mirror of
https://github.com/Decentralized-ID/decentralized-id.github.io.git
synced 2024-12-12 09:04:28 -05:00
sort
This commit is contained in:
⧉ infominer
parent
dce7786dca
commit
604e13a5f2
@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
|
||||
- Apple
|
||||
- Google
|
||||
|
||||
### Thrivacy
|
||||
* [WHY THRIVACY?: Think about it. What did you leave behind when you bought the last round of drinks.](https://www.thrivacy.io/why-thrivacy)
|
||||
> Your Thrivacy wallet allows you to request all your important, personal information that can be used to identify who you are to be created into what we call verified credentials. Then those same verified credentials or VCs can be downloaded and stored in your own personal wallet that is kept inside your cell phone.
|
||||
|
||||
### RIF Identity
|
||||
|
||||
* [Webinar Series: rlogin Developer Workshop from RIF Identity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3Do35EgZ4VH2Q)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
* [Credential-based login to a Pico-based application](https://iiw.idcommons.net/11P/_Credential-based_login_to_a_Pico-based_application) by Bruce Conrad
|
||||
> Verifiable credentials, authentication, picos, pico-based application
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The slides are at [https://bruceatbyu.com/s/HRDDSiiw32](https://bruceatbyu.com/s/HRDDSiiw32)
|
||||
|
||||
* [Announcing Pico Engine 1.0](https://www.windley.com/archives/2021/02/announcing_pico_engine_10.shtml)
|
||||
> In addition to the work on the engine itself, one of the primary workstreams at present is to complete Bruce Conrad's excellent work to use DIDs and DIDComm as the basis for inter-pico communication, called ACA-Pico (Aries Cloud Agent - Pico). [...] This work is important because it will replace the current subscriptions method of connecting heterarchies of picos with DIDComm. [...] because DIDComm is protocological, this will support protocol-based interactions between picos, including credential exchange.
|
||||
* [The Most Inventive Thing I've Done](https://www.windley.com/archives/2022/07/the_most_inventive_thing_ive_done.shtml) Phil Windley
|
||||
|
||||
@ -6,8 +6,6 @@ published: false
|
||||
|
||||
## Contents
|
||||
|
||||
- Explainer
|
||||
- Comparisons with/ other Tech
|
||||
- Varieties
|
||||
- JSON-LD
|
||||
- JSON-LD ZKP BBS+
|
||||
@ -15,120 +13,10 @@ published: false
|
||||
- ZKP-CL - [IIA] Indy Aries AnnonCreds
|
||||
- JWP
|
||||
|
||||
## Explainer
|
||||
|
||||
* [What are Verifiable Credentials](https://academy.affinidi.com/what-are-verifiable-credentials-79f1846a7b9)
|
||||
* [How W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Work: Part 1 – Issuance](https://blockster.global/self-sovereign-identity/)
|
||||
> When an issuer creates a verifiable credential, it contains following information –
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - Who has issued – DID of the Issuer
|
||||
> - To whom it is issued – User Identifier
|
||||
> - Attributes of the credential – Details of the credential being Issued
|
||||
> - When it is Issued – Date of issuance
|
||||
> - Credential proof with Issuer signature that makes it tamper evident
|
||||
> - Revocation details
|
||||
* [The Role of Witness Organizations in Verifiable Credentials](https://medium.com/@m.ruminer/on-the-role-of-witness-organizations-in-self-sovereign-identity-or-vcs-aren-t-just-p2p-e2cbafce6928)
|
||||
> The basis is that not every source of a verifiable credential has an interest in issuing verifiable credentials and that it is not only logical but beneficial to the ecosystem of trust that witness organizations will issue on behalf of these sources.
|
||||
* [An introductory dive into VCs (verifiable credentials)](https://hackernoon.com/understanding-the-verifiable-credentials-vcs-it1535e9) HackerNoon
|
||||
> Verifiable Credentials heavily utilize Decentralized Identifiers to identify people, organizations, and things and to achieve a number of security and privacy-protecting guarantees. They are issued and cryptographically signed documents, intended to be understood by computers rather than people.
|
||||
* [How Does a Verifier Know the Credential is Yours?](https://www.evernym.com/blog/how-does-a-verifier-know-the-credential-is-yours/) Evernym
|
||||
> A link secret is a large random number, wrapped in a way that allows the holder to prove that they know the secret.
|
||||
* [Introduction to Verifiable Credentials](https://www.ubisecure.com/identity-management/verifiable-credentials/) Ubisecure
|
||||
> The Verifiable Credentials specification is quite new, and many pieces that are required to create interoperable solutions are still incomplete or missing at time of writing. However, there is significant momentum around verifiable credentials (VCs). This is partly attributed to VCs being part of the solution for blockchain-based decentralised identity.
|
||||
* [8 Reasons to use Verifiable Credentials](https://academy.affinidi.com/8-reasons-to-use-verifiable-credentials-300833276b52) Affinidi
|
||||
> VCs are interoperable across many systems and can be used in almost every possible scenario.
|
||||
* [What are Verifiable Credentials in 3 Minutes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3Ds5h7OgmnrxE) Affinidi (video)
|
||||
* [The VC Lifecycle](https://credentialmaster.com/the-vc-lifecycle/) Credential Master
|
||||
> In 1956 the switch to consistent shipping containers began, and it changed the physical world [profoundly](https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2013/05/18/the-humble-hero); the switch to consistent, authenticatable digital data containers [will do the same for cyberspace](https://rufftimo.medium.com/like-shipping-containers-verifiable-credentials-will-economically-transform-the-world-fece2b9da14a).
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials Aren’t Credentials. And They’re Not Verifiable In the Way You Might Think](https://credentialmaster.com/verifiable-credentials-arent-credentials-theyre-containers/) Timothy Ruff
|
||||
> think “authenticatable data container” [...]
|
||||
>
|
||||
> VCs can carry any sort of data payload, and that isn’t just a good thing, it’s a great one. [Part two](https://medium.com/@rufftimo/like-shipping-containers-verifiable-credentials-will-economically-transform-the-world-fece2b9da14a) of my container series covers how such fluid data portability could economically affect cyberspace to a degree comparable to how shipping containers affected global trade.
|
||||
* [Verifiable credentials are key to the future of online privacy](https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2021/07/26/verifiable-credentials/) HelpNetSecurity
|
||||
> - All the data is decentralized, meaning there’s no need for a database of student records that could be jeopardized. Alice’s data lives with her.
|
||||
> - The employer doesn’t need to keep a copy of Alice’s transcript to verify her education.
|
||||
> - The college doesn’t play intermediary and doesn’t have access to the list of organizations Alice shares her data with. Other parties have no way of correlating this data as each exchange is private and unique.
|
||||
> - If desired, Alice could pick and choose what she wants to share. She could prove her degree without sharing her date of graduation or GPA, for example.
|
||||
* [What are Verifiable Credentials?](https://medium.com/affinidi/what-are-verifiable-credentials-79f1846a7b9)
|
||||
> At the most basic level, verifiable credentials, or VC in short, are tamper-proof credentials that can be verified cryptographically.
|
||||
* [Self Attested vs Chain of Custody - assurance levels in data provenance in VCs](https://iiw.idcommons.net/23G/_Self_Attested_vs_Chain_of_Custody_-_assurance_levels_in_data_provenance_in_VCs) by Stew Whitman & Alka Lachhwani
|
||||
> There are two important factors in establishing “truth” or the trustworthiness of the information. Attributional and Reputational. You need to have both to have trust.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Digital needs higher level of attestation because it is easier to forge and easier to propagate that forgery.
|
||||
* [An Introduction to Verifiable Credentials](https://verifiablecredential.io/learn) VerifiableCredential.io
|
||||
> Learn about verifiable credentials, then head to the playground to view examples, explore multiple use-cases and start using them.
|
||||
* [Do I Need a Verifiable Credential?](https://community.rsa.com/t5/rsa-labs-blog/do-i-need-a-verifiable-credential/ba-p/610241)
|
||||
* [How a combination of Federated identity and Verifiable Credentials can help with Customer onboarding](https://pranavkirtani.medium.com/how-a-combination-of-federated-identity-and-verifiable-credentials-can-help-with-customer-7e6518feb018) Pranav Kirtani
|
||||
> Before we dive into how Federated systems like OIDC and SAML along with Verifiable Credentials (VC) can help improve customer onboarding to your application, let us first understand what are the current methods being used for onboarding.
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparisons with/ other Tech
|
||||
* [Compare and Contrast: OpenBadges vs Verifiable Credentials](https://academy.affinidi.com/compare-and-contrast-openbadges-vs-verifiable-credentials-d504c054d5db) Affinidi
|
||||
> As we move towards a world of digital identity, many ways of sharing and verifying Personally Identifiable Information are emerging. Two such modes that we’ll talk about today are Open Badges and Verifiable Credentials.
|
||||
* [Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) vs Verifiable Credentials (VCs)](https://academy.affinidi.com/non-fungible-tokens-nfts-vs-verifiable-credentials-vcs-cd0ebb13f1fb) Affinidi
|
||||
> A common thread that connects both NFTs and VCs is that they leverage the potential benefits of the digital world to give users more security, flexibility, and freedom to monetize.
|
||||
* [ERC-721 Non-Fungible Token Standard on Ethereum vs. VCs on Hyperledger Indy](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Feb/0059.html) Michael Herman
|
||||
> When are Hyperledger Indy/Sovrin VCs better than Ethereum smart contracts for NFEs/NFTs (non-fungible entities/tokens)?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> It seems obvious but I don't have a detailed/worked out answer. One project I'm associated with wants to use the [ERC-721 Non-Fungible Token Standard](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721) on Ethereum but I believe VCs are a better route to take. Part of the desire to stay on Ethereum is there is quite a vibrant NFT community on Ethereum and lots of different EC-721 tokens.
|
||||
* [Comparing VCs to ZCAP-LD](https://kyledenhartog.com/comparing-VCs-with-zcaps/) Kyle Den Hartog
|
||||
> Why make the investment then to put the time and effort into ZCAPs when we’ve already got VCs? Simply put because security is hard and trying to push square pegs into round holes often times leads to bugs which are elevated to mission critical authentication/authorization bypass vulnerabilities. By designing around a fit for purpose data model with a well defined problem being solved it allows for us to be much more precise about where we believe extensibility is important versus where normative statements should be made to simplify the processing of the data models. By extension this leads to a simpler security model and likely a much more robust design with fewer vulnerabilities.
|
||||
* [Compare and Contrast — IRMA vs Verifiable Credentials](https://academy.affinidi.com/compare-and-contrast-irma-vs-verifiable-credentials-58e4b30d85f1)
|
||||
- [Re: VCs - zCaps / OCap a Discussion](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2020Dec/0027.html) Dave Longley 12/5
|
||||
> TL; DR: My current view is that the main confusion here may be over the difference between VCs and LD Proofs, not VCs and ZCAPs. VCs are not a generalized container for attaching a cryptographic proof to a document. That's what LD proofs (or JOSE style proofs) are for. VCs *use* LD proofs (or JOSE style proofs) to attach an assertion proof to a document that specifically models statements made by an issuer about some subject, which is therefore inherently about the identity of that subject.
|
||||
* [Could an NFT be a VC?](https://iiw.idcommons.net/20I/_Could_an_NFT_be_a_VC%253F) by Grace Rachmany
|
||||
> Case discussed: A group of villages in Africa using a cryptocurrency platform for alternative currencies. Different organizations issue the coins under different circumstances. When you accept a currency, you want to know who is the issuer. The Red Cross might be more or less trusted than the local leader or agricultural cooperative as the issuer of a currency that is supposedly equivalent to a shilling.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> What types of tech could be used for this?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - Multiple currencies on the blockchains
|
||||
> - Certifications in the form of some kind of NFT issued by the issuer.
|
||||
> - Limited supply tokens or NFTs that are “expired” when you use them
|
||||
> - Open Credential Publisher framework was suggested
|
||||
> - VCs are generally authorizations associated with a person, so maybe a person could have the VC and show their credit rating in some way while they are making a transaction
|
||||
> - Similarly maybe the VC belongs to the organization that is issuing the coin, proving its reputation over time.
|
||||
* [How does VC Functional Stack compare to #ToIP Stack?](https://twitter.com/rufftimo/status/1301314001251438593) @rufftimo
|
||||
> 1. ToIP Layers 2 & 3 compare to Functional Layer 2
|
||||
> 2. ToIP Layer 4 compares to Functional Layers 3 & 4 (horizontal layer for VC Management, vertical layer for Applications)
|
||||
> 3. Functional stack doesn't require #blockchain
|
||||
> 4. Functional Stack doesn't detail steps for trust or verification; ToIP Stack doesn't separate management or storage
|
||||
> 5. Functional Stack clarifies functions, roles, and potential business models; ToIP stack clarifies trust & security They are complementary, not contradictory.
|
||||
> 
|
||||
* [What are VCs similar to?](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Aug/0338.html) Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) (Monday, 23 August)
|
||||
> The chip in your e-passport is the analogy I’ve been most successful with\
|
||||
> An issuer gives it to you.\
|
||||
> You carry it around and show to whom you choose\
|
||||
> The verifier can check its integrity without contacting the issuer\
|
||||
> “A VC is like the chip in your passport - bit for any document type”\
|
||||
> So far the best analogy I’ve found. Policy makers say “ah, I see”…
|
||||
* [Hygiene for a computing pandemic](https://fossandcrafts.org/episodes/20-hygiene-for-a-computing-pandemic.html)
|
||||
> This episode of FOSS and Crafts features Christopher Lemmer Webber discussing the object capability security approach. Its a generalization not specific to VCs, continuing from the conversation on the CCG mailinglist, [Hygiene for a computing pandemic: separation of VCs and ocaps/zcaps](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2020Dec/0028.html), we shared last month.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The podcast *show-notes include an epic list of references* supporting the discussion.
|
||||
* [Re: The dangers of using VCs as permission tokens (was: PROPOSALs for VC HTTP API call on 2021-06-22)](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Jun/0244.html) Manu Sporny
|
||||
> On 6/24/21 12:35 PM, Kyle Den Hartog wrote:
|
||||
> > Agreed, when it comes to the number of checks that occur it's much greater
|
||||
> > because of the delegation. With that in mind, looking at the semantics only
|
||||
> > of the system VCs in my opinion weren't optimally designed for permission
|
||||
> > tokens. This difference between the two requires that an implementation
|
||||
> > that wants to support both claims tokens and permissions tokens has to
|
||||
> > grapple with the different mental model that arise when trying to stuff
|
||||
> > these things together. This introduces additional complexity. Additionally
|
||||
> > it leads to weird statements that are being made where it's difficult to
|
||||
> > tell if the VC is behaving like a claims token or a permissions token.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Yes, exactly this. Exactly what Kyle states above is the reason why it's so complicated (and thus dangerous) to use VCs as permissions tokens.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This is one of the primary reasons that we separated out the Authorization Capabilities work from the Verifiable Credentials work. Things get really complicated when you start mixing authz/authn/claims/permissions into a Verifiable Credential. Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> [https://kyledenhartog.com/example-authz-with-VCs/](https://kyledenhartog.com/example-authz-with-VCs/)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## HowTo
|
||||
* [Example Design of an Authorization System with Verifiable Credentials and the Tradeoffs](https://kyledenhartog.com/example-authz-with-VCs/) Kyle Den Hartog
|
||||
> The primary focus of this blog post is to highlight the different problems that are likely to occur when going down the path of building an authorization system with verifiable credentials. I’ll be sure to keep things at a higher level so that anyone can understand these tradeoffs, but take you through the details that would be thought through by an architect designing the system.
|
||||
* [Managing VCs at scale & the VC Stack](https://iiw.idcommons.net/index.php?title%3D12L/_Managing_VCs_at_Scale_%2526_the_VC_Stack%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1) by Timothy Ruff & Alan Davies
|
||||
* [Indexing and Querying Revoked Verifiable Credentials](https://medium.com/51nodes/indexing-and-querying-revoked-verifiable-credentials-e229dc2781d4) 51 Nodes
|
||||
> this article describes a simple approach to revoke verifiable credentials and a decentralized and efficient way to index and query those revoked credentials using the [Graph protocol](https://thegraph.com/en/).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## History
|
||||
|
||||
@ -148,14 +36,6 @@ published: false
|
||||
* [Verifiable Claim Protocol](https://github.com/ontio/ontology-DID/blob/master/docs/en/claim_spec.md) Ontology
|
||||
|
||||
## Literature
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-vc-data-model-2.0-20220811/)
|
||||
> - The components that constitute a [verifiable credential](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-vc-data-model-2.0-20220811/%23dfn-verifiable-credentials)
|
||||
> - The components that constitute a [verifiable presentation](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-vc-data-model-2.0-20220811/%23dfn-verifiable-presentations)
|
||||
> - An ecosystem where [verifiable credentials](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-vc-data-model-2.0-20220811/%23dfn-verifiable-credentials) and [verifiable presentations](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-vc-data-model-2.0-20220811/%23dfn-verifiable-presentations) are expected to be useful
|
||||
> - The use cases and requirements that informed this specification.
|
||||
* [VC Spec Enhancement Proposal](https://github.com/SmithSamuelM/Papers/blob/master/whitepapers/VC_Enhancement_Strategy.md) Sam Smith
|
||||
> the VC standard appears to be an adoption vector for Linked Data, not the other way around. My overriding interest is that the concept of a VC as a securely attributable statement is a very powerful and attractive one and therefore should be widely adopted. We should therefore be picking the best technologies that best support broad VC adoption, not the other way around.
|
||||
* [https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/advance-readings/rendering-verifiable-credentials.md](https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/advance-readings/rendering-verifiable-credentials.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### NGI
|
||||
* [Crossword wins NGI Atlantic funds for Verifiable Credentials project](https://www.crosswordcybersecurity.com/post/next-generation-internet-grant-win) Crossword Cybersecurity
|
||||
@ -179,44 +59,6 @@ published: false
|
||||
> A common example of this is when someone uses a "Power of Attorney," to sign a contract. When they do, they typically sign documents with their own names and an annotation "on behalf of," "for," or "by power of attorney," they don't forge the signature of the one who granted the power of attorney.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Case
|
||||
|
||||
* [Better digital living with blockchain-backed verifiable credentials](https://thepaypers.com/expert-opinion/better-digital-living-with-blockchain-backed-verifiable-credentials--1250869) The Paypers
|
||||
> The NHS can now provide you with a digital verifiable credential to prove your vaccination status, securely stored in the NHS app and easily accessible, generating a QR code to prove to airlines and employers that you are fit to fly or work. But this is just the first step in the development of an enabling technology that can bring benefits to many areas of modern life.
|
||||
* [On Climate Crisis and Self-Sovereign Verifiable Career Credentials](https://www.velocitynetwork.foundation/on-climate-crisis-and-self-sovereign-verifiable-career-credentials/) Velocity Network
|
||||
> This rich verifiable self-sovereign career identity will be the ‘great transformer’ of the global labor market. It will change the way people navigate their careers and livelihoods, and how employers make talent decisions.
|
||||
* [The World of Anonymous Credentials](https://blog.dock.io/anonymous-credentials/) Dock
|
||||
> A credential is called a verifiable credential when its authenticity can be cryptographically checked by anyone because the credential contains a cryptographic signature by the issuer, and the issuer's public key is well known.
|
||||
* [WHY THRIVACY?: Think about it. What did you leave behind when you bought the last round of drinks.](https://www.thrivacy.io/why-thrivacy)
|
||||
> Your Thrivacy wallet allows you to request all your important, personal information that can be used to identify who you are to be created into what we call verified credentials. Then those same verified credentials or VCs can be downloaded and stored in your own personal wallet that is kept inside your cell phone.
|
||||
* [25 Use Cases for Verifiable Credentials](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BrFjh6-TVkJ4Rfllh5fUTjh6hkYtPbR_/view) LTO Network and Sphereon
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials For Travel & Hospitality](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DXxd56y2mhFQ) Evernym
|
||||
> verifiable credentials and digital wallets can reduce fraud, automate workflows, and transform customer experiences across the travel and hospitality industries.
|
||||
* [The Power of Verifiable Credentials](https://credentialmaster.com/the-power-of-vcs/) Credential Master
|
||||
For the first time ever, data from one ecosystem can be instantly authenticated in any other, online or off, without a direct connection to the source.
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credential Notarization and Third-Party Notary Services Providers: User Scenarios](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Jul/0109.html) Michael Herman 7/15
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials for Authentic Data in the Supply Chain](https://iiw.idcommons.net/10G/_Verifiable_Credentials_for_Authentic_Data_in_the_Supply_Chain) by Gena Morgan, Kevin Dean
|
||||
> Using DiDs and VCs for verifiable product data in supply chains, leveraging the largest supply chain standard system in the world,
|
||||
>
|
||||
> 2.5 million users companies, over 6 billion product scans per day
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Product data and attestations from a number of various authoritative sources
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Leverage DIDs/VCs for distributed data sharing, verification
|
||||
* [IIW verifiable credentials - Decentralized VC integration with Eventbrite and Qiqo chat. This session will review the implementation process, lessons learned, and community discussion on related use cases.](https://iiw.idcommons.net/11A/_IIW_verifiable_credentials_-_Decentralized_VC_integration_with_Eventbrite_and_Qiqo_chat._This_session_will_review_the_implementation_process,_lessons_learned,_and_community_discussion_on_related_use_cases.) by Mike Vesey, Karl Kneis
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials for Assets <30 min](https://iiw.idcommons.net/21E/_Verifiable_Credentials_for_Assets_30_min) by Mahmoud Alkhraishi
|
||||
> General Framework on how to think of VCs for Assets including leveraging GS1 and other vocabularies in the traceability vocab.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Requirements and Opportunities that block adoption of VCs in Supply chains
|
||||
> * [Traceability Vocabulary v0.0](https://w3c-ccg.github.io/traceability-vocab/)
|
||||
> * [VC HTTP API (0.0.2-unstable)](https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-http-api)
|
||||
> * [Status List 2021](https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-status-list-2021/)
|
||||
* [Credential-based login to a Pico-based application](https://iiw.idcommons.net/11P/_Credential-based_login_to_a_Pico-based_application) by Bruce Conrad
|
||||
> Verifiable credentials, authentication, picos, pico-based application
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The slides are at [https://bruceatbyu.com/s/HRDDSiiw32](https://bruceatbyu.com/s/HRDDSiiw32)
|
||||
* [Video] [Using Paper-based Structured Credentials to Humanize Verifiable Credentials [Rough Cut]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DkM30pd3w8qE%26list%3DPLU-rWqHm5p45dzXF2LJZjuNVJrOUR6DaD%26index%3D2) Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) (Friday, 19 November)
|
||||
> User Scenario: ABC Grocery wants to use the Trusted Digital Web to issue a Purchase Order for 10 cabbages from David's Cabbages.
|
||||
|
||||
## Varieties
|
||||
|
||||
@ -232,22 +74,6 @@ published: false
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Also comments that WACI Bloom may play a part in convergence
|
||||
|
||||
## Critique
|
||||
|
||||
Thread: VCs need Threat Modeling
|
||||
|
||||
* [Thread started by Pamela Dingle](https://twitter.com/pamelarosiedee/status/1537233243086327812?s%3D20%26t%3DWWt14_H4AXgtn09xb5-yew)
|
||||
> Another pre-read recommendation for @identiverse: the @openid for Verifiable Credentials Whitepaper. It is a great high level explanation of decentralized benefits and use cases, both @kristinayasuda & @tlodderstedt contributed! OpenID for Verifiable Credentials
|
||||
* [Firstyear Replying to @Erstejahre @pamelarosiedee and 4 others](https://twitter.com/Erstejahre/status/1537615778106658816)
|
||||
> It also seems to lack any sections about threat modelling and possible risks, making it hard to trust since risks are not directly and clearly addressed.
|
||||
* [Torsten Lodderstedt Replying to @Erstejahre @pamelarosiedee and 3 others](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics)
|
||||
> I agree. We [threat] model while we are designing the protocol, we also need to add it to the spec. Please note: we build on existing work. There is an extensive thread model for OAuth and countermeasures that we built on ([datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics). Feel free to contribute.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Extensions Registry
|
||||
* [VC Extensions Registry updates](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2022Apr/0096.html) Manu Sporny (Saturday, 16 April)
|
||||
> I've made a pass at updating the registry to be more helpful to people and organizations that are not involved in the week-to-week with VCWG or CCG. The update, which adds proof methods, links to specs, implementations, and test suites can be found here:
|
||||
> [https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c-ccg/vc-extension-registry/pull/12.html#proof-methods](https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c-ccg/vc-extension-registry/pull/12.html%23proof-methods)
|
||||
|
||||
## VC for OAuth 2.0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -255,13 +81,6 @@ Thread: VCs need Threat Modeling
|
||||
|
||||
We design, implement, and evaluate a solution for achieving continuous authorization of HTTP requests exploiting Verifiable Credentials (VCs) and OAuth 2.0. Specifically, we develop a VC issuer that acts as an OAuth 2.0 authorization server, a VC verifier that transparently protects HTTP-based resources, and a VC wallet implemented as a browser extension capable of injecting the necessary authentication data in HTTP requests without needing user intervention.
|
||||
|
||||
## W3C
|
||||
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credentials Data Model v1.1 is an official W3C standard!](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2022Mar/0005.html) Manu Sporny (Thursday, 3 March)
|
||||
|
||||
Verifiable Credentials Data Model v1.1 [https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/REC-vc-data-model-20220303/](https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/REC-vc-data-model-20220303/)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### VC-HTTP-API
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
|
||||
- Digital Age Verfication (152k retail stores, 200M people)
|
||||
- Content Authenticity Initative (30M Adobe customers)
|
||||
- Digital Permanent Resident Cards (14M people)
|
||||
* [IIW verifiable credentials - Decentralized VC integration with Eventbrite and Qiqo chat. This session will review the implementation process, lessons learned, and community discussion on related use cases.](https://iiw.idcommons.net/11A/_IIW_verifiable_credentials_-_Decentralized_VC_integration_with_Eventbrite_and_Qiqo_chat._This_session_will_review_the_implementation_process,_lessons_learned,_and_community_discussion_on_related_use_cases.) by Mike Vesey, Karl Kneis
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* [Transforming Scottish Education on the Blockchain](https://digitalscot.net/education-blockchain/) DigitalScot
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user