Git-Mirrors/textfiles-politics
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git synced 2025-08-03 03:26:11 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

updated collection

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nate Hammer 2023-05-03 17:06:31 -04:00
parent ffaf033877
commit 57bb8c9cfd
339 changed files with 62850 additions and 44127 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

238
docs/collection/incon002.html
View file

@ -32,17 +32,18 @@
</div>
</a>
</nav>
<p> I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
<div id="conspiracy">
<p> I N V I S I B L E C O N T R A C T S
George Mercier</p>
<p> THIRD PARTY INTERFERENCE WITH A CONTRACT
<p> THIRD PARTY INTERFERENCE WITH A CONTRACT
[Pages 89-130]</p>
<p>[Certain conventions have been used in converting INVISIBLE CONTRACTS to an
<p>[Certain conventions have been used in converting INVISIBLE CONTRACTS to an
electronic medium. For an explanation of the conventions used, please download
the file INCONHLP.ZIP for further illumination. Other background information as
well is contained in INCONHLP.ZIP. It is advisable to EXIT this file right now
and read the contents of INCONHLP.ZIP before proceeding with your study of this
file.]</p>
<p>In a Contract Law Judgment setting, questions sounding in the Tort of
<p>In a Contract Law Judgment setting, questions sounding in the Tort of
unfairness regarding the interference of a person not a party to a contract in
causing a person who is a party to a contract not to honor his contract is
irrelevant, as I will explain later on; and so when cries of unfairness wallow
@ -72,13 +73,13 @@ than snicker at Judges at that late date well after you are in default, you
might want to address the origin of your problem: You entered into a contract
you could not handle under a worst case scenario (worst case meaning loss of
livelihood).</p>
<p>And those are the kinds of very narrow and precise lines that we need to think
<p>And those are the kinds of very narrow and precise lines that we need to think
in, in understanding Contract Law. You may very well have legitimate mitigating
circumstances to justify why you could not honor a contract -- but is an
ELECTION OF REMEDIES for the Party that you are in default to, to decide what
he intends to do with you, and it is not anything for an enforcement judge to
take notice of.</p>
<p>But contrary to the SUB ROSA silence of Lucifer on the existence of any
<p>But contrary to the SUB ROSA silence of Lucifer on the existence of any
Contracts in effect with Father, Father is in fact operating on Contracts and
under Contract Law Jurisprudence with all of us down here, and not on the
principles, fairness, equality, and justice of pure natural moral Tort Law. So
@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ Under the justice of natural Tort Law, the equality of judgment fairness
requires that a person be adjudged on the basis of how other similar people are
being adjudged; but this is not relevant to Father for our purposes at our
Final Judgment. [118]</p>
<p>[118]============================================================= There are
<p>[118]============================================================= There are
many people who take the view, seemingly very reasonably that, since they have
accepted Jesus Christ into their lives, and since they are just as good and
moral as anyone else they know (and a lot more moral than many other people),
@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ Treaties to be the end of the matter; but sharp Gremlins know that contracts
only start the action in motion; so we too should be cognizant of this
attribute in Nature.
=============================================================[118]</p>
<p>Those Torts that are committed by us and those great things that are done by us
<p>Those Torts that are committed by us and those great things that are done by us
outside of our Contracts are irrelevant to Father (and to ourselves at the
Judgment Day); also irrelevant will be those factors of natural Tort Law, such
as fairness, rights, equality, and justice. So the Illuminatti, going into the
@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ are off-point by a wide variance: Because in both of those Judgment Day and
7203 judgment settings that the Illuminatti Gremlin and well-meaning
Constitutionalist are being adjudged by, are under invisible Contract
Jurisprudence and Contract Law, not Tort Law. [119]</p>
<p>[119]============================================================= As a
<p>[119]============================================================= As a
concluding by-line to this digressionary discussion here on Father and
Contracts, if you'll but give it a few moments thought and imagination, it is
interesting to note that this impending Judgment Day arrangement that Father
@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ attitude such a procedure requires which largely explains why there are so few
people around who possess such important knowledge; not that there are few
knowledgeable persons that is an inverse indicia to gauge the importance of the
knowledge). =============================================================[119]</p>
<p>Knowing what you do now about Tort Law rationale and our First Estate Contracts
<p>Knowing what you do now about Tort Law rationale and our First Estate Contracts
with Father, let us examine, just for the moment, the Old Testament's account
of Sodom. There was a city, we are told, full of licentiousness and
whoremongering, and although that behavior doesn't sound too attractive to most
@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ benefits are present. (When criminals are about to work a crime on someone
else, that advance planning in their minds is called the MENS REA. The reason
why their mind is evil is because they were about to try and damage either
another person, or someone else's property). [120]</p>
<p>[120]============================================================= Furthermore,
<p>[120]============================================================= Furthermore,
just to make things seem psychologically interesting back then, I am sure that
Lucifer blended in some ceremonial flair into those orgies, by conveying the
image that orgies were officially sanctioned, somehow. Like contemporary
@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ involving licking down some slice of meat [see Raymond Buckland's THE TREE, THE
COMPLETE BOOK OF SAXON WITCHCRAFT, from Seax-Wica Voys, Box 5149, Virginia
<span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Beach</span>, Virginia 23455].
=============================================================[120]</p>
<p>So if everyone is consenting, and there are no damages, and there is no MENS
<p>So if everyone is consenting, and there are no damages, and there is no MENS
REA, then there is nothing to remedy, and there is no cause of action to effect
a "retort," and there is no retortional corrective justice to apply, since
nothing went amiss in the first place. General reasoning in this area is very
@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ enhanced relative levels of technical knowledge ["this is the Information Age"]
or that self-perceived aggrandizement of intellectual sophistication, relegates
such anachronistic Stone Age bugaboo standards to a classification status
demeaning to your enlightened standing. [121]</p>
<p>[121]============================================================= "We do not
<p>[121]============================================================= "We do not
believe in situation-itis; we do not go with the people who think that there is
a different age, that this is a different time, that these people are more
enlightened, or that [this standard] was for old times. Always the Lord will
@ -227,7 +228,7 @@ their husbands."
-Spencer W. Kimball in CONFERENCE REPORTS ["God The Same Today"], page
162 (April, 1975).
=============================================================[121]</p>
<p>What then gives Father the right to expect technical compliance with such
<p>What then gives Father the right to expect technical compliance with such
ecstatic extracurricular circumstances that every person knows Father does not
approve the inappropriate use of? What gives Father the right to penalize us
for engaging in circumstances that not only damage no one, but are actually
@ -243,7 +244,7 @@ and Father did so without any nymph in Sodom being damaged, everyone consenting
to that behavior, and the residents of Sodom never manifesting an evil state of
mind towards other residents, as pure, raw fleshy Hedonism was practiced
without let up. [122]</p>
<p>[122]============================================================= "As a young
<p>[122]============================================================= "As a young
man David demonstrated a courage and a strength and a power that likely has not
been equaled in all of the great characters of the scriptures. He fought with
wild beasts and overcame them, defeated the giant Goliath virtually with his
@ -308,19 +309,19 @@ not qualify:
"...although my house be not so with God."
-II SAMUEL 23:3 et seq.
=============================================================[122]</p>
<p>The questions of damages, of the presence of a MENS REA, and of consent are
<p>The questions of damages, of the presence of a MENS REA, and of consent are
Tort Law arguments, and are not relevant when contracts are in effect. But
wait,</p>
<p>"I was never baptized, I never entered me into no Contracts with
<p>"I was never baptized, I never entered me into no Contracts with
Father. My parents never got me involved with no church. I don't have me no
baptism certificate in my closet."</p>
<p>Yes, even you have invisible Contracts now in effect with Father. We all have
<p>Yes, even you have invisible Contracts now in effect with Father. We all have
Contracts in effect, and we all took out these contracts, all of us without any
exceptions did this, back in the First Estate as Spirits. And it was then and
there that we were on our knees before Father taking out Contracts in the
angelic language we were then speaking, back before our memories were
temporarily abated down here, that's when.</p>
<p>This then is the Grand Key towards understanding why people want contracts out
<p>This then is the Grand Key towards understanding why people want contracts out
of you: Because that contract you gave them gives them the right to deal with
you effectively at a later time. In the case of Heavenly Father, those previous
existing First Estate Contracts give Father the right to deal effectively with
@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ killed. In a contemporary Commercial setting, merchants, lending institutions,
landlords, etc. all want recourse contracts out of you so they can deal
effectively with you at a later time in Summary Judgment proceedings should
there be a default. And on and on. [123]</p>
<p>[123]============================================================= Illuminatti
<p>[123]============================================================= Illuminatti
Gremlins, vipers, Bolsheviks, witches and other associated imps who circulate
in that genre are not the only ones to be fooled and taken in on Tort Law
reasoning down here. Certain eremitical monks are another prime example of well
@ -367,10 +368,10 @@ liability down here that we need to be concerned originates with Contracts,
such as one that deems parents to be responsible for the acts of their
offspring, if the child goes off on a negative tangent.
=============================================================[123]</p>
<p>Those who want to go forth and FILL THE MEASURE OF THEIR CREATION, just like
<p>Those who want to go forth and FILL THE MEASURE OF THEIR CREATION, just like
Prophets and Patriarchs, need to go out and get some replacement Contracts with
Father; [124]</p>
<p>[124]============================================================= Our old
<p>[124]============================================================= Our old
Patriarch Jeremiah once had a few words to say about the Principle of Nature
that provides for a superseding layer of Covenants replacing a previous layer
of Covenants that have fulfilled their purpose. While quoting Jesus Christ,
@ -400,11 +401,11 @@ is well known in Law and is called the MERGER DOCTRINE by American lawyers,
which I will discuss later. Jeremiah was a marvelous fellow, and I will have
more to say about him personally near the end of this Letter.
=============================================================[124]</p>
<p>the status of a person being a Prophet or Apostle down here does not exalt them
<p>the status of a person being a Prophet or Apostle down here does not exalt them
or confer upon them any special entitlement, as everyone is exalted by reason
of their Covenants with Father, and their status as Prophets are actually an
administrative work assignment for them. [125]</p>
<p>[125]============================================================= Your ability
<p>[125]============================================================= Your ability
to be exalted is neither diminished nor exalted because you are not a Prophet
or an Apostle.
"Here [we Apostles and Prophets are], who [like common Saints], are
@ -413,11 +414,11 @@ Father, to become equal with the Father and the Son..."
-Brigham Young, in a discourse delivered in the Bowery, Salt Lake
City, June 15, 1856; 3 JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES 354, at 360 [London (1856)].
=============================================================[125]</p>
<p>You don't need to be a Prophet, or raise people from the dead, or be endowed
<p>You don't need to be a Prophet, or raise people from the dead, or be endowed
with Celestial magic to snap your fingers and heal people of cancer, in order
to go forth and FILL THE MEASURE OF YOUR CREATION, but you do need to fulfill
difficult Contracts. [126]</p>
<p>[126]============================================================= "We are a
<p>[126]============================================================= "We are a
Covenant-making and a Covenant-taking people. We have the Gospel, which is the
NEW AND EVERLASTING COVENANT: NEW in that the Lord has revealed it anew in our
day; EVERLASTING in that its principles are eternal, have existed with God from
@ -444,14 +445,14 @@ The greatest and most important blessings our Heavenly Father has for his
faithful sons and daughters are received by covenant."
-George F. Richards, in CONFERENCE REPORTS, page 129 (April, 1945).
=============================================================[126]</p>
<p>...Which leads us to the conclusory observation regarding the overall wisdom of
<p>...Which leads us to the conclusory observation regarding the overall wisdom of
ignoring the terms and conditions of contracts we sometimes improvidently get
ourselves into: That people who are well seasoned experientially realize that
although ignorance may very well be bliss in the dreamy ALICE IN WONDERLAND
emotional aura it psychologically creates, this line on Contract Law
Jurisprudence is exemplary as to why ignorance is also highly self-damaging in
the practical setting. [127]</p>
<p>[127]============================================================= "The first
<p>[127]============================================================= "The first
objective of our existence is to know and understand the principles of life, to
know good from evil, to understand light from darkness, to have the ability to
choose between that which gives and perpetuates life and that which would take
@ -461,13 +462,13 @@ given to us."
Tabernacle, Salt Lake City, December 8, 1867; 12 JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES 111, at
111 [London (1869)].
=============================================================[127]</p>
<p>Yes, the benefits inuring to persons entering into and honoring Father's New
<p>Yes, the benefits inuring to persons entering into and honoring Father's New
and Everlasting Covenant are so great that the judgment of folks trying to
search for ways to work around it (by either adapting Tort Law reasoning ["I
don't need me none of that -- it's all the same God"] or by adapting a posture
of avoiding responsibility through claims of factual ignorance), really looks
pathetic by comparison. [128]</p>
<p>[128]============================================================= "We can not
<p>[128]============================================================= "We can not
receive, while in the flesh, the keys [of Celestial Jurisdiction] to form and
fashion kingdoms and to organize matter, for they are beyond our [limited]
capacity and calling [down here], [they are] beyond this world. In the
@ -478,12 +479,12 @@ off and create and people their own planets]."
-Brigham Young, in a discourse delivered in Farmington, Utah, August
24, 1872; 15 JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES 135, at 137 [London (1873)].
=============================================================[128]</p>
<p>And speaking of ignorance (and of staying in ignorance by choice): An
<p>And speaking of ignorance (and of staying in ignorance by choice): An
interesting secondary element surfaces in the Restraining Order and the
chronologically correlative criminal prosecution of Armen Condo. Not only did
Armen Condo not honor his contracts with the King, he did not even know of
their existence. [129]</p>
<p>[129]============================================================= A
<p>[129]============================================================= A
necessarily difficult position to be in. However, since ignorance, whether real
or pretended, of the contract's existence does not vitiate one's liability,
then restraining one's self to remain within the contours of such intellectual
@ -494,7 +495,7 @@ to do, a particular thing. The law binds him to perform his undertaking, and
this is, of course, the obligation of the contract."
-STURGES VS. CROWNINSHIELD, 17 U.S. 122, at 197 (1819).
=============================================================[129]</p>
<p>This state of affairs of throwing criminal prosecutions against people who do
<p>This state of affairs of throwing criminal prosecutions against people who do
not even know of the evidentiary existence of a contract the King is operating
on, has been under consideration and review by the King's Agents in Washington.
Staff members in the Treasury Department have been analyzing the possible
@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ attachment of Equity Jurisdiction, and applicable only to a special class of
people. At the present time, the IRS presentation of the Law, in explaining why
an Income Tax is to be paid, continuously shifts attention over to the 16th
Amendment, and kind of winds up by saying that:</p>
<p>"...well, we collect the tax from every one because the 16th Amendment
<p>"...well, we collect the tax from every one because the 16th Amendment
tells us we need to."</p>
<p>You may be surprised to hear this somewhat pleasant note, but there is internal
<p>You may be surprised to hear this somewhat pleasant note, but there is internal
disagreement within the Treasury Department on the long term wisdom of such an
erroneous presentation of the Law. And both Armen Condo and Irwin Schiff are
prime exemplary models to explain this interesting change in viewpoint now in
@ -515,7 +516,7 @@ intellectual gestation within the senior administrative rank and file of the
King's own tax collectors. In Treasury staff meetings ever since the early
1970's, there has been concern expressed regarding the growing Tax Resistance
Movement, so called. [130]</p>
<p>[130]============================================================= "A growing
<p>[130]============================================================= "A growing
number of taxpayers are developing negative perceptions of the Federal Income
Tax. For example, surveys conducted by the ADVISORY COMMISSION ON
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS finds that Americans perceive the Federal Income
@ -527,11 +528,11 @@ of Myers and Shannon in CHANGING PUBLIC ATTITUDES ON GOVERNMENT AND TAXES
[Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, D.C.
(1980-1983)].
=============================================================[130]</p>
<p>Senior staff members have known about this Movement well in advance, back to
<p>Senior staff members have known about this Movement well in advance, back to
the early 1950's, and it was very clear to them at that time in the 1950's what
we now are seeing all around us: Open and growing resistance and defiance to
the assertion of tax collection authority by the King. [131]</p>
<p>[131]============================================================= Sharp
<p>[131]============================================================= Sharp
Congressmen themselves knew of this impending state of defiance back in the
1800's, before the original version of our present Income Tax was created:
"The imposition of the [income] tax will corrupt the people. It will
@ -547,12 +548,12 @@ Income Tax Act of 1894, on the floor of the House of Representatives, January
1954)]. [But as usual in Congress, cries and pleas for the continuance of the
quiescent STATUS QUO of the 1800's fell on deaf ears.]
=============================================================[131]</p>
<p>Back in the 1950's, statisticians in the Treasury Department, in their long
<p>Back in the 1950's, statisticians in the Treasury Department, in their long
range (10, 20 and 30 year) revenue/budget projection plots, saw that the
combination of both inflation and the percentage progressive Income Tax would,
in just a few decades, be pushing just the average worker into highly
aggressive tax levels of up to 50%. [132]</p>
<p>[132]============================================================= Throughout
<p>[132]============================================================= Throughout
the years, numerous Hearings have been held and Bills introduced into the
Congress proposing a FLAT RATE TAX, but they have never gotten anywhere. See
such Senate Hearing s in THE FLAT TAX RATE ["Hearings Before the Committee on
@ -563,9 +564,9 @@ progressive taxation, through their own words. When such widely held knowledge
jells into something tangible in the corridors of Congress is largely a
function of overcoming the Gremlins who now control the Congress.
=============================================================[132]</p>
<p>In the 1950's, those workers had then been paying just a small percentage.
<p>In the 1950's, those workers had then been paying just a small percentage.
[133]</p>
<p>[133]============================================================= As recently
<p>[133]============================================================= As recently
as the early 1930's, a mere 5% was the maximum graduated federal income tax
due, but in time Bolshevik Gremlins changed that, by escalating taxing
percentage grabs to enscrewment levels more satisfactory to them. The schedule
@ -575,11 +576,11 @@ was, at that time:
5% on the balance.
-WALL STREET JOURNAL, February 8, 1929 ["Income Tax in a Nutshell"],
page 4. =============================================================[133]</p>
<p>It was known at that time that there would be public concern of the growth from
<p>It was known at that time that there would be public concern of the growth from
those low taxation rates in practical effect then, to the substantially higher
tax rates expected in the future, and that this public concern would grow
increasingly with each passing year. [134]</p>
<p>[134]============================================================= This idea
<p>[134]============================================================= This idea
has also been a dominate and recurring theme in research and literature in this
area of studying tax revolts. See generally:
-Lee Sigelman and David Lowery in THE TAX REVOLT: A COMPARATIVE STATE
@ -597,7 +598,7 @@ DEMOCRACY, 59 Social Science Quarterly, at 691 (1979);
-James Buchanan and Richard Wagner in DEMOCRACY IN DEFICIT: THE
POLITICAL LEGACY OF LORD KEYNES [Academic Press, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1977)].
=============================================================[134]</p>
<p>And it was expected that the thrust of the public concern that was out in the
<p>And it was expected that the thrust of the public concern that was out in the
open, would be of the basic legitimacy of the Income Tax itself, and that such
concern would have a strong current under it due to its percentage progressive
nature that would accelerate into such noticeable levels when inflation was
@ -621,23 +622,23 @@ Jurisdiction always precedes the liability for the tax. And so it has been
expected for some time that the United States would one day experience the most
extreme and intolerable levels of income confiscation ever known to Americans:
Without any reciprocity by the King, without any apparent QUID PRO QUO [135]</p>
<p>[135]============================================================= The phrase
<p>[135]============================================================= The phrase
QUID PRO QUO means that there has been an exchange of "something for
something." It has a Roman origin to it, and is a term that appears in old
medieval English Crown cases I have read, and now carries on down to the
present time with Federal Judges. See IN RE LUEDER'S ESTATE, 164 F.2nd 128, at
135 (1947). =============================================================[135]</p>
<p>of incremental increase in benefits to be experienced from one year to the
<p>of incremental increase in benefits to be experienced from one year to the
next, and without any justification at all for the annual percentage
incrementation in tax extraction. These projection plots were not deemed to be
of very high priority at that time back in the 1950's, but the results and
findings were circulated among some administrative personnel and they
eventually made it over to two Congressional committees.</p>
<p>Under the Treasury Department's projection models and plots, it was predicted
<p>Under the Treasury Department's projection models and plots, it was predicted
that open defiance would come some day as such expected aggressive tax levels
are simply not bearable by average folks, previously quiescent, who would then
start to question the legitimacy of the tax itself. [136]</p>
<p>[136]============================================================= And other
<p>[136]============================================================= And other
top tax bureaucrats have repeated the warnings initially contained in that
Treasury Department report of the 1950's. At the close of the Johnson
Administration in 1969, Secretary of the Treasury Joseph W. Barr warned of a
@ -646,10 +647,10 @@ HOW PROGRESSIVE SHOULD IT BE? by The American Enterprise Institute, featuring
cross discussions on the question of progressivity with Charles Galvin and
Boris Bittker (AEI, Washington, 1969)].
=============================================================[136]</p>
<p>The catalytic effect of such aggressive tax levels would be the deprivation of
<p>The catalytic effect of such aggressive tax levels would be the deprivation of
the ability of such average folks to provide minimum necessities for
themselves, such as housing and food. [137]</p>
<p>[137]============================================================= This is a
<p>[137]============================================================= This is a
conclusion also reached by the Fund for Public Policy Research, in a report
entitled TAX CHANGES AND THE COMPOSITION OF FIXED INVESTMENT: AN AGGREGATE
SIMULATION by Aaron, Russek, and Singer. The study was conducted to inform the
@ -659,13 +660,13 @@ the Tax Reform Act of 1969 on investments in housing. [Washington, D.C.
Reserve Board, who researches its own macro-economic taxation models
isochronously (ISOCHRONOUS means at regularly occurring intervals of time).
=============================================================[137]</p>
<p>One of the questions that was hypothetically addressed in the accompanying
<p>One of the questions that was hypothetically addressed in the accompanying
report is the concern the Treasury had of the general institutionalized
acceptance of "Tax Protesting" by the public. Like the widespread flaunting of
the assertion of the King's law during Prohibition, a little resistance and a
few flare-ups can be managed well in the early stages with some well publicized
spankings, [138]</p>
<p>[138]============================================================= "...there is
<p>[138]============================================================= "...there is
one way by which the Government could avoid almost all resource costs in
enforcing the tax code: Penalize only a few taxpayers, but with inordinately
high fines or other punishments. Given that taxpayers are risk adverse, such a
@ -685,7 +686,7 @@ AND CAPITAL INCOME, 31 Public Finance Magazine 287 (1976);
appearing in "Economic Models of Criminal Behavior" by Heineke, Editor [<span class="LOC" title="LOC">North</span>
Holland Publishing, Amsterdam (1978)].
=============================================================[138]</p>
<p>but a lot of resistance later on produces Jury Nullification, widespread
<p>but a lot of resistance later on produces Jury Nullification, widespread
administrative non-cooperation, secondary disrespect for the Law in general, a
growing underground economy, as well as numerous other technical problems. In
the present discussions that are now going on in Washington, there is a
@ -705,16 +706,16 @@ show to all the immoral position of Armen Condo and Irwin Schiff, as those two
were caught defiling themselves by dishonoring contracts they had with the
King. The consequences of this reversal of IRS public justification would be
manifold:</p>
<p>1.First, it would discredit people like Irwin Schiff and Armen Condo,
<p>1.First, it would discredit people like Irwin Schiff and Armen Condo,
who have propagated legally defective tax related information around the
countryside. Appearing on television and selling large numbers of books, these
people develop a cult following [if CULT is the word] and contribute to the
institutionalization of public acceptance of defying the King, and their cult
continues to grow even though the information they propagate is misleading and
technically defective, and will collapse in front of a Federal Judge.</p>
<p>2.Tax revenues would decrease a bit in the near term as some people
<p>2.Tax revenues would decrease a bit in the near term as some people
shift their Status around to avoid being a Taxpayer; [139]</p>
<p>[139]============================================================= An
<p>[139]============================================================= An
adjustment in status from Taxpayer to non-Taxpayer is a behavioral modification
designed to experience relief from a taxation load; if invisible juristic
taxation contracts remain in effect after the transition in status adjustment
@ -764,11 +765,11 @@ multiplying his sample data to the known entire national population that
conforms to each variable classification [see A. Lewis in THE PSYCHOLOGY OF
TAXATION [Saint Martin's Press, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> (1982)].
=============================================================[139]</p>
<p>3.Tax revenues would increase a bit as the immoral and unethical
<p>3.Tax revenues would increase a bit as the immoral and unethical
position of Tax Protestors is frowned on, rather than cheered on by courtroom
supporters; and the resentment against paying a high percentage tax would
cease; [140]</p>
<p>[140]============================================================= When Tax
<p>[140]============================================================= When Tax
Protestors are parties to invisible juristic contracts, they are in fact tax
evaders, because they do in fact owe the tax, regardless of their political
philosophy justification sounding in the Tort of unfairness [even though many
@ -816,10 +817,10 @@ settings where special optional benefits are being offered. In both instances,
you can forget about either of these contractual restrainments ever surfacing
in Constitutions.
=============================================================[140]</p>
<p>4.The underground economy, so called, would partially disappear, as
<p>4.The underground economy, so called, would partially disappear, as
black markets in any commodity can only exist to escape the forced intervention
of Government that creates unnatural pricing. [141]</p>
<p>[141]============================================================= Concern for
<p>[141]============================================================= Concern for
the so called UNDERGROUND ECONOMY has been a recurring theme within the
corridors of Government. By calling it the UNDERGROUND ECONOMY, the King's
Agents are trying to color an illicit and tainted image in such activities; but
@ -891,24 +892,24 @@ representative metropolitan area of a city swirling in such an illicit vortex
of unreported income and officially nonexistent people, not surprisingly, is
Las Vegas, Nevada.
=============================================================[141]</p>
<p>(Bolshevik planners who have reasoned that the underground economy will
<p>(Bolshevik planners who have reasoned that the underground economy will
disappear altogether with their planned cashless society, with all financial
transactions reported to the IRS, are in error);</p>
<p>5.Tax revenues would increase in the long run, as most of those folks
<p>5.Tax revenues would increase in the long run, as most of those folks
who suddenly got rid of their bank accounts and other attachments of King's
Equity to save money found out that the loss of income, benefits, cutoff from
Commerce, deprivation of mortgage and loan availability, and other adverse
secondary effects just wasn't worth it. This is now happening on a small scale
with some commercially oriented enterprising type <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> [142]</p>
<p>[142]============================================================= I feel
<p>[142]============================================================= I feel
uncomfortable with the use of the word PATRIOT, but it does describe a
characteristic worthy of admiration, even though the majority of <span class="NORP" title="NORP">Patriots</span> I
will be referring to in this letter have been engaged in highly immoral
activity, by dishonoring invisible contracts they have no knowledge of.
=============================================================[142]</p>
<p>who are re-entering the highways of Commerce and signing up with the King again
<p>who are re-entering the highways of Commerce and signing up with the King again
(but this time under careful circumstances). [143]</p>
<p>[143]============================================================= A <span class="NORP" title="NORP">British</span>
<p>[143]============================================================= A <span class="NORP" title="NORP">British</span>
researcher argues that the hard suppression of tax evasion by the Government is
actually self-defeating, since such a characteristically GESTAPO suppression of
evaders produces the secondary effect of reducing aggregate tax receipts by
@ -923,12 +924,12 @@ mission and that terror is an important accessory instrument available to help
them accomplish their objectives, and so nice guys are in their way, and
Gremlins have no room for people that are in their way.
=============================================================[143]</p>
<p>6.Near term revenues would increase as Taxpayers who now view the tax
<p>6.Near term revenues would increase as Taxpayers who now view the tax
as either wrong, immoral, or illegitimate and then claim excessive deductions
would be hesitant to do so when the moral position is shifted around and now
it's their failure to pay their full share that is a serious act of
self-defilement on their part. [144]</p>
<p>[144]============================================================= But the
<p>[144]============================================================= But the
realization will never be universal:
"The problem [of both tax avoidance and evasion] is an ancient one. The
natural desire of the Citizen to pay as small a tax as possible is doubtless as
@ -956,14 +957,14 @@ avoid. After all, tax avoidance cannot be had at the dollar book counter."
-Lucious Buck in INCOME TAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: SOME GENERAL
CONSIDERATIONS, 26 Georgetown Law Review 863, at 863 (1937).
=============================================================[144]</p>
<p>It is the opinion of staff members that although this is an interesting model
<p>It is the opinion of staff members that although this is an interesting model
to consider, its revenue generating strength for the King lies in the
correction of wholesale public perception of the King being wrong and working
immoral acts on the countryside. Since a majority of Americans still do not
perceive of things being this way at the present time, this revenue enhancement
and Tax Resistance termination model is best kept on the back shelf, for a
while. [145]</p>
<p>[145]============================================================= At the
<p>[145]============================================================= At the
present time, while a majority of Americans still do not perceive of things as
being structurally wrong, however, there are many other folks who do possess
inclinations of irritation:
@ -971,10 +972,10 @@ inclinations of irritation:
protestors," feel intense irritation at the federal tax authorities..."
-CAMERON VS. I.R.S., 773 F.2nd 126, at 129 (1985).
=============================================================[145]</p>
<p>The value in this story is the knowledge that the King's Tax Collectors in
<p>The value in this story is the knowledge that the King's Tax Collectors in
Washington are not the intellectually lethargic and dim-witted bureaucrats some
people make them out to be. [146]</p>
<p>[146]============================================================= Tax
<p>[146]============================================================= Tax
bureaucrats conduct extensive continuous statistical research on various
different methodologies of conducting the best CRACKING that can be had for the
tax collection dollar spent. Based on technical information derived from
@ -1005,9 +1006,9 @@ their juristic tasks of eating out our substance [see Ann Witte in THE EFFECT
OF TAX LAW AND TAX ADMINISTRATION ON TAX COMPLIANCE; THE CASE OF THE UNITED
STATES INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX, 38 National Tax Journal 1 (March, 1985)].
=============================================================[146]</p>
<p>They are constantly polling public opinion and testing for factual knowledge,
<p>They are constantly polling public opinion and testing for factual knowledge,
to see what they can get away with. [147]</p>
<p>[147]============================================================= The
<p>[147]============================================================= The
assessments and JUDGMENT CALLS that our King goes through in determining how
much money should stay on the farm, what minimum amount is needed by the farmer
for survival, and then how much should be turned over to the State for his own
@ -1041,9 +1042,9 @@ offered, nor any relationship between income extracted from people and
Governmental needs -- and so what we are left with is just an extraction
formula designed to maximize Crown enrichment.
=============================================================[147]</p>
<p>They are brilliant and they know exactly what they are doing at all times.
<p>They are brilliant and they know exactly what they are doing at all times.
[148]</p>
<p>[148]============================================================= And they
<p>[148]============================================================= And they
also know exactly what they are doing when the go around the countryside
looking for some Tax Protesting giblets to crack:
"SENATOR SMOOTHERS: I have been concerned, Mr. Alexander, [Director of
@ -1113,7 +1114,7 @@ sponsored by Gremlins, are in error; as Gremlin Brzezinski pointed out, when
the house is under Gremlin management, such as the United States is today, the
policy maker is largely aloof from the administrative termite.
=============================================================[148]</p>
<p>So too, the IRS knows exactly what it is doing, just like the King. And its
<p>So too, the IRS knows exactly what it is doing, just like the King. And its
present policy of justifying the tax based on a phony hybrid composite blend of
top-down universal Civil Law and 16th Amendment grounds is in place for just
one reason: Because at the present time it is to the King's financial advantage
@ -1123,7 +1124,7 @@ political banality of most Americans. Reverse the banality and the King will
very likely reverse himself). I have a hunch that the King's reversal will be
virtually automatic when the time is right. He closely monitors public opinion,
and he is careful in his public pronouncements. [149]</p>
<p>[149]============================================================= It is my
<p>[149]============================================================= It is my
hunch that a contributing inducement element to the King's deceptive deflection
of the justification for the Income Tax, away from our Father's Common Law on
Contracts and towards the phony 16th Amendment, is likely to also indicate the
@ -1143,10 +1144,10 @@ disorders, especially psychoanalysis and psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Boy, that sounds like just the right medicine for the King's
Senior Tax Collectors.
=============================================================[149]</p>
<p>So all factors considered, it is unlikely that the King would not switch public
<p>So all factors considered, it is unlikely that the King would not switch public
tax justification positions where it is to his own self-enrichment financial
advantage to do so. [150]</p>
<p>[150]============================================================= American
<p>[150]============================================================= American
Jurisprudence, like Nature and society, is stratified into different statuses.
And people and objects situated within those different strata (statuses) have
different rights, motivations, and objectives. I am not convinced that there
@ -1160,7 +1161,7 @@ Hewitt talks about the empirical connections between deviancy in MODUS OPERANDI
and self-perceived elevated status, when he discusses the "Analytical Models of
Social Stratification and Deviant Behavior."
=============================================================[150]</p>
<p>Just as there is deception and lies in the conveyance justification being
<p>Just as there is deception and lies in the conveyance justification being
offered to Americans for an unreasonably sized chunk of their wealth, month in
and month out, year in and year out without any let up in sight, so too was the
Income Tax justified on fraudulent terms by Congressmen who, just like the
@ -1169,7 +1170,7 @@ MAGNUM Torts of deception and lies. Yes, if you were to believe Congressmen
trying to push the 1913 INCOME TAX ACT through Congress, the world was simply
crying out, insisting, and even strongly demanding that they be taxed, fleeced,
and thoroughly looted. [151]</p>
<p>[151]============================================================= "During
<p>[151]============================================================= "During
recent years there has been a general agitation and demand in almost every
state in the union and in almost every country in the world for intelligent,
fair, and practical reforms and readjustments of their tax systems to the end
@ -1181,7 +1182,7 @@ invoked."
Representatives in 1913; as quoted by Thomas Lyons in INCOME TAXES ["Modern
American Law Lecture"], page 14 (The Blackstone Institute, Chicago, 1920).
=============================================================[151]</p>
<p>But if that statement from George Hull is not enough to turn your stomach, then
<p>But if that statement from George Hull is not enough to turn your stomach, then
perhaps some other previous statements, emanating from the floor of the
Congress in support of the WILSON TARIFF ACT OF 1894 [which contained an Income
Tax rider (the Income Tax bill would not pass the Congress by itself)], which
@ -1189,7 +1190,7 @@ present a flowery wonderland promised to us all, if only we were just taxed
more heavily, just damaged more intensely, and deprived of just more wealth
through one more turn of the screws, is just strong enough to make someone
choke. [152]</p>
<p>[152]============================================================= Speaking of
<p>[152]============================================================= Speaking of
the Income Tax provision of the WILSON TARIFF BILL, a Congressman once had a
few flowery words to say:
"The passage of the [Wilson] bill will mark the dawn of a brighter day,
@ -1226,13 +1227,13 @@ correct our present evils."
-Melvin J. Ballard in IMPROVEMENT ERA ["The Political Responsibility
of Latter-day Saints"], at 464 [Desert Book, Salt Lake City (1954)].
=============================================================[152]</p>
<p>The King's policy of keeping the ratio between the Income Tax bracket and the
<p>The King's policy of keeping the ratio between the Income Tax bracket and the
percentage tax demanded where it is, is because it lies just below the
threshold toleration level, although not precisely so. The King's Agents are
constantly surveying us folks out here in the countryside to see how many of us
are in what tax bracket, so the King can reassess how much more tax
confiscation can be extracted from us without an unmanageable revolt. [153]</p>
<p>[153]============================================================= A Gremlin
<p>[153]============================================================= A Gremlin
once made a Statement that is a good representation as to how Gremlins think in
taxation areas:
"The problem of the Government is to fix rates which will bring in a
@ -1255,7 +1256,7 @@ deprivation of minimal material needs to support a family. Gremlins do not want
you and I to have prosperity, they want the Government to have the prosperity,
so that once Government has got the money, then they can spend it.
=============================================================[153]</p>
<p>It is the possible likelihood that this threshold toleration level would be
<p>It is the possible likelihood that this threshold toleration level would be
overpassed and broken that concerns certain senior bureaucrats in Washington,
who are wise to the practical secondary consequences such a passing of the
threshold limit would create. The meaning of this concern is perhaps best
@ -1263,7 +1264,7 @@ understood by the 1979 analogy of the oil pricing decisions made by Saudi
Arabia's Oil Minister, Sheik Admed Yamani. The Sheik's adamant refusal to raise
Saudi crude oil prices above the $40 per barrel limit in the face of such rare
and unusually strong world wide petroleum demand puzzled many observers. [154]</p>
<p>[154]============================================================= Saudi Arabia
<p>[154]============================================================= Saudi Arabia
accomplished its objective of restraining other oil producers by increasing
their oil production to maximum capacity, while refusing to raise its own
price. See numerous articles in the WALL STREET JOURNAL discussing the Saudi
@ -1286,7 +1287,7 @@ Almost 11 Million Barrels a Day"], page 3;
-October 27, 1980 ["How Energy Boss Met Secretly With Yamani On
Untimely Oil Deal"], page 1 (Saudi oil output raised, id., at page 23).
=============================================================[154]</p>
<p>From the viewpoint of some folks, the Sheik was passing up on a golden
<p>From the viewpoint of some folks, the Sheik was passing up on a golden
opportunity to cream in some extra bucks while the oil boom lasted across those
several months. To other observers of the passing scene, the Sheik was a friend
of the United States, and was just a good, kind, caring, public welfare
@ -1303,7 +1304,7 @@ the King with nothing from these folks (as I mentioned that some Tax Collectors
have been concerned about since the 1950's). And that is the great art of
pricing in business: Keeping prices competitively high, but just below the
threshold level of rejection. [155]</p>
<p>[155]============================================================= For recent
<p>[155]============================================================= For recent
commentary of this idea expressing similar conclusions in different words, and
based on different reasoning, see:
1.Jon Harkness in OPEC, RATIONALITY AND THE MACROECONOMY, 7 Journal of
@ -1412,7 +1413,7 @@ too are in error as frequently as INTELLECTUALS are, as a composite blend of
lack of factual knowledge commingled with recurring overtones of philosophical
bias and Gremlin sponsored malice.
=============================================================[155]</p>
<p>No relationship to cost, no relationship to benefits received, no relationship
<p>No relationship to cost, no relationship to benefits received, no relationship
to hard intrinsic value. Just pricing based on Enscrewment (a similar
conclusion reached by others just cited in the footnote, but they use their own
proprietary language that removes identification of the moral orientation (for
@ -1428,7 +1429,7 @@ is often best to drop a prosecution, SANS GENE, in a low level Administrative
or Trial setting, rather than raise the presentation threshold level of the
grievance to senior judicial appellate forums and risk an adverse appellate
opinion on appeal that might benefit others, even if unreported. [156]</p>
<p>[156]============================================================= The decision
<p>[156]============================================================= The decision
on whether or not to continue a prosecution at the appellate level is the same
exercise of discretion that prosecutors exercise when the criminal defendant is
initially charged with his crimes:
@ -1469,11 +1470,11 @@ Alabama Law Review 1, at 7 (1962);
-Silbert in THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE PROCESS OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, 63 American Bar Association Journal 1717 (1977).
=============================================================[156]</p>
<p>Like the Sub-Threshold Pricing Enscrewment Model in Commerce, there is also a
<p>Like the Sub-Threshold Pricing Enscrewment Model in Commerce, there is also a
Sub-Threshold Prosecution Enscrewment Model in effect in the corridors of
Government as well, as the Judiciary is used latently by prosecutors in ways to
help enrich the King. [157]</p>
<p>[157]============================================================= Even
<p>[157]============================================================= Even
something as seemingly removed from the fine art of sequestering common public
knowledge of taxation by contract away from people, a field of law enforcement
seemingly aloof from the high stakes game of tax collection -- Federal
@ -1489,7 +1490,7 @@ THE ANTI-TRUST DIVISION, [MIT Press, Cambridge (1978); 2nd Edition]). So never
assume what the Law is by the mere silence of Judges, as a clever King has
selectively withheld cases potentially adverse to his position.
=============================================================[157]</p>
<p>[Incidentally, the Rothschilds and their ideological mentor, Karl Marx, have
<p>[Incidentally, the Rothschilds and their ideological mentor, Karl Marx, have
planned this impending state of affairs since the Paris Communes of the 1800's,
but their SUB ROSA political involvement and quiet intellectual sponsorship
required our national consent through acts of own American legislatures, which
@ -1503,7 +1504,7 @@ unfairness, as to just who ultimately sponsored this grand scenario become
largely irrelevant, when contracts are in effect. The facts are that the Income
Tax has been around in the United States for a long time. The American
colonists had such a tax imposed on them, [158]</p>
<p>[158]============================================================= "[Income
<p>[158]============================================================= "[Income
Taxes] were imposed by several of the states at or shortly after the adoption
of the Federal Constitution, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> Laws 1778, chap. 17; Report of Oliver
Wolcott, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, to the 4th Congress, 2nd Session
@ -1511,9 +1512,9 @@ Wolcott, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, to the 4th Congress, 2nd Session
429, 437, 439."
-SHAFFER VS. CARTER, 252 U.S. 37, at 51 (1919).
=============================================================[158]</p>
<p>and there was also one imposed during the Civil War under Abraham Lincoln.
<p>and there was also one imposed during the Civil War under Abraham Lincoln.
[159]</p>
<p>[159]============================================================= Acts of
<p>[159]============================================================= Acts of
August 5, 1861 (Chapter 45, Section 49, 12 UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE 292,
309) -- confined the Income Tax then to PERSONS residing within the United
States (meaning PERSONS accepting the benefits of the protection of the United
@ -1527,13 +1528,13 @@ the present Income Tax of Title 26, based on infirmities and defenses centered
around the 14th or 16th Amendments; the information being disseminated by these
people is both erroneous at Law and factually defective (defective by
omission). =============================================================[159]</p>
<p>But the distinction between those prior belief and transient AD HOC taxing
<p>But the distinction between those prior belief and transient AD HOC taxing
occurrences and the present permanent Income Tax is that our contemporary
Income Tax has an underlying political objective as its primary goal: It was
originally designed and is now intended to forcibly screw, harm and damage
people, first, and then to raise revenue as a wealth transfer instrument,
second. [160]</p>
<p>[160]============================================================= I once had a
<p>[160]============================================================= I once had a
conversation with a Bolshevik Gremlin who works for the Brookings Institution
in Washington. There was an aura permeating the atmosphere around him that was
different, as if there was a demon chill in the air. Sensing this introduction
@ -1553,12 +1554,12 @@ only minimum subsistence income levels. I really got the message from him, loud
and clear, that they deem our deprivation of wealth to be of maximum importance
to them and their damages enscrewment objectives.
=============================================================[160]</p>
<p>Creating damages through such devices as a national Tax on Incomes, as a tool
<p>Creating damages through such devices as a national Tax on Incomes, as a tool
for conquest, is very important to international Bolsheviks, particularly since
they thrive in an atmosphere where the true seminal point of beginning of
national destruction is obscure and difficult to see; and very few folks see
the Income Tax as the great tool of destruction that it is. [161]</p>
<p>[161]============================================================= For a highly
<p>[161]============================================================= For a highly
detailed, thorough, and technical discussion on the damaging relationship in
effect between Income Taxation and economic growth, see Vito Tanzi in THE
INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON [John
@ -1593,11 +1594,11 @@ coming down hard on criminals clear across the board, so too should Tax
Protestors take qualified cognizance of the possibility that latent error might
also be present in their judgments as well.
=============================================================[161]</p>
<p>For example, The World Bank in Washington will not make a loan to any political
<p>For example, The World Bank in Washington will not make a loan to any political
jurisdiction in the world, unless that country has enacted a national income
tax at rates high enough to satisfy the Bolsheviks. Nations rise and fall on
Income Taxes. [162]</p>
<p>[162]============================================================= For a
<p>[162]============================================================= For a
discussion of decline in Holland from 1583 to 1674, for reasons relating to the
enactment of an income tax, as a war measure, to finance a war against Spain
and then continued after the war, on justification grounds to suppress domestic
@ -1607,11 +1608,11 @@ speech at the Inaugural Meeting of the Institute of Bankers in Ireland on
November 4, 1909]; as reprinted in the English periodical entitled BANKER'S
MAGAZINE for December, 1909 and February, 1910 [London: Waterton and Sons
(1910)]. =============================================================[162]</p>
<p>And here in the United States, the State of <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>, under the evil genius of
<p>And here in the United States, the State of <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>, under the evil genius of
Nelson <span class="PERSON" title="PERSON">Rockefeller</span>, enacted the highest corporate and personal income taxes in
effect, of any state, during the 1960's and 1970's, driving a large number of
businesses and literally millions of people, to emigrate from <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>. [163]</p>
<p>[163]============================================================= When
<p>[163]============================================================= When
discussing corporate departures from <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>, starting in the mid 60's and
continuing on into the 70's, the NEW YORK TIMES would always talk about the
allure of "the <span class="LOC" title="LOC">Sun</span> Belt," and of the temperature in Houston, and of other
@ -1636,11 +1637,11 @@ income taxes were the propulsion force driving their relocation plans [see the
NEW YORK TIMES ["Corporations Fret About <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span> Tax"], Section 1, page 28
(April 3, 1977)]. So much for the nice temperature of Houston.
=============================================================[163]</p>
<p>Income Taxes have a history of being used to accomplish special objectives
<p>Income Taxes have a history of being used to accomplish special objectives
which, by their nature, require the creation of some incidental damages, and so
Gremlins trying hard to run a country into the ground, need generally look no
farther than simply initiating a Taxing grab on Incomes. [164]</p>
<p>[164]============================================================= Although the
<p>[164]============================================================= Although the
income tax on profits is the true source of economic stagnation, as Gremlins
strive to run one civilization into the ground after another -- here their
MODUS OPERANDI of deception surfaces again, because when Gremlins and their
@ -1702,10 +1703,10 @@ which restricts your progress. You become defiled and unworthy to be an
associate with those who are more clean and pure."
-William R. Bradford in CONFERENCE REPORTS, at 53 (October, 1979).
=============================================================[164]</p>
<p>Although making life difficult for INDIVIDUALS is important for Gremlins as a
<p>Although making life difficult for INDIVIDUALS is important for Gremlins as a
source of damages, creating military engagements and wars can be another such
source of damages, [165]</p>
<p>[165]============================================================= For a
<p>[165]============================================================= For a
discussion on the relationship in effect between the enactment of American
Income Taxes and war, going back to the American Civil War; and of the second
administration of President Cleveland who wanted to reinstate the Income Tax to
@ -1714,8 +1715,8 @@ farmers, see a chapter entitled "What Rip Van Winkle Woke Up To" in a book
entitled THE COLD WAR AND THE INCOME TAX by Edward Wilson [Farrar, Strauss &amp;
Company, <span class="GPE" title="GPE">New York</span>, 1963].
=============================================================[165]</p>
<p>and quiet national economic enscrewment still another. [166]</p>
<p>[166]============================================================= "The real
<p>and quiet national economic enscrewment still another. [166]</p>
<p>[166]============================================================= "The real
effect of a tax on profits is to make the country possess at any given period,
a smaller capital and smaller aggregate production, and to make the stationary
state be attained earlier, and with a smaller sum of national wealth [yes, the
@ -1747,10 +1748,10 @@ articles on economics and philosophy. PRINCIPLES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY was
written in the 1850's, and grew in size as it appeared in several versions. His
philosophical orientation was that of statist and socialist.
=============================================================[166]</p>
<p>Today, in the United States, law school students are taught the Bolshevik line
<p>Today, in the United States, law school students are taught the Bolshevik line
that Income Taxes are good for the country because of the social engineering
that can then be performed with the confiscated money. [167]</p>
<p>[167]============================================================= "Progressive
<p>[167]============================================================= "Progressive
taxation is now regarded as one of the central ideas of modern democratic
capitalism and is widely accepted as a secure policy commitment which does not
require serious examination."
@ -1761,26 +1762,26 @@ Barbara Brudno [West Publishing, Saint Paul, Minnesota (1977)]; as she talks
about Guaranteed Annual Income, Income Maintenance Programs, and the Negative
Income Tax Proposals.
=============================================================[167]</p>
<p>Having been contaminated with clever lies originating from a devilish source
<p>Having been contaminated with clever lies originating from a devilish source
far beyond their minimal factual level of comprehension to understand, and also
requiring a level of judgment operating on a repository of knowledge in excess
of their limited capacity, some sympathetic little Gremlin lawyers are now
trying to twist basic property rights around to have the mere omission of an
Income Tax be construed as a Tort on impoverished people, arguing that poor
folks now have some type of a social right to your money. [168]</p>
<p>[168]============================================================= "...today,
<p>[168]============================================================= "...today,
we see poverty as the consequence of large impersonal forces in a complex
industrial society -- forces like automation, lack of jobs and changing
technologies that are beyond the control of the individual."
-INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND <span class="ORG" title="ORG">SOCIAL</span> WELFARE: THE EMERGING LEGAL ISSUES, 74
Yale Law Journal 1245, at 1255 (1965).
=============================================================[168]</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the Income Tax continues to roll on; opposition is
<p>The bottom line is that the Income Tax continues to roll on; opposition is
minimal; Tax Protestors are being frowned upon by the general public at large,
viewed as cheaters making Government only more expensive for themselves; and so
the Income Tax is now accomplishing its Bolshevik political mission in the
philosophically divided House of the United States, with flying colors. [169]</p>
<p>[169]=============================================================
<p>[169]=============================================================
Accomplishing countermanding objectives in this area is the art of constructing
cogent arguments -- arguments in legal briefs in your tax cases; arguments to
others to catalytically trigger another supporting view; and arguments to
@ -1842,5 +1843,6 @@ perspective; not an easy thing to do, as Judges are approaching the issue
totally different from us. For an abstract theoretical model in how to do so,
see Wayne Grennan in ARGUMENT EVALUATION [University Press of America, Lanham,
Maryland (1984)].</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>