conditions, and disastrously exploded shortly after launch. The evidence
seems to indicate that , as the rising vehicle was stressed, one end of its
right booster broke loose, twisting away and into the main fuel tank, causing
rupture, spillage of the fuel, and catastrophic explosion. Several other
anomalies still exist however, and it is clear that a problem existed with at
least one of the booster seals. All seven astronauts aboard the flight were
killed in the fiery destruction of the vehicle. </p>
<p> Of course no one had recognized that the <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent>s had already tested a
launch-phase anti-ballistic missile (LP<enttype='ORG'>ABM</ent>) system against three of our
previous shuttle launches. These "wet-runs" used a deliberate "time-offset"
to delay the explosive emergence of electromagnetic energy in a launched
shuttle's location along its trajectory. The delayed test shots resulted in
very large "booms" above the launch site after the shuttle was safely out of
the area, but did not destroy the shuttles themselves. For example, the
delayed shot-boom occurred 12 minutes after the evening launch of Nov. 26,
1985. Even a marker beacon (large light in the sky) was utilized on that
launch shortly after lift-off. The marker beacon was photographed. In
addition another photograph taken in a time sequence shows another sudden
streak of light coming down and ending in a burst of light. This was probably
a spacially-offset test of the "pulse mode" for destroying the shuttle. The
"light burst" would have been detected in the <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent> Union and scored against
its intended offset position. However, another mechanism was used to cause
the destruction of the shuttle itself. </p>
<p> On Jan. 1, 1986 the presence of a metal softening signal added on to the
<enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent> LP<enttype='ORG'>ABM</ent> systems scalar EM transmissions was detected by a surprised
<enttype='PERSON'>Frank Golden</ent>. The metal softening ability of the detected signal was
experimentally verified by him at that time. Golden also locally nullified
the action of the scalar EM signal in a test, rather conclusively
establishing (1) that it existed and (2) what it was. The signal was
apparently being prepared for use against an upcoming U.S. shuttle launch. </p>
<p> Just prior to the launch of the shuttle in late January, 1986, the
<enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent>s accomplished significant weather engineering over the U.S. The jet
stream was severely bent southward in the middle of the U.S., bending right-ward again to move across the <enttype='GPE'>Florida</ent> panhandle. Icy cold air from <enttype='GPE'>Canada</ent> was
drawn far down, into <enttype='GPE'>Florida</ent> and onto the Challenger sitting on it launch
pad. This exposure to cold outside its tested range was probably an
additional factor contributing to the Challengers failure. Positive
signatures of the <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent> weather engineering and jet stream manipulation
were observed and photographed by several persons, particularly in <enttype='GPE'>Alabama</ent>
and <enttype='GPE'>California</ent>...
</p>
<p> On January 28, 1986, the <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent> scalar EM weapon system effects were
sharply localized in the launch zone. Localization involved higher
frequencies being present; these are quite painful to small brains--whose
hemispheres act as a scalar interferometer and detector--such as in birds.
As commented upon by national news commentators, strangely the birds were not
flying that morning. Indeed, they were staying down on the ground or avoiding
the area, since the sky over the area was painful to them. </p>
<p> As Challenger rose, the metal softening signal would have been
experienced in and around the boosters shortly after ignition, since the
booster flame acts as a special "ion-plasma" tuner/detector for the scalar
signal. The effect of such a local signal is to "charge mass in the immediate
vicinity" with the particular scalar resonance signal. </p>
<p> The ill fated Challenger was doomed. After ignition, the booster flame
acted as as a ionic plasma detector/amplifier for the metal softening signal
on the <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent><enttype='ORG'>Woodpecker</ent> grid. The metal in and around the booster flame was
slowly and steadily weakening due to a charge up with the metal softening
pattern. This contributed to booster leakage from the already cold damaged
seal. The leaking booster poured out smoke and later flame, contributing to
the impending disaster. </p>
<p> Substantial winds and air turbulence over the site increased the stress
on the Challenger as it rose through this region. This also contributed to
the disaster and may have been deliberately created there by <enttype='NORP'>Soviet</ent> Weather
engineering. </p>
<p> As the Challenger stressed, eventually one or more weakened mounts gave
way, partially freeing the end of the right booster. Another anomalous flame
or light was observed on the vehicle, and may have represented a very small
additional "pulse mode energy form" produced from the weapon that was already
attacking the Challenger. The booster oscillated, rotating into the tank and
rupturing it. Contact of the escaping liquid fuel and the flame resulted in a
fiery explosion, destroying the vehicle and killing those on board...
By creating excess cold exposure to the shuttle, inducing metal
softening in and around the ignited booster, and possibly adding a deliberate
"intensely hot spot", THE <enttype='NORP'>SOVIETS</ent> CAUSED THE CHALLENGER TO <enttype='ORG'>WEAKEN</ent> AND DESTROY
ITSELF SHORTLY AFTER LAUNCH, IN SO SUBTLE A FASHION THAT <enttype='ORG'>NASA</ent> SCIENTISTS
WOULD NOT SUSPECT WHAT HAD ACTUALLY CAUSED THE MISHAP. THE <enttype='NORP'>SOVIETS</ent> HAD ALSO
PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN ALL THEIR TRAWLERS AND SHIPS WHICH NORMALLY SHADOW A
