From bb812871730f43206fb3700e1bffd0b83777290e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: cYDN48 Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 21:00:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix nested list in VPN criteria (#1388) --- docs/vpn.en.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/vpn.en.md b/docs/vpn.en.md index ce9d08ab..e56373d4 100644 --- a/docs/vpn.en.md +++ b/docs/vpn.en.md @@ -284,8 +284,8 @@ With the VPN providers we recommend we like to see responsible marketing. Must not have any marketing which is irresponsible: - Making guarantees of protecting anonymity 100%. When someone makes a claim that something is 100% it means there is no certainty for failure. We know people can quite easily deanonymize themselves in a number of ways, eg: - - Reusing personal information eg. (email accounts, unique pseudonyms etc) that they accessed without anonymity software (Tor, VPN etc) - - [Browser fingerprinting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint#Browser_fingerprint) + - Reusing personal information eg. (email accounts, unique pseudonyms etc) that they accessed without anonymity software (Tor, VPN etc) + - [Browser fingerprinting](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint#Browser_fingerprint) - Claim that a single circuit VPN is "more anonymous" than Tor, which is a circuit of 3 or more hops that regularly changes. - Use responsible language, eg it is okay to say that a VPN is "disconnected" or "not connected", however claiming that someone is "exposed", "vulnerable" or "compromised" is needless use of alarming language that may be incorrect. For example, that person might simply be on another VPN provider's service or using Tor.