<conspiracyFile>Here is explained a new kind of resonance: scalar EM resonance, or
electrogravitational resonance.
First, imagine we have a standard resonant cavity. In this cavity we
have a resonant EM wave moving back and forth. In accordance with convention,
the E-field vector and the B-field vector are at right angles in this moving
wave front. As the wave moves back and forth, the vectors vary back and
forth; however, at any one point between the walls, the two vectors always
have the same value. Thus our resonant EM wave forms a standing wave in the
cavity.
Now imagine that a second wave front, precisely like the first and of
the same frequency, is superposed over the first one and travels with it.
This second wave -- the "antiwave" -- has its force vectors 180 degrees out
of phase with the force vectors of the reference wave. Hence the E-fields
and B-fields of the two superposed waves always sum to vector zeros, anywhere
in the cavity. To an external observer, the cavity contains no ordinary
electromagnetic force fields, hence no ordinary EM energy.
However the energy density of a single EM sine wave in vacuum is given
by:
density 2
[ E + B ]/8pi
This energy density is always positive. Hence the energy density of the
two waves at any point X between the walls is equal to:
2 2
[ E + B ]/4pi
where
E=E(x) ; B=B(x)
Thus the energy density of vacuum varies with X. But, rigorously, since
the resultant E and B fields are zero, this describes a standing
gravitational wave. Hence we have a standing EG wave existing in the cavity.
This is an example of scalar resonance. Rigorously the cavity has mass and
inertia, to an outside observer, as a result of the two warps in spacetime it
contains.
Note that in one half cycle the energy density of vacuum is greater
than ambient, and in the other half cycle it is less. In the region of one
half cycle, time flows at a faster rate than to the ambient observer, and in
the other half cycle time flows at a slower rate than to the ambient
observer. One half cycle appears to contain negative electrical charge, and
the other appears to contain positive charge.
One half cycle appears to contain a north pole (positive magnetostatic
scalar potential), and the other half cycle appears to contain a south pole
(negative magnetostatic scalar potential).
Perhaps n/w one can begin to understand why a continuously accelerated
orbital electron in the atom does not radiate EM energy, completely in
violation of Maxwell's equations. The electron is naught but a complex aspect
Scalar resonance is not in the conventional textbook.
Scalar resonance is a particular zero summed multi-resonance,
electromagnetically, so that it does not act in an electromagnetic manner.
A scalar resonance is a standing electromagnetic wave. It can be made
electrically, but is not electrical in behavior.
In any scalar resonance, spacetime is curved, and it is the magnitude
(and direction) of this spacetime curvature that is oscillating in "standing
wave" fashion.
In respect to stress of the vacuum medium, one half of a standing sine
wave of scalar resonance is tensile; the other half is compressive. However,
this is with respect to the local ambient stress of the vacuum.
"Mass" of a particle is just a characteristic exhibited by a trapped
scalar resonance. Usually this trapping is done by the "spin" of the
individual particle.
The concept of "mass" may be compared with the concept of
"capacitance." That is, a mass is an accumulator for scalar waves; that is,
for scalar resonances. It is continually being "charged" and "discharged"
by absorption and emission of scalar waves from and to the ambient vacuum
scalar wave flux.
Indeed the magnitude of a mass may be defined in terms of the absolute
value of this "switching" (absorption = switch in; emission = switch out)
rate. For details on this see (Bearden, T.E. "Quinton/Perception Physics: A
Theory of Existence, Perception, and Physical Phenomena," March, 1973, AD
763210, available through NTIS.)
In the normal linear spacetime, the "charging" and "discharging" are
equal in all directions; so the mass exhibited in any direction is the same.
With respect to an "external observer's" equilibrium flux, a moving
object encounters an increased amount of flux rate along its line of motion,
just as a moving object in a rainstorm encounters more raindrops per second
in the direction of its path, than does a stationary object. Encountering
increased scalar wave flux (with respect to the external observer) forces the
moving object to absorb and emit scalar waves at a higher rate along its
direction of motion than when its not moving. Thus to the external observer,
the mass of the object has increased, insofar as any disturbing force along
its line of motion is concerned.
At right angles to its line of motion however, the flux rate is
precisely the same as when the object is at rest. Therefore the "mass" of the
moving object with respect to any disturbing force at right angles to its
line of motion has not changed, as seen by the external observer.
Thus is explained both parts of one of the all time great mysteries of
special relativity: (1) how the mass of an object increases with respect to
its motion, and (2) why the mass only increases with respect to its line of
motion, and not at any right angles to it.
The inertia of a particle is due to its mass, i.e., to the total
magnitude of its trapped scalar resonance.
The gravitational attraction between two masses is due to their
spacetime curvature. Further, mass is like a capacitance. It can trap
additional scalar waves as trapped resonance; hence increase its magnitude or
"inertial charge". Or, it can discharge more scalar waves than it absorbs;
hence decrease its magnitude or "internal charge"...
Those scalar waves emitted from resonance are emitted as a pattern
ensemble of the resonance. Hence they may be regarded as constituting a
current of scalar resonance leaving the mass accumulator object. Scalar waves
absorbed into trapped resonance may be regarded as constituting a current of
scalar resonance into the mass accumulator object. Thus it is proper to speak
of scalar resonance as being able to "flow".
Further, it is possible to increase the mass of an object directly, by
transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it absorbs them. (By absorbing
scalar waves one means that more enter the object than leave it, so that the
object acts as an internal accumulator charging up with internal charge. This
is done by insuring the reference potential of the scalar wave transmitter is
higher than the reference potential of the irradiated object.)
It is also possible to decrease the mass of an object directly, by
transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it emits more than it absorbs. (By
emitting scalar waves one means that more leave the object than enter it, so
the object acts as if it were an internal accumulator that is discharging its
internal charge. this is done by insuring that the reference potential of the
scalar transmitter is lower than the reference potential of the irradiated
object.)
As can be seen, the scalar wave "transmitter" is actually somewhat
comparable to a heat pump; it can either act as an "energy transmitter" or as
an "energy extractor", depending on the difference in potential between
"transmitter" and "receiver."
Scalar resonance can have a specific pattern: both in frequency and in
spatial curvature aspects, as well as "rate of flow of time" aspects. Indeed,
scalar-wise every object has its individual "scalar pattern" which is a
unique fingerprint. Since that print is spatiotemporal, it is a product of
that objects entire past history. Thus --scalar wise-- no two objects are
identical.
This brings up another rather amazing potential: If a reasonably
precise scalar pattern of an object can be "irradiated" and resonated with
scalar waves, energy may be created in or extracted from the distant object,
just as stimulating one tuning fork can excite another at a distance by
sympathetic resonance. I leave it to you to ascertain the relavence of this
statement to clairvoyance, radionics, remote viewing, etc.
For the skeptic, however, we must point out that --rigorously--quantum
mechanics requires that, continually, in any localized region of spacetime,
the "pattern" of any object in the universe appears momentarily in the
virtual state, purely from statistical considerations alone. So long as the
situation remains statistical, any place in the universe can continue to have
the "ghosts" of everything present there, in an ethereally thin pattern, and
the observable world will not be affected by it. However if one can
discriminate and scalarly "charge" or "discharge" individual patterns in this
"ghost-realm", action at a distance is directly possible, as is
materialization and dematerialization. If one accepts that even thought
itself produces such virtual "ghost-patterns" in the virtual particle flux of
vacuum, then it is at least theoretically possible to materialize thoughts
and thought images.
We have entered a new kind of reality where the old rules and the old
limitations do not necessarily apply.
As pointed out, we can greatly simplify matters by considering
'currents of scalar resonance'. These currents flow from higher potential to
lower potential, regardless of whether we are considering "transmission" or
"reception".
Indeed, to transmit at lower potential is to receive, and to receive
at higher potential is to transmit. Thus the "transmitter-receiver" is a
special system where simply biasing two nodes differently determines which
way the scalar resonance will flow. We may increase or decrease an object's
inertia and mass, simply by properly biasing the transmitter-receiver's two
nodes.
In one accidental experiment of some hours duration, Golden charged
up an area so that, locally, all clocks became erratic. This included
electrical clocks, battery driven watches, wind up kitchen clocks, and a
pendulum operated grandfather clock. The rate of flow of time itself was
apparently altered in the local area by the accumulated charge, which took
four days to drain off and discharge. At the end of four days of discharge,
all clocks and watches returned to normal.
(Continued)</conspiracyFile>