Git-Mirrors/monero-ccs-proposals
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals.git synced 2024-10-01 01:35:55 -04:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update fcmp++-development.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
luigi1111 2024-04-26 01:55:49 +00:00
parent ca5fb346a2
commit 248f6767eb
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fcmp++-development.md
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
layout: fr
layout: wip
title: Full-Chain Membership Proofs + Spend Authorization + Linkability Development CCS
author: kayabaNerve
date: April 13, 2024
@ -94,4 +94,4 @@ As aforementioned, integration must also be done, and development of a performan
### Failure
If the work within this CCS for any reason fails, the funds raised and remaining (held by core, per the rules of the CCS) will roll over into a general MRL research fund to sponsor further research and development, such as proofs for and review of Seraphis. The direction of and process for this new fund will be decided and agreed upon such a roll over occurring by core and discussions within MRL. The idea for this was premised on the idea of hiring researchers, Cypher Stack specifically, on retainer with the MRL having discretion over how those hours were spent. That was discussed at the same meeting as this proposal (proposal as in cryptographic idea, not proposal as in CCS proposal) with sufficiently well reception for me to propose it as the fallback here.
If the work within this CCS for any reason fails, the funds raised and remaining (held by core, per the rules of the CCS) will roll over into a general MRL research fund to sponsor further research and development, such as proofs for and review of Seraphis. The direction of and process for this new fund will be decided and agreed upon such a roll over occurring by core and discussions within MRL. The idea for this was premised on the idea of hiring researchers, Cypher Stack specifically, on retainer with the MRL having discretion over how those hours were spent. That was discussed at the same meeting as this proposal (proposal as in cryptographic idea, not proposal as in CCS proposal) with sufficiently well reception for me to propose it as the fallback here.