mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
212 lines
11 KiB
HTML
212 lines
11 KiB
HTML
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>prsvbure</title>
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../CSSstyle.css"/>
|
|
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<h1 id="title-index">prsvbure</h1>
|
|
<nav id="menu">
|
|
<a href="../index.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Home</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../fulltext.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../analysis.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Analysis</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../gallery.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Gallery</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../methods.html">
|
|
<div class="button">Methods</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../about.html">
|
|
<div class="button">About</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
<a href="../GitHub.html">
|
|
<div class="button">GitHub <img alt="github icon"
|
|
src="https://logos-download.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GitHub_logo.png"
|
|
width="15"/>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</a>
|
|
</nav>
|
|
<div id="conspiracy">
|
|
<p>THE PRESERVATION OF THE BUREAUCRACY</p>
|
|
<p>By JACOB G. HORNBERGER</p>
|
|
<p>Two hundred years ago, our American ancestors instituted the
|
|
most unusual political system in history. The Constitution
|
|
called into existence a government whose powers, for the first
|
|
time ever, were extremely limited. Thus, unlike other people
|
|
throughout history, Americans lived without such things as
|
|
income taxation, welfare, licensure, immigration control,
|
|
business regulation, drug laws, conscription, and passports.
|
|
Generally, and with exceptions (slavery and tariffs being the
|
|
most notable), laws were limited to protecting people from the
|
|
violence and fraud of others.</p>
|
|
<p>What caused these Americans to institute this strange and
|
|
novel way of life? The answer lies in the way our American
|
|
ancestors perceived the relationship between the individual in
|
|
society and his government.</p>
|
|
<p>Americans of that time believed that the preservation of the
|
|
individual--and the freedom to live his life and dispose of
|
|
his wealth as he chose--was the highest political end. Thus,
|
|
for them, government's sole purpose was to assist in the
|
|
achievement of this end. Government officials were viewed as
|
|
servants, and only as servants, to ensure the preservation of
|
|
the individual, the freedom to live his life, and the
|
|
disposition of his wealth, as he saw fit.</p>
|
|
<p>Although Americans of today operate under the delusion that
|
|
they subscribe to the same value structure as their ancestors,
|
|
the uncomfortable reality is that they have instead rejected
|
|
and abandoned it. Although they will rarely admit it to
|
|
themselves or others, Americans today honestly believe that
|
|
the supreme end in American society is not the preservation of
|
|
the individual and his freedom to choose, but rather the
|
|
preservation of the political bureaucracy and its unlimited
|
|
power to control the lives and wealth of the citizenry.</p>
|
|
<p>How do the politicians and bureaucrats, in turn, perceive the
|
|
citizenry? Paying lip service to their role as "public
|
|
servants," especially at election time, public officials, in
|
|
reality, scoff at any such notion. In their eyes, the citizens
|
|
are means, not ends, who exist solely to ensure the
|
|
preservation of the bureaucracy.</p>
|
|
<p>This philosophical perspective--that the citizen is merely a
|
|
"cog in the wheel" which can, and will, be sacrificed for the
|
|
greater good of the bureaucracy--holds true, of course, with
|
|
the civil bureaucracy. Usually under the guise of fighting
|
|
some domestic "war," or attacking some "crisis"--poverty,
|
|
drugs, illiteracy, racism, or whatever--the civil bureaucracy
|
|
exercises ever increasing control over the lives and wealth of
|
|
the citizenry.</p>
|
|
<p>But the same holds true with the military bureaucracy. No
|
|
matter what the conditions are in the world--even if peace
|
|
were to break out everywhere--even if democracies were
|
|
suddenly found in every nation on earth--even if American
|
|
politicians and bureaucrats appointed every ruler in the
|
|
world--in the mind of the military bureaucrat, crises and wars
|
|
will always be a "potential threat" to "national security."
|
|
And so the military bureaucracy also wields ever increasing
|
|
control over the lives and wealth of the citizenry.</p>
|
|
<p>All money which government has, of course, comes from the
|
|
citizenry through the coercive process of taxation.
|
|
Government officials understand that, in this sense, they are
|
|
parasitic--that is, that they survive and flourish through the
|
|
earnings that are sucked out of the pockets of the citizens.
|
|
They comprehend, for example, that if the citizenry suddenly
|
|
decided to stop paying taxes, the bureaucracy's lifeline
|
|
would, at the same time, dry up.</p>
|
|
<p>The bureaucracy recognizes that, since it is a parasite, it
|
|
must perform a masterful balancing act. On the one hand, it
|
|
must ensure that the citizenry continue paying taxes at such a
|
|
level that the bureaucracy is preserved, and hopefully
|
|
expanded. But it must also ensure that the level of
|
|
confiscation and plunder never gets so high that the worst
|
|
fear of the bureaucracy--a tax revolt among the citizenry--
|
|
materializes.</p>
|
|
<p>Now, the intriguing question is: if the American people
|
|
decided that their ancestors were right, and that 20th-century
|
|
Americans are wrong--that is, that the preservation of the
|
|
individual and his freedom to choose, should, in fact, be the
|
|
end, and the government simply the means to ensure that end--
|
|
would the politicians and bureaucrats comply with the decision
|
|
of the citizenry?</p>
|
|
<p>The answer is in doubt. Why? Because those in the bureaucracy
|
|
honestly believe that they, not the citizenry, are "the
|
|
country"; that is, they actually think that the nation, and
|
|
the well-being of the nation, depend on their preservation.
|
|
The dismantling of the bureaucracy, in their minds, would mean
|
|
the destruction of the country. Therefore, it is entirely
|
|
possible that, in the midst of what the politicians and
|
|
bureaucrats would consider a "national crisis," they would
|
|
refuse to comply with a mandate of the citizenry to dismantle
|
|
the bureaucracy and end the taxation necessary for its
|
|
preservation.</p>
|
|
<p>One of these days, the American people will discover, much to
|
|
their surprise and dismay, that which the Soviet citizens are
|
|
discovering: that the bureaucracy will always tolerate the
|
|
citizens' "freedom of speech" to complain about bureaucratic
|
|
abuses and inefficiencies; but as soon as the bureaucracy is
|
|
threatened by the citizenry with extinction, it will fight
|
|
them "tooth and nail" for its "right" to be preserved.</p>
|
|
<p>Complaints about governmental inefficiencies and corruption
|
|
have become a well-recognized and accepted part of American
|
|
life: "We must get rid of waste in government programs"; "We
|
|
must get 'better people' into public office." So, attempting
|
|
to "correct the system" by gaining political power over their
|
|
fellow citizens, Americans expend much time, money, and effort
|
|
to get themselves, or their friends, elected or appointed to
|
|
public office. And the results? Even when victorious, they
|
|
learn that things only get worse: expanded control, greater
|
|
plunder, increased waste, and more corruption--only this time
|
|
by them and their friends, rather than by others.</p>
|
|
<p>Americans must finally come to the painful realization that
|
|
their ancestors were philosophically correct: that the taking
|
|
of money from one person, through the political process, in
|
|
order to give it to another person is evil, immoral, and
|
|
destructive; and that political interference with how a person
|
|
chooses to peacefully live his life, and dispose of his
|
|
wealth, is equally evil, immoral, and destructive.</p>
|
|
<p>Moreover, Americans must finally conclude, as painful as it
|
|
may be, that waste in government programs (actually somebody's
|
|
income), no matter how great an effort is expended, is
|
|
impossible to eliminate. Evil and immorality, even if
|
|
democratically enshrined, cannot be made to work efficiently.</p>
|
|
<p>And they must learn that getting "better people" into public
|
|
office is not the solution either. One does not change the
|
|
nature of a house of prostitution by voting in a new board of
|
|
directors. And that is exactly what the American people of
|
|
this century have permitted their government to become--a
|
|
house of prostitution in which, for example, the principles
|
|
receive "campaign contributions" and "speakers' honoraria" for
|
|
"services rendered." Of course, some people, and especially
|
|
those who were taught civics in their public schools and who
|
|
were required to pledge allegiance every day for twelve long
|
|
years, will consider this observation to be highly
|
|
unpatriotic. But if it be unpatriotic to oppose a house of
|
|
prostitution where once stood a great and glorious edifice,
|
|
then make the most of it!</p>
|
|
<p>No, the answer is not to engage in a futile quest to eliminate
|
|
waste in government programs. The solution is to
|
|
constitutionally prohibit the programs themselves. No, the
|
|
answer is not to get "better people" into public office. The
|
|
solution is to constitutionally prohibit public officials,
|
|
whoever they may be, from plundering the citizenry and doling
|
|
out money to others. No, the answer is not to reign in the
|
|
bureaucrats. The solution is to dismantle the bureaucracy and
|
|
return the bureaucrats, kicking and screaming, to rewarding
|
|
and productive lives as private citizens. No, the answer is
|
|
not tax reform. The solution is the repeal of the Sixteenth
|
|
Amendment.</p>
|
|
<p>In other words, the solution for America, as we enter the
|
|
third century of this nation's existence, lies with the
|
|
American people's recapturing the principles on which our
|
|
nation was founded and limiting the power of government even
|
|
more severely than our ancestors did. Not only would this
|
|
restore our political system to a sound moral foundation and
|
|
our society to one based on volunteerism rather than coercion,
|
|
it would also unleash an economic prosperity unparalleled in
|
|
history.</p>
|
|
<p>But the heart of the solution is to make the individual in
|
|
society once again sovereign over the state. Until the
|
|
American people make the preservation of the individual, as
|
|
well as his liberty and property, the highest political end,
|
|
they will continue living their lives in subserviency to what
|
|
has been the highest political end in the 20th century: the
|
|
preservation of the bureaucracy . . . and the discord, misery,
|
|
impoverishment, and destruction which it has brought in its
|
|
wake.</p>
|
|
<p>Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of
|
|
Freedom Foundation, P.O. Box 9752, Denver, CO 80209.</p>
|
|
<p>------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From the February 1991 issue of FREEDOM DAILY,
|
|
Copyright (c) 1991, The Future of Freedom Foundation,
|
|
PO Box 9752, Denver, Colorado 80209, 303-777-3588.
|
|
Permission granted to reprint; please give appropriate credit
|
|
and send one copy of reprinted material to the Foundation.
|
|
</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|