17.1: July 2024 ASB work

Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
This commit is contained in:
Tavi 2024-07-17 13:35:58 -04:00
parent 6dee42d038
commit 218493fc4a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: E599F62ECBAEAF2E
11 changed files with 224 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ index f0e779694c90..9f41a4136db9 100644
OsConstants._LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3, 0);
StructCapUserData[] data;
diff --git a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
index 52d0adba0a05..478ccfb2f568 100644
index fe2ff54194fb..6a46a0b7b8ec 100644
--- a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
+++ b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ import android.net.Credentials;
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ index 52d0adba0a05..478ccfb2f568 100644
import android.os.Trace;
import android.system.ErrnoException;
import android.system.Os;
@@ -595,6 +596,13 @@ class ZygoteConnection {
@@ -598,6 +599,13 @@ class ZygoteConnection {
throw new IllegalStateException("WrapperInit.execApplication unexpectedly returned");
} else {
if (!isZygote) {

View file

@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ spawning when doing debugging.
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
index 478ccfb2f568..355c1115fb4f 100644
index 6a46a0b7b8ec..c71a5c5f3d9b 100644
--- a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
+++ b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
@@ -596,7 +596,8 @@ class ZygoteConnection {
@@ -599,7 +599,8 @@ class ZygoteConnection {
throw new IllegalStateException("WrapperInit.execApplication unexpectedly returned");
} else {
if (!isZygote) {

View file

@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ index a8dd041454c9..6940b9eb36ed 100644
<!-- Allows applications to access information about networks.
<p>Protection level: normal
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
index f247610fa8a3..a57a2b819f84 100644
index 7784e4a9717c..c2c2624bf063 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ public class PermissionManagerService {

View file

@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ index 2cf2b923ef90..ae206c1f5872 100644
<string name="permlab_readCalendar">Read calendar events and details</string>
<!-- Description of an application permission, listed so the user can choose whether they want to allow the application to do this. -->
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
index a57a2b819f84..ecbee40cf574 100644
index c2c2624bf063..b826a90f1270 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ public class PermissionManagerService {

View file

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ index d27b5ad0d646..32b022455451 100644
Process.SYSTEM_UID, userId, delayingPermCallback);
// Allow app op later as we are holding mPackages
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
index ed551795aad5..f247610fa8a3 100644
index b342f443d9ac..7784e4a9717c 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
@@ -1024,6 +1024,10 @@ public class PermissionManagerService {

View file

@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martijn Coenen <maco@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:03:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Verify UID of incoming Zygote connections.
Only the system UID should be allowed to connect to the Zygote. While
for generic Zygotes this is also covered by SELinux policy, this is not
true for App Zygotes: the preload code running in an app zygote could
connect to another app zygote socket, if it had access to its (random)
socket address.
On the Java layer, simply check the UID when the connection is made. In
the native layer, this check was already present, but it actually didn't
work in the case where we receive a new incoming connection on the
socket, and receive a 'non-fork' command: in that case, we will simply
exit the native loop, and let the Java layer handle the command, without
any further UID checking.
Modified the native logic to drop new connections with a mismatching
UID, and to keep serving the existing connection (if it was still
there).
[Backport: No native layer for ZygoteCommandBuffer present]
Bug: 319081336
Test: manual
(cherry picked from commit 2ffc7cb220e4220b7e108c4043a3f0f2a85b6508)
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:e397fd3d20c3f409311e411387ec1524ccecf085)
Merged-In: I3f85a17107849e2cd3e82d6ef15c90b9e2f26532
Change-Id: I3f85a17107849e2cd3e82d6ef15c90b9e2f26532
---
core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
index 52d0adba0a05..fe2ff54194fb 100644
--- a/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
+++ b/core/java/com/android/internal/os/ZygoteConnection.java
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ class ZygoteConnection {
throw ex;
}
+ if (peer.getUid() != Process.SYSTEM_UID) {
+ throw new ZygoteSecurityException("Only system UID is allowed to connect to Zygote.");
+ }
isEof = false;
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi-an Chen <theianchen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:53:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix security vulnerability of non-dynamic permission removal
The original removePermission() code in PermissionManagerService
missed a logical negation operator when handling non-dynamic
permissions, causing both
testPermissionPermission_nonDynamicPermission_permissionUnchanged and
testRemovePermission_dynamicPermission_permissionRemoved tests in
DynamicPermissionsTest to fail.
The corresponding test DynamicPermissionsTest is also updated in the
other CL: ag/27073864
Bug: 321711213
Test: DynamicPermissionsTest on sc-dev and tm-dev locally
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:35d77a77feef62dc108f6478cb9228cc6044f70d)
Merged-In: Id573b75cdcfce3a1df5731ffb00c4228c513e686
Change-Id: Id573b75cdcfce3a1df5731ffb00c4228c513e686
---
.../android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
index ed551795aad5..b342f443d9ac 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ public class PermissionManagerService {
if (bp == null) {
return;
}
- if (bp.isDynamic()) {
+ if (!bp.isDynamic()) {
// TODO: switch this back to SecurityException
Slog.wtf(TAG, "Not allowed to modify non-dynamic permission "
+ permName);

View file

@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Delwiche <delwiche@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:14:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix an authentication bypass bug in SMP
When pairing with BLE legacy pairing initiated
from remote, authentication can be bypassed.
This change fixes it.
Bug: 251514170
Test: m com.android.btservices
Test: manual run against PoC
Ignore-AOSP-First: security
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:8a3dbadc71428a30b172a74343be08498c656747)
Merged-In: I66b1f9a80060f48a604001829db8ea7c96c7b7f8
Change-Id: I66b1f9a80060f48a604001829db8ea7c96c7b7f8
---
stack/smp/smp_act.cc | 12 ++++++++++++
stack/smp/smp_int.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/stack/smp/smp_act.cc b/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
index c1f143e92..199c5abb3 100644
--- a/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
+++ b/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ void smp_send_pair_rsp(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
void smp_send_confirm(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
SMP_TRACE_DEBUG("%s", __func__);
smp_send_cmd(SMP_OPCODE_CONFIRM, p_cb);
+ p_cb->flags |= SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT;
}
/*******************************************************************************
@@ -645,6 +646,17 @@ void smp_proc_init(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
return;
}
+ if (!((p_cb->loc_auth_req & SMP_SC_SUPPORT_BIT) &&
+ (p_cb->peer_auth_req & SMP_SC_SUPPORT_BIT)) &&
+ !(p_cb->flags & SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT)) {
+ // in legacy pairing, the peer should send its rand after
+ // we send our confirm
+ tSMP_INT_DATA smp_int_data{};
+ smp_int_data.status = SMP_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
+ smp_sm_event(p_cb, SMP_AUTH_CMPL_EVT, &smp_int_data);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* save the SRand for comparison */
STREAM_TO_ARRAY(p_cb->rrand.data(), p, OCTET16_LEN);
}
diff --git a/stack/smp/smp_int.h b/stack/smp/smp_int.h
index 72fdf55a9..e3063c57d 100644
--- a/stack/smp/smp_int.h
+++ b/stack/smp/smp_int.h
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ typedef union {
(1 << 7) /* used to resolve race condition */
#define SMP_PAIR_FLAG_HAVE_LOCAL_PUBL_KEY \
(1 << 8) /* used on slave to resolve race condition */
+#define SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT (1 << 9)
/* check if authentication requirement need MITM protection */
#define SMP_NO_MITM_REQUIRED(x) (((x)&SMP_AUTH_YN_BIT) == 0)

View file

@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Delwiche <delwiche@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:14:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix an authentication bypass bug in SMP
When pairing with BLE legacy pairing initiated
from remote, authentication can be bypassed.
This change fixes it.
Bug: 251514170
Test: m com.android.btservices
Test: manual run against PoC
Ignore-AOSP-First: security
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:8a3dbadc71428a30b172a74343be08498c656747)
Merged-In: I66b1f9a80060f48a604001829db8ea7c96c7b7f8
Change-Id: I66b1f9a80060f48a604001829db8ea7c96c7b7f8
---
stack/smp/smp_act.cc | 12 ++++++++++++
stack/smp/smp_int.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/stack/smp/smp_act.cc b/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
index a18d8389b..cb8b16329 100755
--- a/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
+++ b/stack/smp/smp_act.cc
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ void smp_send_pair_rsp(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
void smp_send_confirm(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
SMP_TRACE_DEBUG("%s", __func__);
smp_send_cmd(SMP_OPCODE_CONFIRM, p_cb);
+ p_cb->flags |= SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT;
}
/*******************************************************************************
@@ -671,6 +672,17 @@ void smp_proc_rand(tSMP_CB* p_cb, tSMP_INT_DATA* p_data) {
return;
}
+ if (!((p_cb->loc_auth_req & SMP_SC_SUPPORT_BIT) &&
+ (p_cb->peer_auth_req & SMP_SC_SUPPORT_BIT)) &&
+ !(p_cb->flags & SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT)) {
+ // in legacy pairing, the peer should send its rand after
+ // we send our confirm
+ tSMP_INT_DATA smp_int_data{};
+ smp_int_data.status = SMP_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
+ smp_sm_event(p_cb, SMP_AUTH_CMPL_EVT, &smp_int_data);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* save the SRand for comparison */
STREAM_TO_ARRAY(p_cb->rrand.data(), p, OCTET16_LEN);
}
diff --git a/stack/smp/smp_int.h b/stack/smp/smp_int.h
index a9b4471fc..4aab2408a 100644
--- a/stack/smp/smp_int.h
+++ b/stack/smp/smp_int.h
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ enum {
(1 << 7) /* used to resolve race condition */
#define SMP_PAIR_FLAG_HAVE_LOCAL_PUBL_KEY \
(1 << 8) /* used on slave to resolve race condition */
+#define SMP_PAIR_FLAGS_CMD_CONFIRM_SENT (1 << 9)
/* check if authentication requirement need MITM protection */
#define SMP_NO_MITM_REQUIRED(x) (((x)&SMP_AUTH_YN_BIT) == 0)