mirror of
https://github.com/Decentralized-ID/decentralized-id.github.io.git
synced 2024-10-01 01:05:54 -04:00
images https only
This commit is contained in:
Infominer
parent
03a7e60771
commit
13c5fbc1f5
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ It's impossible to have a conversation about decentralized-id without discussing
|
||||
|
||||
[Decentralized Identity: An alternative to password-based authentication](https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2018/10/decentralized-identity-an-alternative-to-password-based-authentication/)
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://www.gsma.com/identity/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/MWCA-19-ID-seminar-Microsoft-presentation-final.pdf)
|
||||
[](https://www.gsma.com/identity/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/MWCA-19-ID-seminar-Microsoft-presentation-final.pdf)
|
||||
|
||||
## Digital Identity Fundamentals
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ JULY 9, 2019
|
||||
{% include video id="hUYpvI43bHA" provider="youtube" %}
|
||||
[Daniel Buchner - Blockchain-Anchored Identity – A Gateway to Decentralized Apps and Services](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUYpvI43bHA)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[Blockchain Identity – Success Factors and Challenges](https://www.kuppingercole.com/blog/kuppinger/blockchain-identity-success-factors-and-challenges) by Martin Kuppinger
|
||||
> When new things arrive, which are still in the pioneering stage and far from reaching maturity, there is always a lot of discussion. This is even more true for Blockchain Identity, where the massive hype around Blockchains, a long history of clever ideas failing, and a few interesting technical and security challenges come together. During my keynote at this year’s EIC, I addressed the challenges and success factors for Blockchain ID as well. That led to a discussion on Twitter about whether some of these success factors are contradictory.
|
||||
* [GDPR - A reflection on the 'self-sovereign identity' and the Blockchain](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/gdpr-reflection-self-sovereign-identity-blockchain-nicolas-ameye/)
|
||||
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ JULY 9, 2019
|
||||
* [Distributed Ledger Technologies, IAM, and the Truth in Things - June 27 - Identiverse 2019](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV2rLgH9TUE) - Robert Brown
|
||||
* [Decentralized Identity: Intersection of Identity and Distributed Ledger - June 25 - Identiverse 2019](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjlnZyMTf1M) - Preeti Rastogi
|
||||
* [Blockchain for Identity - Myth or Potential](https://www.kuppingercole.com/blog/kuppinger/blockchain-for-identity-myth-or-potential)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Assorted Blockchain ID Initiatives
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ trust framework created by the eIDAS Regulation.
|
||||
|
||||
[European Self Sovereign identity framework](https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/1._panel_-_daniel_du_seuil.pdf)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> In European Blockchain Partnership NL-GER-BE started a initiative on
|
||||
> European Self Sovereign Identity framework (eSSIF).
|
||||
|
||||
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Blockchain.com (2011) partners with ArtFinLab, UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), the UN
|
||||
* [BLOCKCHAIN FOR SOCIAL IMPACT MOVING BEYOND THE HYPE](https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/publication-pdf/study-blockchain-impact-moving-beyond-hype.pdf)
|
||||
> The World Bank estimates that over 1.5 billion people on the planet are unable to prove their identity.1 Many of these people come from remote, underserved regions. Using blockchain technology to build and deploy digital identity solutions, if applied correctly, holds promise because it can reduce fraud, increase transparency, and increase efficiency. Several organizations, like BanQu and AID:Tech, are already changing digital identity in the developing world with a blockchain solution, making it easier for NGOs, nonprofits, and commercial entities to provision identities, track aid, and enable underserved populations to access a wider range of economic services.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### First Live Birth Recorded on Blockchain
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ last_modified_at: 2020-01-07
|
||||
>
|
||||
> In addition to being able to support more ledger technologies than just Indy, Aries can work with multiple ledgers at the same time. This allows Agents to use each ledger according to the unique power offered by each, instead of requiring anchoring to only one ledger. In the future, Agents will be able to integrate not only with the recently announced Ion DID method, but also Ethereum, Hyperledger Sawtooth, Bitcoin, Hyperledger Fabric, and others.
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://www.slideshare.net/SSIMeetup/hyperledger-aries-open-source-interoperable-identity-solution-nathan-george)
|
||||
[](https://www.slideshare.net/SSIMeetup/hyperledger-aries-open-source-interoperable-identity-solution-nathan-george)
|
||||
|
||||
[Hyperledger Aries to Enable Blockchain-Agnostic, Self-Sovereign Identity](https://medium.com/@xragrawal/hyperledger-aries-to-enable-blockchain-agnostic-self-sovereign-identity-a7d523064112)
|
||||
> In two years since the introduction of Hyperledger Indy in 2017, the scope of work within its development community has far extended beyond what was initially set in its proposal. To clarify and keep track of new and existing peer-to-peer interaction code for secrets management, verifiable information exchange, and secure messaging across different blockchains and other distributed ledger technologies, Hyperledger Aries was set in motion.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ While none of this is authoritative, it's useful to keep in mind the philosophy
|
||||
[Answering Questions about Self-Sovereign Identity](https://www.windley.com/archives/2019/07/answering_questions_about_self-sovereign_identity.shtml)
|
||||
> Identity professionals continue to have questions about self-sovereign identity (SSI). In this post, I answer a few questions that Susan Morrow raised about the commercial viability, security, privacy, and desired user experience of SSI.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[Self-Sovereign Identity: Shifting the Locus of Control](https://medium.com/@trbouma/self-sovereign-identity-shifting-the-locus-of-control-10da1c8757ad)
|
||||
> Simply put, the old (centralized and federated models) the locus of control was between the other parties that could make decisions about me, whether I was in the picture or not. In the new model (self-sovereign identity), the user is put into the centre of his/her own locus of control. See above.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Not all verifiable credentials are created the same. This post examines the cate
|
||||
* [A Verifiable Credentials Primer](https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot7-toronto/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/verifiable-credentials-primer.md)
|
||||
> NOTE: "Verifiable Claims" are now known as "Verifiable Credentials". The W3C Verifiable Claims Working Group's experience with using the term "Verifiable Claims" demonstrated that it led to confusion in the marketplace. The group has since found consensus in shifting to use the term "Verifiable Credentials", which contain "Claims".
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJCDF_JcRihUQ5uRFbo47dEJPFsQB7FD/view)
|
||||
[](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJCDF_JcRihUQ5uRFbo47dEJPFsQB7FD/view)
|
||||
|
||||
* [Verifiable Credential Exchange](https://www.windley.com/archives/2018/12/verifiable_credential_exchange.shtml)
|
||||
> Multi-source identity (MSI) depends on issuing, exchanging, and verifying digital credentials. The specification for verifiable credentials is being formulated by the World Wide Web Consortium’s Verifiable Credentials Working Group. Verifiable credentials provide a standard way to express credentials in a way that is cryptographically secure, privacy respecting, and automatically verifiable.
|
||||
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Verifiable Claims WG Test Suite.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sovrin
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1UxLLugRQKuV8Mdvv_X9Y6ty4szSi5ZNU?ogsrc=32](https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1UxLLugRQKuV8Mdvv_X9Y6ty4szSi5ZNU?ogsrc=32)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user