Blockchain hashes and key images are flushed, and blocks are
pulled anew from the daemon.
The console command is shortened to match bc_height.
This should make it a lot easier on users who are currently
told to remove this particular cache file but keep the keys
one, etc, etc.
32a2633 no longer need to pass the size to rapidjson (Riccardo Spagni)
bd8e0fd add missing miniupnpc files, modify cmake to not build miniupnpc tests and to fix an issue with finding miniupnpcstrings (Riccardo Spagni)
7da9905 updated miniupnpc (Riccardo Spagni)
61ce8d6 wallet_rpc_server: exit async, so we reply to stop_wallet RPC (moneromooo-monero)
9847db6 wallet: do not return error if incoming_transfers finds none (moneromooo-monero)
b39aae7 Tweak 45800a25e9 (hyc)
4a5a5ff blockchain: always stop the ioservice before returning (moneromooo-monero)
78b65cf db_lmdb: safety close db at exit (moneromooo-monero)
45800a2 db_lmdb: fix a strdup/delete[] mistmatch (moneromooo-monero)
50ee591 hardfork: ensure current_fork_index can not become negative on rescan (moneromooo-monero)
b90e14d tests: add a unit test for canonical decomposed amounts (moneromooo-monero)
79beed2 tests: fix various tests by using parameters better suited to monero (moneromooo-monero)
d0a8362 tests: fix some double spending tests (moneromooo-monero)
2358d0d tests: use 255 as a "too high" block version (moneromooo-monero)
f33a88c blockchain: fix a few block addition bugs (moneromooo-monero)
a9ff11c blockchain: fix an off by one error in unlocked time check (moneromooo-monero)
f294be3 blockchain: reinstate double spending checks in check_tx_inputs (moneromooo-monero)
737b6d6 blockchain: make some flag twiddling code closer to the original (moneromooo-monero)
81cb0fc blockchain: fix bitflipping test with quantized block rewards (moneromooo-monero)
22ddf09 blockchain: add missing m_tx_pool.on_blockchain_dec (moneromooo-monero)
d837c0c blockchain: fix switch to alternative blockchain for more than one block (moneromooo-monero)
5cec076 blockchain: add a missing validity check to rollback_blockchain_switching (moneromooo-monero)
3cabdb5 core: catch exceptions from get_output_key (moneromooo-monero)
5eef645 db: throw when given a non txout_to_key output to add (moneromooo-monero)
Some tests assume the first output in a transaction goes to the recipient.
However, it can be the change. When it is, the recipient's keys will not
recognize this output. To fix this, we send all we have, to ensure there
is no change, and the first output goes to the recipient.
I'm not sure why this worked with Cryptonote. The tests sent 17 coins,
which seems way smaller than the first Bytecoin block reward, so there
would have been change too. Maybe outputs were not shuffled originally.
If the block reward was too high, the verification failed flag
was set, but the function continued. The code which was supposed
to trap this flag and return failure failed to trap it, and,
while the block was not added to the chain, the function would
return success.
The reason for avoiding returning when the block reward problem
was detected was to be able to return any transactions to the
pool if needed. This is now mooted by moving the transaction
return code to a separate function, which is now called at all
appropriate points, making the logic much simpler, and hopefully
correct now.
We also move the hard fork version check after the prev_id check,
as block which does not go on the top of the chain might not
have the expected version there, without being invalid just for
this reason.
Last, we trap the case where a block fails to be added due to
using already spent key images, to set the verification failed
flag.
This fixes some double spending tests.
This may or may not be unneeded in normal (non test) circumstances,
to be determined later. Keeping these for now may be slower, but safer.
Block reward may now be less than the full amount allowed.
This was breaking the bitflipping test.
We now keep track of whether a block which was accepted by the core
has a lower than allowed block reward, and allow this in the test.
The check was explicit in the original version, so it seems
safer to make it explicit here, especially as it is now done
implicitely in a different place, away from the original check.
