99dd572 libwallet_api: tests: checking for result while opening wallet (Ilya Kitaev)
bcf7b67 libwallet_api: Wallet::amountFromString fixed (Ilya Kitaev)
32bc7b4 libwallet_api: helper method to return maximumAllowedAmount (Ilya Kitaev)
cbe534d libwallet_api: tests: removed logged passwords (Ilya Kitaev)
b1a5a93 libwallet_api: do not store wallet on close if status is not ok (Ilya Kitaev)
This plugs a privacy leak from the wallet to the daemon,
as the daemon could previously see what input is included
as a transaction input, which the daemon hadn't previously
supplied. Now, the wallet requests a particular set of
outputs, including the real one.
This can result in transactions that can't be accepted if
the wallet happens to select too many outputs with non standard
unlock times. The daemon could know this and select another
output, but the wallet is blind to it. It's currently very
unlikely since I don't think anything uses non default
unlock times. The wallet requests more outputs than necessary
so it can use spares if any of the returns outputs are still
locked. If there are not enough spares to reach the desired
mixin, the transaction will fail.
f0c0a3fFix#864 Squashed commit of the following: commit 9af9e4223b fixed some formatting commit c7920e1cf8 Merge: 97eb28b1da1c68 fix#864 fix using boolean commit 97eb28ba5dFix#864 boolean value used to verify on new wallet commit 1da1c68bd3fix#864 changed to boolean to prompt for verify commit 5bee966524 fix 864; made variable names easier for understanding branching. commit 45715960d3fix#864; allow password to be entered twice for new wallets for verification. fix#864 password entry verification; ammended boolean fix#864 ; default constructor for password_container should set verify=true (guzzi_jones)
Simplewallet improperly skipped the restore from height code if
restoring a deterministic wallet AND not specifying a wallet file in the
command line. The other generate options require a wallet file as an
argument, which prevents "ask_wallet_create_if_needed()" from being
called, which in turn causes "m_generate_new" to remain unset.
Specifying a wallet file at launch with --restore-deterministic emulated
this behavior.
This constrains the number of instances of any amount
to the unlocked ones (as defined by the default unlock time
setting: outputs with non default unlock time are not
considered, so may be counted as unlocked even if they are
not actually unlocked).
Squashed commit of the following:
commit 9af9e4223b
fixed some formatting
commit c7920e1cf8
Merge: 97eb28b1da1c68
fix#864 fix using boolean
commit 97eb28ba5dFix#864 boolean value used to verify on new wallet
commit 1da1c68bd3fix#864 changed to boolean to prompt for verify
commit 5bee966524
fix 864; made variable names easier for understanding branching.
commit 45715960d3fix#864; allow password to be entered twice for new wallets for verification.
fix#864 password entry verification; ammended boolean
fix#864 ; default constructor for password_container should set verify=true
The previous logic that used a COMMON_*_FLAGS intermediate variable
and then re-assigned CMAKE_*_FLAGS before including each subdirectory
was confusing and ugly. This PR is the right way to do it.
This commit is purely refactoring: built binaries unchanged.
By default the flag is enabled whenever libunwind is found on the
system, with the exception of static build on OSX (for which we can't
install the throw hook #932 due to lack of support for --wrap in OSX
ld64 linker).
They are used to export a signed set of key images from a wallet
with a private spend key, so an auditor with the matching view key
may see which of those are spent, and which are not.
It is not clear why libunbound was added to this in the first place,
since it wasn't here before and #915 doesn't seem to introduce any
new dependency on it.
Tested build with STATIC=OFF (with and without libunbound-dev libunbound8
installed) and STATIC=ON, on Ubuntu Trusty, Debian Jessie, and Arch
Linux. For static builds, beware of #926 and #907.
If this hack was introduced to make it build on some other system
(Windows? OS X?), then it will have to be dealt with, but not this way.
