From 3fdf19398054b3c5c5e80cba0dcd4def19aa9ce0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Devices <devices@autistici.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:24:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Some criticism of warrant cannaries

I thought it would be fair to shine some light on the concept from the other side.
---
 index.html | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index d0d3b7bb..93c76ba0 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@
 		<ul>
 			<li><a href="https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq">Warrant Canary Frequently Asked Questions</a></li>
 			<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary#Companies_and_organizations_with_warrant_canaries">Companies and organizations with warrant canaries</a></li>
+			<li><a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/03/australia_outla.html">Warrant canary criticism by Bruce Sneier and an example of a law against warrant canaries.</a></li>
 		</ul>
 
 		<!-- browsers -->