DivestOS/Patches/LineageOS-16.0/android_system_bt/359738.patch
Tavi 082bc48c32
16.0: Import and verify picks
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-07
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-08
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-11
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-04
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-07
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/361250
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-08
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/364606
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/365328
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-11
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/374916
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-04

Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
2024-05-07 19:43:19 -04:00

83 lines
3.4 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Delwiche <delwiche@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:39:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "Revert "Fix wrong BR/EDR link key downgrades
(P_256->P_192)""
This reverts commit d733c86cbc06ce0ec72216b9d41e172d1939c46f.
Function btm_sec_encrypt_change() is called at most places
with argument "encr_enable" treated as bool and not as per
(tHCI_ENCRYPT_MODE = 0/1/2) expected by the function. The
function has special handling for "encr_enable=1" to downgrade
the link key type for BR/EDR case. This gets executed even
when the caller/context did not mean/expect so. It appears
this handling in btm_sec_encrypt_change() is not necessary and
is removed by this commit to prevent accidental execution of it.
Test: Verified re-pairing with an iPhone works fine now
Issue Reproduction Steps:
1. Enable Bluetooth Hotspot on Android device (DUT).
2. Pair and connect an iPhone to DUT.
3. Forget this pairing on DUT.
4. On iPhone settings, click on old DUT's paired entry to connect.
5. iPhone notifies to click 'Forget Device' and try fresh pairing.
6. On iPhone, after doing 'Forget Device', discover DUT again.
7. Attempt pairing to DUT by clicking on discovered DUT entry.
Pairing will be unsuccessful.
Issue Cause:
During re-pairing, DUT is seen to downgrade
BR/EDR link key unexpectedly from link key type 0x8
(BTM_LKEY_TYPE_AUTH_COMB_P_256) to 0x5 (BTM_LKEY_TYPE_AUTH_COMB).
Log snippet (re-pairing time):
btm_sec_link_key_notification set new_encr_key_256 to 1
btif_dm_auth_cmpl_evt: Storing link key. key_type=0x8, bond_type=1
btm_sec_encrypt_change new_encr_key_256 is 1
--On DUT, HCI_Encryption_Key_Refresh_Complete event noticed---
btm_sec_encrypt_change new_encr_key_256 is 0
updated link key type to 5
btif_dm_auth_cmpl_evt: Storing link key. key_type=0x5, bond_type=1
This is a backport of the following patch: aosp/1890096
Bug: 258834033
Reason for revert: Reinstate original change for QPR
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:56891eedc68c86b40977191dad28d65ebf86a94f)
Merged-In: Iba0c220b82bcf6b15368762b7052a3987ccbc0c6
Change-Id: Iba0c220b82bcf6b15368762b7052a3987ccbc0c6
---
stack/btm/btm_sec.cc | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
index 168750140..899b6b908 100644
--- a/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
+++ b/stack/btm/btm_sec.cc
@@ -4030,22 +4030,6 @@ void btm_sec_encrypt_change(uint16_t handle, uint8_t status,
SMP_BR_PairWith(p_dev_rec->bd_addr);
}
}
- } else {
- // BR/EDR is successfully encrypted. Correct LK type if needed
- // (BR/EDR LK derived from LE LTK was used for encryption)
- if ((encr_enable == 1) && /* encryption is ON for SSP */
- /* LK type is for BR/EDR SC */
- (p_dev_rec->link_key_type == BTM_LKEY_TYPE_UNAUTH_COMB_P_256 ||
- p_dev_rec->link_key_type == BTM_LKEY_TYPE_AUTH_COMB_P_256)) {
- if (p_dev_rec->link_key_type == BTM_LKEY_TYPE_UNAUTH_COMB_P_256)
- p_dev_rec->link_key_type = BTM_LKEY_TYPE_UNAUTH_COMB;
- else /* BTM_LKEY_TYPE_AUTH_COMB_P_256 */
- p_dev_rec->link_key_type = BTM_LKEY_TYPE_AUTH_COMB;
-
- BTM_TRACE_DEBUG("updated link key type to %d",
- p_dev_rec->link_key_type);
- btm_send_link_key_notif(p_dev_rec);
- }
}
}