DivestOS/Patches/LineageOS-16.0/android_external_dtc/342096.patch
Tavi 082bc48c32
16.0: Import and verify picks
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-07
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-08
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-11
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-04
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-05
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-06
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-07
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/361250
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-08
	accounted for via manifest change:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/364606
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/365328
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-09
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-10
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-11
	accounted for via patches:
	https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/374916
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-12
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-01
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-02
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-03
https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-04

Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
2024-05-07 19:43:19 -04:00

56 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:52:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] FROMGIT: libfdt: fdt_offset_ptr(): Fix comparison warnings
With -Wsign-compare, compilers warn about mismatching signedness in
comparisons in fdt_offset_ptr().
This mostly stems from "offset" being passed in as a signed integer,
even though the function would not really tolerate negative values.
Short of changing the prototype, check that offset is not negative, and
use an unsigned type internally.
Bug: 230794395
Test: manual - see bug
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Message-Id: <20200921165303.9115-2-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Change-Id: I33c4ac27780d6bdd46c5504a839c0827c9c76bfc
Merged-In: Idb30ae90e2b263d1dd2e931ef1d3662a23812120
Merged-In: Ice02ecc84d6e9ab30773d039a54664b259979521
(cherry picked from commit 35c4c2b27acf66c217865451eeecf09bc82dae66)
Merged-In: I33c4ac27780d6bdd46c5504a839c0827c9c76bfc
---
libfdt/fdt.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libfdt/fdt.c b/libfdt/fdt.c
index 22286a1..5baaed3 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt.c
@@ -76,15 +76,19 @@ int fdt_check_header(const void *fdt)
const void *fdt_offset_ptr(const void *fdt, int offset, unsigned int len)
{
- unsigned absoffset = offset + fdt_off_dt_struct(fdt);
+ unsigned int uoffset = offset;
+ unsigned int absoffset = offset + fdt_off_dt_struct(fdt);
- if ((absoffset < offset)
+ if (offset < 0)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if ((absoffset < uoffset)
|| ((absoffset + len) < absoffset)
|| (absoffset + len) > fdt_totalsize(fdt))
return NULL;
if (fdt_version(fdt) >= 0x11)
- if (((offset + len) < offset)
+ if (((uoffset + len) < uoffset)
|| ((offset + len) > fdt_size_dt_struct(fdt)))
return NULL;