Awesome-Mirrors/decentralized-id.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Decentralized-ID/decentralized-id.github.io.git synced 2024-12-15 02:24:25 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
73f0b55df7
decentralized-id.github.io/identosphere-dump/open-standards/not-ssi
History
⧉ infominer 73f0b55df7 standards sort
2022-12-16 16:07:05 -05:00
..
fido-alliance.md standards sort 2022-12-16 16:07:05 -05:00
id-not-ssi.md standards sort 2022-12-16 16:07:05 -05:00
README.md standards sort 2022-12-16 16:07:05 -05:00

README.md

Non SSI Identity Standards

Contents

  • OpenID
  • FIDO
  • OAuth
  • SCIM
  • SAML
  • KMIP
  • Secure QR Code

OpenID

The OpenID Foundation is pleased to share its new whitepaper, “Open Banking, Open Data and Financial-Grade APIs”. The paper documents the international movement towards Open Banking, Open Finance, and secure, consent driven access to all user data. It describes the OpenID Foundation and in particular the Financial-Grade API (FAPI) Working Group’s experience with Open Banking ecosystems internationally.

  1. A identity standard’s adoption is driven by its value of the reliability, repeatability and security of its implementations.
  2. A standard’s value can be measured by the number of instances of certified technical conformance extant in the market.
  3. Certified technical conformance is necessary but insufficient for global adoption.
  4. Adoption at scale requires widespread awareness, ongoing technical improvement and a open and authoritative reference source.
  5. When Libraries/Directories/ Registries act as authoritative sources they amplify awareness, extend adoption and promote certification.
  6. Certified technical conformance importantly complements legal compliance and together optimize interoperability.
  7. Interoperability enhances security, contains costs and drives profitability.

GAIN is marked by a cross sector, crowd sourced, open, global due diligence. GAIN’s self organized participants are actively seeking evidence that disconfirms the GAIN hypothesis.

Board participation requires a substantial investment of time and energy. It is a volunteer effort that should not be undertaken lightly. Should you be elected, expect to be called upon to serve both on the board and on its committees. You should have your employer’s agreement to attend two or more in-person board meetings a year, which are typically collocated with important identity conferences around the world.

This specification defines event types and their contents based on the SSE Framework that are required to implement Risk Incident Sharing and Coordination.

OAuth

SCIM

SAML

KMIP

Secure QR Code

RDF

RDF

  • Technical Report on the Universal RDF Dataset Normalization Algorithm - Bill Bradley

    The goal of this technical report is to review the Universal RDF Dataset Normalization Algorithm (URDNA2015) for correctness and to provide satisfactory evidence that possible issues with URDNA2015 have been considered and dismissed. We do not lay out the algorithm in its considerable technical detail here, but refer the reader to the proposed technical specification 1 [Longley], a set of proofs by Rachel Arnold and Dave Longely [Arnold], and a reference implementation in Python [DigitalBazaar]

  • Importing Verifiable Data as Labeled Property Graphs  Orie Steele (Wednesday, 15 June)

I think what happens is that a first blank node is created for the proof, and since that node has @container @graph, instead of being able to trace the relationships directly from credential to proof to verification method...

Each proof is being treated as a disjoint subgraph, and the relationship is not being preserved during import… [...]

I suspect this is solvable with a more complicated graph config: https://neo4j.com/labs/neosemantics/4.0/config/

But I wonder if we might correct this behavior in VC Data Model 2.0, such that RDF representations don't have this odd behavior when imported as labeled property graphs. [...]

answer on the github issue for the standard, I raised it here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/881

The goal of this group is to standardize the way many of us digitally sign Verifiable Credentials. This working group has been about decade in the making (some would say two decades) and is important for achieving things like BBS+ selective disclosure as well as standardizing the way we format Verifiable Credentials before they are digitally signed.

The announcement is here

The proposed charter is here

I've instrumented the rdf-canonicalize library so I can inspect the order of execution, and it appears that what differs between my implementation and the Javascript one is the order of the permutations. The spec doesn't say how the permutations should be ordered, and my intuition is that the order does indeed matter - though I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong.

So, here is my question(s):

  • Does the order of the permutations matter?
  • If so, what order should they be in?
  • In Praise of Kim Cameron OpenID Foundation

    Not only did Kim “inject his 7 laws of identity into Microsoft’s DNA”, but did so throughout today’s growing global digital identity ecosystem.

    Kim was crafty. He not only injected his thinking into Microsoft; as a champion of the Identity Standards Community, Kim embedded his thinking into the standards that inform many of the identity systems operating at scale today.

  • OIDF Workshop at EIC 2022 — Tuesday, May 10, 2022

    The OpenID Foundation hosted a workshop at EIC 2022 in Berlin that was part of the pre-conference workshops on Tuesday, May 10, 2022.
    The Foundation was thrilled to welcome and introduce two of the 2022 Kim Cameron Award winners, Rachelle Sellung and Alen Horvat at the workshop. The Foundation will soon publish blogs from Rachelle and Alen describing their experiences at EIC 2022.-

  • Download workshop presentations
  • Announcing the 2022 OpenID Foundation Kim Cameron Award OpenID

Award recipients will be studying, researching, interning or working in a field relevant to one or more OpenID Foundation working groups and consistent with Foundation’s Mission. The recipients will also be invited to participate in Foundation breakout meetings at the European Identity Conference and Identiverse which will provide exposure to both the Foundation’s business as well as leading technologists.

GAIN was a big topic of discussion

GAIN: The Global Assured Identity Network @OIX_Nick and @gailhodges on the main stage.

https://www.notion.soimages/image4.png

just like trade unions helped the working class during the industrial revolution to fight for their rights. In this panel session, we will discuss about the enablers of such a different approach and the requirements to actually be successfull.

The OpenID Foundation formed the “Shared Signals and Events” (SSE) Working Group as a combination of the previous OpenID RISC working group and an informal industry group that was focused on standardizing Google’s CAEP proposal. These represented two distinct applications of the same underlying mechanism of managing asynchronous streams of events. Therefore the SSE Framework is now proposed to be a standard for managing such streams of events for any application, not just CAEP and RISC. In effect, it is a standard for generalized Webhooks.

I’ve defined an Authentication Method Reference (AMR) value called “pop” to indicate that Proof-of-possession of a key was performed. Unlike the existing “hwk” (hardware key) and “swk” (software key) methods [...] Among other use cases, this AMR method is applicable whenever a WebAuthn or FIDO authenticator are used.

The official voting period will be between Tuesday, February 1, 2022 and Tuesday, February 8, 2022, following the 45-day review of the specifications.

The goal of this whitepaper is to inform and educate the readers about the work on the OpenID for Verifiable Credentials (OpenID4VC) specifications family. It addresses use-cases referred to as Self-Sovereign Identity, Decentralized Identity, or User-Centric Identity.