From 1458abe432e6234d2b1c1334464956c0a9bf9793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: infominer33 <44134283+infominer33@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 05:16:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 10cfc3af..8799f4ec 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Please let me know if any of the links are depreciated\broken, or about anything
 
 I'm digging through the IIW-Wiki, some related blogs to find the earliest references to, and thought around, Self-Sovereign and Blockchain ID:
 
-In april 2014, Phil Windley mentioned someone asking [about blockchain at IIW](http://www.windley.com/archives/2015/04/why_is_blockchain_important.shtml In May of 2014), during [IIW-18](http://iiw.idcommons.net/IIW_18_Notes) there was some discourse on [personal sovereign design](http://iiw.idcommons.net/Personal_Sovereign_Design), as well as *Bitcoin and Identity*, although no notes are available on the latter. I get the impression that IIW has always been seeking the functionality thamade possible by blockchain.
+In April 2014, Phil Windley mentioned someone asking [about blockchain at IIW](http://www.windley.com/archives/2015/04/why_is_blockchain_important.shtml). In May of 2014, during [IIW-18](http://iiw.idcommons.net/IIW_18_Notes) there was some discourse on [personal sovereign design](http://iiw.idcommons.net/Personal_Sovereign_Design), as well as *Bitcoin and Identity*, although no notes are available on the latter. I get the impression that IIW has always been seeking the functionality thamade possible by blockchain.
 
 I expect to find the early history details I need from the IIW-WIki, [identitywoman.net](https://identitywoman.net/), [identityblog.com](http://www.identityblog.com/), and [windley.com](https://windley.com)