Git-Mirrors/textfiles-politics
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git synced 2025-08-03 03:26:11 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

updating HTML output collection, small CSS update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
ebeshero 2023-04-28 08:18:41 -04:00
parent 9fbf8f51b7
commit ea5425869a
332 changed files with 18194 additions and 18312 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

39
docs/collection/incon008.html
View file

@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
</head>
<body>
<h1 id="title-index">Politics-Conspiracies-Project</h1>
<h1 id="title-index">incon008</h1>
<nav id="menu">
<a href="../index.html">
<div class="button">Home</div>
</a>
<a href="../fulltext2.html">
<a href="../fulltext.html">
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
</a>
<a href="../analysis.html">
@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
</div>
</a>
</nav>
<h2>incon008</h2>
<p> I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
George Mercier</p>
<p> FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES
@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ file.]</p>
<p>Next, we turn now and address some Commercial debt instruments that just about
everyone uses constantly. And when this Commercial paper is used and then
recirculated by you, Federal Benefits are being quietly accepted by you and so
now subtle contracts are in effect. As COMMERCIAL HOLDERS IN DUE COURSE, you
now subtle contracts are in effect. As <span class="ORG" title="ORG">COMMERCIAL</span> HOLDERS IN DUE COURSE, you
and the King are experiencing mutual enrichment from each other. [577]</p>
<p>[577]============================================================= If there are
HOLDERS IN DUE COURSE, are there also HOLDERS NOT IN DUE COURSE? Certainly
@ -202,7 +201,7 @@ offered, were accepted by you. [583]</p>
<p>[583]============================================================= Yes, the
benefits that were accepted by you carried with them invisible hooks of
reciprocity, so now, as uncomfortable as the hooks are, contracts are in
effect, and <span class="NORP">Patriot</span> arguments sounding in the Tort of unfairness are not
effect, and <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span> arguments sounding in the Tort of unfairness are not
relevant. =============================================================[583]</p>
<p>Examining a profile slice of the tens of thousands of Cases out there
addressing questions of Commercial Contract Law applicable to the annulment of
@ -241,11 +240,11 @@ proceeding, out of the part in default.</p>
<p>And in addition to outright Consideration, by your Commercial use and
recirculation of Federal Reserve Notes, the King has you strapped into his debt
as an "Automatically Transferred and Joint Obligation Debtor." Under a very
large body of Roman Civil Law, and Jewish Commercial Law going back to Moses
large body of Roman Civil Law, and <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Jewish</span> Commercial Law going back to Moses
and the Talmud, there is a kind of an obligation in law whose source is not
contract or promise in the classical sense, but due to a ripple effect of debt,
an obligation can be automatically transferred down a line of notes passers and
debtors. This Doctrine is elucidated quite well in Jewish Law, where this
debtors. This Doctrine is elucidated quite well in <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Jewish</span> Law, where this
doctrine is formally known as SHIBUDA D'RABBI NATHAN (meaning the line of Rabbi
Nathan). Under this liability dispersion model, debt ripples from one PERSON to
another back up the line, without the appearance of any contract being readily
@ -260,7 +259,7 @@ JEWISH LAW, entitled "The Law of Obligations" (1967).
=============================================================[584]</p>
<p>The reason why this debt liability being rippled back up the line a few person
is called "Rabbi Nathan's Lien" is because this rule is generally attributed to
Rabbi Nathan, a tannaitic sage (<span class="GPE">Babylonia</span> and Palestine, in the Second
Rabbi Nathan, a tannaitic sage (<span class="GPE" title="GPE">Babylonia</span> and Palestine, in the Second
Century), who first formulated it on the basis of a certain interpretation of a
Mosaic text. Here in the contemporary United States, a very similar analogy is
found operating both in Contract Law and in Tort Law, but for different
@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ collateral material as well, but the King's key to effectuate this liability is
our Enfranchised Status, under contract. Since the Angle-Saxon Law Merchant
wants to see Consideration, and Consideration is present when Federal Reserve
Notes are recirculated in King's Commerce, a taxing liability does exist of and
by itself under English Common Law. This Jewish Ripple Liability Model is
by itself under English Common Law. This <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Jewish</span> Ripple Liability Model is
supporting evidence to conclude that although we might not like our King, there
is a very wide body of law out there in the world to support our King with his
taxing justification theories. The Law is always justified, and this is just
@ -364,7 +363,7 @@ has this nasty habit of his to use penal statutes and his hired bouncers (the
U.S. Marshals, as the King's Bouncers) to force people into relationships with
him, against their will and over their objection, that they would never have
voluntarily consummated on their own free will and volition.</p>
<p>[For example, here in Rochester, New York, some enterprising folks,
<p>[For example, here in Rochester, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>, some enterprising folks,
seeing the escalating rise in postage prices going on in the early 1970's, and
detecting that something just wasn't right here due to the wide percentage
variance in cost and pricing, promptly went about setting up their own postal
@ -381,7 +380,7 @@ the block offering cheaper prices and accelerated delivery schedules, quickly
threw a Restraining Order Petition at Rochester Postal Service in Federal
District Court here. The Petition was granted, with justifying reference being
made to the Private Express Statutes of the Civil War Era. On appeal, the
Second Circuit in New York City went into a discussion on how the King's right
Second Circuit in <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York City</span> went into a discussion on how the King's right
to seal up a national postal monopoly under penal statutes has never been
successfully challenged, and remains essentially airtight.] [588]</p>
<p>[588]============================================================= UNITED
@ -649,7 +648,7 @@ RATIFICATION."
-Eugene Wambaugh in A PROBLEM AS TO RATIFICATION in 9 Harvard Law
Review 60, at 60 (1895).
=============================================================[601]</p>
<p>However, rather than <span class="NORP">Patriot</span>s fighting an area of grey where there is some DE
<p>However, rather than <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span>s fighting an area of grey where there is some DE
MINIMIS merit to the Government's position, it might be best to simply accept
the application of the RATIFICATION DOCTRINE, accept the fact that invisible
contracts are in effect by your silent passive benefit acceptance and refusal
@ -1030,10 +1029,10 @@ written and mounted on several walls in the BRASELTON BROTHERS HARDWARE STORE.
Walking into that store, one gets a feeling of power relationships, as
photographs from Presidents, Governors, and Senators, and other Braselton
Family Members hang in open view. With such a display of high powered
acquaintances, I almost felt as if I was in David Rockefeller's office in the
acquaintances, I almost felt as if I was in David <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span>'s office in the
Chase Manhattan Bank -- but there the feeling of similarity stops. In the
BRASELTON HARDWARE STORE, one feels a sweet and pleasant spirit permeating the
store, as if one great American family resides here. In David Rockefeller's
store, as if one great American family resides here. In David <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span>'s
office, also adorned with photographs of powerful acquaintances, the spirit in
the air is one of an icy demon chill. Once while travelling up in an elevator
in the Chase Manhattan Bank, my knees started to rattle when passing the 17th
@ -1160,7 +1159,7 @@ immunization.
<p>and also quietly in post-Opinion regrets. [622]</p>
<p>[622]============================================================= When the
manuscript to Paul Blakewell's book entitled WHAT ARE WE USING FOR MONEY? [New
York: Van Nostrand, 1952] was sent to retired Supreme Court Justice <span class="PERSON">Owen</span>
York: Van Nostrand, 1952] was sent to retired Supreme Court Justice <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Owen</span>
Roberts (who had voted with the majority in the Gold Clause Cases [NORMAN VS.
BALTIMORE and three other Cases starting at 294 U.S. 240 (1934)]), Judge
Roberts sent a letter back to Paul Blakewell stating:
@ -1285,7 +1284,7 @@ necessary use of aggression to obtain rights:
successful event of a long, obstinate, and expensive war. But it is not
incumbent on us to fight the battles of the world for the world's profit."
-THE LIFE AND WRITINGS OF THOMAS PAINE, by David Wheeler, Page 173
[Vincent Parke &amp; Company, New York City (1908)]
[Vincent Parke &amp; Company, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York City</span> (1908)]
=============================================================[625]</p>
<p>We always want to take a moment and examine ourselves in known impending
grievances from the viewpoint of our adversary, in order to see things like a
@ -1337,7 +1336,7 @@ of a federal rule designed to protect a federal right..."
<p>State Law is silent on the matter; [629]</p>
<p>[629]============================================================= In
explaining why state law governed a federal commercial paper question:
"While [the] New York statute... is not controlling... [there is] no
"While [the] <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> statute... is not controlling... [there is] no
conflict with any state or federal policy..."
-ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY VS. UNITED STATES, 313 U.S. 289, at 297
(1940). =============================================================[629]</p>
@ -1405,7 +1404,7 @@ determines from the circumstances that the parties have indicated their assent
to the contract. In the latter, however, the law creates an obligation "for
reasons of justice, without any expression of assent and sometimes even against
a clear expression of dissent."
-FREEDMAN VS. BENEFICIAL CORPORATION, 406 F.Supp. 917, at 923
-FREEDMAN VS. <span class="ORG" title="ORG">BENEFICIAL</span> CORPORATION, 406 F.Supp. 917, at 923
[Footnote #10] (1975); quoting from 1 CORBIN ON CONTRACTS, Section 18 and 19
(1963). Since no explicit statutes exist to adhesively bind recirculators of
Federal Reserve Notes to Title 26, this USE OF FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES contract
@ -1423,9 +1422,9 @@ prevention is worth ten tons of labor exerted later on in patching up. And
merely preparing your multiple objections now, in writing, will spare a person
from substantial expenses in depositions and the like later, as the collection
of evidence, is, generally speaking, an expensive and time-consuming process.
With rare exception, all of the <span class="NORP">Patriot</span> lawsuits I have examined never involved
With rare exception, all of the <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span> lawsuits I have examined never involved
any form of Depositions or Interrogatories being take on the Defendant (and the
<span class="NORP">Patriot</span> wonders why he loses). All of that is neatly avoided by a few
<span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span> wonders why he loses). All of that is neatly avoided by a few
preventative steps.
</p>
</body>