update unbound from upstream

This commit is contained in:
Riccardo Spagni 2015-04-02 11:16:18 +02:00
parent b0151de601
commit 1f49833d4f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 55432DF31CCD4FCD
155 changed files with 5482 additions and 3440 deletions

View file

@ -58,8 +58,8 @@
#include "util/regional.h"
#include "util/config_file.h"
#include "util/fptr_wlist.h"
#include "ldns/rrdef.h"
#include "ldns/wire2str.h"
#include "sldns/rrdef.h"
#include "sldns/wire2str.h"
/* forward decl for cache response and normal super inform calls of a DS */
static void process_ds_response(struct module_qstate* qstate,
@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ val_new_getmsg(struct module_qstate* qstate, struct val_qstate* vq)
sizeof(struct reply_info) - sizeof(struct rrset_ref));
if(!vq->chase_reply)
return NULL;
if(vq->orig_msg->rep->rrset_count > RR_COUNT_MAX)
return NULL; /* protect against integer overflow */
vq->chase_reply->rrsets = regional_alloc_init(qstate->region,
vq->orig_msg->rep->rrsets, sizeof(struct ub_packed_rrset_key*)
* vq->orig_msg->rep->rrset_count);
@ -574,6 +576,61 @@ detect_wrongly_truncated(struct reply_info* rep)
return 1;
}
/**
* For messages that are not referrals, if the chase reply contains an
* unsigned NS record in the authority section it could have been
* inserted by a (BIND) forwarder that thinks the zone is insecure, and
* that has an NS record without signatures in cache. Remove the NS
* record since the reply does not hinge on that record (in the authority
* section), but do not remove it if it removes the last record from the
* answer+authority sections.
* @param chase_reply: the chased reply, we have a key for this contents,
* so we should have signatures for these rrsets and not having
* signatures means it will be bogus.
* @param orig_reply: original reply, remove NS from there as well because
* we cannot mark the NS record as DNSSEC valid because it is not
* validated by signatures.
*/
static void
remove_spurious_authority(struct reply_info* chase_reply,
struct reply_info* orig_reply)
{
size_t i, found = 0;
int remove = 0;
/* if no answer and only 1 auth RRset, do not remove that one */
if(chase_reply->an_numrrsets == 0 && chase_reply->ns_numrrsets == 1)
return;
/* search authority section for unsigned NS records */
for(i = chase_reply->an_numrrsets;
i < chase_reply->an_numrrsets+chase_reply->ns_numrrsets; i++) {
struct packed_rrset_data* d = (struct packed_rrset_data*)
chase_reply->rrsets[i]->entry.data;
if(ntohs(chase_reply->rrsets[i]->rk.type) == LDNS_RR_TYPE_NS
&& d->rrsig_count == 0) {
found = i;
remove = 1;
break;
}
}
/* see if we found the entry */
if(!remove) return;
log_rrset_key(VERB_ALGO, "Removing spurious unsigned NS record "
"(likely inserted by forwarder)", chase_reply->rrsets[found]);
/* find rrset in orig_reply */
for(i = orig_reply->an_numrrsets;
i < orig_reply->an_numrrsets+orig_reply->ns_numrrsets; i++) {
if(ntohs(orig_reply->rrsets[i]->rk.type) == LDNS_RR_TYPE_NS
&& query_dname_compare(orig_reply->rrsets[i]->rk.dname,
chase_reply->rrsets[found]->rk.dname) == 0) {
/* remove from orig_msg */
val_reply_remove_auth(orig_reply, i);
break;
}
}
/* remove rrset from chase_reply */
val_reply_remove_auth(chase_reply, found);
}
/**
* Given a "positive" response -- a response that contains an answer to the
@ -1642,6 +1699,8 @@ processValidate(struct module_qstate* qstate, struct val_qstate* vq,
}
subtype = val_classify_response(qstate->query_flags, &qstate->qinfo,
&vq->qchase, vq->orig_msg->rep, vq->rrset_skip);
if(subtype != VAL_CLASS_REFERRAL)
remove_spurious_authority(vq->chase_reply, vq->orig_msg->rep);
/* check signatures in the message;
* answer and authority must be valid, additional is only checked. */
@ -2295,7 +2354,7 @@ primeResponseToKE(struct ub_packed_rrset_key* dnskey_rrset,
struct key_entry_key* kkey = NULL;
enum sec_status sec = sec_status_unchecked;
char* reason = NULL;
int downprot = 1;
int downprot = qstate->env->cfg->harden_algo_downgrade;
if(!dnskey_rrset) {
log_nametypeclass(VERB_OPS, "failed to prime trust anchor -- "