mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:15:38 -04:00
1491 lines
80 KiB
Plaintext
1491 lines
80 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
--SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS--
|
||
|
||
This briefing presents the basic concepts of Soviet Scalar
|
||
electromagnetic weapons, some of the major types available, and evidence of
|
||
their widespread testing.
|
||
|
||
- Scalar Electromagnetics is Electrogravitation -
|
||
|
||
Scalar electromagnetics is an extension of present electromagnetics (EM)
|
||
to include gravitation. That is, a unified electrogravitation, and, what is
|
||
more important, it is a unified engineering theory. Its basis was discovered
|
||
by Nikola Tesla.
|
||
|
||
In the scalar EM extension, EM field energy can be turned into
|
||
gravitational field energy and vice versa. This exchange can be patterned and
|
||
localized, in specific areas and objects. Such a controlled change of
|
||
electromagnetics to gravitation is not possible in the normal EM or physics
|
||
presently taught in Western textbooks. However, the bits and pieces of the
|
||
theory have been scattered through the physics literature for some time, but
|
||
no orthodox western scientist seems to have realized that these anomalous
|
||
portions could be integrated into a startling new physics. Unorthodox
|
||
experimenters, inventors, and scientists have made discoveries in this arena
|
||
for several decades, but again have not realized the exact implications or
|
||
the precise manner in which their results could be combined with present
|
||
electrical physics.
|
||
|
||
- Fer-De-Lance -
|
||
|
||
Such sluggishness is certainly not present in the Soviet Union. For
|
||
over three decades, the Soviet Union has been developing electrogravitation
|
||
and app,ying it to develop strange new s%cret weapons of incredible power
|
||
and capability. They have sustained the largest weapons development program
|
||
ever launched by any nation, and they have kept it effectively hidden from
|
||
prying western eyes. I have called this program "Fer-De-Lance", after the
|
||
deadly South American pit viper of the same name.
|
||
|
||
The dreaded fer-de-lance is a snake of great agility and lethal effect.
|
||
It often ambushes its hapless prey, and strikes unexpectedly and without
|
||
warning. Its first sudden strike is usually lethal to its victim, which
|
||
promptly expires in writhing agony. Since the Soviet development of scalar EM
|
||
weapons has been designed for the same purpose, the name seems appropriate.
|
||
|
||
The equivalent effort of about seven Manhattan projects has been poured
|
||
into fer-de-lance by the Soviets, and the program has been successful almost
|
||
beyond imagination. The eerie weapons are now developed, deployed, and
|
||
tested. The ambush has been completed; Fer-de-Lance is coiled and ready to
|
||
strike.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
--ENERGETICS AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEW'S)--
|
||
|
||
The ordinary Soviet name for this type of weapons science is
|
||
energetics. In the west that term is believed to be associated with
|
||
conventional directed energy weapons (DEWs) such as particle beam weapons,
|
||
lasers, radio-frequency (RF) directed energy devices, etc. The Soviets do not
|
||
limit the term in this way.
|
||
|
||
Western scientists are familiar only with directed energy weapons
|
||
where fragments, masses, photons, or particles travel through space and
|
||
contact the target to deliver their effects. Hence in their thinking they
|
||
limit the Soviet term "energetics" to the type of weapons they themselves
|
||
understand -- exotic but normal weapons using energy or mass traveling
|
||
through space to impact a target.
|
||
|
||
However, it is possible to focus the potential for the effects of a
|
||
weapon through spacetime itself, in a manner so that mass and energy do not
|
||
"travel through space" from the transmitter to the target at all. Instead,
|
||
ripples and patterns in the fabric of spacetime itself are manipulated to
|
||
meet and interfere in and at the local spacetime of some distant target.
|
||
There interference of these ripple patterns creates the desired energetic
|
||
effect (hence the term energetics) directly in and through the target itself,
|
||
emerging from the very spacetime (vacuum) in which the target is imbedded at
|
||
its distant location. As used by the Soviets, energetics refers to these
|
||
eerie new superweapons, as well as to the more mundane DEWs known to the
|
||
west.
|
||
|
||
As a consequence of the Soviet breakthrough and decades of feverish
|
||
development, monstrous strategic weapons undreamed of in the West are
|
||
already in Soviet hands. A noose is slowly and steadily being tightened about
|
||
our throats, and it is already the 11th hour.
|
||
|
||
--THE SOVIETS USE A DECEPTION PLAN--
|
||
|
||
Concomitant with this supersecret development program, the Soviets
|
||
developed and implemented an elaborate deception plan to conceal these
|
||
startling weapons and their nature from Western eyes until it is too late.
|
||
Soviet deception has been so successful that even when Western scientists are
|
||
confronted with the actual tests of these weapons directly over their heads,
|
||
they do not recognize the weaponry nor the nature of the effects produced.
|
||
|
||
As early as January 1960, Nikita Khrushchev announced the Soviet
|
||
development of a new, fantastic weapon.
|
||
|
||
On April 10 1963 one of the first new superweapons operationally
|
||
deployed was used to destroy the U.S.S. Thresher atomic submarine
|
||
underwater, off the east coast of the U.S. The next day, April 11, 1963 the
|
||
same deployed superweapon was utilized in a different mode to produce a giant
|
||
underwater explosion in the ocean over the Puerto Rican Trench, 100 miles
|
||
north of Puerto Rico.
|
||
|
||
Over the years, various aircraft were interfered with or downed as
|
||
tests of these Soviet weapons. A particular case involved the mysterious
|
||
loss of F-111s in the Vietnam conflict. At least one downed F-111 crew was
|
||
recovered in the subsequent prisoner of war exchange. On that aircraft all
|
||
electrical systems were in difficulty simultaneously. This was probably due
|
||
to special Soviet teams converting some North Vietnamese SA-2 missile system
|
||
radars to the scalar EM mode, and employing "scalar beam" interference to
|
||
produce spurious EM noise throughout the electrical and electronic systems of
|
||
the aircraft.
|
||
|
||
|
||
In late April/early May of 1985, the entire armada of Soviet strategic
|
||
scalar EM superweapons was activated as a special celebration of the 40th
|
||
anniversary of the end of W.W.II. Activation of this armada (which probably
|
||
contained over 100 giant weapons), together with 27 giant power systems and a
|
||
large number of command and control transmissions, was monitored on an
|
||
advanced, proprietary detection system by Frank Golden. After the gigantic
|
||
strategic exercise, which lasted several days, most of the weapons and power
|
||
sources were once again stood down to "standby."
|
||
|
||
The NASA shuttle launches provided an convenient opportunity for Soviet
|
||
testing of these superweapons in a launch phase ABM mode, where a launched
|
||
missile can be detected and destroyed shortly after liftoff. At first,
|
||
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) bursts on the early shuttle trajectory were
|
||
deliberately delayed in time, to prevent actual destruction of the target and
|
||
avoid alerting the U.S. that something unusual was happening.
|
||
|
||
The shuttle launch of November 26, 1985 saw a particularly significant
|
||
test of this kind. In this case, a very loud "sonic boom" or explosion
|
||
occurred over the launch site 12 minutes after shuttle liftoff, when the
|
||
shuttle was already away and downrange. At least two previous shuttle
|
||
launches had also been used as pseudotargets, with delayed booms occurring
|
||
over the launch site well behind the vehicles.
|
||
|
||
After lack of U.S. reaction to these tests showed that the U.S. still
|
||
had no knowledge of the new technology and did not even recognize its
|
||
employment, the Soviets apparently decided to proceed with tests where the
|
||
target would actually be destroyed.
|
||
|
||
On December 12, 1985 the same Soviet weapon tested against the NASA
|
||
shuttle launches deliberately interfered with the controls of an Arrow DC-8
|
||
taking off from Gander Air Force Base, Newfoundland. At an altitude of 100
|
||
feet, the aircraft--carrying over 250 U.S. soldiers and civilian crew
|
||
members lost power and sank into the ground tail-low, killing everyone on
|
||
board. Three Canadian witnesses to the crash were interviewed over the
|
||
Canadian Broadcast Corporation's television news on April 8,1986 at 10 p.m.
|
||
No flame or smoke issued from the plane before its descent and crash. However
|
||
the aircraft was seen to be mysteriously glowing with a yellow glow. That is
|
||
a signature of the use of a scalar howitzer in the "continuous EM emergence"
|
||
mode, similar to the manner in which the F-111s were downed in Vietnam. In
|
||
short, the DC-8s electrical systems were interfered with ny electromagnetic
|
||
noise created throughout the spacetime occupied by the aircraft. The powerful
|
||
charge created in and around the aircraft also apparently caused the loss of
|
||
two engines, one after the other. With its controls ineffective, and its
|
||
power drastically reduced, the aircraft sank to earth, still in its "tail
|
||
down" configuration from takeoff, and crashed and burned. The "yellow glow"
|
||
was a corona due to the acquisition of a high electrical charge by the skin
|
||
of the aircraft.
|
||
|
||
Other factors contributing to the crash may have been reduced lift due
|
||
to poor engine maintenance, increased weight of the aircraft due to icing,
|
||
and heavy loading. Still, no one has recognized the significance of the
|
||
"yellow glow" or what it implies, or the possible connection between the loss
|
||
of the aircraft and previous Soviet testing of a Launch Phase ABM system
|
||
against U.S. shuttle launches...
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
As of September 1987, the last two Air Force Titan 34-D missiles fired
|
||
from Vandenburg Air Force Base in California have blown up shortly after
|
||
launch. The first one blew up on Aug. 28, 1985 just after lift-off. That loss
|
||
had been attributed to failure of a high powered fuel pump, causing a massive
|
||
oxidizer leak and a smaller fuel leak. The second Titan loss occurred on
|
||
April 18, 1986 when the missile blew up 5 seconds after lift off. Its loss is
|
||
still under investigation and no determination of cause has been made.
|
||
Apparently the shuttle and the Titan presently provide the only viable launch
|
||
vehicles for launching U.S. "spy" satellites. The loss of these sensitive
|
||
satellites--if indeed they constituted the payloads--cannot help but be
|
||
damaging to our strategic capability. According to the Los Angeles Times
|
||
(in 1986) the single remaining KH-11 satellite was launched in December 1984
|
||
and, with an expected life of two to three years, could stop functioning
|
||
later this year.
|
||
|
||
Whether or not significant Woodpecker grid activity existed in the
|
||
vicinity of the Titan launch of August 1985 is unknown at this time. However,
|
||
significant activity in the grid definitely occurred before the April 18
|
||
Titan disaster and on the same day.
|
||
|
||
On Easter Sunday, Mar. 30,1986 engineer Ron Cole observed significant
|
||
correlated with Soviet Woodpecker measurements. On April 18, T.E Bearden,
|
||
perhaps the head of SEM research today, observed traces of a cloud radial
|
||
over Huntsville, Alabama and took photographs of it. Preliminary reports from
|
||
Thousand Oaks Ca. indicate extensive grid activity again on April 18, the day
|
||
the second Titan exploded.
|
||
|
||
At least the second of these two missile destructions shortly after
|
||
launch is suspicious, since the grid positively was active during that time.
|
||
Also, a clear trail of Launch Phase ABM system indicators exists back to the
|
||
massive scalar exercise of April/May 1985. The first Titan explosion in Aug.
|
||
1985 thus falls within the Soviets "now lets test them against the U.S.
|
||
launch vehicles" period. The second Titan loss follows highly suspicious
|
||
losses of the Arrow DC-8 on Dec. 12, 1985 and the Challenger on Jan. 28,
|
||
1986. The same Soviet weapon that destroyed those #gets may have also
|
||
destroyed one or both of the critical Titans.
|
||
|
||
The Soviets also have been able to significantly engineer the weather
|
||
over North America for more than a decade without being found out. They have
|
||
tested a fantastic range of anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defense weapons for
|
||
over two decades, and no one is the wiser in the West.
|
||
|
||
As previously stated, prior to the end of November, 1985, at least three
|
||
"wet-run" tests of a Soviet "launch phase ABM system" against actual U.S.
|
||
shuttle launches were made directly over Cape Canaveral itself, and still no
|
||
one recognized what was happening or what sort of weapon was being tested. On
|
||
December 12, destruction of the Arrow DC-8 in Newfoundland produce no
|
||
indications that the Americans and Canadians knew anything about the nature
|
||
of the weapon possibly used.
|
||
|
||
Accordingly, after a sufficient wait to test our reactions (if any), the
|
||
Soviets prepared to actually destroy a shuttle after its launch...
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
--DESTRUCTION OF THE CHALLENGER, JANUARY, 1986--
|
||
|
||
As the whole world knows, on January 28, 1986 the Challenger was
|
||
launched from Cape Canaveral Florida after exposure to undesirable weather
|
||
conditions, and disastrously exploded shortly after launch. The evidence
|
||
seems to indicate that , as the rising vehicle was stressed, one end of its
|
||
right booster broke loose, twisting away and into the main fuel tank, causing
|
||
rupture, spillage of the fuel, and catastrophic explosion. Several other
|
||
anomalies still exist however, and it is clear that a problem existed with at
|
||
least one of the booster seals. All seven astronauts aboard the flight were
|
||
killed in the fiery destruction of the vehicle.
|
||
|
||
Of course no one had recognized that the Soviets had already tested a
|
||
launch-phase anti-ballistic missile (LPABM) system against three of our
|
||
previous shuttle launches. These "wet-runs" used a deliberate "time-offset"
|
||
to delay the explosive emergence of electromagnetic energy in a launched
|
||
shuttle's location along its trajectory. The delayed test shots resulted in
|
||
very large "booms" above the launch site after the shuttle was safely out of
|
||
the area, but did not destroy the shuttles themselves. For example, the
|
||
delayed shot-boom occurred 12 minutes after the evening launch of Nov. 26,
|
||
1985. Even a marker beacon (large light in the sky) was utilized on that
|
||
launch shortly after lift-off. The marker beacon was photographed. In
|
||
addition another photograph taken in a time sequence shows another sudden
|
||
streak of light coming down and ending in a burst of light. This was probably
|
||
a spacially-offset test of the "pulse mode" for destroying the shuttle. The
|
||
"light burst" would have been detected in the Soviet Union and scored against
|
||
its intended offset position. However, another mechanism was used to cause
|
||
the destruction of the shuttle itself.
|
||
|
||
On Jan. 1, 1986 the presence of a metal softening signal added on to the
|
||
Soviet LPABM systems scalar EM transmissions was detected by a surprised
|
||
Frank Golden. The metal softening ability of the detected signal was
|
||
experimentally verified by him at that time. Golden also locally nullified
|
||
the action of the scalar EM signal in a test, rather conclusively
|
||
establishing (1) that it existed and (2) what it was. The signal was
|
||
apparently being prepared for use against an upcoming U.S. shuttle launch.
|
||
|
||
Just prior to the launch of the shuttle in late January, 1986, the
|
||
Soviets accomplished significant weather engineering over the U.S. The jet
|
||
stream was severely bent southward in the middle of the U.S., bending right-
|
||
ward again to move across the Florida panhandle. Icy cold air from Canada was
|
||
drawn far down, into Florida and onto the Challenger sitting on it launch
|
||
pad. This exposure to cold outside its tested range was probably an
|
||
additional factor contributing to the Challengers failure. Positive
|
||
signatures of the Soviet weather engineering and jet stream manipulation
|
||
were observed and photographed by several persons, particularly in Alabama
|
||
and California...
|
||
|
||
|
||
On January 28, 1986, the Soviet scalar EM weapon system effects were
|
||
sharply localized in the launch zone. Localization involved higher
|
||
frequencies being present; these are quite painful to small brains--whose
|
||
hemispheres act as a scalar interferometer and detector--such as in birds.
|
||
As commented upon by national news commentators, strangely the birds were not
|
||
flying that morning. Indeed, they were staying down on the ground or avoiding
|
||
the area, since the sky over the area was painful to them.
|
||
|
||
As Challenger rose, the metal softening signal would have been
|
||
experienced in and around the boosters shortly after ignition, since the
|
||
booster flame acts as a special "ion-plasma" tuner/detector for the scalar
|
||
signal. The effect of such a local signal is to "charge mass in the immediate
|
||
vicinity" with the particular scalar resonance signal.
|
||
|
||
The ill fated Challenger was doomed. After ignition, the booster flame
|
||
acted as as a ionic plasma detector/amplifier for the metal softening signal
|
||
on the Soviet Woodpecker grid. The metal in and around the booster flame was
|
||
slowly and steadily weakening due to a charge up with the metal softening
|
||
pattern. This contributed to booster leakage from the already cold damaged
|
||
seal. The leaking booster poured out smoke and later flame, contributing to
|
||
the impending disaster.
|
||
|
||
Substantial winds and air turbulence over the site increased the stress
|
||
on the Challenger as it rose through this region. This also contributed to
|
||
the disaster and may have been deliberately created there by Soviet Weather
|
||
engineering.
|
||
|
||
As the Challenger stressed, eventually one or more weakened mounts gave
|
||
way, partially freeing the end of the right booster. Another anomalous flame
|
||
or light was observed on the vehicle, and may have represented a very small
|
||
additional "pulse mode energy form" produced from the weapon that was already
|
||
attacking the Challenger. The booster oscillated, rotating into the tank and
|
||
rupturing it. Contact of the escaping liquid fuel and the flame resulted in a
|
||
fiery explosion, destroying the vehicle and killing those on board...
|
||
|
||
By creating excess cold exposure to the shuttle, inducing metal
|
||
softening in and around the ignited booster, and possibly adding a deliberate
|
||
"intensely hot spot", THE SOVIETS CAUSED THE CHALLENGER TO WEAKEN AND DESTROY
|
||
ITSELF SHORTLY AFTER LAUNCH, IN SO SUBTLE A FASHION THAT NASA SCIENTISTS
|
||
WOULD NOT SUSPECT WHAT HAD ACTUALLY CAUSED THE MISHAP. THE SOVIETS HAD ALSO
|
||
PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN ALL THEIR TRAWLERS AND SHIPS WHICH NORMALLY SHADOW A
|
||
SHUTTLE LAUNCH, TO PREVENT ANY SUGGESTION OF SOVIET PRESENCE NEAR OR
|
||
INVOLVEMENT IN THE CATASTROPHIC ACCIDENT.
|
||
|
||
A few days later, sporadically intense "high frequency localization
|
||
signals" were still present on the grid, at least one hinge-point at
|
||
Birmingham, Alabama confirmed this. From 1-4 February 1986, many birds
|
||
inadvertently flew into the zone when an intense breakout occurred, and birds
|
||
fell dead from the sky in substantial numbers....
|
||
|
||
Next:
|
||
-Technological Surprise and a New Hiroshima-
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Sadly, the bureaucratic smugness of orthodox Western scientists has
|
||
materially assisted the Soviet deception process. Most Western managerial
|
||
scientists -particularly in weapons development activities - have continued
|
||
to view the Soviets as ignorant peasants, still trying to clean the mud off
|
||
their boots. This view is of course, Totally untrue and unwarranted.
|
||
|
||
It takes only a few examples to refute this attitude. In nonlinear
|
||
mathematics, engineering and science, the Soviets have led their Western
|
||
counterparts since the beginning. The electromagnetic pulse (EMP) effect of a
|
||
nuclear explosion appeared in the ordinary Soviet scientific literature
|
||
before Western scientists were even aware that te effect existed. The Soviets
|
||
continue to lead the world in explosive welding, titanium welding and
|
||
forming, etc. While the Soviet scientists exhibit little inclination to build
|
||
good washing machines, they certainly do produce state of the art
|
||
technology-- and beyond-- in any area in which they focus their main efforts.
|
||
(We do lead the Soviets in some areas such as computers hardware, computer
|
||
software, miniaturization, etc.)
|
||
|
||
Once before, a modern nation, the United States, developed a mighty
|
||
weapon in secrecy and used it to force a powerful foe, Japan, to its knees...
|
||
The mindbending atomic blows to Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, showed once and for
|
||
all that in the modern age technological surprise can prove instantly
|
||
disastrous. Yet in our scientific arrogance, we have assumed that it could
|
||
never happen to us, and that the "secret weapon" scenario will never be
|
||
repeated. On the contrary, it HAS happened again, someone else has done it,
|
||
and it has happened to us.
|
||
|
||
It has also become fashionable in the West to believe that all the
|
||
laws of physics are already discovered. We assume we know all of them. While
|
||
we have been pridefully crowing this tune, the Soviets have been steadily new
|
||
laws in secret, as well as new ways to circumvent the old laws.
|
||
Our defense is strategic, we rely on our offense. Our huge nuclear arsenal..
|
||
If this offense were nullified or destroyed by Soviet secret weapons, we
|
||
would be powerless to prevent our own destruction and Soviet domination of
|
||
our world.
|
||
|
||
We have been viewing ourselves as indestructible, confident in the
|
||
strength of our defense. Yet literally our defense has been stripped from us.
|
||
Indeed Soviet energetics weapons are now capable of destroying our defense,
|
||
our homeland, our armed forces in the field, and our population, quickly and
|
||
efficiently. We have a new gap of monumental proportions: not a missile gap,
|
||
not a submarine or bomber gap, and not even a particle beam or laser gap.
|
||
We have a "Scalar Electromagnetics or Electrogravitation" gap.....
|
||
|
||
|
||
He that has ears, let him hear.
|
||
|
||
Here is the secret of antigravity.
|
||
|
||
The "electrical charge" of a charged particle-- such as one of the
|
||
charged particles of an atom or one of the protons of its nucleus--
|
||
represents a difference in flux intensity (potential) between the local
|
||
particle and its ambient vacuum. Its the continual bleed-off of
|
||
gravitational charge as electrical charge. If that bleed off is reversed or
|
||
stopped, a drastic effect on the gravitational charge ensues. The 5-potential
|
||
and the 5-charge have become 4-G-potential and 4-d-charge respectively. Thus
|
||
"charging" an object with its scalar EM pattern charges it gravitationally.
|
||
Now the only "bleed off channel" is through the 4-G force field. Further,
|
||
in a nucleus the nucleons continually back and forth between proton and
|
||
neutron, so the electrical charge is "spread" throughout the nucleus and
|
||
shared by all the nucleons.
|
||
|
||
Further, each element (actually each isotope) has its own unique
|
||
"ensemble pattern" of Fourier expansion scalar frequencies, amplitudes, ect.
|
||
This pattern can, of course, be reproduced artificially and transmitted by
|
||
modified EM transmitters). There is, however, a sort of "master key" scalar
|
||
EM (EG) pattern for nucleons (protons and neutrons which are changing back
|
||
and forth into each other by exchange of virtual charge currents).
|
||
|
||
If one reverses the charge by inverting this pattern, and then
|
||
"charges up a mass with the inverted charge," to the external observer the
|
||
charging mass just gets lighter and lighter, and its inertia gets less and
|
||
less. Eventually it seems (to him) to acquire negative mass and negative
|
||
inertia, and just accelerate away from the earth. the object falls upward
|
||
instead of falling downwards.
|
||
|
||
There are also some weird time effects; that object can be moving
|
||
slower through time than the laboratory observer, or even be moving backwards
|
||
through time in respect to the laboratory observer. (Don't believe everything
|
||
they taught you in relativity; none of those guys ever had engineered a
|
||
single general relativistic situation. &othing they teach in GR is based on
|
||
direct experiment. Most of what they teach has already experimentally proven
|
||
to be in error.
|
||
|
||
|
||
This is the concept for a scalar EG detector for a scalar EG waves.
|
||
This is the Bendini scalar wave detector, adapted from an original concept by
|
||
Dea and Faretto.
|
||
|
||
The idea is quite simple: install a very powerful bar magnet inside a
|
||
grounded Faraday cage. Then install an open-ended coil longitudally above the
|
||
magnet so that a line through the longitudal axis of the magnet passes
|
||
through the longitudal axis of the coil above it. The open end of the coil
|
||
does not touch the magnet.
|
||
|
||
Connect the other end of the coil to a variable tuning capacitor, so
|
||
that the coil and the capacitor form a tunable, series-L-C-oscillatory
|
||
circuit. The output of the capacitor is connected to a transistorized
|
||
preamplifier inside the cage. A tuning shaft for the capacitor is very
|
||
carefully placed through a small hole in the shield to allow tuning from
|
||
outside.
|
||
|
||
The output of the preamp passes through a small hole in the shield,
|
||
through a shielded cable, to an adjacent oscilloscope. The cable shield is
|
||
also grounded t a reference ground potential.
|
||
|
||
The theory is as follows: Suppose a normal EM wave appears inside
|
||
the cage, above the magnet or closely adjacent thereto. In that case a
|
||
coupled oscillation appears in the field of the magnet, and this oscillation
|
||
is coupled to the coil immediately above it. If the oscillation is within the
|
||
bandwidth of the tuned series LC circuit, detection occurs. This is amplified
|
||
by the preamp and passed to the oscilloscope, where it is displayed on the
|
||
scope.
|
||
|
||
Note that the detector detects normal EM wave. Now our problem is:
|
||
How do we get an EG wave to be detected? And how do we assure that we do not
|
||
detect ordinary EM waves from the outside? Actually this is simple. Ordinary
|
||
waves (except for quite low frequency) will be grounded out by the Faraday
|
||
shield, and will not penetrate the cage. Thus these normal EM waves cannot
|
||
enter the cage and appear above the magnet. They will not be detected. Scalar
|
||
EG waves, on the other hand, will enter the cage since they do not couple to
|
||
conduction electrons in the metal of the cage. Above the pole of the magnet,
|
||
spacetime is locally bent. After all, a pole is a magnetostatic scalar
|
||
potential, which is a part of the conglomerate called "G-potential." The pole
|
||
represents an increase (or decrease, depending on whether it is a north or a
|
||
south pole) in the magnetostatic component of the local G-potential. This is a
|
||
curvature of spacetime. An EG wave entering this region adds a varying
|
||
component component of magnetostatic G-potential, which bleeds off in the coil
|
||
as an ordinary EM wave.
|
||
|
||
Another way to view the detector is to model the EG wave as a
|
||
longitudal wave, and an ordinary EM wave as a transverse wave. When the EG
|
||
wave enters the curved spacetime region above the magnet, to the coil (the
|
||
"observer" in this case!) the longitudal aspect of the EG wave appears to be
|
||
rotating back and forth, so that an oscillating transverse component is
|
||
present. This transverse component appears to the coil as an ordinary EM
|
||
field, and so the LC circuit detects it if it is in the proper frequency
|
||
band.
|
||
|
||
Yet another way to view the situation is to realize that an EG wave
|
||
entering the magnet results in an oscillating component added to the
|
||
magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength) of t8e magnet. Accordingly,
|
||
the magnet is a receiver for scalar waves, which are detected to "bleed-off"
|
||
as an oscillation of the magnetic field strength of the magnet. Coupling of
|
||
this oscillating magnetic field to the coil creates an oscillating current
|
||
flow into the capacitor. This oscillates the voltage input to the preamp,
|
||
which amplifies and feeds the signal to the oscilloscope for display.
|
||
|
||
|
||
It is important to remember that a magnetostatic potential and an
|
||
electrostatic potential can be oscillated by a scalar EG wave. By placing a
|
||
magnetic material inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of the magnetostatic
|
||
scalar potential (pole strength of the magnet) can be used as the EG
|
||
detecting mechanism. By placing a chargeable material inside a Faraday cage,
|
||
the oscillation of the electrostatic scalar potential can be detected.
|
||
(Possible examples of the latter type detectors are given by Hodowanec,"Radio
|
||
Electronics," April 1986.)
|
||
|
||
Note also that one may detect waves at one reference level and not
|
||
at another. Changing the bias on the zero-reference ground of the Bendini
|
||
detector affects the detection. To look inside a normal EM carrier (such as
|
||
the Soviet Woodpecker carrier) and see what scalar signals are riding upon
|
||
it, the carrier may be used to bias the reference ground of the Bendini
|
||
detector. To produce a spectrum analyzer, simply use additional series
|
||
resonant LC tuning circuits in parallel (put multiple taps on the coil, and
|
||
wire each tap to a separate tuning capacitor of different capacitance).
|
||
Again, varying the zero reference level is important, as is varying the
|
||
strength of the magnet. Frank Golden has also invented an excellent series of
|
||
scalar wave detectors based on quite different proprietary principles.
|
||
|
||
The bottom line is: we can indeed rigorously detect and measure
|
||
scalar EG waves. When one considers the large sums of money presently being
|
||
spent to bury large aluminum cylinders etc. in an attempt to detect
|
||
gravitational waves, one wonders why some funds could not be released to a
|
||
few unorthodox researchers by the National Academy of Sciences to fund the
|
||
proven creation and detection of electrogravitational waves...
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Here is explained a new kind of resonance: scalar EM resonance, or
|
||
electrogravitational resonance.
|
||
|
||
First, imagine we have a standard resonant cavity. In this cavity we
|
||
have a resonant EM wave moving back and forth. In accordance with convention,
|
||
the E-field vector and the B-field vector are at right angles in this moving
|
||
wave front. As the wave moves back and forth, the vectors vary back and
|
||
forth; however, at any one point between the walls, the two vectors always
|
||
have the same value. Thus our resonant EM wave forms a standing wave in the
|
||
cavity.
|
||
|
||
Now imagine that a second wave front, precisely like the first and of
|
||
the same frequency, is superposed over the first one and travels with it.
|
||
This second wave -- the "antiwave" -- has its force vectors 180 degrees out
|
||
of phase with the force vectors of the reference wave. Hence the E-fields
|
||
and B-fields of the two superposed waves always sum to vector zeros, anywhere
|
||
in the cavity. To an external observer, the cavity contains no ordinary
|
||
electromagnetic force fields, hence no ordinary EM energy.
|
||
|
||
However the energy density of a single EM sine wave in vacuum is given
|
||
by:
|
||
|
||
density 2
|
||
[ E + B ]/8pi
|
||
|
||
This energy density is always positive. Hence the energy density of the
|
||
two waves at any point X between the walls is equal to:
|
||
|
||
|
||
2 2
|
||
[ E + B ]/4pi
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
E=E(x) ; B=B(x)
|
||
|
||
Thus the energy density of vacuum varies with X. But, rigorously, since
|
||
the resultant E and B fields are zero, this describes a standing
|
||
gravitational wave. Hence we have a standing EG wave existing in the cavity.
|
||
This is an example of scalar resonance. Rigorously the cavity has mass and
|
||
inertia, to an outside observer, as a result of the two warps in spacetime it
|
||
contains.
|
||
|
||
Note that in one half cycle the energy density of vacuum is greater
|
||
than ambient, and in the other half cycle it is less. In the region of one
|
||
half cycle, time flows at a faster rate than to the ambient observer, and in
|
||
the other half cycle time flows at a slower rate than to the ambient
|
||
observer. One half cycle appears to contain negative electrical charge, and
|
||
the other appears to contain positive charge.
|
||
|
||
One half cycle appears to contain a north pole (positive magnetostatic
|
||
scalar potential), and the other half cycle appears to contain a south pole
|
||
(negative magnetostatic scalar potential).
|
||
|
||
Perhaps n/w one can begin to understand why a continuously accelerated
|
||
orbital electron in the atom does not radiate EM energy, completely in
|
||
violation of Maxwell's equations. The electron is naught but a complex aspect
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Scalar resonance is not in the conventional textbook.
|
||
|
||
Scalar resonance is a particular zero summed multi-resonance,
|
||
electromagnetically, so that it does not act in an electromagnetic manner.
|
||
|
||
A scalar resonance is a standing electromagnetic wave. It can be made
|
||
electrically, but is not electrical in behavior.
|
||
|
||
In any scalar resonance, spacetime is curved, and it is the magnitude
|
||
(and direction) of this spacetime curvature that is oscillating in "standing
|
||
wave" fashion.
|
||
|
||
In respect to stress of the vacuum medium, one half of a standing sine
|
||
wave of scalar resonance is tensile; the other half is compressive. However,
|
||
this is with respect to the local ambient stress of the vacuum.
|
||
|
||
"Mass" of a particle is just a characteristic exhibited by a trapped
|
||
scalar resonance. Usually this trapping is done by the "spin" of the
|
||
individual particle.
|
||
|
||
The concept of "mass" may be compared with the concept of
|
||
"capacitance." That is, a mass is an accumulator for scalar waves; that is,
|
||
for scalar resonances. It is continually being "charged" and "discharged"
|
||
by absorption and emission of scalar waves from and to the ambient vacuum
|
||
scalar wave flux.
|
||
|
||
Indeed the magnitude of a mass may be defined in terms of the absolute
|
||
value of this "switching" (absorption = switch in; emission = switch out)
|
||
rate. For details on this see (Bearden, T.E. "Quinton/Perception Physics: A
|
||
Theory of Existence, Perception, and Physical Phenomena," March, 1973, AD
|
||
763210, available through NTIS.)
|
||
|
||
In the normal linear spacetime, the "charging" and "discharging" are
|
||
equal in all directions; so the mass exhibited in any direction is the same.
|
||
|
||
With respect to an "external observer's" equilibrium flux, a moving
|
||
object encounters an increased amount of flux rate along its line of motion,
|
||
just as a moving object in a rainstorm encounters more raindrops per second
|
||
in the direction of its path, than does a stationary object. Encountering
|
||
increased scalar wave flux (with respect to the external observer) forces the
|
||
moving object to absorb and emit scalar waves at a higher rate along its
|
||
direction of motion than when its not moving. Thus to the external observer,
|
||
the mass of the object has increased, insofar as any disturbing force along
|
||
its line of motion is concerned.
|
||
|
||
At right angles to its line of motion however, the flux rate is
|
||
precisely the same as when the object is at rest. Therefore the "mass" of the
|
||
moving object with respect to any disturbing force at right angles to its
|
||
line of motion has not changed, as seen by the external observer.
|
||
|
||
Thus is explained both parts of one of the all time great mysteries of
|
||
special relativity: (1) how the mass of an object increases with respect to
|
||
its motion, and (2) why the mass only increases with respect to its line of
|
||
motion, and not at any right angles to it.
|
||
|
||
The inertia of a particle is due to its mass, i.e., to the total
|
||
magnitude of its trapped scalar resonance.
|
||
|
||
The gravitational attraction between two masses is due to their
|
||
spacetime curvature. Further, mass is like a capacitance. It can trap
|
||
additional scalar waves as trapped resonance; hence increase its magnitude or
|
||
"inertial charge". Or, it can discharge more scalar waves than it absorbs;
|
||
hence decrease its magnitude or "internal charge"...
|
||
|
||
|
||
Those scalar waves emitted from resonance are emitted as a pattern
|
||
ensemble of the resonance. Hence they may be regarded as constituting a
|
||
current of scalar resonance leaving the mass accumulator object. Scalar waves
|
||
absorbed into trapped resonance may be regarded as constituting a current of
|
||
scalar resonance into the mass accumulator object. Thus it is proper to speak
|
||
of scalar resonance as being able to "flow".
|
||
|
||
Further, it is possible to increase the mass of an object directly, by
|
||
transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it absorbs them. (By absorbing
|
||
scalar waves one means that more enter the object than leave it, so that the
|
||
object acts as an internal accumulator charging up with internal charge. This
|
||
is done by insuring the reference potential of the scalar wave transmitter is
|
||
higher than the reference potential of the irradiated object.)
|
||
|
||
It is also possible to decrease the mass of an object directly, by
|
||
transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it emits more than it absorbs. (By
|
||
emitting scalar waves one means that more leave the object than enter it, so
|
||
the object acts as if it were an internal accumulator that is discharging its
|
||
internal charge. this is done by insuring that the reference potential of the
|
||
scalar transmitter is lower than the reference potential of the irradiated
|
||
object.)
|
||
|
||
As can be seen, the scalar wave "transmitter" is actually somewhat
|
||
comparable to a heat pump; it can either act as an "energy transmitter" or as
|
||
an "energy extractor", depending on the difference in potential between
|
||
"transmitter" and "receiver."
|
||
|
||
|
||
Scalar resonance can have a specific pattern: both in frequency and in
|
||
spatial curvature aspects, as well as "rate of flow of time" aspects. Indeed,
|
||
scalar-wise every object has its individual "scalar pattern" which is a
|
||
unique fingerprint. Since that print is spatiotemporal, it is a product of
|
||
that objects entire past history. Thus --scalar wise-- no two objects are
|
||
identical.
|
||
|
||
This brings up another rather amazing potential: If a reasonably
|
||
precise scalar pattern of an object can be "irradiated" and resonated with
|
||
scalar waves, energy may be created in or extracted from the distant object,
|
||
just as stimulating one tuning fork can excite another at a distance by
|
||
sympathetic resonance. I leave it to you to ascertain the relavence of this
|
||
statement to clairvoyance, radionics, remote viewing, etc.
|
||
|
||
For the skeptic, however, we must point out that --rigorously--quantum
|
||
mechanics requires that, continually, in any localized region of spacetime,
|
||
the "pattern" of any object in the universe appears momentarily in the
|
||
virtual state, purely from statistical considerations alone. So long as the
|
||
situation remains statistical, any place in the universe can continue to have
|
||
the "ghosts" of everything present there, in an ethereally thin pattern, and
|
||
the observable world will not be affected by it. However if one can
|
||
discriminate and scalarly "charge" or "discharge" individual patterns in this
|
||
"ghost-realm", action at a distance is directly possible, as is
|
||
materialization and dematerialization. If one accepts that even thought
|
||
itself produces such virtual "ghost-patterns" in the virtual particle flux of
|
||
vacuum, then it is at least theoretically possible to materialize thoughts
|
||
and thought images.
|
||
|
||
|
||
We have entered a new kind of reality where the old rules and the old
|
||
limitations do not necessarily apply.
|
||
|
||
|
||
As pointed out, we can greatly simplify matters by considering
|
||
'currents of scalar resonance'. These currents flow from higher potential to
|
||
lower potential, regardless of whether we are considering "transmission" or
|
||
"reception".
|
||
|
||
Indeed, to transmit at lower potential is to receive, and to receive
|
||
at higher potential is to transmit. Thus the "transmitter-receiver" is a
|
||
special system where simply biasing two nodes differently determines which
|
||
way the scalar resonance will flow. We may increase or decrease an object's
|
||
inertia and mass, simply by properly biasing the transmitter-receiver's two
|
||
nodes.
|
||
|
||
In one accidental experiment of some hours duration, Golden charged
|
||
up an area so that, locally, all clocks became erratic. This included
|
||
electrical clocks, battery driven watches, wind up kitchen clocks, and a
|
||
pendulum operated grandfather clock. The rate of flow of time itself was
|
||
apparently altered in the local area by the accumulated charge, which took
|
||
four days to drain off and discharge. At the end of four days of discharge,
|
||
all clocks and watches returned to normal.
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
|
||
If we interfere two transmitters in a region of great energy--such as
|
||
the molten core of the earth itself--and bias the transmitters negatively, we
|
||
can extract enormous energy directly from that distant source!
|
||
|
||
Indeed, a slight variation of this effect is precisely how the Soviet
|
||
Union obtains the enormous energy with which to power its incredibly
|
||
powerful strategic "continent-buster" scalar EM weapons. Scalar frequency
|
||
pairs -- 12 kilohertz apart -- are transmitted into the earth itself on some
|
||
portion of the earth's "giant scalar resonance" frequency curve. Biasing the
|
||
two transmitters differently with respect to each other produces a high
|
||
potential difference (voltage) between them. At the same time, biasing them
|
||
both negative with respect to the earth's molten core produces a scalar
|
||
resonance current from the core to the two transmitters. In the "outer loop"
|
||
between the two scalar transmitters, there appears a gigantic v/ltage and
|
||
gigantic electrical current which can be captured by appropriate means. This
|
||
electrical power is tapped off and transmitted to incredibly powerful scalar
|
||
EM weapon systems. There, special accumulators ad switchers are utilized to
|
||
provide awesome amounts of power to each weapon.
|
||
|
||
Just before May 1,1985 the Soviet Union performed a "full-up"
|
||
operational test of their entire strategic scalar EM weap/ns complex. This
|
||
test was detected and monitored periodically by Frank Golden. Some 27 of
|
||
these giant Soviet "power taps" were locked into the molten core of the
|
||
earth, producing forced (entrained) scalar resonance of the entire planet on
|
||
54 controlled frequencies under our very feet. The remainder of the scalar
|
||
frequency spectrum was ablaze with literally hundreds of Soviet scalar
|
||
transmitters: probably the entire strategic scalar command and control system
|
||
to underwater submarines, higher command centers, distant commands, etc. was
|
||
activated in the giant exercise.
|
||
|
||
For several days the system was exercised on a mind-boggling scale,
|
||
apparently as part of the Soviet Unions highly accentuated 40th anniversary
|
||
celebration of the end of World War II.
|
||
|
||
Ironically, not a single U.S. intelligence agency, laboratory, or
|
||
scientist detected this monstrous exercise for the new Soviet leader,
|
||
Gorbacev. Not one of them had a detector for scalar EM radiation, and not one
|
||
of them will --officially-- say that the exercise ever happened.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- CREATING ENERGY AT A DISTANCE --
|
||
|
||
A most useful device is obtained if one uses a scalar inferometer where
|
||
the two transmitters transmit beams which intersect at a distance.
|
||
|
||
In the interference zone, an energy bottle is created.
|
||
|
||
By biasing the transmitter reference potentials well above that of the
|
||
distant energy bottle, EM energy emerges in that zone. In that case the
|
||
interferometer is operating in the Exothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
By biasing the transmitter reference potentials well below that of the
|
||
distant energy bottle, EM energy is extracted from the distant zone and
|
||
emerges from the transmitter. In that case the inferometer is operating in
|
||
the Endothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
If the transmitters transmit continuously, the effect in the distant
|
||
zone is continuous.
|
||
|
||
If each transmitter transmits a pulse, and the two pulses meet in the
|
||
distant intersection zone, then an explosive emergence or extraction of
|
||
energy occurs at the distant interference zone, depending on whether the
|
||
inferometer is operating in the exothermic or endothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- EXOTHERMIC MODE (SCALAR INTERFEROMETER) --
|
||
|
||
For a scalar interferometer, "del phi" (the gradient of the potential)
|
||
applies between the transmitter sit and the distant intersection site, not to
|
||
the intervening space in between. Thus one speaks of "energy flow" as being
|
||
between the transmitter and intersection --without- any "in between". In the
|
||
intervening space, all energy exists as locked-in artificial potential, not
|
||
EM force field energy (gradient bleed off potential).
|
||
|
||
In the Exothermic mode, the ground potential of the transmitter is
|
||
biased well above the ground potential of ambient vacuum. Energy enters the
|
||
transmitter and "disappears", to "reappear" in the distant interference zone.
|
||
|
||
If continuous wave transmission is used, the energy continuously
|
||
appears in the distant zone.
|
||
|
||
If pulse transmission is used and timed so that the two scalar pulses
|
||
meet in the distant zone, energy explosively appears there.
|
||
|
||
If multiple frequencies are transmitted in the manner of a Fourier
|
||
expansion of a particular geometric form, then a 3-dimensional energy form
|
||
appears at the distant intersection. In this manner a spherical or
|
||
hemispherical shell (a globe or "dome" of EM energy) can be created at a
|
||
distance. If pulse transmission is used, this will be an impulsive or
|
||
explosive emergence of that energy form. If continuous transmission is used,
|
||
this will be a continuous glowing form.
|
||
|
||
By feeding incredibly powerful transmitters with large amounts of
|
||
energy extracted from the earth's molten core by "energy taps," very large
|
||
spherical globes and hemispherical domes of EM energy can be created at a
|
||
distance. The energy in the interference "shell" of such a sphere or
|
||
hemisphere is sufficiently dense to lift Dirac matter from the Dirac sea of
|
||
the vacuum. Thus the shell contains a glowing plasma.
|
||
|
||
Many such scalar howitzer signatures have been seen over the oceans,
|
||
particularly over the north Pacific by jet airliners flying into and out of
|
||
Japan. (Remember some months ago the big story about the JAL flight in which
|
||
all passengers and crew saw a giant spherical "UFO".) Also such globes and
|
||
domes of light have been seen deep within the Soviet Union, by observers in
|
||
Afghanistan and by pilots of aircraft landing in Iran.
|
||
|
||
In the impulsive exothermic mode, a large visible flash will occur if
|
||
EM energy in the visible spectrum is produced. "Flashes" in the infrared may
|
||
similarly occur, if the emerging energy is in that spectral band. In
|
||
September 1979 our Vela satellites detected such a large "nuclear flash" over
|
||
the South Atlantic, off the southern coast of Africa. A second "nuclear
|
||
flash" detected by the Vela satellites in 1980 was in the infrared only. Some
|
||
years ago, a series of anomalous "flashes" and "booms" occurred off the east
|
||
coast of the United States. The were due to the orientation and alignment --
|
||
and registration -- of one or more "scalar howitzers" -- scalar EM
|
||
interferometers in the exothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
Large "booms" occurred over the shuttle launch site at Cape Canaveral,
|
||
associated with three shuttle launches prior to the end of November 1985.
|
||
These were tests of such exothermic scalar EM howitzers, being tested as part
|
||
of the Soviet Launch Phase ABM system. In that mode, the scalar pulses from
|
||
the two transmitters are injected into special zero-reference scalar EM
|
||
"channels" established in the EM carriers of the Woodpecker over-the-horizon
|
||
radars. The scalar pulses travel through these channels, traveling in the
|
||
ordinary EM beam of the transmitter and following it in its curvature around
|
||
the earth in the earth-ionospheric waveguide. The scalar pulses are timed,
|
||
phased, and oriented so as to meet the rising shuttle. In these tests the
|
||
transmissions were offset in time so the shuttle would not actually be
|
||
destroyed, but the system could be tested against actual shuttle launches in
|
||
the U.S.
|
||
|
||
The specific uses of these various exothermic modes will be covered in
|
||
later parts of this series.
|
||
|
||
In the endothermic mode, the bias on the transmitters is such that
|
||
energy is extracted from the distant intersection zone, to re-emerge from the
|
||
transmitters. There the energy must be caught and disposed of if it is not to
|
||
burn out the transmitters. When very large amounts of energy are extracted
|
||
from distant points, the Soviets often use a "dump" method of temporarily
|
||
capturing, and storing in an accumulator, the heat energy emerging at the
|
||
transmitters. A second howitzer in the exothermic mode is then fed by a
|
||
"scalar energy tap" established into the accumulator. This howitzer is
|
||
focused on the distant dump site -- often Bennett Island, where exhausts are
|
||
continually observed by U.S. weather satellites.
|
||
|
||
In the impulsive endothermic mode, energy is impulsively extracted from
|
||
the distant intersection zone. In the atmosphere this results in a very sharp
|
||
cooling or "cold explosion". It also results in the type of boom and rumble
|
||
often associated with thunder after a lightning bolt.
|
||
|
||
On April 9, 1984 the Soviet Union tested such a "cold explosion" off
|
||
the coast of Japan, near the Kuril Islands. In the suddenly induced low
|
||
pressure "cold zone" above the ocean, ocean water was sharply sucked up from
|
||
the ocean, forming a dense cloud. Then air rushing into the low pressure zone
|
||
forced the cloud upward, forming a mushroom much like that of an atomic
|
||
explosion except for the absence of a flash and the absence of a shockwave
|
||
moving out and away from the center of the explosion.
|
||
|
||
As the cloud rises, it expands by mixing -- very similar to a giant
|
||
thunderhead buildup, except much faster. In this case the cloud rose to about
|
||
60,000 feet in about 2 minutes, spreading out until it reached a diameter of
|
||
about 200 miles. The incident was seen by the pilots and crews of several
|
||
Boeing 747 jet airliners in the general vicinity. Sometime after that, a U.S.
|
||
weather satellite photo of the area occurred. The cloud in that photo has an
|
||
anomalous density distribution, differing from that of all other clouds in
|
||
the area...
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
|
||
--TESLA'S "BIG EYE" FOR REMOTE VIEWING--
|
||
|
||
Nikola Tesla planned a very special use for his endothermic scalar
|
||
interferometer. He planned to produce what he called his "big eye to see at a
|
||
distance."
|
||
|
||
The system used to accomplish this is only weakly endothermic, so that
|
||
only a small amount of energy is extracted from the distant target. Also, the
|
||
beams are "scanned" by an open receiver, timewise, from side to side and top
|
||
to bottom. By scanning yet another single beam through the intersection zone
|
||
and phasing its pulses, an even better representation can be obtained. Thus
|
||
the receiver produces a representation of the energy extracted from various
|
||
locations within the distant endothermic zone. By displaying the received
|
||
signals on an appropriately scanned screen, a representation of the distant
|
||
scene can be created. This is a special kind of "microwave interferometry,"
|
||
and -- with modern techniques -- the imagery obtained can be surprisingly
|
||
good.
|
||
|
||
With development, it might even become as good as the image presently
|
||
obtained by side looking acquisition radars.
|
||
|
||
Interestingly enough, since scalar beams will easily penetrate the earth
|
||
or the ocean, one can also look beneath the earth or ocean with this type of
|
||
scanning scalar interferometer.
|
||
|
||
The importance of this capability to strategic and tactical
|
||
reconnaissance is obvious. Camouflage, cover, and concealment have no effect
|
||
on such a system. One can easily look into buildings and into underground
|
||
facilities. With a small system such as this, the U.S. Marines at Khe Sahn
|
||
would have had little difficulty locating the tunnels continually dug under
|
||
the perimeter by the Viet Cong. And targets under jungle canopies are
|
||
directly visible...
|
||
|
||
It requires little imagination to see that this system is easily
|
||
adapted for use underwater. A type of "underwater radar." With such devices,
|
||
the problem posed by the underwater nuclear submarine is solved. For example,
|
||
an entire area can be continually searched, much like acquisition radar
|
||
systems do now. A submarine can be detected and tracked, and none of its
|
||
ordinary detectors will detect anything out of the ordinary. By using a
|
||
separate pair of beams in the exothermic mode, powerful scalar pulses can be
|
||
fired at the distant sub, intersecting at the submarine in a violent EMP
|
||
throughout the sub and its armament. Thus the sub and all of its missiles
|
||
are destroyed instantly.
|
||
|
||
Or, continuous exothermic transmission can be used by the targeting
|
||
weapon at lesser power, gradually interfering with the sub's electrical
|
||
systems and causing it to loose control. The sub then sinks to crush depths
|
||
and implodes.
|
||
|
||
Precisely that scenario seems to be what happened on April 10, 1963 to
|
||
the U.S.S. Thresher nuclear submarine. It left a signature: the subs nearby
|
||
surface companion, the U.S.S. Skylark, was in the "splatter zone" of the
|
||
underwater scalar interference. That is, spurious EM noise was being
|
||
generated in all the Skylark's electrical systems, some of which were
|
||
actually disabled. So intense was the "electronic jamming" that it required
|
||
over an hour and a half for the Skylark to transmit an emergency message
|
||
back to its headquarters that the Thresher was n serious trouble and contact
|
||
with it had been lost. Some of the Skylark's communication systems actually
|
||
failed, but later resumed operation inexplicably, once the jamming was gone.
|
||
That type of "jamming" of multiple bands and multiple electronic equipment,
|
||
of course, together with the anomalous failure of electronic equipment and
|
||
its later mysterious recovery, were direct signatures of the exothermic
|
||
scalar interferometer against thee undersea target in the vicinity of the
|
||
skylark.
|
||
|
||
The very next day, April 11,1963, the same Soviet scalar EM howitzer
|
||
system was tested in the "destroy submarine" pulse mode. A huge underwater EM
|
||
blast occurred off the coast of Puerto Rico, about 100 miles north of the
|
||
island. The underwater explosion caused a huge boiling of the surface of the
|
||
ocean, followed by the rising up of a giant mushroom of water about a third
|
||
of a mile high, the mushroom of water then fell back into the ocean,
|
||
completing the signature.
|
||
|
||
Fortunately the entire incident was seen by the startled crew of a
|
||
passing U.S. jetliner which was just passing its checkpoint in that area.
|
||
(See Robert J.Durant, "An underwater explosion -- or what?", Pursuit, 5(2),
|
||
April 1972, p. 30-31.)
|
||
|
||
These two incidents were full up operational tests of Khrushchev's
|
||
newly-deployed superweapons. He probably staged this dramatic one-two punch
|
||
in a desperate effort to recover face with the Communist Party after his
|
||
disastrous face down by Kennedy in thee Cuban Missile Crisis a few short
|
||
months previously. Apparently the attempt was successful, since he remained
|
||
in power another year before being deposed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
--MUSHROOM CLOUD FROM SEA OFF JAPAN NEAR RUSSIAN TEST AREA--
|
||
|
||
The following is concerning the "cold explosion" of April 9,1984. The
|
||
site of the explosion was only about 200 miles from downtown Tokyo. It was
|
||
seen by the crews of several jet airliners, including Japan Air Lines Flight
|
||
36.
|
||
|
||
A short time before the Soviets had hastily announced missile tests
|
||
would be conducted into a zone some distance away from the ol explosion site.
|
||
This may have been a deception to cover this incident, should any nation
|
||
indicate they knew what was going on.
|
||
|
||
It was also a direct "stimulus" to the Japanese and the rest of the
|
||
world: That is stimulate the system and see if the scientists recognize what
|
||
happened. If they do, then they know about scalar EM weapons. If they don't,
|
||
then their countries know nothing of scalar EM weapons, and those countries
|
||
are defenseless against them.
|
||
|
||
At any rate, at about 5:14 a.m. Pacific Standard time on April 9,1984,
|
||
a giant mushroom cloud erupted above the ocean south of the Kuril Islands.
|
||
The mushroom rose rapidly, expanding to an altitude of 60,000 feet and a
|
||
diameter of 200 miles within 2 minutes.
|
||
|
||
One pilot of a Boeing 747 who observed the cloud was a former B-52
|
||
bomber pilot. He described the cloud as being very similar to that of a
|
||
gigantic nuclear explosion, except there was no flash of visible light.
|
||
Taking evasive action, he turned off course away from the blast, and braced
|
||
for a blast shock that never came...
|
||
|
||
|
||
--MUSHROOM CLOUD RISING FROM THE SEA (COLD EXPLOSION)--
|
||
|
||
Indeed, this highly anomalous cloud was due to a cold explosion -- a
|
||
test of a Soviet scalar EM howitzer in the pulsed endothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
Thus a beautiful "stimulus" and test was conducted: quite a few
|
||
airliners were "pinged", providing a high-level stimulus to competent
|
||
observers. The news was sure to be reported by them to several nations. The
|
||
press was sure to pick up the story. This was a high order stimulus to see
|
||
whether the U.S., Japan, or other potential adversaries of the Soviet Union
|
||
recognized the testing of a cold explosion weapon.
|
||
|
||
By our reaction, we assured them (with high confidence) that we still
|
||
knew nothing of scalar EM interferometry or cold explosions.
|
||
|
||
Five Boeing 747's flew through or near the cloud on their way to
|
||
Anchorage Alaska. The aircraft were checked at Anchorage for rad)oactive
|
||
contamination, but nothing was found. This showed that the huge explosion
|
||
had been non-nuclear.
|
||
|
||
The ocean in the area is also about 21,000 feet deep. That is really
|
||
too deep for a submarine volcano to have erupted and caused the cloud.
|
||
(Besides, a volcano would have continued to snort at least a bit, and so that
|
||
appears to be out of the question as a cause of the incident.)
|
||
|
||
In short, a man made phenomenon is indicated.
|
||
|
||
Indeed, we know it was a cold explosion. In fact, the basic effect has
|
||
been produced over a dish of water in the laboratory, using a small scalar
|
||
interferometer in the endothermic mode.
|
||
|
||
Further, the story does not end there.
|
||
|
||
A geophysicist at the University of Hawaii, Dr.Daniel A. Walker,
|
||
together with his colleages monitor an array of Hydrophones on the ocean
|
||
bottom, recording signals such as seismic events, volcano eruptions, etc.
|
||
|
||
Dr.Walker and his colleages performed a comprehensive analysis of the
|
||
data recorded by the hydrophones in and around the time of the incident in
|
||
question. The data shows the absence of any natural seismic or volcanic event
|
||
that could have caused the April 9th phenomenon off the coast of Japan.
|
||
|
||
He and his colleages concluded that it was either an as yet unknown
|
||
natural phenomenon, or a man made phenomenon.
|
||
|
||
Their report is published in "Science". (D.Walker,"Kaitoku Seamount and
|
||
the Mystery Cloud of 9 April 1984," Science, 227(4687),Feb.8,1985,p.
|
||
607-611.)
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
--THE TESLA SHIELD--
|
||
|
||
Of particular interest is the hemispherical shell of energy which years
|
||
ago was dubbed the "Tesla Shield."
|
||
|
||
Two scalar hemispherical surfaces are created, using multiple frequency
|
||
transmitters and truncated Fourier series expansions. Interference of the two
|
||
scalar hemispheres creates a great, glowing hemispherical shell of ordinary
|
||
electromagnetic energy. In the shell, the energy density is sufficient to
|
||
lift Dirac matter from the Dirac sea of vacuum. The shell is thus filled with
|
||
a glowing plasma.
|
||
|
||
Such a shell may be several hundreds of miles in diameter at the base.
|
||
The enormous energy required to form such a defense shell is obtained by a
|
||
"scalar power tap" into the molten core of the earth itself as previously
|
||
explained. In late April/early May of 1985, 27 such "power taps" were placed
|
||
in the earth by the Soviets. If each tap is capable of powering 4 to 6 large
|
||
scalar EM weapons, then the Soviet strategic scalar EM arsenal contains over
|
||
100 monstrous superweapons capable of generating exothermic explosions,
|
||
endothermic explosions, engineering the weather, locating and destroying
|
||
underwater submarines, detecting and destroying ballistic missiles shortly
|
||
after launch, detecting and destroying long range strategic bombers as soon
|
||
as they are airborne, etc.
|
||
|
||
At any rate, the giant Tesla shield is useful against any penetrating
|
||
vehicle. If the shell is not so large, its energy density may be very high.
|
||
In that case, the intense plasma heating will fuse and even vaporize metallic
|
||
bodies. In addition, any vehicle encountering the shell is subjected to an
|
||
extremely intense EMP arising everywhere inside its circuitry. EMP shielding
|
||
is of no use against the creation of energy throughout the spacetime of the
|
||
circuits; such shielding only helps against energy flow through space in the
|
||
conventional sense.
|
||
|
||
Thus the electronics of any vehicle encountering the shield are
|
||
instantly dudded, whether or not they are shielded against ordinary
|
||
electromagnetic interference (EMI). This includes the electronics operating a
|
||
nuclear warhead, carried by a re-entry vehicle. Electrically everything
|
||
penetrating the shell is totally dudded. Further, explosive materials are
|
||
exploded when such an EMP is encountered, and combustible materials are
|
||
fiercely consumed or set afire. Ablative shielding suffers an interesting
|
||
catastrophe: since energy does not try to "flow into" the shielding but
|
||
"arises" everywhere in it simultaneously, "ablation" occurs everywhere
|
||
throughout the ablative material, simply exploding it instantly. In addition,
|
||
for smaller Tesla shells (say of 50 miles in diameter) the energy density is
|
||
sufficient to melt or vaporize metals such as missile structures.
|
||
|
||
With such a Tesla shield, there is no need to discriminate true
|
||
warhead bearing re-entry vehicles from decoys, chaff, etc. The whole "mess"
|
||
entering the shield is simply "cleaned up" and "sterilized" or destroyed. The
|
||
shield can take care of ICBMs/IRBMs and their nuclear warheads, strategic
|
||
bombers and their nuclear bombs, cruise missiles and their nuclear warheads,
|
||
re-entry vehicles and their warheads, decoys, chaff, etc.
|
||
|
||
|
||
--SARYSHAGAN DIRECTION-SEPTEMBER 1979--
|
||
|
||
The London Sunday Times of 17 August 1980 contained information and a
|
||
photo-sketch of incidents fo sighting of the testing of very large Tesla
|
||
globes deep within the Soviet Union. The sightings were made in Afghanistan
|
||
by British war cameraman Nick Downie. The phenomena seen were in the
|
||
direction of the Saryshagan Missile Test Range, which -- according to the
|
||
U.S. Defense Departments "Soviet Military Power," 1986 -- contains one or
|
||
more large directed energy weapons (DEW's).
|
||
|
||
Even though Downie was seeing the globe of light from a great
|
||
distance, it flared silently over the Hindu Kush and expanded to subtend an
|
||
arc of about 20 degrees, dimming as it expanded. (An arc of 20 degrees
|
||
subtended by an object many hundreds of miles distant indicates an object of
|
||
well over a hundred miles in diameter. This gives some idea of the enormous
|
||
energy being controlled and manipulated by these Soviet weapons.)
|
||
|
||
Downie saw the sight on more than one occasion in September 1979.
|
||
|
||
In the same month --December 1979-- a stationary luminous globe
|
||
containing a vertical stripe of black in the center was seen in the sky off
|
||
the coast of St.Petersburg, Florida. This particular type of sighting in that
|
||
area has been previously correlated with times of known activity at
|
||
Saryshagan.
|
||
|
||
Further, in the same month, U.S. nuclear warning Vela satellites
|
||
detected a "nuclear flash" over the South Atlantic, off the coast of Africa.
|
||
Controversy has raged in U.S. Intelligence and scientific circles to this day
|
||
as to whether a nuclear explosion or some other kind of mechanism produced
|
||
the flash.
|
||
|
||
Indeed, the flash may have been produced by a scalar EM howitzer from
|
||
Saryshagan as one more "ping" of the U.S. Intelligence system, to ascertain
|
||
whether or not it knew anything about scalar EM howitzers. Again the negative
|
||
response told them with high confidence that (1) We still didn't know about
|
||
scalar EM stuff, and (2) We were still totally defenseless against the Soviet
|
||
scalar EM weaponry.
|
||
|
||
At any rate, from Downie's sightings, it is highly probable that the
|
||
DEW weaponry at Saryshagan Missile Test Range was active in September 1979,
|
||
and was producing large Tesla globes. If the DEWs at Saryshagan can produce
|
||
the giant luminous Tesla globe, they are almost certainly scalar EM
|
||
interferometers and can produce the giant Tesla shields as well. Downie
|
||
reported other earlier sightings of similar phenomena seen by Afghans deep
|
||
within the Soviet Union in the same direction toward Saryshagan...
|
||
|
||
|
||
Briefly, let us cover the uses of such a giant globe or spherical
|
||
shell of glowing EM energy and plasma.
|
||
|
||
By placing such a giant globe hundreds of miles out away from the
|
||
defended heartland, an entire arc of the sky can be defended against long
|
||
range ballistic missile attack in midcourse. During their midcourse
|
||
trajectory, the attacking missiles would have to penetrate the globular shell
|
||
twice, exposing them to giant internal EMPs twice. A very high probability
|
||
thus exists that all missiles entering the space occupied by the globe are
|
||
dudded upon entry and/or exit. This includes the electronics inside the
|
||
nuclear warheads themselves. Also this is particularly effective against MIRV
|
||
and MARV missile carriers since the multiple re-entry vehicles are normally
|
||
still on the main vehicle during most of midcourse. The use of this midcourse
|
||
ABM globe defense greatly reduces the number of vehicles arriving at the
|
||
latter part of midcourse and the terminal phase of their trajectory.
|
||
|
||
By using a smaller, more intense globe, and placing it on incoming
|
||
clusters of objects or single objects, both EMP and local heating are used
|
||
against the objects. This is suitable in the latter part of midcourse and in
|
||
the terminal phase of ICBMs, IRBMs, SLBMs, and cruise missiles. It is also
|
||
useful against incoming strategic bombers and their air to surface missiles
|
||
both ballistic and cruise.
|
||
|
||
Two modes of the globes -- especially the small ones -- can be used.
|
||
First the continuous mode can be used to "fry" or vaporize incoming objects
|
||
in a relatively small volume (say ten to fifteen miles in diameter). Second,
|
||
the "pulse" mode can be used to "service" all incoming objects, whether or
|
||
not they have passed through the "large globe" midcourse defense. This
|
||
provides an additional guarantee of killing the objects; discrimination is
|
||
not require, just get all of them. The exposure of all incoming objects to
|
||
multiple attacks raises the probability of kill to essentially 100%, or as
|
||
close to that as one wishes. Of course the incoming vehicle may still
|
||
encounter a terminal defense consisting of the Tesla shield and associated
|
||
roving "quickshot" small intense globes.
|
||
|
||
In short, with these systems an essentially 100% ABM and anti bomber
|
||
defense is possible. Further, the Soviets have possessed such an effective
|
||
defense for two decades, JUST AS THEY HAVE OPENLY STATED SINCE 1960 WHEN
|
||
KHRUSHCHEV ANNOUNCED HIS "SUPERWEAPONS"!!
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
--CONTINUOUS TESLA EMP GLOBE--
|
||
|
||
Here is another verified incident of a gigantic test of a Soviet
|
||
scalar EM howitzer deep within the Soviet Union.
|
||
|
||
This is a C.I.A. report, released under the Freedom of Information
|
||
Act. One can be quite sure that the incident occurred as stated.
|
||
|
||
The phenomenon was seen from two aircraft approaching Mehrabad Airport
|
||
in Teheran, Iran on June 17, 1966 and reported by their pilots.
|
||
|
||
On the far horizon deep within the Soviet Union, an intense spherical
|
||
ball of light appeared, "sitting on the horizon" so to speak. The globe of
|
||
light increased to enormous size, dimming as it did so, literally filling an
|
||
arc of the distant sky as it expanded. The sighting was shielded from most
|
||
ground observers view at the airport itself due to an intervening mountain
|
||
range which masked most of the phenomena from the ground.
|
||
|
||
The silent, expanding globe was observed for four or five minutes
|
||
before it faded away.
|
||
|
||
Again this is positive evidence of the testing of a giant scalar
|
||
interferometer, in the "midcourse ABM globe" type of action.
|
||
|
||
However, note the date -- mid 1966! The Soviets have therefore been
|
||
testing such scalar weapons of enormous size and power for at least two
|
||
decades. This implies that development must have started at least a decade
|
||
earlier, or in the mid '50s.
|
||
|
||
Still earlier, in January 1960 Nikita Khrushchev had announced the
|
||
development of a "fantastic" Soviet weapon, one which could even destroy all
|
||
life on earth if unrestrainedly used. In 1962 the ebullient Khrushchev was
|
||
forced to back down and lose face before John Kennedy, in the Cuban Missile
|
||
Crisis. Khrushchev's missiles and bombers were in woeful shape, as Kennedy
|
||
well knew (by courtesy of the Russian spy, Colonel Oleg Penkovsky). Kennedy
|
||
did not know that Khrushchev's new superweapons were nearing deployment, but
|
||
were not quite ready yet.
|
||
|
||
To save face and prevent his immediate ouster, Khrushchev apparently
|
||
conducted a startling two-strike demonstration of his new weapons as soon as
|
||
they became operationally ready. On April 10, 1963 he detected and destroyed
|
||
the U.S.S. Thresher nuclear submarine, using a scalar EM howitzer in the
|
||
underwater "continuous" mode. The next day he demonstrated the "pulsed"
|
||
underwater destruction mode for underwater subs by producing a giant
|
||
underwater
|
||
explosion underneath the water 100 miles north of Puerto Rico. Ironically,
|
||
just as the Atlantic was coming alive with U.S. naval vessels searching for
|
||
the lost Thresher, a second test of the weapons that had finished off the sub
|
||
occurred to the south of them, unnoticed and disregarded, even though seen
|
||
and reported to he F.B.I. and the U.S. Coast Guard by a passing U.S.
|
||
jetliner's pilot and crew, who observed the underwater explosion.
|
||
|
||
We thus can peg the development of these weapons by the Soviets as
|
||
starting well before 1960. The first operational deployment of the gigantic
|
||
strategic weaponry occurred in early 1963.
|
||
|
||
Note that the 1966 testing observed here is completely consistent
|
||
with this estimated development schedule.
|
||
|
||
Thus large Soviet strategic scalar EM weapons have been operational
|
||
on site for 24 YEARS !!! This implies that at least three additional
|
||
generations of the scalar EM weapons have been developed and deployed by
|
||
now...
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
--MYSTERIOUS LIGHTS OVER NORTH PACIFIC--
|
||
|
||
Incidents of Soviet testing of the Tesla shield and the Tesla globe
|
||
weapons are routinely observed by airline pilots flying over the North
|
||
Pacific into and out of Japan.
|
||
|
||
This is one typical example. Two jetliners, Japan Air Lines flights
|
||
403 and 421, sighted and reported a large glowing globe of light sitting just
|
||
beyond the horizon and extending well above it. The aircraft were in the
|
||
vicinity of 42 degrees N latitude and 153 degrees longitude at the time. The
|
||
sighting was thus about 700 miles east of Kushiro.
|
||
|
||
The diameter of the ball was estimated as at least 18-27 kilometers
|
||
by the pilots. Depending upon the actual distance to the sphere it may have
|
||
been of much larger size.
|
||
|
||
This incident is reported in the Asahi Evening News, Tokyo, June 22,
|
||
1982.
|
||
|
||
Many similar sightings have been reported by jet airliner pilots
|
||
flying over these waters.
|
||
|
||
--WHITE SPHERE SEEN IN NORTH ATLANTIC 1976--
|
||
|
||
Here is another sighting closer to home.
|
||
|
||
This incident was observed from a passing ship on June 22,1976 in the
|
||
North Atlantic, at about 2113-2140 hours. It is reported in the Marine
|
||
Observer, Vol.47,1977, p.66.
|
||
|
||
First an orange glow was sighted behind some distant clouds. A couple
|
||
of minutes later, a glowing white sphere of light was observed to the left of
|
||
the orange glow, just above the clouds. The white sphere then slowly expanded
|
||
to a much larger sphere, dimming as it expanded. At its maximum size, the top
|
||
of the white sphere reached about 24 degrees 30 minutes elevation angle to
|
||
the observer. Development to maximum size required about 10 minutes.
|
||
|
||
By 2140 hours the sphere had faded and disappeared. The sphere was
|
||
sufficiently thin that the stars could be seen through it at all times.
|
||
|
||
Again, this incident strong<y fits the large Tesla globe mode of a
|
||
Soviet scalar EM interferometer.
|
||
|
||
The significance and role of the orange glow are not known at this
|
||
time.
|
||
|
||
|
||
--CONTINUOUS TESLA FIREBALL--
|
||
|
||
Here is another incident that represents a stimulus to the British
|
||
government, to see if the British are aware of scalar electromagnetics.
|
||
|
||
Again this is a CIA report released under the Freedom of Information
|
||
Act, so the details are reliable.
|
||
|
||
On Sep. 10, 1976 British European Airways flight 831, flying between
|
||
Moscow and London and over Lithuania at the time, observed an intense ball
|
||
of light above the clouds below the aircraft. The light was so intense it
|
||
lit up the sky in the entire vicinity.
|
||
|
||
The concerned pilot reported the glowing object to Soviet ground
|
||
authorities with whom he was in contact. He received harsh instructions to
|
||
ignore the light, and essentially to continue on his way out of there.
|
||
|
||
Here we see an incident involving a small, intense Tesla globe, of the
|
||
kind with which the defense could "service" objects that had already
|
||
penetrated a large midcourse globe, or aircraft approaching the defended
|
||
area.
|
||
|
||
Obviously the Soviet authorities were tracking the aircraft, and knew
|
||
it was in the vicinity. It seems logical, then, that they deliberately
|
||
placed the brightly glowing ball beneath the aircraft so that the pilot and
|
||
crew could not fail to observe it.
|
||
|
||
The strange message to the pilot was simply designed to increase the
|
||
intensity of the stimulus. The stimulus was to be something like, "The
|
||
Soviets are doing something in research and development that allows them to
|
||
create intense balls of glowing light at a distance, and place these objects
|
||
in and around the air in and around aircraft, possibly to intercept them."
|
||
The purpose, of course, was to observe the British governments reaction
|
||
after the incident was reported by the pilot upon his arrival in London.
|
||
|
||
Again the reaction of the British -- and the U.S. as well -- was as
|
||
predicted. Again we showed that we knew nothing of scalar electromagnetic
|
||
weapons, and did not recognize one when we encountered its effects.
|
||
|
||
(Continued)
|
||
|
||
--TERMINAL ABM SYSTEM--
|
||
|
||
Very neat things can be done if one "nests" several Tesla shields --
|
||
say three or four -- concentrically, one inside the other. In that case even
|
||
the nuclear radiation (such as gamma rays) from a defense-suppressive high
|
||
altitude nuclear burst can be handled.
|
||
|
||
For example, suppose three such concentric shields are placed over a
|
||
large vital area. Further, suppose a high altitude nuclear burst is placed
|
||
above the outer shield. Gamma radiation almost instantly strikes the plasma
|
||
in the outer shell, where it is absorbed, scattered, and re-radiated at a
|
||
lower temperature. (That after all is what plasmas do.) Inside the first
|
||
shell, the scattered radiation is now in the x-ray and ultra violet region.
|
||
Let us track the most lethal component, the x-rays.
|
||
|
||
The scattered x-rays then strike the second plasma shell, and are
|
||
absorbed scattered and re-radiated at a lower temperature. Inside the second
|
||
shell the scattered radiation is now in the visible and infrared region, with
|
||
a little ultraviolet.
|
||
|
||
This optical radiation in turn strikes the third plasma shell, and is
|
||
absorbed scattered and re-radiated at still lower temperature. Inside the
|
||
third shell, most of the energy is now in the form of radio frequency (RF)
|
||
energy, with a little IR and visible band spectral energy content.
|
||
|
||
At this point, ordinary electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding of
|
||
electronic equipment on the ground inside the third shield can take care of
|
||
any RF interference resulting from the emergent RF noise.
|
||
|
||
As can be seen, three shells are sufficient to convert the gamma and
|
||
x-ray radiation (and ultraviolet and infrared) mostly to harmless RF energy
|
||
before all three shells are penetrated. Thus the tactic of deliberate defense
|
||
suppression by a preliminary high altitude nuclear burst can be countered by
|
||
multiple Tesla shields.
|
||
|
||
In addition, of course, any ordinary vehicles penetrating all three
|
||
shields are exposed to successive violent EMP's and are almost certainly
|
||
electrically dudded. The vehicles are also subjected to multiple periods of
|
||
intense heating, so combustibles, fuels, explosives, and ablatives are
|
||
destroyed. In addition, metal structures may be melted or vaporized.
|
||
|
||
Think of it this way: anything which hits one of these Tesla shields
|
||
goes phhht! Just like a bug hitting an electrified bugkiller screen.
|
||
|
||
For years passing ships have observed and reported such multiple-shield
|
||
"light phenomena" over remote regions of the ocean. U.S. intelligence has
|
||
routinely not paid any heed to "lights at night" over remote ocean areas, and
|
||
so Soviet tests in this manner have remained relatively unnoticed by
|
||
officialdom...
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
--WOODPECKER BEAMS INTERSECT OVER NORTH AMERICA--
|
||
|
||
In July 1976 the U.S. received very special Bicentennial greetings from
|
||
the Soviet Union.
|
||
|
||
At that time, communications systems of the world in the 3-30 megaHertz
|
||
band suddenly met substantial interference from extremely powerful, chirped
|
||
Soviet transmitters which were suddenly activated. These transmitters
|
||
continue their transmission to this day.
|
||
|
||
Estimates of the power of these transmitters vary, but figures range as
|
||
high as several hundred megawatts, with a nominal figure being 100 megawatts.
|
||
|
||
These powerful transmitters were properly nicknamed "Woodpeckers"
|
||
because of the characteristic sound of the chirped signal when received. That
|
||
is, the received signal makes a "pecking" sound much like a woodpecker's beak
|
||
hitting a block of wood.
|
||
|
||
Several nations protested, but the powerful signals have continued,
|
||
right down to this day. The only Soviet response was to add a "spread
|
||
spectrum" capability, so that the transmitter would not dwell too long on one
|
||
specific frequency, but shifted periodically to other frequencies.
|
||
|
||
These transmitters have apparently never been precisely located by U.S.
|
||
intelligence, but their beams carry much of the characteristics of an over-
|
||
the-horizon (OTH) radar. They have been dubbed OTH radars by U.S.
|
||
intelligence, and can without question perform that mission, in addition to
|
||
some very interesting missions that U.S. intelligence does not assess.
|
||
|
||
"Soviet Military Power", Department of Defense, 1985, p.45 shows the
|
||
direct intersection over the United States of the Woodpecker radar beams used
|
||
in an OTH role. In addition, shown is an additional "scanner" beam which can
|
||
be scanned across the intersection "grid" over the U.S., formed by waveform
|
||
interference of two main Woodpecker beams.
|
||
|
||
First, they can be used in a conventional OTH radar mode, since their
|
||
beams follow the earth-ionosphere waveguide and curve around the earth. In
|
||
this mode they can detect missiles at launch and thereafter, and strategic
|
||
bombers at launch and thereafter.
|
||
|
||
These scalar interference grid weapons can be used to biologically
|
||
attack entire populations in a targeted area. This aspect is not covered in
|
||
this briefing. Suffice it to say that phase locked ELF modulation signals of
|
||
10 Hz and less are often detected on multiple woodpecker frequencies
|
||
simultaneously. In a target area, this modulation -- is sufficiently stronger
|
||
than the Schumann resonance of the earth's magnetic field -- will entrain a
|
||
percentage of the brains into "forced entrainment". In that case, these human
|
||
brains are "synchronized" to the Woodpecker signals so that multiple coherent
|
||
frequencies are phase-locked into them. That is, multiple coherent EM
|
||
channels directly into these entrained brains now exist. At that point,
|
||
Fourier expansions may now be used to attack specific portions of the brain
|
||
geometrically.
|
||
|
||
In addition, scalar EM disease patterns can be modulated upon the
|
||
carriers, again with fourier expansions. Specific biological effects can be
|
||
induced in the entrained populations at will, limited only by the state of
|
||
the art of the Soviet technology used to attack them. Possible effects
|
||
include instantaneous death, heart seizure, severe emotional disruption, loss
|
||
of control of internal functions, diseases, disabling of the immune system,
|
||
and even implantation of thoughts, emotions, and ideas which are interpreted
|
||
by the subjects as their own.
|
||
|
||
While further discussion of this area is beyond the scope of my
|
||
knowledge, the biological aspects of the Woodpecker transmitters are
|
||
horrible. It suffices to say that, in thousands of experiments, Kaznacheyev
|
||
demonstrated that almost any kind of cellular death and disease pattern
|
||
could be electromagnetically transmitted. Kaznacheyev reported the effect in
|
||
te near ultraviolet. Experimenters at the University of Marburg in West
|
||
Germany duplicated the experiments in the infrared.
|
||
|
||
The bottom line is that photons themselves can carry death and disease
|
||
patterns between cells. Scalar EM technology allows synthesis of the actual
|
||
potential pattern (which after all represents total control of charge and
|
||
charge distribution, hence biochemistry in the cell) of a particular
|
||
disease or death mechanism. Symptoms (and cellular death from them!) of
|
||
nuclear radiation, chemical poisoning, bacterial infection, and other
|
||
mechanisms were induced by the Kaznacheyev experiments.
|
||
|
||
Dr. Popp of West Germany has published an analysis of the virtual
|
||
photon master control system of the cells. Since scalar EM represents the
|
||
deliberate ordering of virtual particle flux into deterministic patterns,
|
||
the master control system can readily be entered with scalar techniques to
|
||
induce disease and disorder at will...
|
||
|
||
|