DivestOS/Patches/LineageOS-16.0/android_frameworks_base/389269.patch

108 lines
5.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

16.0: Import and verify picks https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-05 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-06 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-07 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-08 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-09 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-10 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-11 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2022-12 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-01 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-02 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-03 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-04 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-05 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-06 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-07 accounted for via manifest change: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/361250 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-08 accounted for via manifest change: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_external_freetype/+/364606 accounted for via patches: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/365328 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-09 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-10 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-11 accounted for via patches: https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_system_ca-certificates/+/374916 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2023-12 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-01 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-02 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-03 https://review.lineageos.org/q/topic:P_asb_2024-04 Signed-off-by: Tavi <tavi@divested.dev>
2024-05-07 19:13:31 -04:00
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Beverly <beverlyt@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:13:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] isUserInLockDown can be true when there are other strong auth
requirements
Bug: 315206668
Bug: 218495634
Flag: None
Test: manual, atest LockPatternUtilsTest
(cherry picked from commit d341f1ecdb011d24b17358f115391b3f997cb179)
(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:ba8dfc68aada76127abafdb17d0f0896cc14447a)
Merged-In: I5e979a7822dd7254b4579ab28ecf96df1db44179
Change-Id: I5e979a7822dd7254b4579ab28ecf96df1db44179
---
.../internal/widget/LockPatternUtils.java | 4 +--
.../internal/util/LockPatternUtilsTest.java | 33 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockPatternUtils.java b/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockPatternUtils.java
index 1d8ae14bbb87..7221e521def5 100644
--- a/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockPatternUtils.java
+++ b/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockPatternUtils.java
@@ -1596,8 +1596,8 @@ public class LockPatternUtils {
}
public boolean isUserInLockdown(int userId) {
- return getStrongAuthForUser(userId)
- == StrongAuthTracker.STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_USER_LOCKDOWN;
+ return (getStrongAuthForUser(userId)
+ & StrongAuthTracker.STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_USER_LOCKDOWN) != 0;
}
private ICheckCredentialProgressCallback wrapCallback(
diff --git a/core/tests/utiltests/src/com/android/internal/util/LockPatternUtilsTest.java b/core/tests/utiltests/src/com/android/internal/util/LockPatternUtilsTest.java
index b18ee171eb0c..0d102daf76e9 100644
--- a/core/tests/utiltests/src/com/android/internal/util/LockPatternUtilsTest.java
+++ b/core/tests/utiltests/src/com/android/internal/util/LockPatternUtilsTest.java
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ package com.android.internal.util;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_MANAGED;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_UNSPECIFIED;
+import static com.android.internal.widget.LockPatternUtils.StrongAuthTracker.STRONG_AUTH_NOT_REQUIRED;
+import static com.android.internal.widget.LockPatternUtils.StrongAuthTracker.STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_USER_LOCKDOWN;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
@@ -46,12 +48,15 @@ import org.mockito.Mockito;
@SmallTest
public class LockPatternUtilsTest {
+ private ILockSettings mLockSettings;
+ private static final int USER_ID = 1;
private static final int DEMO_USER_ID = 5;
private LockPatternUtils mLockPatternUtils;
private void configureTest(boolean isSecure, boolean isDemoUser, int deviceDemoMode)
throws Exception {
+ mLockSettings = Mockito.mock(ILockSettings.class);
final Context context = spy(new ContextWrapper(InstrumentationRegistry.getTargetContext()));
final MockContentResolver cr = new MockContentResolver(context);
@@ -59,13 +64,12 @@ public class LockPatternUtilsTest {
when(context.getContentResolver()).thenReturn(cr);
Settings.Global.putInt(cr, Settings.Global.DEVICE_DEMO_MODE, deviceDemoMode);
- final ILockSettings ils = Mockito.mock(ILockSettings.class);
- when(ils.havePassword(DEMO_USER_ID)).thenReturn(isSecure);
- when(ils.getLong("lockscreen.password_type", PASSWORD_QUALITY_UNSPECIFIED, DEMO_USER_ID))
- .thenReturn((long) PASSWORD_QUALITY_MANAGED);
+ when(mLockSettings.getCredentialType(DEMO_USER_ID)).thenReturn(isSecure);
+ when(mLockSettings.getLong("lockscreen.password_type", PASSWORD_QUALITY_UNSPECIFIED,
+ DEMO_USER_ID)).thenReturn((long) PASSWORD_QUALITY_MANAGED);
// TODO(b/63758238): stop spying the class under test
mLockPatternUtils = spy(new LockPatternUtils(context));
- when(mLockPatternUtils.getLockSettings()).thenReturn(ils);
+ when(mLockPatternUtils.getLockSettings()).thenReturn(mLockSettings);
final UserInfo userInfo = Mockito.mock(UserInfo.class);
when(userInfo.isDemo()).thenReturn(isDemoUser);
@@ -74,6 +78,25 @@ public class LockPatternUtilsTest {
when(context.getSystemService(Context.USER_SERVICE)).thenReturn(um);
}
+ @Test
+ public void isUserInLockDown() throws Exception {
+ configureTest(true, false, 2);
+ // GIVEN strong auth not required
+ when(mLockSettings.getStrongAuthForUser(USER_ID)).thenReturn(STRONG_AUTH_NOT_REQUIRED);
+ // THEN user isn't in lockdown
+ assertFalse(mLockPatternUtils.isUserInLockdown(USER_ID));
+ // GIVEN lockdown
+ when(mLockSettings.getStrongAuthForUser(USER_ID)).thenReturn(
+ STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_USER_LOCKDOWN);
+ // THEN user is in lockdown
+ assertTrue(mLockPatternUtils.isUserInLockdown(USER_ID));
+ // GIVEN lockdown and lockout
+ when(mLockSettings.getStrongAuthForUser(USER_ID)).thenReturn(
+ STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_USER_LOCKDOWN | STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED_AFTER_LOCKOUT);
+ // THEN user is in lockdown
+ assertTrue(mLockPatternUtils.isUserInLockdown(USER_ID));
+ }
+
@Test
public void isLockScreenDisabled_isDemoUser_true() throws Exception {
configureTest(false, true, 2);