From b334e9782e7c06ce7afabfa984f4ac937fb45443 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: humanacollaborator Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:17:56 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] cosmetics --- codeberg.md | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/codeberg.md b/codeberg.md index 4e6e3ab..946bb4c 100644 --- a/codeberg.md +++ b/codeberg.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# Codeberg's Censorship, Attack on Transparency, and Attack on Cloudflare Resistance +# Codeberg's Attack on Transparency and on Cloudflare Opposition Codeberg hosted the Cloudflare-Tor project. In 2021, Codeberg took down the project alleging libel. @@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ were spotted publicly promoting Cloudflare. ## Codeberg-inflicted censorship -Allegedly in response to complaints, Codeberg shut down the CFT -project and issued +Codeberg shut down the CFT project and issued [this statement](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/423#issuecomment-187783) to contributors, and posted -[this blog announcement](https://blog.codeberg.org/on-the-cloudflare-tor-takedown.html). +[this blog announcement](https://blog.codeberg.org/on-the-cloudflare-tor-takedown.html), +allegedly in response to complaints. ### Analysis of Codeberg's e-mail @@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ personally condone Cloudflare and thus claimed to not be a Cloudflare "supporter" on that basis. But investigation of [public statements](https://codeberg.org/swiso/website/issues/141#issuecomment-69593) by that individual revealed that the other party actually supported -Cloudflare operationally. +Cloudflare operationally. Note that Codeberg destroyed the +investigation logs which led to the finding, so we can't cite them +here. > The pure existence of lis ts "Enemies of X" is by all rational means > unlikely to have any other purpose than public shaming, defamation, @@ -194,7 +196,7 @@ Yet Codeberg still removed the project despite immediate compliance. CloudFlare itself is [listing](https://web.archive.org/web/20210406200322/https://www.cloudflare.com/people) -their employees since day 1. +their employees, so it's already public information. > People reaching out to us and to the maintainers of the repository > itself tried to make clear that they do not consider themselves as