mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-17 19:54:27 -05:00
199 lines
12 KiB
HTML
199 lines
12 KiB
HTML
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
||
|
|
<head>
|
||
|
|
<title>sem2</title>
|
||
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../CSSstyle.css"/>
|
||
|
|
<!--Fill in your link line for CSS and JS in the XSLT here! -->
|
||
|
|
</head>
|
||
|
|
<body>
|
||
|
|
<h1 id="title-index">Politics-Conspiracies-Project</h1>
|
||
|
|
<nav id="menu">
|
||
|
|
<a href="../index.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">Home</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../fulltext2.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">Fulltext</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../analysis.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">Analysis</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../gallery.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">Gallery</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../methods.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">Methods</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../about.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">About</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
<a href="../GitHub.html">
|
||
|
|
<div class="button">GitHub <img alt="github icon"
|
||
|
|
src="https://logos-download.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GitHub_logo.png"
|
||
|
|
width="15"/>
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
</a>
|
||
|
|
</nav>
|
||
|
|
<h2>sem2</h2>
|
||
|
|
<p>
|
||
|
|
Sadly, the bureaucratic smugness of orthodox Western scientists has
|
||
|
|
materially assisted the Soviet deception process. Most Western managerial
|
||
|
|
scientists -particularly in weapons development activities - have continued
|
||
|
|
to view the Soviets as ignorant peasants, still trying to clean the mud off
|
||
|
|
their boots. This view is of course, Totally untrue and unwarranted. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> It takes only a few examples to refute this attitude. In nonlinear
|
||
|
|
mathematics, engineering and science, the Soviets have led their Western
|
||
|
|
counterparts since the beginning. The electromagnetic pulse (EMP) effect of a
|
||
|
|
nuclear explosion appeared in the ordinary Soviet scientific literature
|
||
|
|
before Western scientists were even aware that te effect existed. The Soviets
|
||
|
|
continue to lead the world in explosive welding, titanium welding and
|
||
|
|
forming, etc. While the Soviet scientists exhibit little inclination to build
|
||
|
|
good washing machines, they certainly do produce state of the art
|
||
|
|
technology-- and beyond-- in any area in which they focus their main efforts.
|
||
|
|
(We do lead the Soviets in some areas such as computers hardware, computer
|
||
|
|
software, miniaturization, etc.)</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Once before, a modern nation, the United States, developed a mighty
|
||
|
|
weapon in secrecy and used it to force a powerful foe, Japan, to its knees...
|
||
|
|
The mindbending atomic blows to Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, showed once and for
|
||
|
|
all that in the modern age technological surprise can prove instantly
|
||
|
|
disastrous. Yet in our scientific arrogance, we have assumed that it could
|
||
|
|
never happen to us, and that the "secret weapon" scenario will never be
|
||
|
|
repeated. On the contrary, it HAS happened again, someone else has done it,
|
||
|
|
and it has happened to us. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> It has also become fashionable in the West to believe that all the
|
||
|
|
laws of physics are already discovered. We assume we know all of them. While
|
||
|
|
we have been pridefully crowing this tune, the Soviets have been steadily new
|
||
|
|
laws in secret, as well as new ways to circumvent the old laws.
|
||
|
|
Our defense is strategic, we rely on our offense. Our huge nuclear arsenal..
|
||
|
|
If this offense were nullified or destroyed by Soviet secret weapons, we
|
||
|
|
would be powerless to prevent our own destruction and Soviet domination of
|
||
|
|
our world.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> We have been viewing ourselves as indestructible, confident in the
|
||
|
|
strength of our defense. Yet literally our defense has been stripped from us.
|
||
|
|
Indeed Soviet energetics weapons are now capable of destroying our defense,
|
||
|
|
our homeland, our armed forces in the field, and our population, quickly and
|
||
|
|
efficiently. We have a new gap of monumental proportions: not a missile gap,
|
||
|
|
not a submarine or bomber gap, and not even a particle beam or laser gap.
|
||
|
|
We have a "Scalar Electromagnetics or Electrogravitation" gap.....
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
He that has ears, let him hear.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Here is the secret of antigravity.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> The "electrical charge" of a charged particle-- such as one of the
|
||
|
|
charged particles of an atom or one of the protons of its nucleus--
|
||
|
|
represents a difference in flux intensity (potential) between the local
|
||
|
|
particle and its ambient vacuum. Its the continual bleed-off of
|
||
|
|
gravitational charge as electrical charge. If that bleed off is reversed or
|
||
|
|
stopped, a drastic effect on the gravitational charge ensues. The 5-potential
|
||
|
|
and the 5-charge have become 4-G-potential and 4-d-charge respectively. Thus
|
||
|
|
"charging" an object with its scalar EM pattern charges it gravitationally.
|
||
|
|
Now the only "bleed off channel" is through the 4-G force field. Further,
|
||
|
|
in a nucleus the nucleons continually back and forth between proton and
|
||
|
|
neutron, so the electrical charge is "spread" throughout the nucleus and
|
||
|
|
shared by all the nucleons. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Further, each element (actually each isotope) has its own unique
|
||
|
|
"ensemble pattern" of Fourier expansion scalar frequencies, amplitudes, ect.
|
||
|
|
This pattern can, of course, be reproduced artificially and transmitted by
|
||
|
|
modified EM transmitters). There is, however, a sort of "master key" scalar
|
||
|
|
EM (EG) pattern for nucleons (protons and neutrons which are changing back
|
||
|
|
and forth into each other by exchange of virtual charge currents). </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> If one reverses the charge by inverting this pattern, and then
|
||
|
|
"charges up a mass with the inverted charge," to the external observer the
|
||
|
|
charging mass just gets lighter and lighter, and its inertia gets less and
|
||
|
|
less. Eventually it seems (to him) to acquire negative mass and negative
|
||
|
|
inertia, and just accelerate away from the earth. the object falls upward
|
||
|
|
instead of falling downwards.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> There are also some weird time effects; that object can be moving
|
||
|
|
slower through time than the laboratory observer, or even be moving backwards
|
||
|
|
through time in respect to the laboratory observer. (Don't believe everything
|
||
|
|
they taught you in relativity; none of those guys ever had engineered a
|
||
|
|
single general relativistic situation. &othing they teach in GR is based on
|
||
|
|
direct experiment. Most of what they teach has already experimentally proven
|
||
|
|
to be in error. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> This is the concept for a scalar EG detector for a scalar EG waves.
|
||
|
|
This is the Bendini scalar wave detector, adapted from an original concept by
|
||
|
|
Dea and Faretto. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> The idea is quite simple: install a very powerful bar magnet inside a
|
||
|
|
grounded Faraday cage. Then install an open-ended coil longitudally above the
|
||
|
|
magnet so that a line through the longitudal axis of the magnet passes
|
||
|
|
through the longitudal axis of the coil above it. The open end of the coil
|
||
|
|
does not touch the magnet. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Connect the other end of the coil to a variable tuning capacitor, so
|
||
|
|
that the coil and the capacitor form a tunable, series-L-C-oscillatory
|
||
|
|
circuit. The output of the capacitor is connected to a transistorized
|
||
|
|
preamplifier inside the cage. A tuning shaft for the capacitor is very
|
||
|
|
carefully placed through a small hole in the shield to allow tuning from
|
||
|
|
outside. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> The output of the preamp passes through a small hole in the shield,
|
||
|
|
through a shielded cable, to an adjacent oscilloscope. The cable shield is
|
||
|
|
also grounded t a reference ground potential.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The theory is as follows: Suppose a normal EM wave appears inside
|
||
|
|
the cage, above the magnet or closely adjacent thereto. In that case a
|
||
|
|
coupled oscillation appears in the field of the magnet, and this oscillation
|
||
|
|
is coupled to the coil immediately above it. If the oscillation is within the
|
||
|
|
bandwidth of the tuned series LC circuit, detection occurs. This is amplified
|
||
|
|
by the preamp and passed to the oscilloscope, where it is displayed on the
|
||
|
|
scope. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Note that the detector detects normal EM wave. Now our problem is:
|
||
|
|
How do we get an EG wave to be detected? And how do we assure that we do not
|
||
|
|
detect ordinary EM waves from the outside? Actually this is simple. Ordinary
|
||
|
|
waves (except for quite low frequency) will be grounded out by the Faraday
|
||
|
|
shield, and will not penetrate the cage. Thus these normal EM waves cannot
|
||
|
|
enter the cage and appear above the magnet. They will not be detected. Scalar
|
||
|
|
EG waves, on the other hand, will enter the cage since they do not couple to
|
||
|
|
conduction electrons in the metal of the cage. Above the pole of the magnet,
|
||
|
|
spacetime is locally bent. After all, a pole is a magnetostatic scalar
|
||
|
|
potential, which is a part of the conglomerate called "G-potential." The pole
|
||
|
|
represents an increase (or decrease, depending on whether it is a north or a
|
||
|
|
south pole) in the magnetostatic component of the local G-potential. This is a
|
||
|
|
curvature of spacetime. An EG wave entering this region adds a varying
|
||
|
|
component component of magnetostatic G-potential, which bleeds off in the coil
|
||
|
|
as an ordinary EM wave.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Another way to view the detector is to model the EG wave as a
|
||
|
|
longitudal wave, and an ordinary EM wave as a transverse wave. When the EG
|
||
|
|
wave enters the curved spacetime region above the magnet, to the coil (the
|
||
|
|
"observer" in this case!) the longitudal aspect of the EG wave appears to be
|
||
|
|
rotating back and forth, so that an oscillating transverse component is
|
||
|
|
present. This transverse component appears to the coil as an ordinary EM
|
||
|
|
field, and so the LC circuit detects it if it is in the proper frequency
|
||
|
|
band. </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Yet another way to view the situation is to realize that an EG wave
|
||
|
|
entering the magnet results in an oscillating component added to the
|
||
|
|
magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength) of t8e magnet. Accordingly,
|
||
|
|
the magnet is a receiver for scalar waves, which are detected to "bleed-off"
|
||
|
|
as an oscillation of the magnetic field strength of the magnet. Coupling of
|
||
|
|
this oscillating magnetic field to the coil creates an oscillating current
|
||
|
|
flow into the capacitor. This oscillates the voltage input to the preamp,
|
||
|
|
which amplifies and feeds the signal to the oscilloscope for display.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is important to remember that a magnetostatic potential and an
|
||
|
|
electrostatic potential can be oscillated by a scalar EG wave. By placing a
|
||
|
|
magnetic material inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of the magnetostatic
|
||
|
|
scalar potential (pole strength of the magnet) can be used as the EG
|
||
|
|
detecting mechanism. By placing a chargeable material inside a Faraday cage,
|
||
|
|
the oscillation of the electrostatic scalar potential can be detected.
|
||
|
|
(Possible examples of the latter type detectors are given by Hodowanec,"Radio
|
||
|
|
Electronics," April 1986.) </p>
|
||
|
|
<p> Note also that one may detect waves at one reference level and not
|
||
|
|
at another. Changing the bias on the zero-reference ground of the Bendini
|
||
|
|
detector affects the detection. To look inside a normal EM carrier (such as
|
||
|
|
the Soviet Woodpecker carrier) and see what scalar signals are riding upon
|
||
|
|
it, the carrier may be used to bias the reference ground of the Bendini
|
||
|
|
detector. To produce a spectrum analyzer, simply use additional series
|
||
|
|
resonant LC tuning circuits in parallel (put multiple taps on the coil, and
|
||
|
|
wire each tap to a separate tuning capacitor of different capacitance).
|
||
|
|
Again, varying the zero reference level is important, as is varying the
|
||
|
|
strength of the magnet. Frank Golden has also invented an excellent series of
|
||
|
|
scalar wave detectors based on quite different proprietary principles.</p>
|
||
|
|
<p> The bottom line is: we can indeed rigorously detect and measure
|
||
|
|
scalar EG waves. When one considers the large sums of money presently being
|
||
|
|
spent to bury large aluminum cylinders etc. in an attempt to detect
|
||
|
|
gravitational waves, one wonders why some funds could not be released to a
|
||
|
|
few unorthodox researchers by the National Academy of Sciences to fund the
|
||
|
|
proven creation and detection of electrogravitational waves... </p>
|
||
|
|
<p>(Continued)
|
||
|
|
</p>
|
||
|
|
</body>
|
||
|
|
</html>
|