textfiles-politics/politicalTextFiles/origmas3.txt

THE ORIGIN OF MASONRY
III The Symbolism of the Father's House
by E. Cromwell Mensch 32 degree

THE NEW AGE - SEPTEMBER 1948

Speculative Masonry was instituted by Moses for the purpose of bringing
the true "word" of God to his followers. These were the people of the
Exodus, most of whom had been engaged in building the treasure cities,
Pithom and Raamses, in Egypt. They were not a literate people, for at
that time the art of writing was confined to the rulers of Egypt and
their official families. Although Moses himself was a loyal scribe, he
knew that the only way he could spread his doctrine among the people was
through the medi um of symbolism. The nucleus of that symbolism was the
Ark of the Covenant, in which was deposited the true word of God. The
setting for this sacred instrument was the Tabernacle, every part of
which symbolized some feature of the Father's house in the celestial.

This symbolism is concealed in the cabalism of the writings of Moses,
and the key to that cabmlism lies in the pattern of our planetary
system. For example, the superstructure of the" House was made up of 7
bents, or frames, for they were symbolic of the 7 days of the week. This
may be picked up from Exodus 36:27, wherein the e boards of the sides
westw@rd are specified. These 6 boards were strung out, end to end,
across the 5 vertical bars, also spe@ified for this west wall in Exodus
36 : 32. Obviously, th e terminal ends of boards No. 1 mnd No. 6 also
were attached to vertical bars, for they were the corner bars in the
north and south walls, rp,spectively. Added to the 5 sper,ified for the
sides westward, these two corner bars brought the number up to 7. Each
of these 7 bars was paired off with a corresponding bar in the east
wall, and, with the other members of the framing, formed the 7 bents.

The symbolism of these 7 bents is to be found in the Second Degree,
 wherein it is stated that in 6 days God created the heaven and the
 earth, and rested on the 7th day. The total number of structural
 numbers with which the Tabernacle was framed is also given in the
 Second Degree. However, this symbolism was lost in the Temple of
 Solomon, for the stone walls of that structure replaced the function of
 the 7 bents used in the Tabernacle. These bents were designed as
 trusses, the patern of which is indicated in the specifications for the
 north and south walls. Each of these walls contained 5 vertical bars.
 They were braced at the corners with the diagonals specified in Exodus
 36:28 as corner boards, and were tied together at the top with the
 horizontal cross bar specified in Exodus 36:33. An extra cross bar was
 used in these walls to form the eaves of the Tabernacle, and was
 supported on 5 struts. In all, there were 14 members in each of these
 end wall bents, and there were 12 members in each of the 5 intermediate
 bents. The bents themselves were held together at the top with a series
 of 60 rafters, and were also held together at the ceiling level with a
 series of 26 horizontal ties. In all there were 178 structural members
 in the Tabernacle proper.

There were also 67 structural members in the Court of the Congregation,
which surrounded the Tabernacle. In the specifications, 20 pillars each
were assigned to the north and south sides of the Court, and 10 to the
west side. The specifications for the east side are quite complicated,
and, when Properly analyzed, only yield 9 pillars for this side of the
Court. To these 59 pillars must be added the 8 corner boards used as
diagonal bracing at the corners of the Court, which makes the total 67.

The lower part of the Tabernacle was sheathed with boards, which were
120 in number. The 178 structural members of the Tabernacle, plus the 67
members of the Court and the 120 boards, bring the grand total up to
365. These 365 members were symbolic of the days of the year, and
correspond to the phenomenon arising from the annual revolution of the
earth around the sun, and its diurnal rotation on its own axis, as set
forth in the monitorial work of the Second Degree. There was no such
symbolism incorporated into the stone walls of the Temple, although the
1,453 columns and 2,906 pilasters used to enclose the court before the
Temple were evidently multiples of 365, less 7, and 14, respectively.

The specifications for the east wall of the Tabernacle are rather brief.
They simply call for a Door, and the 5 pillars of it (Exodus 36:38).
Between the 5 pillars were the 4 archways, which formed the Door. In
addition, there was a panel flanking the Door on either side, making a
total of 6 panels in all. These, of course, matched the panels formed by
the "six" boards in the west wall. These flanking panels in the east
wall contained the corner boards, which served as diagonal wind bracing
to impart stabil ity to the structure. They ran from the tops of the
corner posts down to the adjacent end pillars of the Door. Since these
diagonal braces blanked off the use of these two end panels in the east
wall, it is obvious they must have been sheathed with boards. This
brings the total number of panels up to 12, for there were 6 in the west
wall, 2 each in the north and south walls, and these 2 in the east wall.
This also accounts for the 120 boards, for each panel was 10 boards
high. These 12 pane ls represented th e 12 tribes of Israel.

This arrangement of the panels is confirmed in Genesis 48:13, wherein it
is stated that "Joseph took them both, Ephraim in his right hand, toward
Israel's left hand, and Manasseh in his left hand toward Israel's right
hand, and brought them near unto him." In other words, the two panels
flanking the Door were named Ephraim and Manasseh. The 5 pillars of the
Door are now represented by the 5 orders of architecture, although these
orders were actually formulated by Vignola, worthy successor to Michel
Angelo.

The parts so far enumermted are all authentic, for they have been worked
out according to the bill of materials Moses left to posterity. Among
other items, this bill lists the fastenings which held the Tabernacle
together. As it was a portable structure, these fastenings were so
designed that the House could be dismantled and reassembled at will. The
structural members were held together by means of rings, but the
specification covering them is very brief, and is only given in
connection with the corner boa rds (Exodus 36:29): "And they were
coupled beneath, and coupled together at the head thereof, to one ring."
The ring in this case was cast with two lugs, and the corner boards had
sockets in their ends, which fitted over the lugs of the ring. To make
the joint secure after assembling, pins were inserted through both lug
and corner boards. This same type of fastening was used wherever two or
more structural members intersected each other. Where more than two
structural members were brought to a common focal point, rings were
supplied with additional lugs. Rings with as high as 4 lugs were used in
some of the complicated portions of the bents.

The boards which formed the sheathing of the Tabernacle were also held
to the framing by means of rings. These rings encircled the vertical
bars and had lugs projecting outward from them in a horizontal plane.
The boards themselves were joined together by means of dowel pins, in
the same manner that extra leaves are joined together in a dining-room
table, except that they were in a vertical plane. The lugs of the rings
fitted in between the edges of two boards, and the dowel pins in the
boards also passed t hrough holes in the lugs. This type of joint is
covered by the specification for the sockets and tenons of the boards in
Exodus 36:24

From the use of these rings and pins it truly may be said of the
Tabernacle that there was neither hammer, nor axe, nor any tool of iron
heard in the House, while it was in building. These lines are to be
found in I Kings 6:7, and are applied to the stone work of Solomon's
Temple. It is hard to conceive of the fabrication of a stone building in
which no tools of iron are employed. The insertion of the word "axe,"
even though it was not used, raises the question as to whether this
passage was not also borrow ed from the Tabernacle along with the
attempt to copy its design. The axe was used to shape the boards and
bars of the Tabernacle during its initial fabrication, but, after that,
no tool of iron was ever required during its subsequent assemblies.