Git-Mirrors/textfiles-politics
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git synced 2025-08-02 19:16:06 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

updating HTML output collection, small CSS update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
ebeshero 2023-04-28 08:18:41 -04:00
parent 9fbf8f51b7
commit ea5425869a
332 changed files with 18194 additions and 18312 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

117
docs/collection/incon007.html
View file

@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
</head>
<body>
<h1 id="title-index">Politics-Conspiracies-Project</h1>
<h1 id="title-index">incon007</h1>
<nav id="menu">
<a href="../index.html">
<div class="button">Home</div>
</a>
<a href="../fulltext2.html">
<a href="../fulltext.html">
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
</a>
<a href="../analysis.html">
@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
</div>
</a>
</nav>
<h2>incon007</h2>
<p> I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
George Mercier</p>
<p> THE CITIZENSHIP CONTRACT
@ -114,7 +113,7 @@ birth:
1)A person born in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO ITS JURISDICTION
thereof;"
-Title 8, Section 1401 ["Nationality and Naturalization"] Section 1401
then continues on with similar hooks planted into American <span class="NORP">Indians</span>, Eskimos,
then continues on with similar hooks planted into American <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Indians</span>, Eskimos,
persons born outside the United States, persons of unknown parentage, etc.
Notice the phrase AND SUBJECT TO ITS JURISDICTION; not all individuals born in
the United States are automatically Citizens, so not all individuals born in
@ -171,7 +170,7 @@ political matter."
=============================================================[509]</p>
<p>So although the 14th Amendment creates benefits proprietary to Citizenship,
those are not the only Citizenship benefits that you need to concern yourself
with. Many Tax Protestors and <span class="NORP">Patriots</span> are aware of the 14th Amendment story,
with. Many Tax Protestors and <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> are aware of the 14th Amendment story,
and accordingly counsel their students to file NOTICES OF BREACH OF CONTRACT
and the like, and other hybrid unilateral declarations of RECESSION, in an
attempt to remove themselves as persons attached to the 14th Amendment. Those
@ -209,7 +208,7 @@ followers to get ready to justify their actions at the Last Day, an alluring
preventative move that intellectuals find brilliant and intriguing background
advice; so now Lucifer has their attention. [512]</p>
<p>[512]============================================================= When some
folks emphasize the value to you of <span class="EVENT">PREVENTION</span>, what they are also saying is
folks emphasize the value to you of <span class="EVENT" title="EVENT">PREVENTION</span>, what they are also saying is
that they realize that it is beneficial for folks to occasionally look up and
ahead once in a while; and out of such a vision into the future, unpleasant
circumstances can be deflected from making their appearance (the avoidance of a
@ -236,7 +235,7 @@ with these facts.
"Few things are more difficult to do. The main obstacle lies in
disentangling ourselves from our own emotions."
-Gremlin Bernard Baruch in Baruch: My Own Story,
at 248 [Henry Holt and Company, New York (1957)]. On the
at 248 [Henry Holt and Company, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1957)]. On the
following pages in this book [which is his autobiography], Bernard Baruch gives
two stores from his business dealings exemplifying why and how he deemed it so
extremely important to approach the task of fact finding free of emotions --
@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ municipal relations; that he was... of Tarsus, a natural born Citizen, of no
mean city, and that he had been brought up in Jerusalem, in the strictest
manner, according to the law and faith of his fathers. But this did not appease
the angry crowd, who were proceeding with great violence to kill him. And then:
"the Chief Captain [of the Jews] commanded that he be brought into the
"the Chief Captain [of the <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Jews</span>] commanded that he be brought into the
castle, and bade that he should be EXAMINED BY SCOURGING, that is, tortured to
enforce confession.
"And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the Centurion that
@ -655,7 +654,7 @@ lands, both for themselves and their property while over there. In Title 22,
Section 1732, the President of the United States is under a specific duty to
first inquire of foreign governments and then offer assistance whenever an
American is incarcerated abroad. See:
-CITIZENSHIP by Edward Borehard, Thesis [<span class="GPE">Columbia</span> University, New York
-CITIZENSHIP by Edward Borehard, Thesis [<span class="GPE" title="GPE">Columbia</span> University, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>
(1914)], discussing the diplomatic protection of American Citizens abroad;
refers to the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW for July, 1913.
-United States Department Publication, THE RIGHT TO PROTECT CITIZENS
@ -680,9 +679,9 @@ volume of Court Cases. See:
-THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS IN THE SEVERAL STATES, 1
Michigan Law Review 286 (1902);
-Roger Howell in CITIZENSHIP - THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF STATE
CITIZENSHIP [John Hopkins Press, <span class="GPE">Baltimore</span> (1918)];
-Arnold J. Lien in PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS [<span class="GPE">Columbia</span>
University Press, New York (1913)].
CITIZENSHIP [John Hopkins Press, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Baltimore</span> (1918)];
-Arnold J. Lien in PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS [<span class="GPE" title="GPE">Columbia</span>
University Press, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1913)].
=============================================================[525]</p>
<p>Claiming that you are a COMMON LAW CITIZEN, or a PREAMBLE CITIZEN with a
special reciprocity exempt status to avoid that irritating QUID PRO QUO
@ -696,8 +695,8 @@ National Military Draft. In propagating this line, these people suggest the
view that Draft Protestors are burning the wrong card, that is, that Draft
Resisters should be burning their Social Security Card. This line of reasoning
is defective, as the United States has been successfully drafting Citizens into
military service in World War I, long before FDR's <span class="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Cartel sponsors
in New York City presented the wealth transfer grab of Social Security to
military service in World War I, long before FDR's <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Cartel sponsors
in <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York City</span> presented the wealth transfer grab of Social Security to
America through their imp nominees in Washington in the 1930's; just like the
United States had been successfully collecting taxes on Income during the Civil
War, before the 14th or 16th Amendments ever made their appearance. See the
@ -827,7 +826,7 @@ decedent who is a Citizen or resident of the United States."
-Title 26, Section 2001 ["Imposition and Rate of Tax"].
=============================================================[531]</p>
<p>The answer lies by probing a level deeper into the King's statutes, into an
area <span class="NORP">Patriots</span> and Tax Protestors do not seem to be pursuing that much: Into the
area <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> and Tax Protestors do not seem to be pursuing that much: Into the
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, which operate as junior statutes. [532]</p>
<p>[532]============================================================= The Code is
divided into 50 titles or PARTS, which do not always correlate to statutory
@ -871,7 +870,7 @@ pay Income Taxes -- but what if you are not a Citizen GENERALLY speaking
benefits]. By having vacated the factual record of any benefits having been
accepted, by striping the factual record of any QUID PRO QUO of equivalence
exchanged, that factual setting is no longer GENERAL and ordinary, now it is
SPECIAL and extraordinary, where if the King makes any revenue collection
<span class="ORG" title="ORG">SPECIAL</span> and extraordinary, where if the King makes any revenue collection
attempt, you have him worked into an immoral position. Yes, Citizenship is a
contract in the classical sense, since benefits offered conditionally were
accepted, and where expectations of reciprocity were retained by the benefit
@ -893,26 +892,26 @@ page 596 et seq. (2nd Edition, 1978)]. In a sense, Government has set a price
for not voting; so theoretically, by inverse reasoning, Citizens should also be
able to set a price and buy their way out of not voting by selling their right
to others [there is not a lot of difference between paying Government not to
vote and paying someone else to vote on your behalf]. SOLDIERS AND <span class="NORP">JURORS</span>: The
vote and paying someone else to vote on your behalf]. SOLDIERS AND <span class="NORP" title="NORP">JURORS</span>: The
arguments for selling jury duty is slightly different because the higher
standards necessarily exclude many Citizens from serving, but even the
qualified sale of a call to serve on a jury is appropriate for private
negotiation. Military enlistment in the United States was once up for sale,
i.e., the draft was an ALIENABLE [transferable] duty. During the United States
Civil War, draftees for both the <span class="PERSON">North</span> and the South could buy their way out of
Civil War, draftees for both the <span class="LOC" title="LOC">North</span> and the South could buy their way out of
the draft, or buy a substitute; so the net effect was a military infantry
consisting of a volunteer army financed by wealthy draftees instead of
Taxpayers. While soldiers may have ended up being paid the opportunity cost of
enlistment, the Government is planning its military activity was not required
to take these opportunity costs into account. The reason why this interesting
system broke down is because in the <span class="PERSON">North</span>, several municipalities and States
system broke down is because in the <span class="LOC" title="LOC">North</span>, several municipalities and States
intervened by appropriating money to enable destitute folks to buy their way
out and then began to pay bounties to enlistees. In the South, the purchase of
substitutes was heavily criticized and was abolished soon after it was begun,
as the howling of UNFAIRNESS ascended into Legislatures [see E. Murdock in
PATRIOTISM LIMITED: 1862-1854: THE CIVIL WAR DRAFT AND THE BOUNTY SYSTEM
(1967)]. See generally INALIENABILITY AND THE THEORY OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
["Inalienability and Citizenship"], 85 <span class="GPE">Columbia</span> Law Review 931, at 961 (1985).
["Inalienability and Citizenship"], 85 <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Columbia</span> Law Review 931, at 961 (1985).
=============================================================[536]</p>
<p>The CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS is also another source of identifying handouts
and benefits offered to Citizens. [537]</p>
@ -953,7 +952,7 @@ Workman's Compensation;
Cooperation Agency and related pipelines to looters;
-Part 23: Highways -- Federal Highway Administration;
-Part 24: Housing and Urban Development;
-Part 25: <span class="NORP">Indians</span> -- Bureau of <span class="NORP">Indian</span> Affairs; grants and counseling;
-Part 25: <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Indians</span> -- Bureau of <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Indian</span> Affairs; grants and counseling;
-Part 26: Internal Revenue;
-Part 27: Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms -- regulatory intervention;
-Part 28: Judicial Administration -- Federal Prisons (concentration
@ -1014,23 +1013,23 @@ the United States is by:
2.Be employed by the Federal Government;
3.Apply for its privileges, or accept its benefits; See generally:
-John H. Hughes in THE AMERICAN CITIZEN -- HIS RIGHTS AND DUTIES
[Pudney &amp; Russell, New York (1857)];
[Pudney &amp; Russell, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1857)];
-Luella Gettys in THE LAW OF CITIZENSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES
[University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1934)];
-Albert Brill in TEN LECTURES ON CITIZENSHIP [Ascendancy Foundation,
New York (1938)];
-David Josiah Brewer in YALE LECTURES ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
CITIZENSHIP -- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENS [C. Scribner's Sons, New York (1907)];
-Imp Charles Beard in AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP [MacMillian, New York
CITIZENSHIP -- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENS [C. Scribner's Sons, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1907)];
-Imp Charles Beard in AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP [MacMillian, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>
(1921)];
-Editors, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP "Rights and Duties of an American"
[American Heritage Foundation, New York (1948)];
[American Heritage Foundation, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1948)];
-Nathan S. Shaler in CITIZENSHIP "The Citizen -- A Study of the
Individual and the Government" [A.S. Barnes &amp; Company, New York (1904)];
Individual and the Government" [A.S. Barnes &amp; Company, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1904)];
-Melvin Risa in CITIZENSHIP "Theories on the Obligations of Citizens
to the State," Thesis, [University of <span class="GPE">Pennsylvania</span>, Philadelphia (1921)];
to the State," Thesis, [University of <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Pennsylvania</span>, Philadelphia (1921)];
-Ansaldo Ceba in CITIZENSHIP "Rights, Duties, and Privileges of
Citizens" [Paine &amp; Burgess, New York (1845)].
Citizens" [Paine &amp; Burgess, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1845)].
=============================================================[539]</p>
<p>Despite the fact that I say a few isolated nice things about Federal Judges
(with the applicability of my favorable comments being restricted to just a few
@ -1058,7 +1057,7 @@ either; whatever information the Federal Judiciary is deficient in elucidating
regarding identifying Citizenship as the invisible contract that it is, I can
get from other sources, even ecclesiastical sources, and then retrofit it
interstitially to uncover the real meaning of obscure Judicial reasoning:</p>
<p>"An old principle, laid down from the earliest ages of British
<p>"An old principle, laid down from the earliest ages of <span class="NORP" title="NORP">British</span>
jurisprudence, from which we receive our national institutions, is that
allegiance is that ligament or thread which bonds the subject to the sovereign,
by an implied contract, owes, in turn, protection to the subject; and the very
@ -1178,7 +1177,7 @@ provision for preventing conflict between them.
are these: No State may tax appropriate means which the United States may
employ for exercising their delegated powers; the United States may not tax
instrumentalities which a State may employ in the discharge of her essential
governmental duties -- that is, those duties which the <span class="NORP">Framers</span> intended each
governmental duties -- that is, those duties which the <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Framers</span> intended each
member of the Union would assume in order adequately to function under the form
of Government guaranteed by the Constitution."
-HELVERING VS. THERRELL, 303 U.S. 218, at 222 (1937). The Constitution
@ -1283,17 +1282,17 @@ Judicially created, and Judges, as the individuals that they are, frequent do
possess views diverging from the expected conformal median. Question: Are there
some Judges who would like to merely cite national CITIZENSHIP as THE
justifying taxation contract, and ignore Immunity Doctrines? Yes, there are:
"... respondents, though Employees of the New York Port Authority, are
"... respondents, though Employees of the <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> Port Authority, are
Citizens of the United States; the tax levied upon their incomes from the
Authority is the same as that paid by other Citizens receiving equal net
incomes; and payment of this non-discriminatory income tax by respondents
cannot impair or defeat in whole or in part the governmental operations of the
State of New York. A Citizen who receives his income from a State, owes the
State of <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>. A Citizen who receives his income from a State, owes the
same obligation to the United States as other Citizens who draw their salaries
from private sources or the United States and pay Federal income taxes."
-HELVERING VS. GERHARDT, 304 U.S. 405, at 424 [Justice Black
concurring] (1937). The same difficulty in assigning values to competing
differentials in contract priority, that some <span class="NORP">Patriots</span> will have to come to
differentials in contract priority, that some <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> will have to come to
grips with the strong relevance of national CITIZENSHIP for taxation purposes
when not otherwise disabled, but not quite strong enough to pierce this State
Employee immunity veil, is exemplary of the same judgment we all confront daily
@ -1306,7 +1305,7 @@ levels of perceived Covenant importance.</p>
<p>Your successful severance of liability away from the administrative mandates of
Title 26 requires a thorough decontamination of yourself away from the contract
of Citizenship and all Commercial contracts. Yes, you can be an alien from some
foreign jurisdiction, you can be a <span class="NORP">Russian</span> Native who never left Russia or set
foreign jurisdiction, you can be a <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Russian</span> Native who never left Russia or set
foot in the United States, and still have a liability to produce administrative
conformance with Title 26. [545]</p>
<p>[545]============================================================= Aliens from
@ -1342,7 +1341,7 @@ adhesion to tax individuals goes far back into antiquity. [546]</p>
<p>[546]============================================================= The
jurisdictional basis of Citizenship to tax is one of the oldest juristic
Principles that there is in law. See Edwin Seligman, in ESSAYS ON TAXATION
["Double Taxation"], page 111 [MacMillian Company, New York (1928); 9th
["Double Taxation"], page 111 [MacMillian Company, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1928); 9th
Edition].</p>
<p>=============================================================[546]</p>
<p>In the old days of 1913, our Fathers came right out in the open and declared
@ -1358,7 +1357,7 @@ King's Equity Jurisdiction of Citizenship was made apparently intuitively and
without much debate. [548]</p>
<p>[548]============================================================= Surrey
reviews this in his article entitled CURRENT ISSUES IN THE TAXATION OF
CORPORATE FOREIGN INCOME, 56 <span class="GPE">Columbia</span> Law Review 815, at 817 (1956).
CORPORATE FOREIGN INCOME, 56 <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Columbia</span> Law Review 815, at 817 (1956).
=============================================================[548]</p>
<p>The purpose of broadening the number of objects subject to federal taxation,
away from exclusively constituting only participants in King's Commerce, over
@ -1437,7 +1436,7 @@ mandatory exchange of reciprocity). The Court then listed those benefits that
American Citizens carried with them no matter what their geographical situs
was. [553]</p>
<p>[553]============================================================= Many
<span class="NORP">Patriots</span> will be quite familiar with the following widely published words from
<span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> will be quite familiar with the following widely published words from
a Supreme Court ruling called HALE VS. HENKEL, 201 U.S. 43 (1915), which
discusses the difference in rights and duties between Corporations and
Individuals:
@ -1461,7 +1460,7 @@ acceptance or nonacceptance of juristic benefits, and not based upon their
biological Status as human INDIVIDUALS (or NATURAL PERSONS, as lawyers would
call them). If you do accept those juristic benefits, then you very much owe
the money, regardless of whether or not you are a human Individual (NATURAL
PERSONS) or a Corporation (an ARTIFICIAL PERSON). I once saw a 7203 WILLFUL
PERSONS) or a Corporation (an <span class="ORG" title="ORG">ARTIFICIAL</span> PERSON). I once saw a 7203 WILLFUL
FAILURE TO FILE prosecution conviction appeal in California where the criminal
defendant argued that he was exempt from Income Tax Liability because he was an
"absolute individual," and not a Corporation. When I saw this argument in this
@ -1695,7 +1694,7 @@ Gold through the much more intense Refiner's Fire, extremely accurate (as
accurate went in those days) measurements of the Gold content could then be
determined. However, the Refiner's Fire process took a lot of additional time,
and didn't really tell the goldsmith anything that he didn't already know. In
similar ways, I would suggest that <span class="NORP">Patriot</span> inactivity (because you are
similar ways, I would suggest that <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span> inactivity (because you are
"waiting" for the Model Case to come down from on High) is improvident, and
such a Model Case will not tell you anything you don't already know.
=============================================================[565]</p>
@ -1707,8 +1706,8 @@ or hold office. So by mutuality they also owed no Citizen-like capitation tax
to the Crown. Although Denizens had occupancy jurisdiction to stay within a
Kingdom, the only taxes the Crown was able to get out of them was limited to
the extent that the Denizen participated in Commerce. See generally, James
Kettner, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP 1608-1870 [University of <span class="PERSON">North</span>
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, <span class="PERSON">North</span> Carolina (1976)]. That I am aware of, the
Kettner, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP 1608-1870 [University of <span class="LOC" title="LOC">North</span>
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, <span class="LOC" title="LOC">North Carolina</span> (1976)]. That I am aware of, the
word DENIZEN appears 21 times in the United States Supreme Court between 1952
[in ON LEE VS. UNITED STATES, 343 U.S. 747] and 1812 [in FAIRFAX'S DEVISEE VS.
HUNTER'S LEASEE, 11 U.S. 603]. For example, it is mentioned in LUDECKE VS.
@ -1726,7 +1725,7 @@ privileges from our adopted subjects, and we may naturally conclude, that there
may be some qualification of the privilege in the laws of other countries. But
our resident Denizens are entitled, as I take it, to all sorts of commercial
privileges, which our natural-born subject can claim."
-MARRYAT VS. WILSON, a British case (1799). Yes, Denizens do not enjoy
-MARRYAT VS. WILSON, a <span class="NORP" title="NORP">British</span> case (1799). Yes, Denizens do not enjoy
political franchise rights [nor can they hold elective Government office], but
they do hold occupancy jurisdiction, and they do enjoy Commercial benefits
created by the State, and so Denizens were only taxed to the extent they
@ -1838,7 +1837,7 @@ University Press, Cambridge (1967)]. Bernard Bailyn went back into the 1770's
and uncovered some 400 pamphlets on all sorts of writings that he reviewed --
treatises on political theory, essays on history, political arguments, sermons,
correspondence, poems and other literary devices. They were all expressions of
the kind of society the <span class="NORP">Framers</span> lived in, and were exemplary of the
the kind of society the <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Framers</span> lived in, and were exemplary of the
intellectual thought then permeating the American countryside at that time.
Those pamphlets and other literary devices were explanatory to a degree beyond
the FEDERALIST PAPERS, in so far as they reveal motives, undercurrent, and
@ -1863,7 +1862,7 @@ people if well administered; ..."
CONSTITUTION, James Madison, Editor, at page 554 [J.P. Lippincott &amp; Company,
Philadelphia (1863)].
=============================================================[569]</p>
<p>and then the <span class="NORP">Framers</span> gave the King the blank check to nail Citizens to the wall
<p>and then the <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Framers</span> gave the King the blank check to nail Citizens to the wall
as taxable objects, a situation that did not exist with the ARTICLES OF
CONFEDERATION:</p>
<p>"Both the States and the United States existed before the Constitution.
@ -1898,7 +1897,7 @@ little subjects to do? [572]</p>
<p>[572]============================================================= For
commentary on loss of Citizenship for any one of several reasons, see:
-Lawrence Abramson in UNITED STATES LOSS OF CITIZENSHIP LAW AFTER
TERRAZAS: DECISIONS OF THE BOARD OF APPELLATE REVIEW, 16 New York University
TERRAZAS: DECISIONS OF THE BOARD OF APPELLATE REVIEW, 16 <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> University
Journal of International Law and Politics 29 (1984);
-Terry Reicher in A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS
AGAINST THE IMPOSITION OF INVOLUNTARY EXPATRIATION AND A TAXPAYER'S RIGHT TO
@ -1950,7 +1949,7 @@ generated a heavy controversy locally; this was the Vietnam era where Bay area
protesting was in vogue. After making preliminary inquiries to San Francisco
planning and zoning officials, the building was downsized to 48 stories.
Numerous environmental groups (such as THE ENVIRONMENT WORKSHOP), neighborhood
associations (such as the TELEGRAPH HILL DWELLERS ASSOCIATION), and other
associations (such as the TELEGRAPH HILL DWELLERS <span class="ORG" title="ORG">ASSOCIATION</span>), and other
assorted individuals (such as activist Alvin Daskin) just looking for something
tame to challenge -- let it be known that they disapproved of these plans.
Numerous other professional architectural groups from surrounding areas (such
@ -1972,7 +1971,7 @@ the same UNUSUAL, SNEAKY, and CLEVER ways that all Americans, and even the
entire world, will one day be very well acquainted with, but for very different
objectives: Because next time around, building a high-rise will not be the
objective.
For many years the California State Legislature in <span class="GPE">Sacramento</span> had
For many years the California State Legislature in <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Sacramento</span> had
encouraged insurance companies to locate home offices in California by allowing
them to deduct from their state income taxes whatever amount those companies
had paid in local property taxes on a headquarters building. This generous
@ -2040,9 +2039,9 @@ that the entire world will take rather strong notice of. Nothing will change
the next time around, other than that the desired end objective will be
different. Next time, instead of an American Corporate President like John
Beckett pulling off something quick and clever to get the upper hand over
adversaries, next time, a <span class="NORP">Russian</span> General will be supervising the logistics.
adversaries, next time, a <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Russian</span> General will be supervising the logistics.
Instead of heavy construction equipment being sneaked into urban areas and then
pulled out into the open quickly, next time heavy <span class="NORP">Russian</span> tanks, personnel
pulled out into the open quickly, next time heavy <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Russian</span> tanks, personnel
carriers, and attack support equipment will come forth one day out of their
hiding places to roll down American streets to grab the police barracks and
nearby Army Base. Next time, instead of a handful of environmental activists
@ -2053,8 +2052,8 @@ helicopters, and the like? Where did those SPACE PLATFORMS come from? Where
were all those tank stashed away? Yes, it is going to happen, just like John
Beckett has already made it happen once before on a small introductory scale in
San Francisco. Just like major media news correspondents -- those pathetic
little idiots -- expressing amazement on how well organized the <span class="PERSON">North</span>
<span class="NORP">Vietnamese</span> were in their take-over of Saigon in April of 1975, folks who
little idiots -- expressing amazement on how well organized the <span class="LOC" title="LOC">North</span>
<span class="NORP" title="NORP">Vietnamese</span> were in their take-over of Saigon in April of 1975, folks who
actually rely on the caliber of such baneful judgement (like news
correspondents who were amazed that professional Gremlins actually knew what
they were doing), will also find themselves being amazed when we are next. The
@ -2072,7 +2071,7 @@ represent themselves as being professionals, so Joe SixPacks are not held to
the more stringent standards that Journalists and Lawyers seeking financial
compensation for their errors are held to.] The instant appearance of
construction crews that John Beckett pulled off was not even considered as a
factual possibility by this opponents; just like <span class="NORP">Russian</span> opposition in the
factual possibility by this opponents; just like <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Russian</span> opposition in the
United States [alleged tough cookie right-wing CONSERVATIVES self-perceiving
themselves as being pretty sharp politically] are not even considering the
factual possibility that Mikhail Gorbachev's superiors have already had planned
@ -2133,7 +2132,7 @@ Tories wanted to use the guns of Government to create PROHIBITION, so that they
could then practice commercial enrichment in the BLACK MARKET of elevated
prices and restricted competition that all exclusion monopolies creates. Some
of the most prominent American families had been sponsoring the WOMAN'S
CHRISTIAN TEMPERANCE LEAGUE and other nominees using deceptive names, to
<span class="NORP" title="NORP">CHRISTIAN</span> TEMPERANCE LEAGUE and other nominees using deceptive names, to
plaster the countryside with the noble and lofty sounding objectives of ridding
drunks from our society -- while all along the sponsors of PROHIBITION could
care less about drunks and merely wanted to experience the commercial
@ -2146,7 +2145,7 @@ a Tory sympathizer is someone who is content with the STATUS QUO as it has been
brought to its present position by Gremlins, and has no desire to return to our
Father's quiescent STATUS QUO ANTE. A Tory sympathizer is a little dupe who
feels good about going off to a foreign country to fight a war -- because the
President says its <span class="NORP">Patriot</span>ic to do so. Yes, a Tory sympathizer plays into the
President says its <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriot</span>ic to do so. Yes, a Tory sympathizer plays into the
hands of Gremlins by giving them what they want -- as Gremlins want the
contemporary STATUS QUO, the foreign wars, and BLACK MARKETS they have created.
"Whenever Government exists, even Government limited to those powers
@ -2165,10 +2164,10 @@ minority, it is beyond the experience of the human race that his mental
attitude should not regard the relation of SUBJECT to ruler as the proper
relation of human being to Government."
-Francis X. Hennessy in CITIZEN OR SUBJECT? ["The Exiled Tory About To
Return"], at 235 [E.P. Dutton, New York (1923)]. Gremlins want such a KING TO
Return"], at 235 [E.P. Dutton, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1923)]. Gremlins want such a KING TO
SUBJECT relational status in effect specifically for purposes of conquest and
furthering their own proprietary enrichment through taxation enstripment.
Francis Hennessy, an attorney and member of the New York State Bar, goes into
Francis Hennessy, an attorney and member of the <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> State Bar, goes into
highly detailed factual recital of the circumstances surrounding the proposal
and later ratification of the 18th Amendment [the PROHIBITION AMENDMENT]. From
debates on the Floor of the Congress to the inner sanctums of Gremlin power,
@ -2236,7 +2235,7 @@ contracts, and then turn around and demand financial reciprocity in return
pursuant to an ADHESION covenant therein. The King's Federal Jurisdiction is
necessarily limited to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United
States Congress -- meaning limited to Federal Employees, residents of the
District of <span class="GPE">Columbia</span> and Federal Territories, and other Federal Enclaves.
District of <span class="GPE" title="GPE">Columbia</span> and Federal Territories, and other Federal Enclaves.
QUESTION: Is that closed private domain of King's Commerce a Federal Enclave?
Is the acceptance of Federal protectorate benefits the creation of a situation
specific AD HOC Federal Enclave? I am not really interested in arguing those
@ -2270,7 +2269,7 @@ contribution requests to member Nations, and there is no World Citizenship.
With that modeling scenario in mind, consider the following: Citizenship is
known up and down the corridors of Gremlin power world wide as being a very
interesting adhesive source of Object Jurisdiction to loot. For example, even
if the atrophied remnants of the <span class="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Cartel are unsuccessful in
if the atrophied remnants of the <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Cartel are unsuccessful in
convincing Americans to hand over their national Sovereignty to some world
Juristic Institution like the United Nations, then one of the ways that the ONE
WORLDERS could largely accomplish their Grand Objectives of global conquest
@ -2284,7 +2283,7 @@ world], income taxes and the like can be collected from its Citizens in
reciprocating exchange for some benefits that will be created; and with World
Citizenship in place, handy regulatory jurisdictions, licensing, and other
favorite Bolshevik enscrewment tools can be erected. Gremlins in the
<span class="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Nest have already given this idea some thought; see an interview
<span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span> Nest have already given this idea some thought; see an interview
with imp Robert Hutchins in THE CENTER MAGAZINE, ["What the World Needs Now is
Citizens"], page 23 (January/February, 1971). The Gremlin drive for World
Citizenship has been in gestation for some time; see EDUCATION FOR WORLD