mirror of
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-doc.git
synced 2025-01-11 15:29:41 -05:00
Fix links and references
This commit is contained in:
parent
7857970f00
commit
c48b13c981
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ As always, exercise caution and use your good judgment.)
|
||||
|
||||
- Current implementation requires importing of public keys to the vault domain.
|
||||
This opens up an avenue to attack the gpg running in the backend domain via a hypothetical bug in public key importing code.
|
||||
See ticket [#474] for more details and plans how to get around this problem, as well as the section on [using Split GPG with subkeys] below.
|
||||
See ticket [#474] for more details and plans how to get around this problem, as well as the section on [using Split GPG with subkeys].
|
||||
|
||||
- It doesn't solve the problem of allowing the user to know what is to be signed before the operation gets approved.
|
||||
Perhaps the GPG backend domain could start a DisposableVM and have the to-be-signed document displayed there? To Be Determined.
|
||||
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ As always, exercise caution and use your good judgment.)
|
||||
- The Split GPG client will fail to sign or encrypt if the private key in the GnuPG backend is protected by a passphrase.
|
||||
It will give an `Inappropriate ioctl for device` error.
|
||||
Do not set passphrases for the private keys in the GPG backend domain.
|
||||
Doing so won't provide any extra security anyway, as explained [above][intro] and [below][using Split GPG with subkeys].
|
||||
Doing so won't provide any extra security anyway, as explained in the introduction and in [using Split GPG with subkeys].
|
||||
If you are generating a new key pair, or if you have a private key that already has a passphrase, you can use `gpg2 --edit-key <key_id>` then `passwd` to set an empty passphrase.
|
||||
Note that `pinentry` might show an error when you try to set an empty passphrase, but it will still make the change.
|
||||
(See [this StackExchange answer][se-pinentry] for more information.)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user