mirror of
https://github.com/Divested-Mobile/DivestOS-Build.git
synced 2024-12-14 10:24:32 -05:00
082bc48c32
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-05 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-06 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-07 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-08 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-09 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-10 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-11 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-12 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-01 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-02 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-03 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-04 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-05 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-06 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-07 accounted for via manifest change: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/361250 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-08 accounted for via manifest change: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/364606 accounted for via patches: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/365328 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-09 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-10 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-11 accounted for via patches: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/374916 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-12 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-01 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-02 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-03 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-04 Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
129 lines
5.4 KiB
Diff
129 lines
5.4 KiB
Diff
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Hui Peng <phui@google.com>
|
|
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:54:08 +0000
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] Reorganize the code for checking auth requirement
|
|
|
|
Original bug
|
|
Bug: 294854926
|
|
|
|
regressions:
|
|
Bug: 299570702
|
|
|
|
Test: Test: m com.android.btservices
|
|
Test: QA validation
|
|
Ignore-AOSP-First: security
|
|
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:0c488b2420befe0f8038957861072a8e63702f91)
|
|
Merged-In: I976a5a6d7bb819fd6accdc71eb1501b9606f3ae4
|
|
Change-Id: I976a5a6d7bb819fd6accdc71eb1501b9606f3ae4
|
|
---
|
|
stack/btm/btm_sec.cc | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
|
|
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
|
|
index 41f81631e..b8a423d28 100644
|
|
--- a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
|
|
+++ b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
|
|
@@ -5076,46 +5076,65 @@ tBTM_STATUS btm_sec_execute_procedure(tBTM_SEC_DEV_REC* p_dev_rec) {
|
|
|
|
/* If connection is not authenticated and authentication is required */
|
|
/* start authentication and return PENDING to the caller */
|
|
- if ((((!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED)) &&
|
|
- ((p_dev_rec->is_originator &&
|
|
- (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_OUT_AUTHENTICATE)) ||
|
|
- (!p_dev_rec->is_originator &&
|
|
- (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_AUTHENTICATE)))) ||
|
|
- (!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED) &&
|
|
- (!p_dev_rec->is_originator &&
|
|
- (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN)))) &&
|
|
- (p_dev_rec->hci_handle != BTM_SEC_INVALID_HANDLE)) {
|
|
-/*
|
|
- * We rely on BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED being set if MITM is in use,
|
|
- * as 16 DIGIT is only needed if MITM is not used. Unfortunately, the
|
|
- * BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED is used for both MITM and non-MITM
|
|
- * authenticated connections, hence we cannot distinguish here.
|
|
- */
|
|
-
|
|
- BTM_TRACE_EVENT("Security Manager: Start authentication");
|
|
+ if (p_dev_rec->hci_handle != HCI_INVALID_HANDLE) {
|
|
+ bool start_auth = false;
|
|
+
|
|
+ // Check link status of BR/EDR
|
|
+ if (!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED)) {
|
|
+ if (p_dev_rec->is_originator) {
|
|
+ if (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_OUT_AUTHENTICATE) {
|
|
+ LOG_DEBUG(LOG_TAG, "Outgoing authentication Required");
|
|
+ start_auth = true;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
+ if (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_AUTHENTICATE) {
|
|
+ LOG_DEBUG(LOG_TAG, "Incoming authentication Required");
|
|
+ start_auth = true;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * If we do have a link-key, but we end up here because we need an
|
|
- * upgrade, then clear the link-key known and authenticated flag before
|
|
- * restarting authentication.
|
|
- * WARNING: If the controller has link-key, it is optional and
|
|
- * recommended for the controller to send a Link_Key_Request.
|
|
- * In case we need an upgrade, the only alternative would be to delete
|
|
- * the existing link-key. That could lead to very bad user experience
|
|
- * or even IOP issues, if a reconnect causes a new connection that
|
|
- * requires an upgrade.
|
|
- */
|
|
- if ((p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_KNOWN) &&
|
|
- (!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED) &&
|
|
- (!p_dev_rec->is_originator &&
|
|
- (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN)))) {
|
|
- p_dev_rec->sec_flags &=
|
|
- ~(BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_KNOWN | BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_AUTHED |
|
|
- BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED);
|
|
+ if (!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED)) {
|
|
+ /*
|
|
+ * We rely on BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED being set if MITM is in use,
|
|
+ * as 16 DIGIT is only needed if MITM is not used. Unfortunately, the
|
|
+ * BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED is used for both MITM and non-MITM
|
|
+ * authenticated connections, hence we cannot distinguish here.
|
|
+ */
|
|
+ if (!p_dev_rec->is_originator) {
|
|
+ if (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN) {
|
|
+ LOG_DEBUG(LOG_TAG, "BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN Required");
|
|
+ start_auth = true;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
- btm_sec_start_authentication(p_dev_rec);
|
|
- return (BTM_CMD_STARTED);
|
|
+ if (start_auth) {
|
|
+ LOG_DEBUG(LOG_TAG, "Security Manager: Start authentication");
|
|
+
|
|
+ /*
|
|
+ * If we do have a link-key, but we end up here because we need an
|
|
+ * upgrade, then clear the link-key known and authenticated flag before
|
|
+ * restarting authentication.
|
|
+ * WARNING: If the controller has link-key, it is optional and
|
|
+ * recommended for the controller to send a Link_Key_Request.
|
|
+ * In case we need an upgrade, the only alternative would be to delete
|
|
+ * the existing link-key. That could lead to very bad user experience
|
|
+ * or even IOP issues, if a reconnect causes a new connection that
|
|
+ * requires an upgrade.
|
|
+ */
|
|
+ if ((p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_KNOWN) &&
|
|
+ (!(p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_16_DIGIT_PIN_AUTHED) &&
|
|
+ (!p_dev_rec->is_originator &&
|
|
+ (p_dev_rec->security_required & BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN)))) {
|
|
+ p_dev_rec->sec_flags &=
|
|
+ ~(BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_KNOWN | BTM_SEC_LINK_KEY_AUTHED |
|
|
+ BTM_SEC_AUTHENTICATED);
|
|
+ }
|
|
+
|
|
+ btm_sec_start_authentication(p_dev_rec);
|
|
+ return (BTM_CMD_STARTED);
|
|
+ }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If connection is not encrypted and encryption is required */
|