mirror of
https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno.git
synced 2025-05-17 05:52:19 -04:00
persist trade with payment confirmation msgs before processing
This commit is contained in:
parent
923b3ad73b
commit
de5250e89a
3 changed files with 114 additions and 104 deletions
|
@ -811,6 +811,10 @@ public abstract class Trade extends XmrWalletBase implements Tradable, Model {
|
|||
if (processModel.getTradeManager() != null) processModel.getTradeManager().requestPersistence();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void persistNow(@Nullable Runnable completeHandler) {
|
||||
processModel.getTradeManager().persistNow(completeHandler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public TradeProtocol getProtocol() {
|
||||
return processModel.getTradeManager().getTradeProtocol(this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -546,6 +546,10 @@ public class TradeManager implements PersistedDataHost, DecryptedDirectMessageLi
|
|||
persistenceManager.requestPersistence();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void persistNow(@Nullable Runnable completeHandler) {
|
||||
persistenceManager.persistNow(completeHandler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void handleInitTradeRequest(InitTradeRequest request, NodeAddress sender) {
|
||||
log.info("TradeManager handling InitTradeRequest for tradeId={}, sender={}, uid={}", request.getOfferId(), sender, request.getUid());
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -537,62 +537,63 @@ public abstract class TradeProtocol implements DecryptedDirectMessageListener, D
|
|||
|
||||
// save message for reprocessing
|
||||
trade.getBuyer().setPaymentSentMessage(message);
|
||||
trade.requestPersistence();
|
||||
trade.persistNow(() -> {
|
||||
|
||||
// process message on trade thread
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
ThreadUtils.execute(() -> {
|
||||
// We are more tolerant with expected phase and allow also DEPOSITS_PUBLISHED as it can be the case
|
||||
// that the wallet is still syncing and so the DEPOSITS_CONFIRMED state to yet triggered when we received
|
||||
// a mailbox message with PaymentSentMessage.
|
||||
// TODO A better fix would be to add a listener for the wallet sync state and process
|
||||
// the mailbox msg once wallet is ready and trade state set.
|
||||
synchronized (trade.getLock()) {
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
if (trade.getPhase().ordinal() >= Trade.Phase.PAYMENT_SENT.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received another PaymentSentMessage which was already processed for {} {}, ACKing", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
// process message on trade thread
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
ThreadUtils.execute(() -> {
|
||||
// We are more tolerant with expected phase and allow also DEPOSITS_PUBLISHED as it can be the case
|
||||
// that the wallet is still syncing and so the DEPOSITS_CONFIRMED state to yet triggered when we received
|
||||
// a mailbox message with PaymentSentMessage.
|
||||
// TODO A better fix would be to add a listener for the wallet sync state and process
|
||||
// the mailbox msg once wallet is ready and trade state set.
|
||||
synchronized (trade.getLock()) {
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
if (trade.getPhase().ordinal() >= Trade.Phase.PAYMENT_SENT.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received another PaymentSentMessage which was already processed for {} {}, ACKing", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.getPayoutTx() != null) {
|
||||
log.warn("We received a PaymentSentMessage but we have already created the payout tx " +
|
||||
"so we ignore the message. This can happen if the ACK message to the peer did not " +
|
||||
"arrive and the peer repeats sending us the message. We send another ACK msg.");
|
||||
sendAckMessage(peer, message, true, null);
|
||||
removeMailboxMessageAfterProcessing(message);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
latchTrade();
|
||||
expect(anyPhase()
|
||||
.with(message)
|
||||
.from(peer))
|
||||
.setup(tasks(
|
||||
ApplyFilter.class,
|
||||
ProcessPaymentSentMessage.class,
|
||||
VerifyPeersAccountAgeWitness.class)
|
||||
.using(new TradeTaskRunner(trade,
|
||||
() -> {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
},
|
||||
(errorMessage) -> {
|
||||
log.warn("Error processing payment sent message: " + errorMessage);
|
||||
processModel.getTradeManager().requestPersistence();
|
||||
|
||||
// schedule to reprocess message unless deleted
|
||||
if (trade.getBuyer().getPaymentSentMessage() != null) {
|
||||
UserThread.runAfter(() -> {
|
||||
reprocessPaymentSentMessageCount++;
|
||||
maybeReprocessPaymentSentMessage(reprocessOnError);
|
||||
}, trade.getReprocessDelayInSeconds(reprocessPaymentSentMessageCount));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerFault(peer, message, errorMessage); // otherwise send nack
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlatchTrade();
|
||||
})))
|
||||
.executeTasks(true);
|
||||
awaitTradeLatch();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.getPayoutTx() != null) {
|
||||
log.warn("We received a PaymentSentMessage but we have already created the payout tx " +
|
||||
"so we ignore the message. This can happen if the ACK message to the peer did not " +
|
||||
"arrive and the peer repeats sending us the message. We send another ACK msg.");
|
||||
sendAckMessage(peer, message, true, null);
|
||||
removeMailboxMessageAfterProcessing(message);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
latchTrade();
|
||||
expect(anyPhase()
|
||||
.with(message)
|
||||
.from(peer))
|
||||
.setup(tasks(
|
||||
ApplyFilter.class,
|
||||
ProcessPaymentSentMessage.class,
|
||||
VerifyPeersAccountAgeWitness.class)
|
||||
.using(new TradeTaskRunner(trade,
|
||||
() -> {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
},
|
||||
(errorMessage) -> {
|
||||
log.warn("Error processing payment sent message: " + errorMessage);
|
||||
processModel.getTradeManager().requestPersistence();
|
||||
|
||||
// schedule to reprocess message unless deleted
|
||||
if (trade.getBuyer().getPaymentSentMessage() != null) {
|
||||
UserThread.runAfter(() -> {
|
||||
reprocessPaymentSentMessageCount++;
|
||||
maybeReprocessPaymentSentMessage(reprocessOnError);
|
||||
}, trade.getReprocessDelayInSeconds(reprocessPaymentSentMessageCount));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerFault(peer, message, errorMessage); // otherwise send nack
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlatchTrade();
|
||||
})))
|
||||
.executeTasks(true);
|
||||
awaitTradeLatch();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, trade.getId());
|
||||
}, trade.getId());
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// received by buyer and arbitrator
|
||||
|
@ -619,59 +620,60 @@ public abstract class TradeProtocol implements DecryptedDirectMessageListener, D
|
|||
|
||||
// save message for reprocessing
|
||||
trade.getSeller().setPaymentReceivedMessage(message);
|
||||
trade.requestPersistence();
|
||||
trade.persistNow(() -> {
|
||||
|
||||
// process message on trade thread
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
ThreadUtils.execute(() -> {
|
||||
synchronized (trade.getLock()) {
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
latchTrade();
|
||||
Validator.checkTradeId(processModel.getOfferId(), message);
|
||||
processModel.setTradeMessage(message);
|
||||
// process message on trade thread
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
ThreadUtils.execute(() -> {
|
||||
synchronized (trade.getLock()) {
|
||||
if (!trade.isInitialized() || trade.isShutDownStarted()) return;
|
||||
latchTrade();
|
||||
Validator.checkTradeId(processModel.getOfferId(), message);
|
||||
processModel.setTradeMessage(message);
|
||||
|
||||
// check minimum trade phase
|
||||
if (trade.isBuyer() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.PAYMENT_SENT.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before payment sent for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
// check minimum trade phase
|
||||
if (trade.isBuyer() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.PAYMENT_SENT.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before payment sent for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.isArbitrator() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.DEPOSITS_CONFIRMED.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before deposits confirmed for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.isSeller() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.DEPOSITS_UNLOCKED.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before deposits unlocked for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expect(anyPhase()
|
||||
.with(message)
|
||||
.from(peer))
|
||||
.setup(tasks(
|
||||
ProcessPaymentReceivedMessage.class)
|
||||
.using(new TradeTaskRunner(trade,
|
||||
() -> {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
},
|
||||
errorMessage -> {
|
||||
log.warn("Error processing payment received message: " + errorMessage);
|
||||
processModel.getTradeManager().requestPersistence();
|
||||
|
||||
// schedule to reprocess message unless deleted
|
||||
if (trade.getSeller().getPaymentReceivedMessage() != null) {
|
||||
UserThread.runAfter(() -> {
|
||||
reprocessPaymentReceivedMessageCount++;
|
||||
maybeReprocessPaymentReceivedMessage(reprocessOnError);
|
||||
}, trade.getReprocessDelayInSeconds(reprocessPaymentReceivedMessageCount));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerFault(peer, message, errorMessage); // otherwise send nack
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlatchTrade();
|
||||
})))
|
||||
.executeTasks(true);
|
||||
awaitTradeLatch();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.isArbitrator() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.DEPOSITS_CONFIRMED.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before deposits confirmed for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trade.isSeller() && trade.getPhase().ordinal() < Trade.Phase.DEPOSITS_UNLOCKED.ordinal()) {
|
||||
log.warn("Received PaymentReceivedMessage before deposits unlocked for {} {}, ignoring", trade.getClass().getSimpleName(), trade.getId());
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expect(anyPhase()
|
||||
.with(message)
|
||||
.from(peer))
|
||||
.setup(tasks(
|
||||
ProcessPaymentReceivedMessage.class)
|
||||
.using(new TradeTaskRunner(trade,
|
||||
() -> {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerSuccess(peer, message);
|
||||
},
|
||||
errorMessage -> {
|
||||
log.warn("Error processing payment received message: " + errorMessage);
|
||||
processModel.getTradeManager().requestPersistence();
|
||||
|
||||
// schedule to reprocess message unless deleted
|
||||
if (trade.getSeller().getPaymentReceivedMessage() != null) {
|
||||
UserThread.runAfter(() -> {
|
||||
reprocessPaymentReceivedMessageCount++;
|
||||
maybeReprocessPaymentReceivedMessage(reprocessOnError);
|
||||
}, trade.getReprocessDelayInSeconds(reprocessPaymentReceivedMessageCount));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
handleTaskRunnerFault(peer, message, errorMessage); // otherwise send nack
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlatchTrade();
|
||||
})))
|
||||
.executeTasks(true);
|
||||
awaitTradeLatch();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, trade.getId());
|
||||
}, trade.getId());
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void onWithdrawCompleted() {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue