restores xml root element to pre-src

pre-src-xml/pcensor.xml

@@ -1,40 +1,41 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<div class="article">
-   <p> From: NLNS
+<xml>
+   <div class="article">
+      <p> From: NLNS
 Subject: Project Censored</p>
-   <p>By Carl Jensen,Ph.D.
+      <p>By Carl Jensen,Ph.D.
 Director of "Project Censored"
 Sonoma State University
 Rohnert Park, California</p>
-   <p>What is Project Censored?</p>
-   <p>The basic premise of Project Censored is that the mass media have failed
+      <p>What is Project Censored?</p>
+      <p>The basic premise of Project Censored is that the mass media have failed
 to provide the public with all the information it needs to succeed and
 prosper as a society.</p>
-   <p>While the United States may have a free press and the most sophisti-cated communications system in the world, unfortunately a free press and
+      <p>While the United States may have a free press and the most sophisti-cated communications system in the world, unfortunately a free press and
 high technology do not guarantee a well-informed society.</p>
-   <p>The problem is not the quantity of information, which sometimes reaches
+      <p>The problem is not the quantity of information, which sometimes reaches
 an overload level, but the quality of information. For example, when
 something starts to go wrong in your personal life, there generally are
 some warning signals that alert you to the problem. If you are a
 rational person, you normally would act upon that information in an
 effort to solve the problem.</p>
-   <p>So too, it is with a society. When a problem arises, there should be a
+      <p>So too, it is with a society. When a problem arises, there should be a
 warning signal -- information-- that alerts the citizens that something
 is wrong which needs attention and resolution. An aware and informed
 populace could then influence its leaders to act upon that information
 in an effort to solve the problem. This, unfortunately, is not the case
 in the United States as we are becoming abundantly aware during these
 difficult times.</p>
-   <p>I would suggest that a systematic omission of news about significant
+      <p>I would suggest that a systematic omission of news about significant
 issues in our major news media has led to a dangerously distorted
 picture of America in the late 20th Century. This false picture of
 society, while perhaps reassuring to, or even desired by, an elite group
 in our society, represents a festering sore that must be treated if we
 are to survive as a nation.</p>
-   <p>To understand how this situation has come about in a society with a free
+      <p>To understand how this situation has come about in a society with a free
 press that mass produces information, we must understand how the flow
 of information is controlled.</p>
-   <p>In totalitarian societies, we find outright, overt censorship. The
+      <p>In totalitarian societies, we find outright, overt censorship. The
 state, through its bureaucracy, determines what can or cannot be said or
 printed and maintains its control of the information flow through a
 monopoly on the means of production of the information industry. The
@@ -44,33 +45,33 @@ parliamentary commission, chaired by Volodymyr Yavorivsky, revealed
 that in April 1986 Soviet authorities reacted to the Chernobyl nuclear
 power accident with "a total lie, falsehoods, coverup and concealment"
 which led to thousands of deaths.</p>
-   <p>In societies perceived as free, we find the information output deter-mined by economic pressures to produce corporate profits, by a system-atic distribution of "punishment and reward" to workers in the media,
+      <p>In societies perceived as free, we find the information output deter-mined by economic pressures to produce corporate profits, by a system-atic distribution of "punishment and reward" to workers in the media,
 and by a less obvious, but nonetheless effective, control of the means
 of production of the information industry. The latter is
 well-documented in Ben Bagdikian's book "The Media Monopoly."</p>
-   <p>In both cases, the efforts to manipulate and control the flow of
+      <p>In both cases, the efforts to manipulate and control the flow of
 information are successful -- whether by overt censorship or by covert
 censorship. The crucial difference is that the citizens in a
 totalitarian society are aware that their information is controlled
 and manipulated and they conduct their lives with that knowledge.</p>
-   <p>However, the citizens of a free society, such as the United States, want
+      <p>However, the citizens of a free society, such as the United States, want
 to believe the mass media provide them with a fair, objective, and
 uncensored report of what is happening in the world around them and thus
 are lulled into a false sense of being well-informed.</p>
-   <p>Project Censored Launched</p>
-   <p>In 1976, concerned about increasing social problems and public apa-thy, I launched a national research effort, called Project Censored, to
+      <p>Project Censored Launched</p>
+      <p>In 1976, concerned about increasing social problems and public apa-thy, I launched a national research effort, called Project Censored, to
 explore whether there really is a systematic omission of certain issues
 in our national news media. My quest was specifically stimulated by
 personal bewilderment over how the American people could elect Richard
 Nixon by a landslide after Watergate, one of the most sensational
 political crimes of the century.</p>
-   <p>Project Censored is now an international media research project in its
+      <p>Project Censored is now an international media research project in its
 16th year. By exploring and publicizing stories on important issues
 that have been overlooked or underreported by the news media, the
 project seeks to stimulate journalists and editors to provide more mass
 media coverage of those issues. It also hopes to encourage the general
 public to seek out and demand more information on those issues.</p>
-   <p>Since its start, the research project has generated queries for more
+      <p>Since its start, the research project has generated queries for more
 information about the project as well as about individual stories from
 journalists, scholars, and concerned people throughout the world. It
 has been described variously as a tip sheet for investigative television
@@ -84,33 +85,33 @@ attention to the most important San Francisco Bay Area stories that the
 local media under-report or ignore. Bay Area Censored, now in its third
 year, is sponsored by the Media Alliance, a San Francisco-based
 organization of journalists.</p>
-   <p>The Project director has been cited by the Giraffe Project for "sticking
+      <p>The Project director has been cited by the Giraffe Project for "sticking
 his neck out for the common good; " been honored with the Media Alli-ance Meritorious Achievement Award in the "Unimpeachable of the annual
 Freedom of Information Award from the Society of Professional
 Journalists, in Los Angeles; and was named the "Outstanding Journalism
 Teacher of 1991" at the four-year college level by the California
 Newspaper Publishers Association.</p>
-   <p>Despite its growing impact and recognition, the Project has largely been
+      <p>Despite its growing impact and recognition, the Project has largely been
 ignored by the major news media in the United States, which,
 incidentally, are not known for their inclination to accept and evaluate
 criticism. Supporters of Project Censored regularly nominate the pro-ject itself as a top "censored' ' story of the year. This may be
 changing, however. The Project's first major national media recognition
 occurred in February, 1991,when it was the subject of an hour-long
 documentary on PBS-TV, hosted by Bill Moyers.</p>
-   <p>Information about securing a copy of the videotape, titled "Moyers:
+      <p>Information about securing a copy of the videotape, titled "Moyers:
 Project Censored," is available from Public Affairs Television, 356 West
 58th St., New York, NY 10019, (212/560-6961).</p>
-   <p>The Censored Research Process</p>
-   <p>Researchers in the censorship seminar I teach at Sonoma State University
+      <p>The Censored Research Process</p>
+      <p>Researchers in the censorship seminar I teach at Sonoma State University
 have reviewed thousands of stories over the past 16 years that many
 Americans have not seen or heard about. The stories are nominated
 annually by journalists, scholars, librarians, and the general public
 from throughout the United States and abroad.</p>
-   <p>We then select the top 25 stories according to a number of criteria in-cluding the amount of coverage the story received, the importance of the
+      <p>We then select the top 25 stories according to a number of criteria in-cluding the amount of coverage the story received, the importance of the
 issue, the reliability of the source, and the potential impact the story
 may have. Next, the top 25 "censored" stories are submitted in synopsis
 form to a panel of judges who select the top ten stories of the year.</p>
-   <p>A review of the project to date reveals that the major news media do
+      <p>A review of the project to date reveals that the major news media do
 systematically overlook, ignore, or distort certain subjects. The most
 under-reported category of ignored subjects deals with political or gov-ernmental issues ranging from regulatory agencies to foreign
 political/ military involvement to the presidency. The second leading
@@ -120,19 +121,19 @@ to an individual's health, whether from poisonous pesticides or
 pharmaceutical malfeasance or low-level radiation. Other leading
 subjects often under covered by the mainstream press include civil and
 human rights, the military, and the environment.</p>
-   <p>Why Are Some Issues Overlooked?</p>
-   <p>One of the questions often asked is why doesn't the press cover the
+      <p>Why Are Some Issues Overlooked?</p>
+      <p>One of the questions often asked is why doesn't the press cover the
 issues raised by Project Censored. The failure of the news media to
 cover critical and sometimes controversial issues consistently and in
 depth is not, as some say, a conspiracy on the part of the media elite.
 News is too diverse, fast-breaking, and unpredictable to be controlled
 by some sinister conservative eastern establishment media cabal.</p>
-   <p>However, there are a variety of factors operating that, when combined,
+      <p>However, there are a variety of factors operating that, when combined,
 lead to the systematic failure of the news media to fully inform the
 public. While it is not an overt form of censorship, such as the kind
 we observe in some other societies, it is nonetheless real and often
 equally dangerous.</p>
-   <p>The media's explanations for censorship are plentiful. Sometimes a
+      <p>The media's explanations for censorship are plentiful. Sometimes a
 source for a story isn't considered to be reliable; other times the
 story doesn't have an easily identifiable "beginning, middle, and end;"
 some stories are considered to be "too complex" for the general public;
@@ -141,12 +142,12 @@ The New York Times or The Washington Post. Reporters and editors at
 most of the other 1650 daily newspapers know their news judgment isn't
 going to be challenged when they produce the-leader" stories, a practice
 which leads to the "pack" or "herd" phenomenon in journalism.</p>
-   <p>Another major factor contributing to media self-censorship is that the
+      <p>Another major factor contributing to media self-censorship is that the
 story is considered potentially libelous. There is no question that
 long and costly jury trials, and sometimes large judgments against the
 media, have produced a massive chilling effect on the press and replaced
 copy editors with copy attorneys.</p>
-   <p>Nonetheless, the bottom line explanation for much of the censorship
+      <p>Nonetheless, the bottom line explanation for much of the censorship
 found in the mainstream media is the media's own bottom line. Corpo-rate media perceive their primary responsibility is to maximize profits,
 not, as some would have it, to inform the public. Many of the stories
 cited by Project Censored are not in the best financial interests of
@@ -155,65 +156,65 @@ investigative journalism is more expensive than the traditional public
 stenographers school of journalism. And, of course, there is always the
 "don't rock the boat" mentality which pervades corporate media
 boardrooms.</p>
-   <p>Jonathan Alter, media columnist for Newsweek, suggests an additional
+      <p>Jonathan Alter, media columnist for Newsweek, suggests an additional
 reason for the lack of coverage given some issues. According to Alter,
 some stories are not covered because they do not fit conventional
 definitions of news. This, of course, is why I suggest it is time for
 journalism to rethink its traditional definitions of news. In a time of
 pending economic doom, nuclear terrorism, and environmental disaster,
 it is not news when a man bites a dog.</p>
-   <p>Real news is not repetitive, sensationalistic coverage of
+      <p>Real news is not repetitive, sensationalistic coverage of
 non-important events such as the William Kennedy Smith Palm Beach trial
 which attracted so much media attention in 1991.</p>
-   <p>By contrast, real news is objective and reliable information about
+      <p>By contrast, real news is objective and reliable information about
 important events happening in a society. And I suggest that the
 widespread dissemination of such information will help people become
 better informed and that a better informed public will elect
 politicians who are more responsive to people's needs.</p>
-   <p>A Smoking Gun! People Magazine Censors Bohemian Grove Story</p>
-   <p>Critics of Project Censored, who deny there is such a thing as media
+      <p>A Smoking Gun! People Magazine Censors Bohemian Grove Story</p>
+      <p>Critics of Project Censored, who deny there is such a thing as media
 self-censorship, often ask for "smoking gun" examples. Then, when
 provided with such examples, they too often merely ignore them. None-theless, here's another example, excerpted from an article I wrote for
 Fine Line, The Newsletter On Journalism Ethics, "Project Censored,
 Sins of Omission and The Hardest 'W' of all -- Why," November/ December
 1991 .</p>
-   <p>Perhaps the most blatant recent example of media self-censorship, and
+      <p>Perhaps the most blatant recent example of media self-censorship, and
 media denial, is an incident which occurred during the summer of 1991.
 The Bohemian Grove encampment, which draws the cream of America's male
 power elite -- including press moguls -- to northern California each
 year, is one of the media's best known, best kept secrets.</p>
-   <p>Dirk Mathison, San Francisco bureau chief for People Magazine at the
+      <p>Dirk Mathison, San Francisco bureau chief for People Magazine at the
 time, managed to surreptitiously infiltrate the encampment in search of
 a good story. And he got it. He recorded a variety of newsworthy
 items, including a previously unpublicized Gulf War Iraqi casualty
 count of 200000 as reported to the Bohemian Club members by former
 Navy Secretary John Lehman. Unfortunately, Mathison was spotted by a
 Time Inc. executive and quietly ordered to leave.</p>
-   <p>The article, which Mathison said was scheduled to run for four pages,
+      <p>The article, which Mathison said was scheduled to run for four pages,
 was suddenly killed. When I asked Lanny Jones, managing editor of
 People Magazine, whether the fact that Time Inc. owns People had
 anything to do with killing the story, he said no. Since his magazine
 had obtained the story by illegal trespass, he said, running it would
 have been unethical.</p>
-   <p>Think about it. People Magazine -- pleading ethics to explain why it
+      <p>Think about it. People Magazine -- pleading ethics to explain why it
 spiked a story the American people should hear!</p>
-   <p>When I took exception to Jones' response, he asked me what I would have
+      <p>When I took exception to Jones' response, he asked me what I would have
 done without violating the publication's guidelines. I said, at the
 very least, I'd have Mathison write a straight news article describing
 exactly what happened -- how he gained access to the Bohemian Grove,
 what he heard there, and why he was told to leave. Jones said it was a
 good idea and he'd think about it. That was August 6, 1991.</p>
-   <p>The People Magazine/Bohemian Grove story of self-censorship is a classic
+      <p>The People Magazine/Bohemian Grove story of self-censorship is a classic
 example of the dangers Ben Bagdikian warns about in Media Monopoly. If
 People Magazine were not part of the Time Inc. media empire, it is
 doubtful that the story would have been spiked.</p>
-   <p>Would It Make Any Difference?</p>
-   <p>Finally, there is yet another question that is often asked about the
+      <p>Would It Make Any Difference?</p>
+      <p>Finally, there is yet another question that is often asked about the
 project. Would it really make any difference if the press were to
 provide more coverage for the kinds of stories cited by Project
 Censored?</p>
-   <p>The answer is very simple: yes.</p>
-   <p>First, there is the issue of a lack of public interest. Critics of
+      <p>The answer is very simple: yes.</p>
+      <p>First, there is the issue of a lack of public interest. Critics of
 Project Censored say that the media give the public what it wants, i.e.
 "junk food news," because the people are not interested in reading about
 the issues raised by Project Censored. We counter that by saying,
@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ responsibility, as watchdogs of society, to explore, compile, and
 present information people should know about in a way that will attract
 their attention and be relevant to their everyday lives. And, when the
 media do this, the people will read and respond to the issues raised.</p>
-   <p>An example of what the press can do when it takes its responsibilities
+      <p>An example of what the press can do when it takes its responsibilities
 seriously is provided by one of 1991's top 25 stories -- "Voodoo
 Economics: The Untold Story" (#3). Authors Donald Barlett and James
 Steele, and their newspaper, The Philadelphia Inquirer, invested the
@@ -233,27 +234,27 @@ economy. Within hours of the first installment of the series, the
 Inquirer started to receive requests for reprints. Altogether the
 newspaper distributed more than 225000 free reprints. One reader
 wanted 535 copies -- one to distribute to each member of Congress.</p>
-   <p>There is, indeed, a genuine desire on the part of people to know more
+      <p>There is, indeed, a genuine desire on the part of people to know more
 about issues that affect them. But then, the next question is, would it
 make any difference if the people were better informed?</p>
-   <p>Hunger in Africa was consistently nominated as a "censored" subject
+      <p>Hunger in Africa was consistently nominated as a "censored" subject
 during the early 1980s. When I would ask journalists why they did not
 cover the tragedy unfolding there, they would say: " It is not news, "
 or, "Everyone already knows about starving Africans," or "Nothing can be
 done about it anyway.''</p>
-   <p>Early in 1984, an ABC-TV News correspondent in Rome came upon
+      <p>Early in 1984, an ABC-TV News correspondent in Rome came upon
 information that led him to believe that millions of lives were being
 threatened by drought and famine in Africa. He asked the home office in
 New York for permission to take his crew to Africa to get the story.
 The answer was no.</p>
-   <p>(There's an ironic twist to this story. I subsequently discovered who
+      <p>(There's an ironic twist to this story. I subsequently discovered who
 it was at ABC that refused to let the network's TV crew go to Africa in
 1984. It was Rick Kaplan, who later became executive producer of Ted
 Koppel's "Nightline." And, in mid-1986, it was the same Rick Kaplan
 who killed a two-part "Nightline" series on Project Censored which was
 going to explore whether the news media ever overlook, undercover, or
 censor important stories.)</p>
-   <p>ABC-TV News was not the only, nor even the first, television network to
+      <p>ABC-TV News was not the only, nor even the first, television network to
 reject the tragic story of starving children in Ethiopia. In October,
 1983, David Kline, a free-lance journalist and news producer in San
 Francisco, shot film on assignment for CBS showing emaciated adults and
@@ -267,18 +268,18 @@ interested in a story about millions of people facing death. Kline also
 offered the story to a number of magazines including Life, Playboy, The
 New Yorker, Esquire, Harper's, and Mother Jones, all of whom rejected
 it. Only the Christian Science Monitor ran Kline's piece.</p>
-   <p>Later, as we all now know, a BBC television crew, traveling through
+      <p>Later, as we all now know, a BBC television crew, traveling through
 Ethiopia, captured the stark reality of children starving to death.
 People throughout the world saw the coverage and responded.
 Overnight, it sparked a world-wide reaction that reportedly saved the
 lives of seven million Ethiopians.</p>
-   <p>Indeed, the media can make a difference.</p>
-   <p>The press has the power to stimulate people to clean up the environ-ment; to prevent nuclear proliferation; to force crooked politicians
+      <p>Indeed, the media can make a difference.</p>
+      <p>The press has the power to stimulate people to clean up the environ-ment; to prevent nuclear proliferation; to force crooked politicians
 out of office; to reduce poverty; to provide quality health care for
 all people; to create a truly equitable society; and, as we have seen,
 to literally save the lives of millions of human beings.</p>
-   <p>Project Censored Judges Of 1991</p>
-   <p>One of the most difficult challenges of Project Censored is to select
+      <p>Project Censored Judges Of 1991</p>
+      <p>One of the most difficult challenges of Project Censored is to select
 the top ten "censored" stories from among the 25 top nominations. This
 responsibility falls to our distinguished national panel of judges who
 volunteer their efforts. Perhaps one of the greatest tributes to the
@@ -286,55 +287,55 @@ project is that some of our judges, identified with asterisks below,
 have participated in Project Censored every year since selecting the
 first group of "best censored stories" of 1976. We are indebted to the
 following judges who selected the top ten "censored" stories of 1991.</p>
-   <p>Dr. Donna Allen, founding editor of Media Report to Women;</p>
-   <p>Ben Bagdikian,* Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Journalism, UC-Berkeley;</p>
-   <p>Richard Barnet, Senior Fellow, Institute for Policy Studies;</p>
-   <p>Noam Chomsky,* professor, Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT;</p>
-   <p>Dr. George Gerbner, professor, Annenberg School of Communications,
+      <p>Dr. Donna Allen, founding editor of Media Report to Women;</p>
+      <p>Ben Bagdikian,* Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Journalism, UC-Berkeley;</p>
+      <p>Richard Barnet, Senior Fellow, Institute for Policy Studies;</p>
+      <p>Noam Chomsky,* professor, Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT;</p>
+      <p>Dr. George Gerbner, professor, Annenberg School of Communications,
 University of Pennsylvania;</p>
-   <p>Nicholas Johnson, * professor, College of Law, University of Iowa;</p>
-   <p>Rhoda H. Karpatkin, executive director, Consumers Union;</p>
-   <p>Charles L. Klotzer, editor and publisher, St. Louis Journalism
+      <p>Nicholas Johnson, * professor, College of Law, University of Iowa;</p>
+      <p>Rhoda H. Karpatkin, executive director, Consumers Union;</p>
+      <p>Charles L. Klotzer, editor and publisher, St. Louis Journalism
 Review;</p>
-   <p>Judith Krug, director, Office for Intellectual Freedom, American
+      <p>Judith Krug, director, Office for Intellectual Freedom, American
 Library Association;</p>
-   <p>Frances Moore Lappe, co-founder and co-director, Institute for the Arts
+      <p>Frances Moore Lappe, co-founder and co-director, Institute for the Arts
 of Democracy;</p>
-   <p>William Lutz, professor, English, Rutgers University, and editor of The
+      <p>William Lutz, professor, English, Rutgers University, and editor of The
 Quarterly Review of Doublespeak;</p>
-   <p>Robert C. Maynard, editor and publisher, Oakland Tribune;</p>
-   <p>Jack L. Nelson, * professor, Graduate School of Education, Rutgers
+      <p>Robert C. Maynard, editor and publisher, Oakland Tribune;</p>
+      <p>Jack L. Nelson, * professor, Graduate School of Education, Rutgers
 University;</p>
-   <p>Tom Peters, nationally syndicated columnist on excellence;</p>
-   <p>Herbert 1. Schiller, Professor Emeritus of Communication, UC-San Diego;</p>
-   <p>Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld,* president, D.C. Productions.</p>
-   <p>The following pages provide a brief one page synopsis of each of the top
+      <p>Tom Peters, nationally syndicated columnist on excellence;</p>
+      <p>Herbert 1. Schiller, Professor Emeritus of Communication, UC-San Diego;</p>
+      <p>Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld,* president, D.C. Productions.</p>
+      <p>The following pages provide a brief one page synopsis of each of the top
 25 censored stories of 1991 and some additional background information
 about the issue supplied by the author when available. If you are
 interested in any of these issues, you are encouraged to go to the
 original articles, or other sources, for more information. The synopsis
 is merely a brief overview of the issue.</p>
-   <p>From: New Liberation News Service <special>nlns@igc.apc.org</special>
-   </p>
-   <p>/* Written 11:38 am Mar 19, 1993 by newsdesk@igc.apc.org in igc:media.issues */
+      <p>From: New Liberation News Service <special>nlns@igc.apc.org</special>
+      </p>
+      <p>/* Written 11:38 am Mar 19, 1993 by newsdesk@igc.apc.org in igc:media.issues */
 /* ---------- "Project Censored" ---------- */
 From: News Desk <special>newsdesk</special>
 Subject: Project Censored</p>
-   <p>Events conspired against me but here at long last is the 1992 list
+      <p>Events conspired against me but here at long last is the 1992 list
 from Project Censored. Hopefully, it has not already been uploaded
 by someone else...</p>
-   <p>Brian Wilson
+      <p>Brian Wilson
 Sonoma State University</p>
-   <p>NEWS FROM: PROJECT CENSORED
+      <p>NEWS FROM: PROJECT CENSORED
 Sonoma State University
 Rohnert Park, CA 94928</p>
-   <p>For Immediate Release: # 106
+      <p>For Immediate Release: # 106
 Contact: Mark Lowenthal
 Project Censored: 707/664-2500</p>
-   <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: A NATIONAL PANEL OF MEDIA EXPERTS ANNUALLY SELECTS
+      <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: A NATIONAL PANEL OF MEDIA EXPERTS ANNUALLY SELECTS
 THE TOP TEN UNDER-REPORTED NEWS STORIES OF THE YEAR.)</p>
-   <p>NEWS MEDIA SELL-OUT TOPS CENSORED NEWS LIST</p>
-   <p>ROHNERT PARK -- The top censored story of 1992 revealed how
+      <p>NEWS MEDIA SELL-OUT TOPS CENSORED NEWS LIST</p>
+      <p>ROHNERT PARK -- The top censored story of 1992 revealed how
 the nation's major news media traded their traditional adversarial
 watchdog role for profits and deregulation during the Reagan/Bush era
 according to a national panel of media experts.
@@ -393,7 +394,7 @@ attend.
 cold war did not end the secretive cold war mentality of the Pentagon; today,
 close to $100 million is being spent to fuel the national security machinery
 of the Pentagon.</p>
-   <p>15 OTHER "CENSORED" STORIES
+      <p>15 OTHER "CENSORED" STORIES
 Another 15 under-reported issues round out the list of the top 25
 "censored" stories of 1992: Solar Power Eclipsed by Oil, Gas, and Nuclear
 Interests; What Happened to the EPA?; The Specter of Sterility; News Media
@@ -404,7 +405,7 @@ Pacific; Black Gold Conquistadors Invade Ecuador; How To Sell Pollution for
 Profit; Clear-cutting the World's Rainforests; Censorship Through Bribery;
 The No-Pest Shell Game; University of Arizona Desecrates Sacred Native
 American Site.</p>
-   <p>PROJECT CENSORED JUDGES
+      <p>PROJECT CENSORED JUDGES
 The panel of judges who selected the top ten under-reported
 news stories were Dr. Donna Allen, founding editor of Media Report to
 Women; Richard Barnet, Senior Fellow, Institute for Policy Studies;
@@ -447,14 +448,14 @@ CENSORED Newsletter, PO Box 310, Cotati, CA 94931.
 To receive a free pamphlet listing the top 25 stories, please send a
 self-addressed, stamped envelope to PROJECT CENSORED, Sonoma State
 University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928.</p>
-   <p>--SSU--</p>
-   <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: SIDEBAR STORY #1 FOLLOWS)</p>
-   <p>INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA
+      <p>--SSU--</p>
+      <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: SIDEBAR STORY #1 FOLLOWS)</p>
+      <p>INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA
 CITED FOR EXPOSING "CENSORED" STORIES</p>
-   <p>Following are the investigative journalists and media cited by Project
+      <p>Following are the investigative journalists and media cited by Project
 Censored for exposing the top ten issues overlooked or under-reported by the
 national news media in 1992:</p>
-   <p>1.THE GREAT MEDIA SELL-OUT. MOTHER JONES, May/June 1992,
+      <p>1.THE GREAT MEDIA SELL-OUT. MOTHER JONES, May/June 1992,
 "Journalism of Joy," by Ben Bagdikian.
 2.CORPORATE CRIME. MULTINATIONAL MONITOR, December 1991,
 "Corporate Crime &amp; Violence in Review," by Russell Mokhiber.
@@ -488,10 +489,10 @@ CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF COMMERCIALISM, 1992, "Dictating Content: How
 Advertising Pressure Can Corrupt a Free Press," by Ronald K. L. Collins.
 10.PENTAGON'S POST COLD WAR BLACK BUDGET. MOTHER JONES,
 March/April 1992, "The Pentagon's Secret Stash," by Tim Weiner.</p>
-   <p>-- SSU --</p>
-   <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: SIDEBAR STORY #2 FOLLOWS)</p>
-   <p>DAN QUAYLE IS JUNK FOOD NEWS OF 1992</p>
-   <p>ROHNERT PARK -- Vice President-reject Dan Quayle set a new
+      <p>-- SSU --</p>
+      <p>(EDITOR'S NOTE: SIDEBAR STORY #2 FOLLOWS)</p>
+      <p>DAN QUAYLE IS JUNK FOOD NEWS OF 1992</p>
+      <p>ROHNERT PARK -- Vice President-reject Dan Quayle set a new
 record in the annual Junk Food News competition by being cited in two
 of the top three over-covered unimportant news stories of 1992
 according to Dr. Carl Jensen, professor of Communication Studies at
@@ -513,7 +514,7 @@ they may
 9. The Elvis Stamp Election -- the youngest candidate won this
 election too
 10. U.S. Olympic Dream Team -- first single sport Olympics in history</p>
-   <p>Other nominations cited by the news ombudsmen included Bush Tosses
+      <p>Other nominations cited by the news ombudsmen included Bush Tosses
 Cookies in Japan, the Jay Leno/Arsenio Hall Late Night War, Clinton's Vietnam
 Record, Jerry Brown's 800 Number, Batman Returns/Superman Dies, Polls-Polls-Polls, and Sinead O'Connor Rips the Pope.
 Ombudsmen comments on the Junk Food News stories included:
@@ -540,7 +541,8 @@ to more relevant political issues during an election year.
 For more information about Junk Food News stories, contact
 Project Censored at Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California
 94928, 707/664-2500.</p>
-   <p>-- SSU --
+      <p>-- SSU --
 
 </p>
-</div>
+   </div>
+</xml>