mirror of
https://github.com/nhammer514/textfiles-politics.git
synced 2024-12-27 00:09:39 -05:00
274 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
274 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
|
<conspiracyFile>--SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS--
|
||
|
This briefing presents the basic concepts of Soviet Scalar
|
||
|
electromagnetic weapons, some of the major types available, and evidence of
|
||
|
their widespread testing.
|
||
|
- Scalar Electromagnetics is Electrogravitation -
|
||
|
Scalar electromagnetics is an extension of present electromagnetics (EM)
|
||
|
to include gravitation. That is, a unified electrogravitation, and, what is
|
||
|
more important, it is a unified engineering theory. Its basis was discovered
|
||
|
by Nikola Tesla.
|
||
|
In the scalar EM extension, EM field energy can be turned into
|
||
|
gravitational field energy and vice versa. This exchange can be patterned and
|
||
|
localized, in specific areas and objects. Such a controlled change of
|
||
|
electromagnetics to gravitation is not possible in the normal EM or physics
|
||
|
presently taught in Western textbooks. However, the bits and pieces of the
|
||
|
theory have been scattered through the physics literature for some time, but
|
||
|
no orthodox western scientist seems to have realized that these anomalous
|
||
|
portions could be integrated into a startling new physics. Unorthodox
|
||
|
experimenters, inventors, and scientists have made discoveries in this arena
|
||
|
for several decades, but again have not realized the exact implications or
|
||
|
the precise manner in which their results could be combined with present
|
||
|
electrical physics.
|
||
|
- Fer-De-Lance -
|
||
|
Such sluggishness is certainly not present in the Soviet Union. For
|
||
|
over three decades, the Soviet Union has been developing electrogravitation
|
||
|
and app,ying it to develop strange new s%cret weapons of incredible power
|
||
|
and capability. They have sustained the largest weapons development program
|
||
|
ever launched by any nation, and they have kept it effectively hidden from
|
||
|
prying western eyes. I have called this program "Fer-De-Lance", after the
|
||
|
deadly South American pit viper of the same name.
|
||
|
The dreaded fer-de-lance is a snake of great agility and lethal effect.
|
||
|
It often ambushes its hapless prey, and strikes unexpectedly and without
|
||
|
warning. Its first sudden strike is usually lethal to its victim, which
|
||
|
promptly expires in writhing agony. Since the Soviet development of scalar EM
|
||
|
weapons has been designed for the same purpose, the name seems appropriate.
|
||
|
The equivalent effort of about seven Manhattan projects has been poured
|
||
|
into fer-de-lance by the Soviets, and the program has been successful almost
|
||
|
beyond imagination. The eerie weapons are now developed, deployed, and
|
||
|
tested. The ambush has been completed; Fer-de-Lance is coiled and ready to
|
||
|
strike.
|
||
|
--ENERGETICS AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (DEW'S)--
|
||
|
The ordinary Soviet name for this type of weapons science is
|
||
|
energetics. In the west that term is believed to be associated with
|
||
|
conventional directed energy weapons (DEWs) such as particle beam weapons,
|
||
|
lasers, radio-frequency (RF) directed energy devices, etc. The Soviets do not
|
||
|
limit the term in this way.
|
||
|
Western scientists are familiar only with directed energy weapons
|
||
|
where fragments, masses, photons, or particles travel through space and
|
||
|
contact the target to deliver their effects. Hence in their thinking they
|
||
|
limit the Soviet term "energetics" to the type of weapons they themselves
|
||
|
understand -- exotic but normal weapons using energy or mass traveling
|
||
|
through space to impact a target.
|
||
|
However, it is possible to focus the potential for the effects of a
|
||
|
weapon through spacetime itself, in a manner so that mass and energy do not
|
||
|
"travel through space" from the transmitter to the target at all. Instead,
|
||
|
ripples and patterns in the fabric of spacetime itself are manipulated to
|
||
|
meet and interfere in and at the local spacetime of some distant target.
|
||
|
There interference of these ripple patterns creates the desired energetic
|
||
|
effect (hence the term energetics) directly in and through the target itself,
|
||
|
emerging from the very spacetime (vacuum) in which the target is imbedded at
|
||
|
its distant location. As used by the Soviets, energetics refers to these
|
||
|
eerie new superweapons, as well as to the more mundane DEWs known to the
|
||
|
west.
|
||
|
As a consequence of the Soviet breakthrough and decades of feverish
|
||
|
development, monstrous strategic weapons undreamed of in the West are
|
||
|
already in Soviet hands. A noose is slowly and steadily being tightened about
|
||
|
our throats, and it is already the 11th hour.
|
||
|
--THE SOVIETS USE A DECEPTION PLAN--
|
||
|
Concomitant with this supersecret development program, the Soviets
|
||
|
developed and implemented an elaborate deception plan to conceal these
|
||
|
startling weapons and their nature from Western eyes until it is too late.
|
||
|
Soviet deception has been so successful that even when Western scientists are
|
||
|
confronted with the actual tests of these weapons directly over their heads,
|
||
|
they do not recognize the weaponry nor the nature of the effects produced.
|
||
|
As early as January 1960, Nikita Khrushchev announced the Soviet
|
||
|
development of a new, fantastic weapon.
|
||
|
On April 10 1963 one of the first new superweapons operationally
|
||
|
deployed was used to destroy the U.S.S. Thresher atomic submarine
|
||
|
underwater, off the east coast of the U.S. The next day, April 11, 1963 the
|
||
|
same deployed superweapon was utilized in a different mode to produce a giant
|
||
|
underwater explosion in the ocean over the Puerto Rican Trench, 100 miles
|
||
|
north of Puerto Rico.
|
||
|
Over the years, various aircraft were interfered with or downed as
|
||
|
tests of these Soviet weapons. A particular case involved the mysterious
|
||
|
loss of F-111s in the Vietnam conflict. At least one downed F-111 crew was
|
||
|
recovered in the subsequent prisoner of war exchange. On that aircraft all
|
||
|
electrical systems were in difficulty simultaneously. This was probably due
|
||
|
to special Soviet teams converting some North Vietnamese SA-2 missile system
|
||
|
radars to the scalar EM mode, and employing "scalar beam" interference to
|
||
|
produce spurious EM noise throughout the electrical and electronic systems of
|
||
|
the aircraft.
|
||
|
In late April/early May of 1985, the entire armada of Soviet strategic
|
||
|
scalar EM superweapons was activated as a special celebration of the 40th
|
||
|
anniversary of the end of W.W.II. Activation of this armada (which probably
|
||
|
contained over 100 giant weapons), together with 27 giant power systems and a
|
||
|
large number of command and control transmissions, was monitored on an
|
||
|
advanced, proprietary detection system by Frank Golden. After the gigantic
|
||
|
strategic exercise, which lasted several days, most of the weapons and power
|
||
|
sources were once again stood down to "standby."
|
||
|
The NASA shuttle launches provided an convenient opportunity for Soviet
|
||
|
testing of these superweapons in a launch phase ABM mode, where a launched
|
||
|
missile can be detected and destroyed shortly after liftoff. At first,
|
||
|
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) bursts on the early shuttle trajectory were
|
||
|
deliberately delayed in time, to prevent actual destruction of the target and
|
||
|
avoid alerting the U.S. that something unusual was happening.
|
||
|
The shuttle launch of November 26, 1985 saw a particularly significant
|
||
|
test of this kind. In this case, a very loud "sonic boom" or explosion
|
||
|
occurred over the launch site 12 minutes after shuttle liftoff, when the
|
||
|
shuttle was already away and downrange. At least two previous shuttle
|
||
|
launches had also been used as pseudotargets, with delayed booms occurring
|
||
|
over the launch site well behind the vehicles.
|
||
|
After lack of U.S. reaction to these tests showed that the U.S. still
|
||
|
had no knowledge of the new technology and did not even recognize its
|
||
|
employment, the Soviets apparently decided to proceed with tests where the
|
||
|
target would actually be destroyed.
|
||
|
On December 12, 1985 the same Soviet weapon tested against the NASA
|
||
|
shuttle launches deliberately interfered with the controls of an Arrow DC-8
|
||
|
taking off from Gander Air Force Base, Newfoundland. At an altitude of 100
|
||
|
feet, the aircraft--carrying over 250 U.S. soldiers and civilian crew
|
||
|
members lost power and sank into the ground tail-low, killing everyone on
|
||
|
board. Three Canadian witnesses to the crash were interviewed over the
|
||
|
Canadian Broadcast Corporation's television news on April 81986 at 10 p.m.
|
||
|
No flame or smoke issued from the plane before its descent and crash. However
|
||
|
the aircraft was seen to be mysteriously glowing with a yellow glow. That is
|
||
|
a signature of the use of a scalar howitzer in the "continuous EM emergence"
|
||
|
mode, similar to the manner in which the F-111s were downed in Vietnam. In
|
||
|
short, the DC-8s electrical systems were interfered with ny electromagnetic
|
||
|
noise created throughout the spacetime occupied by the aircraft. The powerful
|
||
|
charge created in and around the aircraft also apparently caused the loss of
|
||
|
two engines, one after the other. With its controls ineffective, and its
|
||
|
power drastically reduced, the aircraft sank to earth, still in its "tail
|
||
|
down" configuration from takeoff, and crashed and burned. The "yellow glow"
|
||
|
was a corona due to the acquisition of a high electrical charge by the skin
|
||
|
of the aircraft.
|
||
|
Other factors contributing to the crash may have been reduced lift due
|
||
|
to poor engine maintenance, increased weight of the aircraft due to icing,
|
||
|
and heavy loading. Still, no one has recognized the significance of the
|
||
|
"yellow glow" or what it implies, or the possible connection between the loss
|
||
|
of the aircraft and previous Soviet testing of a Launch Phase ABM system
|
||
|
against U.S. shuttle launches...
|
||
|
As of September 1987, the last two Air Force Titan 34-D missiles fired
|
||
|
from Vandenburg Air Force Base in California have blown up shortly after
|
||
|
launch. The first one blew up on Aug. 28, 1985 just after lift-off. That loss
|
||
|
had been attributed to failure of a high powered fuel pump, causing a massive
|
||
|
oxidizer leak and a smaller fuel leak. The second Titan loss occurred on
|
||
|
April 18, 1986 when the missile blew up 5 seconds after lift off. Its loss is
|
||
|
still under investigation and no determination of cause has been made.
|
||
|
Apparently the shuttle and the Titan presently provide the only viable launch
|
||
|
vehicles for launching U.S. "spy" satellites. The loss of these sensitive
|
||
|
satellites--if indeed they constituted the payloads--cannot help but be
|
||
|
damaging to our strategic capability. According to the Los Angeles Times
|
||
|
(in 1986) the single remaining KH-11 satellite was launched in December 1984
|
||
|
and, with an expected life of two to three years, could stop functioning
|
||
|
later this year.
|
||
|
Whether or not significant Woodpecker grid activity existed in the
|
||
|
vicinity of the Titan launch of August 1985 is unknown at this time. However,
|
||
|
significant activity in the grid definitely occurred before the April 18
|
||
|
Titan disaster and on the same day.
|
||
|
On Easter Sunday, Mar. 301986 engineer Ron Cole observed significant
|
||
|
correlated with Soviet Woodpecker measurements. On April 18, T.E Bearden,
|
||
|
perhaps the head of SEM research today, observed traces of a cloud radial
|
||
|
over Huntsville, Alabama and took photographs of it. Preliminary reports from
|
||
|
Thousand Oaks Ca. indicate extensive grid activity again on April 18, the day
|
||
|
the second Titan exploded.
|
||
|
At least the second of these two missile destructions shortly after
|
||
|
launch is suspicious, since the grid positively was active during that time.
|
||
|
Also, a clear trail of Launch Phase ABM system indicators exists back to the
|
||
|
massive scalar exercise of April/May 1985. The first Titan explosion in Aug.
|
||
|
1985 thus falls within the Soviets "now lets test them against the U.S.
|
||
|
launch vehicles" period. The second Titan loss follows highly suspicious
|
||
|
losses of the Arrow DC-8 on Dec. 12, 1985 and the Challenger on Jan. 28,
|
||
|
1986. The same Soviet weapon that destroyed those #gets may have also
|
||
|
destroyed one or both of the critical Titans.
|
||
|
The Soviets also have been able to significantly engineer the weather
|
||
|
over North America for more than a decade without being found out. They have
|
||
|
tested a fantastic range of anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defense weapons for
|
||
|
over two decades, and no one is the wiser in the West.
|
||
|
As previously stated, prior to the end of November, 1985, at least three
|
||
|
"wet-run" tests of a Soviet "launch phase ABM system" against actual U.S.
|
||
|
shuttle launches were made directly over Cape Canaveral itself, and still no
|
||
|
one recognized what was happening or what sort of weapon was being tested. On
|
||
|
December 12, destruction of the Arrow DC-8 in Newfoundland produce no
|
||
|
indications that the Americans and Canadians knew anything about the nature
|
||
|
of the weapon possibly used.
|
||
|
Accordingly, after a sufficient wait to test our reactions (if any), the
|
||
|
Soviets prepared to actually destroy a shuttle after its launch...
|
||
|
--DESTRUCTION OF THE CHALLENGER, JANUARY, 1986--
|
||
|
As the whole world knows, on January 28, 1986 the Challenger was
|
||
|
launched from Cape Canaveral Florida after exposure to undesirable weather
|
||
|
conditions, and disastrously exploded shortly after launch. The evidence
|
||
|
seems to indicate that , as the rising vehicle was stressed, one end of its
|
||
|
right booster broke loose, twisting away and into the main fuel tank, causing
|
||
|
rupture, spillage of the fuel, and catastrophic explosion. Several other
|
||
|
anomalies still exist however, and it is clear that a problem existed with at
|
||
|
least one of the booster seals. All seven astronauts aboard the flight were
|
||
|
killed in the fiery destruction of the vehicle.
|
||
|
Of course no one had recognized that the Soviets had already tested a
|
||
|
launch-phase anti-ballistic missile (LPABM) system against three of our
|
||
|
previous shuttle launches. These "wet-runs" used a deliberate "time-offset"
|
||
|
to delay the explosive emergence of electromagnetic energy in a launched
|
||
|
shuttle's location along its trajectory. The delayed test shots resulted in
|
||
|
very large "booms" above the launch site after the shuttle was safely out of
|
||
|
the area, but did not destroy the shuttles themselves. For example, the
|
||
|
delayed shot-boom occurred 12 minutes after the evening launch of Nov. 26,
|
||
|
1985. Even a marker beacon (large light in the sky) was utilized on that
|
||
|
launch shortly after lift-off. The marker beacon was photographed. In
|
||
|
addition another photograph taken in a time sequence shows another sudden
|
||
|
streak of light coming down and ending in a burst of light. This was probably
|
||
|
a spacially-offset test of the "pulse mode" for destroying the shuttle. The
|
||
|
"light burst" would have been detected in the Soviet Union and scored against
|
||
|
its intended offset position. However, another mechanism was used to cause
|
||
|
the destruction of the shuttle itself.
|
||
|
On Jan. 1, 1986 the presence of a metal softening signal added on to the
|
||
|
Soviet LPABM systems scalar EM transmissions was detected by a surprised
|
||
|
Frank Golden. The metal softening ability of the detected signal was
|
||
|
experimentally verified by him at that time. Golden also locally nullified
|
||
|
the action of the scalar EM signal in a test, rather conclusively
|
||
|
establishing (1) that it existed and (2) what it was. The signal was
|
||
|
apparently being prepared for use against an upcoming U.S. shuttle launch.
|
||
|
Just prior to the launch of the shuttle in late January, 1986, the
|
||
|
Soviets accomplished significant weather engineering over the U.S. The jet
|
||
|
stream was severely bent southward in the middle of the U.S., bending right-
|
||
|
ward again to move across the Florida panhandle. Icy cold air from Canada was
|
||
|
drawn far down, into Florida and onto the Challenger sitting on it launch
|
||
|
pad. This exposure to cold outside its tested range was probably an
|
||
|
additional factor contributing to the Challengers failure. Positive
|
||
|
signatures of the Soviet weather engineering and jet stream manipulation
|
||
|
were observed and photographed by several persons, particularly in Alabama
|
||
|
and California...
|
||
|
On January 28, 1986, the Soviet scalar EM weapon system effects were
|
||
|
sharply localized in the launch zone. Localization involved higher
|
||
|
frequencies being present; these are quite painful to small brains--whose
|
||
|
hemispheres act as a scalar interferometer and detector--such as in birds.
|
||
|
As commented upon by national news commentators, strangely the birds were not
|
||
|
flying that morning. Indeed, they were staying down on the ground or avoiding
|
||
|
the area, since the sky over the area was painful to them.
|
||
|
As Challenger rose, the metal softening signal would have been
|
||
|
experienced in and around the boosters shortly after ignition, since the
|
||
|
booster flame acts as a special "ion-plasma" tuner/detector for the scalar
|
||
|
signal. The effect of such a local signal is to "charge mass in the immediate
|
||
|
vicinity" with the particular scalar resonance signal.
|
||
|
The ill fated Challenger was doomed. After ignition, the booster flame
|
||
|
acted as as a ionic plasma detector/amplifier for the metal softening signal
|
||
|
on the Soviet Woodpecker grid. The metal in and around the booster flame was
|
||
|
slowly and steadily weakening due to a charge up with the metal softening
|
||
|
pattern. This contributed to booster leakage from the already cold damaged
|
||
|
seal. The leaking booster poured out smoke and later flame, contributing to
|
||
|
the impending disaster.
|
||
|
Substantial winds and air turbulence over the site increased the stress
|
||
|
on the Challenger as it rose through this region. This also contributed to
|
||
|
the disaster and may have been deliberately created there by Soviet Weather
|
||
|
engineering.
|
||
|
As the Challenger stressed, eventually one or more weakened mounts gave
|
||
|
way, partially freeing the end of the right booster. Another anomalous flame
|
||
|
or light was observed on the vehicle, and may have represented a very small
|
||
|
additional "pulse mode energy form" produced from the weapon that was already
|
||
|
attacking the Challenger. The booster oscillated, rotating into the tank and
|
||
|
rupturing it. Contact of the escaping liquid fuel and the flame resulted in a
|
||
|
fiery explosion, destroying the vehicle and killing those on board...
|
||
|
By creating excess cold exposure to the shuttle, inducing metal
|
||
|
softening in and around the ignited booster, and possibly adding a deliberate
|
||
|
"intensely hot spot", THE SOVIETS CAUSED THE CHALLENGER TO WEAKEN AND DESTROY
|
||
|
ITSELF SHORTLY AFTER LAUNCH, IN SO SUBTLE A FASHION THAT NASA SCIENTISTS
|
||
|
WOULD NOT SUSPECT WHAT HAD ACTUALLY CAUSED THE MISHAP. THE SOVIETS HAD ALSO
|
||
|
PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN ALL THEIR TRAWLERS AND SHIPS WHICH NORMALLY SHADOW A
|
||
|
SHUTTLE LAUNCH, TO PREVENT ANY SUGGESTION OF SOVIET PRESENCE NEAR OR
|
||
|
INVOLVEMENT IN THE CATASTROPHIC ACCIDENT.
|
||
|
A few days later, sporadically intense "high frequency localization
|
||
|
signals" were still present on the grid, at least one hinge-point at
|
||
|
Birmingham, Alabama confirmed this. From 1-4 February 1986, many birds
|
||
|
inadvertently flew into the zone when an intense breakout occurred, and birds
|
||
|
fell dead from the sky in substantial numbers....
|
||
|
Next:
|
||
|
-Technological Surprise and a New Hiroshima-
|
||
|
(Continued)</conspiracyFile>
|