mirror of
https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno-ts.git
synced 2025-04-01 18:45:44 -04:00
fix bugs to recreate stale data error
This commit is contained in:
woodser
parent
dc4fd33d7f
commit
8b81cebb61
@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ class TradeContext {
|
||||
return this.direction === OfferDirection.BUY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
wasDisputeOpened() {
|
||||
return this.buyerOpenedDispute || this.sellerOpenedDispute;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
getDisputeOpener(): PeerContext | undefined {
|
||||
if (this.disputeOpener === undefined) return undefined;
|
||||
return this.disputeOpener === SaleRole.BUYER ? this.getBuyer() : this.getSeller();
|
||||
@ -1808,25 +1812,30 @@ test("Can complete all trade combinations (Test, stress)", async () => {
|
||||
const BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS = [DisputeContext.NONE, DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK, DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_PAYMENT_SENT];
|
||||
const SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS = [DisputeContext.NONE, DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK, DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_PAYMENT_SENT];
|
||||
const DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS = [DisputeResult.Winner.BUYER, DisputeResult.Winner.SELLER];
|
||||
const RESOLVE_DISPUTE_OPTS = [false, true];
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < MAKER_OPTS.length; i++) {
|
||||
for (let j = 0; j < DIRECTION_OPTS.length; j++) {
|
||||
for (let k = 0; k < BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS.length; k++) {
|
||||
for (let l = 0; l < SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS.length; l++) {
|
||||
for (let m = 0; m < DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS.length; m++) {
|
||||
if (BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS[k] !== DisputeContext.NONE && SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS[l] !== DisputeContext.NONE) continue; // skip both opening a dispute
|
||||
const ctx: Partial<TradeContext> = {
|
||||
walletSyncPeriodMs: 8000, // increase for stress test
|
||||
maxTimePeerNoticeMs: 8000,
|
||||
maker: { havenod: MAKER_OPTS[i] === TradeRole.MAKER ? user1 : user2 },
|
||||
taker: { havenod: MAKER_OPTS[i] === TradeRole.MAKER ? user2 : user1 },
|
||||
direction: DIRECTION_OPTS[j],
|
||||
buyerDisputeContext: BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS[k],
|
||||
sellerDisputeContext: SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS[l],
|
||||
disputeWinner: DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS[m],
|
||||
disputeSummary: "After much deliberation, " + (DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS[m] === DisputeResult.Winner.BUYER ? "buyer" : "seller") + " is winner",
|
||||
offerAmount: getRandomBigIntWithinPercent(TestConfig.trade.offerAmount!, 0.15)
|
||||
};
|
||||
ctxs.push(new TradeContext(Object.assign({}, new TradeContext(TestConfig.trade), ctx)));
|
||||
for (let n = 0; n < RESOLVE_DISPUTE_OPTS.length; n++) {
|
||||
if (BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS[k] !== DisputeContext.NONE && SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS[l] !== DisputeContext.NONE) continue; // skip both opening a dispute
|
||||
if (BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS[k] === DisputeContext.NONE && SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS[l] === DisputeContext.NONE && RESOLVE_DISPUTE_OPTS[n]) continue; // skip permutations to resolve dispute when no dispute
|
||||
const ctx: Partial<TradeContext> = {
|
||||
walletSyncPeriodMs: 8000, // increase for stress test
|
||||
maxTimePeerNoticeMs: 8000,
|
||||
maker: { havenod: MAKER_OPTS[i] === TradeRole.MAKER ? user1 : user2 },
|
||||
taker: { havenod: MAKER_OPTS[i] === TradeRole.MAKER ? user2 : user1 },
|
||||
direction: DIRECTION_OPTS[j],
|
||||
buyerDisputeContext: BUYER_DISPUTE_OPTS[k],
|
||||
sellerDisputeContext: SELLER_DISPUTE_OPTS[l],
|
||||
disputeWinner: DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS[m],
|
||||
resolveDispute: RESOLVE_DISPUTE_OPTS[n],
|
||||
disputeSummary: "After much deliberation, " + (DISPUTE_WINNER_OPTS[m] === DisputeResult.Winner.BUYER ? "buyer" : "seller") + " is winner",
|
||||
offerAmount: getRandomBigIntWithinPercent(TestConfig.trade.offerAmount!, 0.15)
|
||||
};
|
||||
ctxs.push(new TradeContext(Object.assign({}, new TradeContext(TestConfig.trade), ctx)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1931,6 +1940,7 @@ test("Can resolve disputes (Test, CI)", async () => {
|
||||
const trade2 = await user1.getTrade(tradeIds[configIdx === undefined ? 2 : 0]);
|
||||
Object.assign(ctxs[0], {
|
||||
resolveDispute: false,
|
||||
buyerSendsPayment: false,
|
||||
sellerDisputeContext: DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK,
|
||||
disputeWinner: DisputeResult.Winner.SELLER,
|
||||
disputeReason: DisputeResult.Reason.PEER_WAS_LATE,
|
||||
@ -1938,6 +1948,7 @@ test("Can resolve disputes (Test, CI)", async () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
Object.assign(ctxs[1], {
|
||||
resolveDispute: false,
|
||||
buyerSendsPayment: false,
|
||||
buyerDisputeContext: DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK,
|
||||
disputeWinner: DisputeResult.Winner.BUYER,
|
||||
disputeReason: DisputeResult.Reason.SELLER_NOT_RESPONDING,
|
||||
@ -1946,6 +1957,7 @@ test("Can resolve disputes (Test, CI)", async () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
Object.assign(ctxs[2], {
|
||||
resolveDispute: false,
|
||||
buyerSendsPayment: false,
|
||||
buyerDisputeContext: DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK,
|
||||
disputeWinner: DisputeResult.Winner.SELLER,
|
||||
disputeReason: DisputeResult.Reason.TRADE_ALREADY_SETTLED,
|
||||
@ -1955,6 +1967,7 @@ test("Can resolve disputes (Test, CI)", async () => {
|
||||
Object.assign(ctxs[3], {
|
||||
resolveDispute: false,
|
||||
buyerSendsPayment: true,
|
||||
sellerReceivesPayment: false,
|
||||
sellerDisputeContext: DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_PAYMENT_SENT,
|
||||
disputeWinner: DisputeResult.Winner.BUYER,
|
||||
disputeReason: DisputeResult.Reason.TRADE_ALREADY_SETTLED,
|
||||
@ -2684,16 +2697,16 @@ async function executeTrade(ctxP: Partial<TradeContext>): Promise<string> {
|
||||
|
||||
// handle opened dispute
|
||||
if (ctx.isStopped) return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
if (ctx.disputeOpener) {
|
||||
if (ctx.wasDisputeOpened()) {
|
||||
|
||||
// test open dispute
|
||||
await testOpenDispute(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
// resolve dispute if configured
|
||||
if (ctx.resolveDispute) await resolveDispute(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
// return offer id
|
||||
return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
if (ctx.resolveDispute) {
|
||||
await resolveDispute(ctx);
|
||||
return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// buyer confirms payment is sent
|
||||
@ -2759,12 +2772,12 @@ async function executeTrade(ctxP: Partial<TradeContext>): Promise<string> {
|
||||
if (!ctx.disputeOpener) ctx.disputeOpener = SaleRole.SELLER;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ctx.isStopped) return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
if (ctx.disputeOpener) await testOpenDispute(ctx);
|
||||
if (ctx.wasDisputeOpened()) await testOpenDispute(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
// if dispute opened, resolve dispute if configured and return
|
||||
// if dispute opened, resolve dispute if configured
|
||||
if (ctx.isStopped) return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
if (ctx.disputeOpener) {
|
||||
if (ctx.resolveDispute) await resolveDispute(ctx);
|
||||
if (ctx.wasDisputeOpened() && ctx.resolveDispute) {
|
||||
await resolveDispute(ctx);
|
||||
return ctx.offerId!;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2846,7 +2859,7 @@ async function testTradePayoutUnlock(ctxP: Partial<TradeContext>) {
|
||||
let trade = await ctx.arbitrator.havenod!.getTrade(ctx.offerId!);
|
||||
if (trade.getPayoutState() !== "PAYOUT_CONFIRMED") await mineToHeight(height + 1);
|
||||
await wait(TestConfig.maxWalletStartupMs + ctx.walletSyncPeriodMs * 2);
|
||||
const disputeState = ctx.isPaymentReceived ? "NO_DISPUTE" : "DISPUTE_CLOSED";
|
||||
const disputeState = ctx.wasDisputeOpened() ? "DISPUTE_CLOSED" : "NO_DISPUTE";
|
||||
if (ctx.getBuyer().havenod) await testTradeState(await ctx.getBuyer().havenod!.getTrade(ctx.offerId!), {phase: ctx.getPhase(), disputeState: disputeState, payoutState: ["PAYOUT_CONFIRMED", "PAYOUT_UNLOCKED"]});
|
||||
if (ctx.getSeller().havenod) await testTradeState(await ctx.getSeller().havenod!.getTrade(ctx.offerId!), {phase: ctx.getPhase(), disputeState: disputeState, payoutState: ["PAYOUT_CONFIRMED", "PAYOUT_UNLOCKED"]});
|
||||
await testTradeState(await ctx.arbitrator.havenod!.getTrade(ctx.offerId!), {phase: ctx.getPhase(), payoutState: ["PAYOUT_CONFIRMED", "PAYOUT_UNLOCKED"]});
|
||||
@ -3163,16 +3176,17 @@ async function testOpenDispute(ctxP: Partial<TradeContext>) {
|
||||
expect(sellerPaymentAccountPayload).toEqual(expectedSellerPaymentAccountPayload);
|
||||
expect(await ctx.arbitrator.havenod?.getPaymentAccountPayloadForm(sellerPaymentAccountPayload!)).toEqual(await ctx.arbitrator.havenod?.getPaymentAccountPayloadForm(expectedSellerPaymentAccountPayload!));
|
||||
|
||||
// arbitrator has buyer's payment account info unless opener is seller and payment not sent
|
||||
// arbitrator has buyer's payment account info unless seller opens dispute before payment sent
|
||||
// TODO: should arbitrator receive buyer's payment account info if seller opens dispute before payment sent?
|
||||
let buyerPaymentAccountPayload = arbDisputeOpener.getContract()!.getIsBuyerMakerAndSellerTaker() ? arbDisputeOpener.getMakerPaymentAccountPayload() : arbDisputeOpener.getTakerPaymentAccountPayload();
|
||||
if (ctx.getDisputeOpener()!.havenod === ctx.getSeller().havenod && !ctx.isPaymentSent) expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
if (ctx.getDisputeOpener()!.havenod === ctx.getSeller().havenod && ctx.sellerDisputeContext === DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK) expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
else {
|
||||
let expectedBuyerPaymentAccountPayload = (await ctx.getBuyer().havenod?.getPaymentAccount(buyerPaymentAccountPayload?.getId()!))?.getPaymentAccountPayload();
|
||||
expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toEqual(expectedBuyerPaymentAccountPayload);
|
||||
expect(await ctx.arbitrator.havenod?.getPaymentAccountPayloadForm(buyerPaymentAccountPayload!)).toEqual(await ctx.arbitrator.havenod?.getPaymentAccountPayloadForm(expectedBuyerPaymentAccountPayload!));
|
||||
}
|
||||
buyerPaymentAccountPayload = arbDisputePeer.getContract()!.getIsBuyerMakerAndSellerTaker() ? arbDisputePeer.getMakerPaymentAccountPayload() : arbDisputePeer.getTakerPaymentAccountPayload();
|
||||
if (ctx.getDisputeOpener()!.havenod === ctx.getSeller().havenod && !ctx.isPaymentSent) expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
if (ctx.getDisputeOpener()!.havenod === ctx.getSeller().havenod && ctx.sellerDisputeContext === DisputeContext.OPEN_AFTER_DEPOSITS_UNLOCK) expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
else {
|
||||
let expectedBuyerPaymentAccountPayload = (await ctx.getBuyer().havenod?.getPaymentAccount(buyerPaymentAccountPayload?.getId()!))?.getPaymentAccountPayload();
|
||||
expect(buyerPaymentAccountPayload).toEqual(expectedBuyerPaymentAccountPayload);
|
||||
@ -3380,8 +3394,8 @@ async function testAmountsAfterComplete(tradeCtx: TradeContext) {
|
||||
const payoutTxFee = BigInt(payoutTx!.getFee());
|
||||
|
||||
// get expected payouts for normal trade
|
||||
const isDisputedTrade = tradeCtx.getDisputeOpener() !== undefined;
|
||||
if (!isDisputedTrade) {
|
||||
const isResolvedByDispute = tradeCtx.wasDisputeOpened() && tradeCtx.resolveDispute;
|
||||
if (!isResolvedByDispute) {
|
||||
tradeCtx.getBuyer().payoutTxFee = payoutTxFee / 2n;
|
||||
tradeCtx.getBuyer().payoutAmount = tradeCtx.getBuyer().securityDepositActual! + tradeCtx.tradeAmount! - tradeCtx.getBuyer().payoutTxFee!;
|
||||
tradeCtx.getSeller().payoutTxFee = payoutTxFee / 2n;
|
||||
@ -3404,7 +3418,7 @@ async function testAmountsAfterComplete(tradeCtx: TradeContext) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: payout tx is unknown to offline non-signer until confirmed
|
||||
if (isDisputedTrade || tradeCtx.isOfflineFlow()) {
|
||||
if (isResolvedByDispute || tradeCtx.isOfflineFlow()) {
|
||||
await mineToHeight(await monerod.getHeight() + 1);
|
||||
await wait(TestConfig.maxWalletStartupMs + tradeCtx.walletSyncPeriodMs * 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user