Merge pull request #8396

a46b6ba contrib: add more valgrind suppressions for spurious issues (moneromooo-monero)
7f3e31d unit_tests: fix accessing invalid memory in tree_hash test (moneromooo-monero)
This commit is contained in:
luigi1111 2024-05-20 22:45:46 -05:00
commit 8db863c415
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: F4ACA0183641E010
2 changed files with 38 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -26,3 +26,34 @@
fun:_ZN2el4base7Storage7getELPPEv
...
}
{
in boost multiprecision, we don't get a pointer to the actual code causing it but if so it's only in the test itself anyway
Memcheck:Overlap
fun:__memcpy_chk
fun:_ZL6MKHASHmm
fun:_ZN26difficulty_check_hash_Test8TestBodyEv
fun:_ZN7testing8internal38HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupportedINS_4TestEvEET0_PT_MS4_FS3_vEPKc
fun:_ZN7testing8internal35HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupportedINS_4TestEvEET0_PT_MS4_FS3_vEPKc
fun:_ZN7testing4Test3RunEv
fun:_ZN7testing8TestInfo3RunEv
fun:_ZN7testing8TestCase3RunEv
fun:_ZN7testing8internal12UnitTestImpl11RunAllTestsEv
fun:_ZN7testing8internal38HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupportedINS0_12UnitTestImplEbEET0_PT_MS4_FS3_vEPKc
fun:_ZN7testing8internal35HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupportedINS0_12UnitTestImplEbEET0_PT_MS4_FS3_vEPKc
fun:_ZN7testing8UnitTest3RunEv
}
{
valgrind seems to be confusing memmove with memcpy
Memcheck:Overlap
fun:__memcpy_chk
fun:memmove
fun:left_shift_byte<boost::multiprecision::backends::cpp_int_backend<512, 512, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_integer_type)0, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_int_check_type)0, void> >
fun:eval_left_shift<512, 512, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_integer_type)0, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_int_check_type)0, void>
fun:eval_left_shift<512, 512, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_integer_type)0, (boost::multiprecision::cpp_int_check_type)0, void>
fun:operator<<=<int>
fun:_ZN10cryptonote14check_hash_128ERKN6crypto4hashEN5boost14multiprecision6numberINS5_8backends15cpp_int_backendILj128ELj128ELNS5_16cpp_integer_typeE0ELNS5_18cpp_int_check_typeE0EvEELNS5_26expression_template_optionE0EEE
fun:_ZN10cryptonote10check_hashERKN6crypto4hashEN5boost14multiprecision6numberINS5_8backends15cpp_int_backendILj128ELj128ELNS5_16cpp_integer_typeE0ELNS5_18cpp_int_check_typeE0EvEELNS5_26expression_template_optionE0EEE
fun:_ZN26difficulty_check_hash_Test8TestBodyEv
}

View File

@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ TEST(Crypto, tree_branch)
{
crypto::hash inputs[6];
crypto::hash branch[8];
crypto::hash branch_1[8 + 1];
crypto::hash root, root2;
size_t depth;
uint32_t path, path2;
@ -296,12 +297,16 @@ TEST(Crypto, tree_branch)
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[5].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth, path));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(crypto::null_hash.data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth, path));
// a version with an extra (dummy) hash
memcpy(branch_1, branch, sizeof(branch));
branch_1[depth] = crypto::null_hash;
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth - 1, path));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth + 1, path));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch_1, depth + 1, path));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth, path ^ 1));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth, path ^ 2));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])branch, depth, path ^ 3));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])(branch + 1), depth, path));
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::is_branch_in_tree(inputs[4].data, root.data, (const char(*)[32])(branch_1 + 1), depth, path));
// five, not found
ASSERT_FALSE(crypto::tree_branch((const char(*)[32])inputs, 5, crypto::null_hash.data, (char(*)[32])branch, &depth, &path));