From 778dc89bb6126212d9c897f6e7add88ca5e6a96e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorin-Oakenpants Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:40:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2002 WebRTC tests #580 FYI, the https://www.privacytools.io/webrtc.html test in our wiki is 404, so I gave it a strikethru and added this one. This is also handy for 2001, but do we need to double up on it? We're only disabling WebRTC because of IP leaks, so I don't see the point in testing if WebRTC is disabled. --- user.js | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/user.js b/user.js index 4ffd04a..7c6a668 100644 --- a/user.js +++ b/user.js @@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ user_pref("media.peerconnection.turn.disable", true); user_pref("media.peerconnection.ice.tcp", false); user_pref("media.navigator.video.enabled", false); // video capability for WebRTC /* 2002: limit WebRTC IP leaks if using WebRTC + * [TEST] https://browserleaks.com/webrtc * [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1189041,1297416 * [2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Media/WebRTC/Privacy ***/ user_pref("media.peerconnection.ice.default_address_only", true); // [FF42-FF50]