Git-Mirrors/advmlthreatmatrix
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mitre/advmlthreatmatrix.git synced 2025-03-13 02:46:29 -04:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixed links and added some edits to why section

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Joshua D. Harguess 2020-10-15 21:27:42 -07:00 committed by harguess
parent 95578534b3
commit 7461a10876
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
pages/why-adversarial-ml-threat-matrix.md
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
## Why Adversarial ML Threat Matrix?
1. In the last three years, major companies such as [Google](https://www.zdnet.com/article/googles-best-image-recognition-system-flummoxed-by-fakes/), [Amazon] (https://www.fastcompany.com/90240975/alexa-can-be-hacked-by-chirping-birds), [Microsoft](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai- chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter), and [Tesla](https://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/three-small-stickers-on- road-can-steer-tesla-autopilot-into-oncoming-lane), have had their ML systems tricked, evaded, or misled.
1. In the last three years, major companies such as [Google](https://www.zdnet.com/article/googles-best-image-recognition-system-flummoxed-by-fakes/), [Amazon](https://www.fastcompany.com/90240975/alexa-can-be-hacked-by-chirping-birds), [Microsoft](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai- chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter), and [Tesla](https://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/three-small-stickers-on- road-can-steer-tesla-autopilot-into-oncoming-lane), have had their ML systems tricked, evaded, or misled.
2. This trend is only set to rise: According to [Gartner report](https://www.gartner.com/doc/3939991). 30% of cyberattacks by 2022 will involve data poisoning, model theft or adversarial examples.
3. However, industry is underprepared. In a [survey](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.05646.pdf) of 28 organizations spanning small as well as large organizations, 25 organizations did not know how to secure their ML systems.
3. However, industry is underprepared. In a [survey](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.05646.pdf) of 28 organizations spanning small as well as large organizations, 25 of the 28 organizations did not know how to secure their ML systems.
Unlike traditional cybersecurity vulnerabilities that are tied to specific software and hardware systems, adversarial ML vulnerabilities are enabled by inherent limitations underlying ML algorithms. As a result, data can now be weaponized in new ways requiring that we extend the way we model cyber adversary behavior, reflecting emerging threat vectors and the rapidly evolving adversarial machine learning attack lifecycle.