This commit is contained in:
HTotoo 2023-12-08 22:12:29 +01:00
parent c558ad3683
commit 049acdea9b
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ void WeatherProcessor::execute(const buffer_c8_t& buffer) {
tm += mag;
if (meashl == currentHiLow && currentDuration < 10'000'000) // allow pass 'end' signal
{
if (currentDuration < UINT32_MAX) currentDuration += usperTick;
if (currentDuration < UINT32_MAX) currentDuration += nsPerDecSamp;
} else { // called on change, so send the last duration and dir.
if (protoList) protoList->feed(currentHiLow, currentDuration / 1000);
currentDuration = usperTick;
currentDuration = nsPerDecSamp;
currentHiLow = meashl;
}
}

View File

@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ class WeatherProcessor : public BasebandProcessor {
void on_message(const Message* const message) override;
private:
static constexpr size_t baseband_fs = 4'000'000; // it works, I think we need to write that master clock in the baseband_threat , even later we decimate it.
static constexpr uint32_t usperTick = 500 * 8; // In current sw , we do not scale it due to clock. We scaled it due to less array buffer sampes due to /8 decimation.
// TODO , Pending to investigate , why ticks are not proportional to the SR clock, 500 nseg (2Mhz) , 250 nseg (4Mhz) ??? ;previous comment : "we nees ms to has to divide by 1000"
static constexpr size_t baseband_fs = 4'000'000; // it works, I think we need to write that master clock in the baseband_threat , even later we decimate it.
static constexpr uint32_t nsPerDecSamp = 500 * 8; // In current sw , we do not scale it due to clock. We scaled it due to less array buffer sampes due to /8 decimation.
// TODO , Pending to investigate , why ticks are not proportional to the SR clock, 500 nseg (2Mhz) , 250 nseg (4Mhz) ??? ;previous comment : "we nees ms to has to divide by 1000"
/* Array Buffer aux. used in decim0 and decim1 IQ c16 signed data ; (decim0 defines the max length of the array) */
std::array<complex16_t, 512> dst{}; // decim0 /4 , 2048/4 = 512 complex I,Q