From 77e30648edeb10638ed14107e604c65153c2378f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: fria <138676274+friadev@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 07:40:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fix typo

---
 blog/posts/differential-privacy.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/blog/posts/differential-privacy.md b/blog/posts/differential-privacy.md
index 6b312a90..40ab29e2 100644
--- a/blog/posts/differential-privacy.md
+++ b/blog/posts/differential-privacy.md
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Being able to collect aggregate data is essential for research. It's what the U.
 
 Usually we're more interested in the data as a whole and not data of individual people as it can show trends and overall patterns in groups of people. However, in order to get that data we must collect it from individuals.
 
-It was thought at first that simply r[emoving names and other obviously identifying details](https://simons.berkeley.edu/news/differential-privacy-issues-policymakers#:~:text=Prior%20to%20the%20line%20of%20research%20that%20led%20to%20differential%20privacy%2C%20it%20was%20widely%20believed%20that%20anonymizing%20data%20was%20a%20relatively%20straightforward%20and%20sufficient%20solution%20to%20the%20privacy%20challenge.%20Statistical%20aggregates%20could%20be%20released%2C%20many%20people%20thought%2C%20without%20revealing%20underlying%20personally%20identifiable%20data.%20Data%20sets%20could%20be%20released%20to%20researchers%20scrubbed%20of%20names%2C%20but%20otherwise%20with%20rich%20individual%20information%2C%20and%20were%20thought%20to%20have%20been%20anonymized.) from the data was enough to prevent re-identification, but [Latanya Sweeney](https://latanyasweeney.org/JLME.pdf) (a name that will pop up a few more times) proved in 1997 that even without names, a significant portion of individuals can be re-identified from a dataset by cross-referencing external data.
+It was thought at first that simply [removing names and other obviously identifying details](https://simons.berkeley.edu/news/differential-privacy-issues-policymakers#:~:text=Prior%20to%20the%20line%20of%20research%20that%20led%20to%20differential%20privacy%2C%20it%20was%20widely%20believed%20that%20anonymizing%20data%20was%20a%20relatively%20straightforward%20and%20sufficient%20solution%20to%20the%20privacy%20challenge.%20Statistical%20aggregates%20could%20be%20released%2C%20many%20people%20thought%2C%20without%20revealing%20underlying%20personally%20identifiable%20data.%20Data%20sets%20could%20be%20released%20to%20researchers%20scrubbed%20of%20names%2C%20but%20otherwise%20with%20rich%20individual%20information%2C%20and%20were%20thought%20to%20have%20been%20anonymized.) from the data was enough to prevent re-identification, but [Latanya Sweeney](https://latanyasweeney.org/JLME.pdf) (a name that will pop up a few more times) proved in 1997 that even without names, a significant portion of individuals can be re-identified from a dataset by cross-referencing external data.
 
 Previous attempts at anonymizing data have relied on been highly vulnerable to reidentification attacks.