nihilism to be a form of Anarchism, and Anarchism a
form of radical revolutionism.  He interprets Marxism in an anarchistic
light, and correctly suggests that Communist governments today are feudal/
reactionary.  However, his emphasis on the Marxist element in anarchist
intellectual tradition is clearly one-sided.  A more through and fair
analysis can be found in "Native American Anarchism" (1932) by Eunice Minette
Schuster.

    Bergman's emphasis on the Nihilistic and destructive aspects of
Anarchism I find disturbing.  This emphasis seems to arise from the axiom
that the State is all, so to oppose the State is to oppose everything. 
Anarchists do not have to propose a concrete alternative because that would
be auhoritarian.

    The rest of this book consists mainly of drug and explosive recipes
relayed to us by William Powell.  His motivation for doing so is supposedly
to allow the "silent majority" access to information which he claims only the
radical groups now possess.  The idea of a "silent majority" comes from
classical Greek literature and in that context referred to the dead who are
the real majority.  If you follow the steps outlined in these recipes, you
may soon join them!  the "Library Journal" (March 15, 1971) puts it this way:

    "Much of it is so sketchy as to be harmless, but there are a number
     of booby traps still for the nitwit who wishes to try them.  There
     are drug making recipes...that may make one very ill...there are also
     a number of stunts which could backfire on the idiot who tries them."

    Lets get down to specifics.

    Ed Rosenthal told me that he had spent a lot of time trying to track down
the rumors of pot growing in New York sewers.  Well, I just may have stumbled
on the origin of the "New York White" rumors.  Despite what Powell may think,
plants are not as adaptable as alligators and need light to grow.  Another
choice quote:  "...strangely enough, insects ignore marijuana and do no
harm."  Strange indeed.

    The DEA has a Precursor Control Program watch list.  This means that if
you buy large quantities of the common precursors to illegal chemicals, the
Federal Government may take an interest in your activities.  Several of the
chemicals on this lists are used in Mr. Powell's LSD recipe, such as
Acetonitrile, Trifluoroacetic Anhydride, Dimethylformamide, and Diethylamine.
Benzene is also on the list, and my also arouse the interest of the EPA
because it is a known cancer-causing agent.

    Much the same can be said of many of his other recipes, and in some
cases the precursors are as hard to get as he final product.  For instance,
his recipe for DMT starts out with indole, which is quite hard to get.  Much
better methods using L-Tryptophan (available in most health-food stores) are
covered in "Synthesis" (1973 - present).

    Powell suggests ground up nutmeg for a psychedelic experience.  Nutmeg
has a poor dose/toxicity ratio!  However, the oil extract of Nutmeg,
containing myristicin, can be used in the synthesis of MMDA - a better and
mellower high than MDA.  See "Journal of Psychedelic Drugs" (Vol. 8, #4,
October-December 1976).

    On page 58 of Powell's cookbook, Nalline is described as "...a freak - a
drug someone forgot to make illegal."  Perhaps they forgot because Nalorphine
is a powerful narcotic antagonist, which tents to produce violent convulsive
reactions in morphine addicts.  (See the Merck Index.)

     For more information on drugs, see "The clandestine Drug Laboratory
Situation in the U.S.", "Journal of Forensic Sciences" (January 1983, p. 18-
31.)  This article, obligingly written by the DEA chief, reports that none of
the 17 labs busted the previous year were successful in producing what was
intended to be produced.  The busted chemists were relying on recipes from
popular "underground" drug manufacturing books.  It was noted that such books
contain errors which prevent the manufacture of the desired chemicals, while
at the same time drawing the attention of government authorities because of
the precursors recommended.

    Let's now examine his recommendations for manufacturing explosives:

    His methods for producing Mercury Fulminate is incomplete and dangerous. 
Between steps 2 and 3, the solution should be cooled.  Do not breathe the
fumes.  See "A Dictionary of Applied Chemistry" by Sir Edward Thorpe.

    Powell's recipe entitled "How to Make TNT" is also quite dangerous and
incomplete.  In step 1, mixing sulfuric acid and nitric acid will likely
result in fulmination and red toxic fumes.  ALso the crude method he
describes does not cover the removal of the Ortho-Dinitro groups.  If this
were not done, the TNT would be extremely unstable.  However, they can be
removed with great ease by heating the crude material with aqueous sodium
sulfite.  See "Chemistry of Explosives" by George Wright, University of
Toronto, in "Organic Chemistry" (p. 974).

    The description of picric acid does not sufficiently emphasize its
unstable nature.  For example, storing it in a cracked glass container may
cause it to explode.  See "Thorpe's".  However, on page 120 he describes two
relatively safer and easily obtainable chemicals (potassium bichromate and
potassium permanganate) as very sensitive, unstable, and too hazardous to
work with.

    He does have a couple of pages on general safety precautions, but the
language suggests that they have been lifted from a military manual.  Also,
he uses the German spelling for some chemicals.  If you attempt to order
chemicals from an American company using German spelling, your order would
likely be looked at with suspicion.

     "The Anarchist Cookbook" was originally published in 1971; the review by
the "Library Journal," which exposed these dangerous errors, came shortly
thereafter.  I wonder why it has gone through 26 printings without these
errors being corrected.  My theory is that Mr. Powell is not an anarchist,
but in reality is spreading disinformation to potential enemies of the
government.  At the time of original publication, Mr. Powell was an unknown
21-year-old college freshman.  Where did he get access to this "information?"
He says, from radical friends on both the left and right.

    The "Minuteman Manual" is listed in tthe bibliography.  The original
Minutemen were colonial American revolutionaries.  In the '60's there was a
radical offshoot of the John Birch Society called the Minutemen; they have
since been disbanded by the FBI.  It is not likely that the 1960's Minutemen
would have handed out their manual to a long-haired 21-year-old college
freshman.  Also, the John Birch Society and the Minutemen are opposed to the
United Nations, and Powell's father was a powerful bureaucrat in the UN
propaganda ministry (see "Newsweek", April 12, 1971.)  Things are getting
curiouse and curiouser!

    This same William Powell has also written a book entitled "Saudi Arabia
and its Royal Family" (1982).  It consists of interviews with members of the
Saudi royal family and other observations gathered while teaching at the
University of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.  It does not seem likely that the Saudi
royal family would give such generous treatment to a real anarchist.  Reading
the Saudi book, I came across some interesting quotes (p. 17):

     "Were something or someone to cut the flow of oil from the
      Arabian Gulf, the result would be truly apocalyptic or the
      United States, Western Europe, Japan, and much of the developing
      world...In a worst case scenario, all gasoline available would go
      to essential services such as the military, the police and fire
      departments, and the transportation of foodstuffs.  Most
      nonessential businesses and industries would close.  Unemployment
      would skyrocket."

     "All major cities would, in all probability, have to be placed under
      martial law.  Curfews would be enforced at gunpoint...Inflation
      would metamorphose...into a lethal epidemic.  We would enter a
      wheelbarrow economy like that of Germany prior to Hitler's rise
      to power."

    I could go on, but I think you get the idea.  WHile his pessimistic
analysis does not take full account of the market's ability to conserve and
switch to alternate fuels, I think a more important point is that Powell
seems to believe that government is as essential as the transportation of
foodstuffs, and that it can help solve the fuel crisis through the draconian
methods he describes.  If governments were to run out of gas tomorrow,
anarchists would be dancing in celebration.

    (Mr. Powell's talk of martial law is not fantasy.  Executive Order
#11490, signed by Richard Nixon in October 1969, allows the president to
assume dictatorial powers after declaring a "national emergency.")

     It just doesn't add up, unless an alternative theory is developed to
explain these anomalies.  My attempts to get the other side of the story from
the publisher were met with a stone wall of silence.  My suggestion is that
much of Powell's disinformation and influence may have come from the
Trilateral Commission and/or the CIA.  A U.S. Air Force combat controllers
group studying theory would seem to dovetail with the "National Review"
article which presented "The ANarchist Cookbook" at face valued and even
included a patronizing reference to "the boys at Harvard."  It is well known
that W.F. Buckley, the "National Review" editor, is a Yale graduate and once
served the CIA in Mexico.  (E. HOward Hunt, of Watergate fame, was CIA
paymaster in Mexico City at the same time Buckley served.)

    I would like to quote Mr. Powell from the April 12, 1971 issue of
Newsweek:  "My book places power in the hands of the individual, where it
belongs.  The right calls it communist, the leftists call it profiteering,
the liberals call it Neo-Nazi."

    And this reviewer calls it bullshit!

 -Esperanza Godot


    Esperanza Godot is a nom de guerre of a Conter-Economics Entrepreneur in
the Washington-Portland area.  Alas, we cannot publish a biography of him,
like others in our series, but I'm sure you'll agree he deserves our title of
"Libertarian Entrepreneurs!  #3."  - Samuel Edward Konkin III.

  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    
[End of Transcription]



    
/s/e