mirror of
https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:35:55 -04:00
Update fcmp++-development.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca5fb346a2
commit
248f6767eb
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
layout: fr
|
layout: wip
|
||||||
title: Full-Chain Membership Proofs + Spend Authorization + Linkability Development CCS
|
title: Full-Chain Membership Proofs + Spend Authorization + Linkability Development CCS
|
||||||
author: kayabaNerve
|
author: kayabaNerve
|
||||||
date: April 13, 2024
|
date: April 13, 2024
|
||||||
@ -94,4 +94,4 @@ As aforementioned, integration must also be done, and development of a performan
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Failure
|
### Failure
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the work within this CCS for any reason fails, the funds raised and remaining (held by core, per the rules of the CCS) will roll over into a general MRL research fund to sponsor further research and development, such as proofs for and review of Seraphis. The direction of and process for this new fund will be decided and agreed upon such a roll over occurring by core and discussions within MRL. The idea for this was premised on the idea of hiring researchers, Cypher Stack specifically, on retainer with the MRL having discretion over how those hours were spent. That was discussed at the same meeting as this proposal (proposal as in cryptographic idea, not proposal as in CCS proposal) with sufficiently well reception for me to propose it as the fallback here.
|
If the work within this CCS for any reason fails, the funds raised and remaining (held by core, per the rules of the CCS) will roll over into a general MRL research fund to sponsor further research and development, such as proofs for and review of Seraphis. The direction of and process for this new fund will be decided and agreed upon such a roll over occurring by core and discussions within MRL. The idea for this was premised on the idea of hiring researchers, Cypher Stack specifically, on retainer with the MRL having discretion over how those hours were spent. That was discussed at the same meeting as this proposal (proposal as in cryptographic idea, not proposal as in CCS proposal) with sufficiently well reception for me to propose it as the fallback here.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user