From 9e8f56e33ca7e27ed5acc6583c3aa4f35f311b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: xe3 <137224605+xe-3@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:10:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update out of date statement about Arkenfox fingerprinting protection Arkenfox now uses FPP by default, not RFP which is used by Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser. RFP is the stronger feature. This commit updates our language to reflect that Mullvad (and Tor Browser) have stronger anti-fingerprinting protection than Arkenfox out of the box. Signed-off-by: xe3 <137224605+xe-3@users.noreply.github.com> --- docs/desktop-browsers.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/desktop-browsers.md b/docs/desktop-browsers.md index 69cd14942..4bef394a9 100644 --- a/docs/desktop-browsers.md +++ b/docs/desktop-browsers.md @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ Max Protection enforces the use of DNS over HTTPS, and a security warning will s

Use Mullvad Browser for advanced anti-fingerprinting

-[Mullvad Browser](#mullvad-browser) provides the same anti-fingerprinting protections as Arkenfox out of the box, and does not require the use of Mullvad's VPN to benefit from these protections. Coupled with a VPN, Mullvad Browser can thwart more advanced tracking scripts which Arkenfox cannot. Arkenfox still has the advantage of being much more flexible, and allowing per-site exceptions for websites which you need to stay logged in to. +[Mullvad Browser](#mullvad-browser) provides stronger anti-fingerprinting protections than Arkenfox out of the box, and does not require the use of Mullvad's VPN to benefit from these protections. Coupled with a VPN, Mullvad Browser can thwart more advanced tracking scripts which Arkenfox cannot. Arkenfox still has the advantage of being much more flexible, and allowing per-site exceptions for websites which you need to stay logged in to.