From 8abe26083c2fcd0dc29d91d696e54695478184aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorin-Oakenpants Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 12:49:27 +1200 Subject: [PATCH] punycode test and the PoC/article by Xudong Zheng that re-sparked the conversation early this year --- user.js | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/user.js b/user.js index 6174dfb..baacba9 100644 --- a/user.js +++ b/user.js @@ -1313,10 +1313,12 @@ user_pref("security.block_script_with_wrong_mime", true); * Firefox has *some* protections to mitigate the risk, but it is better to be safe * than sorry. The downside: it will also display legitimate IDN's punycoded, which * might be undesirable for users from countries with non-latin alphabets + * [TEST] https://www.xn--80ak6aa92e.com/ (www.apple.com) * [1] http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.IDN_show_punycode * [2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/IDN_Display_Algorithm * [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack - * [4] CVE-2017-5383: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2017-02/ ***/ + * [4] CVE-2017-5383: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2017-02/ + * [5] https://www.xudongz.com/blog/2017/idn-phishing/ ***/ user_pref("network.IDN_show_punycode", true); /* 2673: enable CSP (Content Security Policy) (default is true) * [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CSP ***/