DivestOS/Patches/LineageOS-16.0/android_frameworks_base/345902.patch
Tavi 082bc48c32
16.0: Import and verify picks
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-07
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-08
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-11
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-04
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-07
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/361250
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-08
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/364606
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/365328
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-11
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/374916
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-04

Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
2024-05-07 19:43:19 -04:00

103 lines
4.9 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hao Ke <haok@google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:43:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add safety checks on KEY_INTENT mismatch.
For many years, Parcel mismatch typed exploits has been using the
AccoungManagerService's passing of KEY_INTENT workflow, as a foothold of
launching arbitrary intents. We are adding an extra check on the service
side to simulate the final deserialization of the KEY_INTENT value, to
make sure the client side won't get a mismatched KEY_INTENT value.
Bug: 250588548
Bug: 240138294
Test: atest CtsAccountManagerTestCases
Test: local test, also see b/250588548
Change-Id: I433e34f6e21ce15c89825044a15b1dec46bb25cc
(cherry picked from commit eb9a0566a583fa13f8aff671c41f78a9e33eab82)
Merged-In: I433e34f6e21ce15c89825044a15b1dec46bb25cc
---
.../accounts/AccountManagerService.java | 34 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/accounts/AccountManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/accounts/AccountManagerService.java
index 4c8acc5ffb63..c1f401e9a11f 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/accounts/AccountManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/accounts/AccountManagerService.java
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ import android.os.SystemClock;
import android.os.UserHandle;
import android.os.UserManager;
import android.text.TextUtils;
+import android.util.EventLog;
import android.util.Log;
import android.util.Pair;
import android.util.Slog;
@@ -3001,7 +3002,7 @@ public class AccountManagerService
*/
if (!checkKeyIntent(
Binder.getCallingUid(),
- intent)) {
+ result)) {
onError(AccountManager.ERROR_CODE_INVALID_RESPONSE,
"invalid intent in bundle returned");
return;
@@ -3411,7 +3412,7 @@ public class AccountManagerService
&& (intent = result.getParcelable(AccountManager.KEY_INTENT)) != null) {
if (!checkKeyIntent(
Binder.getCallingUid(),
- intent)) {
+ result)) {
onError(AccountManager.ERROR_CODE_INVALID_RESPONSE,
"invalid intent in bundle returned");
return;
@@ -4771,7 +4772,13 @@ public class AccountManagerService
* into launching arbitrary intents on the device via by tricking to click authenticator
* supplied entries in the system Settings app.
*/
- protected boolean checkKeyIntent(int authUid, Intent intent) {
+ protected boolean checkKeyIntent(int authUid, Bundle bundle) {
+ if (!checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly(bundle)) {
+ EventLog.writeEvent(0x534e4554, "250588548", authUid, "");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ Intent intent = bundle.getParcelable(AccountManager.KEY_INTENT);
// Explicitly set an empty ClipData to ensure that we don't offer to
// promote any Uris contained inside for granting purposes
if (intent.getClipData() == null) {
@@ -4808,6 +4815,25 @@ public class AccountManagerService
}
}
+ /**
+ * Simulate the client side's deserialization of KEY_INTENT value, to make sure they don't
+ * violate our security policy.
+ *
+ * In particular we want to make sure the Authenticator doesn't trick users
+ * into launching arbitrary intents on the device via exploiting any other Parcel read/write
+ * mismatch problems.
+ */
+ private boolean checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly(Bundle bundle) {
+ Parcel p = Parcel.obtain();
+ p.writeBundle(bundle);
+ p.setDataPosition(0);
+ Bundle simulateBundle = p.readBundle();
+ p.recycle();
+ Intent intent = bundle.getParcelable(AccountManager.KEY_INTENT);
+ Intent simulateIntent = simulateBundle.getParcelable(AccountManager.KEY_INTENT);
+ return (intent.filterEquals(simulateIntent));
+ }
+
private boolean isExportedSystemActivity(ActivityInfo activityInfo) {
String className = activityInfo.name;
return "android".equals(activityInfo.packageName) &&
@@ -4954,7 +4980,7 @@ public class AccountManagerService
&& (intent = result.getParcelable(AccountManager.KEY_INTENT)) != null) {
if (!checkKeyIntent(
Binder.getCallingUid(),
- intent)) {
+ result)) {
onError(AccountManager.ERROR_CODE_INVALID_RESPONSE,
"invalid intent in bundle returned");
return;