DivestOS/Patches/Linux_CVEs/CVE-2017-10661/ANY/0.patch
2017-10-29 22:14:37 -04:00

100 lines
3.2 KiB
Diff

From 24a4020b992c7f3cd3320d574947c5a1f51f264d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:24:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] timerfd: Protect the might cancel mechanism proper
commit 1e38da300e1e395a15048b0af1e5305bd91402f6 upstream.
The handling of the might_cancel queueing is not properly protected, so
parallel operations on the file descriptor can race with each other and
lead to list corruptions or use after free.
Protect the context for these operations with a seperate lock.
The wait queue lock cannot be reused for this because that would create a
lock inversion scenario vs. the cancel lock. Replacing might_cancel with an
atomic (atomic_t or atomic bit) does not help either because it still can
race vs. the actual list operation.
Bug: 36266767
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org"
Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1701311521430.3457@nanos
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Siqi Lin <siqilin@google.com>
Change-Id: I122753e0920e51757d3012cd1a133e823719be51
---
fs/timerfd.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/timerfd.c b/fs/timerfd.c
index 86b32c3cb247f..31374ec8f9bd2 100644
--- a/fs/timerfd.c
+++ b/fs/timerfd.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct timerfd_ctx {
short unsigned settime_flags; /* to show in fdinfo */
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct list_head clist;
+ spinlock_t cancel_lock;
bool might_cancel;
};
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ void timerfd_clock_was_set(void)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-static void timerfd_remove_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
+static void __timerfd_remove_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
{
if (ctx->might_cancel) {
ctx->might_cancel = false;
@@ -123,6 +124,13 @@ static void timerfd_remove_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
}
}
+static void timerfd_remove_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ spin_lock(&ctx->cancel_lock);
+ __timerfd_remove_cancel(ctx);
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->cancel_lock);
+}
+
static bool timerfd_canceled(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
{
if (!ctx->might_cancel || ctx->moffs.tv64 != KTIME_MAX)
@@ -133,6 +141,7 @@ static bool timerfd_canceled(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
static void timerfd_setup_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx, int flags)
{
+ spin_lock(&ctx->cancel_lock);
if ((ctx->clockid == CLOCK_REALTIME ||
ctx->clockid == CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM ||
ctx->clockid == CLOCK_POWEROFF_ALARM) &&
@@ -143,9 +152,10 @@ static void timerfd_setup_cancel(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx, int flags)
list_add_rcu(&ctx->clist, &cancel_list);
spin_unlock(&cancel_lock);
}
- } else if (ctx->might_cancel) {
- timerfd_remove_cancel(ctx);
+ } else {
+ __timerfd_remove_cancel(ctx);
}
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->cancel_lock);
}
static ktime_t timerfd_get_remaining(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
@@ -397,6 +407,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(timerfd_create, int, clockid, int, flags)
return -ENOMEM;
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh);
+ spin_lock_init(&ctx->cancel_lock);
ctx->clockid = clockid;
if (isalarm(ctx)) {