clarify that the slab design isn't like jemalloc

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Micay 2018-08-26 07:19:58 -04:00
parent c97bbc141c
commit 1b3d485e87

View File

@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ separate region with the memory left non-readable and non-writable.
The slab slot count for each size class is not yet finely tuned beyond choosing values avoiding
internal fragmentation for slabs (i.e. avoiding wasted space due to page size rounding).
The choice of size classes is the same as jemalloc:
The choice of size classes is the same as jemalloc, but with a much different approach to the
slabs containing them:
> size classes are multiples of the quantum [16], spaced such that there are four size classes for
> each doubling in size, which limits internal fragmentation to approximately 20% for all but the