qubes-doc/developer/services/qrexec.md

---
layout: doc
title: "Qrexec: secure communication across domains"
permalink: /doc/qrexec/
redirect_from:
- /en/doc/qrexec3/
- /doc/Qrexec3/
- /doc/qrexec3/
- /wiki/Qrexec3/
- /doc/qrexec/
- /en/doc/qrexec/
- /doc/Qrexec/
- /wiki/Qrexec/
---

# Qrexec: secure communication across domains

(*This page is about qrexec v3. For qrexec v2, see [here](/doc/qrexec2/).*)

The **qrexec framework** is used by core Qubes components to implement communication between domains.
Qubes domains are strictly isolated by design.
However, the OS needs a mechanism to allow the administrative domain (dom0) to force command execution in another domain (VM).
For instance, when a user selects an application from the KDE menu, it should start in the selected VM.
Also, it is often useful to be able to pass stdin/stdout/stderr from an application running in a VM to dom0 (and the other way around).
(For example, so that a VM can notify dom0 that there are updates available for it).
By default, Qubes allows VMs initiate such communications in specific circumstances.
The qrexec framework generalizes this process by providing a remote procedure call (RPC) protocol for the Qubes architecture.
It allows users and developers to use and design secure inter-VM tools.

## Qrexec basics: architecture and examples

Qrexec is built on top of *vchan*, a Xen library providing data links between VMs.
During domain startup , a process named `qrexec-daemon` is started in dom0, and a process named `qrexec-agent` is started in the VM.
They are connected over a **vchan** channel.
`qrexec-daemon` listens for connections from a dom0 utility named `qrexec-client`.
Let's say we want to start a process (call it `VMprocess`) in a VM (`someVM`).
Typically, the first thing that a `qrexec-client` instance does is to send a request to the `qrexec-daemon`, which in turn relays it to `qrexec-agent` running in `someVM`.
`qrexec-daemon` assigns unique vchan connection details and sends them to both `qrexec-client` (in dom0) and `qrexec-agent` (in `someVM`).
`qrexec-client` starts a vchan server, which `qrexec-agent` then connects to.
Once this channel is established, stdin/stdout/stderr from the VMprocess is passed between `qrexec-agent` and the `qrexec-client` process.

![qrexec basics diagram](/attachment/wiki/qrexec3/qrexec3-basics.png)

The `qrexec-client` command is used to make connections to VMs from dom0.
For example, the following command creates an empty file called `hello-world.txt` in the home folder of `someVM`:

```
$ qrexec-client -e -d someVM user:'touch hello-world.txt'
```

The string before the colon specifies what user to run the command as.
The `-e` flag tells `qrexec-client` to exit immediately after sending the execution request and receiving a status code from `qrexec-agent` (whether the process creation succeeded).
With this option, no further data is passed between the domains.
By contrast, the following command demonstrates an open channel between dom0 and someVM (in this case, a remote shell):

```
$ qrexec-client -d someVM user:bash
```

The `qvm-run` command is heavily based on `qrexec-client`.
It also takes care of additional activities, e.g. starting the domain if it is not up yet and starting the GUI daemon.
Thus, it is usually more convenient to use `qvm-run`.

There can be an almost arbitrary number of `qrexec-client` processes for a given domain.
The limiting factor is the number of available vchan channels, which depends on the underlying hypervisor, as well the domain's OS.

For more details on the qrexec framework and protocol, see "[Qubes RPC internals](/doc/qrexec-internals)."

## Qubes RPC services

Some common tasks (like copying files between VMs) have an RPC-like structure: a process in one VM (say, the file sender) needs to invoke and send/receive data to some process in other VM (say, the file receiver).
The Qubes RPC framework was created to securely facilitate a range of such actions.

Obviously, inter-VM communication must be tightly controlled to prevent one VM from taking control of another, possibly more privileged, VM.
Therefore the design decision was made to pass all control communication via dom0, that can enforce proper authorization.
Then, it is natural to reuse the already-existing qrexec framework.

Also, note that bare qrexec provides `VM <-> dom0` connectivity, but the command execution is always initiated by dom0.
There are cases when VM needs to invoke and send data to a command in dom0 (e.g. to pass information on newly installed `.desktop` files).
Thus, the framework allows dom0 to be the RPC target as well.

Thanks to the framework, RPC programs are very simple -- both RPC client and server just use their stdin/stdout to pass data.
The framework does all the inner work to connect these processes to each other via `qrexec-daemon` and `qrexec-agent`.
Additionally, disposable VMs are tightly integrated -- RPC to a DisposableVM is identical to RPC to a normal domain, all one needs is to pass `@dispvm` as the remote domain name.

## Qubes RPC administration

### Policy files

The dom0 directory `/etc/qubes-rpc/policy/` contains a file for each available RPC action that a VM might call.
Together the contents of these files make up the RPC access policy database.
Policies are defined in lines with the following format:

```
srcvm destvm (allow|deny|ask[,default_target=default_target_VM])[,user=user_to_run_as][,target=VM_to_redirect_to]
```

You can specify srcvm and destvm by name or by one of the reserved keywords such as `@anyvm`, `@dispvm`, or `dom0`.
(Of these three, only `@anyvm` keyword makes sense in the srcvm field.
Service calls from dom0 are currently always allowed, and `@dispvm` means "new VM created for this particular request," so it is never a source of request.)
Other methods using *tags* and *types* are also available (and discussed below).

Whenever a RPC request for an action is received, the domain checks the first matching line of the relevant file in `/etc/qubes-rpc/policy/` to determine access:
whether to allow the request, what VM to redirect the execution to, and what user account the program should run under.
Note that if the request is redirected (`target=` parameter), policy action remains the same -- even if there is another rule which would otherwise deny such request.
If no policy rule is matched, the action is denied.
If the policy file does not exist, the user is prompted to create one.
If there is still no policy file after prompting, the action is denied.

In the target VM, the file `/etc/qubes-rpc/RPC_ACTION_NAME` must exist, containing the file name of the program that will be invoked, or being that program itself -- in which case it must have executable permission set (`chmod +x`).

### Making an RPC call

From outside of dom0, RPC calls take the following form:

```
$ qrexec-client-vm target_vm_name RPC_ACTION_NAME rpc_client_path client arguments
```

For example:

```
$ qrexec-client-vm work qubes.StartApp+firefox
```

Note that only stdin/stdout is passed between RPC server and client -- notably, no command line arguments are passed.
By default, stderr of client and server is logged in the syslog/journald of the VM where the process is running.

It is also possible to call service without specific client program -- in which case server stdin/out will be connected with the terminal:

```
$ qrexec-client-vm target_vm_name RPC_ACTION_NAME
```

### Specifying VMs: tags, types, targets, etc.

There are severals methods for specifying source/target VMs in RPC policies.

- `@tag:some-tag` - meaning a VM with tag `some-tag`
- `@type:type` - meaning a VM of `type` (like `AppVM`, `TemplateVM` etc)

Target VM can be also specified as `@default`, which matches the case when calling VM didn't specified any particular target (either by using `@default` target, or empty target).
For DisposableVMs, `@dispvm:DISP_VM` is very similar to `@dispvm` but forces using a particular VM (`DISP_VM`) as a base VM to be started as DisposableVM.
For example:

```
anon-whonix @dispvm:anon-whonix-dvm allow
```

Adding such policy itself will not force usage of this particular `DISP_VM` - it will only allow it when specified by the caller.
But `@dispvm:DISP_VM` can also be used as target in request redirection, so _it is possible_ to force particular `DISP_VM` usage, when caller didn't specify it:

```
anon-whonix @dispvm allow,target=@dispvm:anon-whonix-dvm
```

Note that without redirection, this rule would allow using default Disposable VM (`default_dispvm` VM property, which itself defaults to global `default_dispvm` property).
Also note that the request will be allowed (`allow` action) even if there is no second rule allowing calls to `@dispvm:anon-whonix-dvm`, or even if there is a rule explicitly denying it.
This is because the redirection happens _after_ considering the action.

The policy confirmation dialog (`ask` action) allows the user to specify target VM.
User can choose from VMs that, according to policy, would lead to `ask` or `allow` actions.
It is not possible to select VM that policy would deny.
By default no VM is selected, even if the caller provided some, but policy can specify default value using `default_target=` parameter.
For example:

```
work-mail work-archive allow
work-mail @tag:work ask,default_target=work-files
work-mail @default  ask,default_target=work-files
```

The first rule allow call from `work-mail` to `work-archive`, without any confirmation.
The second rule will ask the user about calls from `work-mail` VM to any VM with tag `work`.
And the confirmation dialog will have `work-files` VM chosen by default, regardless of the VM specified by the caller (`work-mail` VM).
The third rule allow the caller to not specify target VM at all and let the user choose, still - from VMs with tag `work` (and `work-archive`, regardless of tag), and with `work-files` as default.

### RPC services and security

Be very careful when coding and adding a new RPC service.
Unless the offered functionality equals full control over the target (it is the case with e.g. `qubes.VMShell` action), any vulnerability in an RPC server can be fatal to Qubes security.
On the other hand, this mechanism allows to delegate processing of untrusted input to less privileged (or disposable) AppVMs, thus wise usage of it increases security.

For example, this command will run the `firefox` command in a DisposableVM based on `work`:

```
$ qvm-run --dispvm=work firefox
```

By contrast, consider this command:

```
$ qvm-run --dispvm=work --service qubes.StartApp+firefox
```

This will look for a `firefox.desktop` file in a standard location in a DisposableVM based on `work`, then launch the application described by that file.
The practical difference is that the bare `qvm-run` command uses the `qubes.VMShell` service, which allows you to run an arbitrary command with arbitrary arguments, essentially providing full control over the target VM.
By contrast, the `qubes.StartApp` service allows you to run only applications that are advertised in `/usr/share/applications` (or other standard locations) *without* control over the arguments, so giving a VM access to `qubes.StartApp` is much safer.
While there isn't much practical difference between the two commands above when starting an application from dom0 in Qubes 4.0, there is a significant security risk when launching applications from a domU (e.g., from a separate GUI domain).
This is why `qubes.StartApp` uses our standard `qrexec` argument grammar to strictly filter the permissible grammar of the `Exec=` lines in `.desktop` files that are passed from untrusted domUs to dom0, thereby protecting dom0 from command injection by maliciously-crafted `.desktop` files.

### Service policies with arguments

Sometimes a service name alone isn't enough to make reasonable qrexec policy.
One example of such a situation is [qrexec-based USB passthrough](https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/usb-devices/).
Using just a service name would make it difficult to express the policy "allow access to devices X and Y, but deny to all others."
It isn't feasible to create a separate service for every device: we would need to change the code in multiple files any time we wanted to update the service.

For this reason it is possible to specify a service argument, which will be subject to a policy.
A service argument can make service policies more fine-grained.
With arguments, it is easier to write more precise policies using the "allow" and "deny" actions, instead of relying on the "ask" method.
(Writing too many "ask" policies offloads additional decisions to the user.
Generally, the fewer choices the user must make, the lower the chance to make a mistake.)

Each specific argument that we want to use needs its own policy in dom0 at a path like `/etc/qubes-rpc/policy/RPC_ACTION_NAME+ARGUMENT`.
So for instance, we might have policies called `test.Device`, `test.Device+device1` and `test.Device+device2`.
If the policy for the specific argument is not set (that is, if no file exists for `RPC_ACTION_NAME+ARGUMENT`), then dom0 uses the default policy with no argument for this service.

When calling a service that takes an argument, just add the argument to the service name separated with `+`.

```
$ qrexec-client-vm target_vm_name RPC_ACTION_NAME+ARGUMENT
```

The script will receive `ARGUMENT` as its argument.
The argument will also become available as the `QREXEC_SERVICE_ARGUMENT` environment variable.
This means it is possible to install a different script for a particular service argument.

See [below](#rpc-service-with-argument-file-reader) for an example of an RPC service using an argument.

<!-- TODO document "Yes to All" authorization if it is reintroduced -->

## Qubes RPC examples

To demonstrate some of the possibilities afforded by the qrexec framework, here are two examples of custom RPC services.

### Simple RPC service (addition)

We can create an RPC service that adds two integers in a target domain (the server, call it "anotherVM") and returns back the result to the invoker (the client, "someVM").
In someVM, create a file with the following contents and save it with the path `/usr/bin/our_test_add_client`:

```
#!/bin/sh
echo $1 $2             # pass data to RPC server
exec cat >&$SAVED_FD_1 # print result to the original stdout, not to the other RPC endpoint
```

Our server will be anotherVM at `/usr/bin/our_test_add_server`.
The code for this file is:

```
#!/bin/sh
read arg1 arg2        # read from stdin, which is received from the RPC client
echo $(($arg1+$arg2)) # print to stdout, which is passed to the RPC client
```

We'll need to create a service called `test.Add` with its own definition and policy file in dom0.
Now we need to define what the service does.
In this case, it should call our addition script.
We define the service with a symlink at `/etc/qubes-rpc/test.Add` pointing to our server script (the script can be also placed directly in `/etc/qubes-rpc/test.Add` - make sure the file has executable bit set!):

```
ln -s /usr/bin/our_test_add_server /etc/qubes-rpc/test.Add
```

The administrative domain will direct traffic based on the current RPC policies.
In dom0, create a file at `/etc/qubes-rpc/policy/test.Add` containing the following:

```
@anyvm @anyvm ask
```

This will allow our client and server to communicate.

Before we make the call, ensure that the client and server scripts have executable permissions.
Finally, invoke the RPC service.

```
$ qrexec-client-vm anotherVM test.Add /usr/bin/our_test_add_client 1 2
```

We should get "3" as answer.
(dom0 will ask for confirmation first.)

**Note:** For a real world example of writing a qrexec service, see this [blog post](https://blog.invisiblethings.org/2013/02/21/converting-untrusted-pdfs-into-trusted.html).

### RPC service with argument (file reader)

Here we create an RPC call that reads a specific file from a predefined directory on the target.
This example uses an [argument](#service-policies-with-arguments) to the policy.
In this example a simplified workflow will be used. The service code placed is placed directly in the service definition file on the target VM.
No separate client script will be needed.

First, on your target VM, create two files in the home directory: `testfile1` and `testfile2`.
Have them contain two different "Hello world!" lines.

Next, we define the RPC service.
On the target VM, place the code below at `/etc/qubes-rpc/test.File`:

```
#!/bin/sh
argument="$1" # service argument, also available as $QREXEC_SERVICE_ARGUMENT
if [ -z "$argument" ]; then
    echo "ERROR: No argument given!"
    exit 1
fi
cat "/home/user/$argument"
```

Make sure the file is executable!
(The service argument is already sanitized by qrexec framework.
It is guaranteed to not contain any spaces or slashes, so there should be no need for additional path sanitization.)

Now we create three policy files in dom0.
See the table below for details.
Replace "source_vm1" and others with the names of your own chosen domains.

|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Path to file in dom0                      | Policy contents            |
|-------------------------------------------+----------------------------|
| /etc/qubes-rpc/policy/test.File           | @anyvm @anyvm deny         |
| /etc/qubes-rpc/policy/test.File+testfile1 | source_vm1 target_vm allow |
| /etc/qubes-rpc/policy/test.File+testfile2 | source_vm2 target_vm allow |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

With this done, we can run some tests.
Invoke RPC from `source_vm1` via

```
[user@source_vm1] $ qrexec-client-vm target_vm test.File+testfile1
```

We should get the contents of `/home/user/testfile1` printed to the terminal.
Invoking the service from `source_vm2` should work the same, and `testfile2` should also work.

```
[user@source_vm2] $ qrexec-client-vm target_vm test.File+testfile1
[user@source_vm2] $ qrexec-client-vm target_vm test.File+testfile2
```

But when invoked with other arguments or from a different VM, it should be denied.