mirror of https://github.com/JoseDeFreitas/awesome-youtubers.git synced 2024-07-03 09:41:34 +00:00

History

Jose De Freitas 681e4ab2b2 Start of data		2021-03-01 14:30:18 -05:00
..
api	Change text y-offset	2021-03-01 12:53:41 -05:00
data.json	Start of data	2021-03-01 14:30:18 -05:00
log.txt	Add log function	2021-02-28 20:51:29 -05:00
Procfile	Add space	2021-02-28 22:25:07 -05:00
readme.md	Add request header	2021-03-01 12:42:37 -05:00
requirements.txt	Add gunicorn	2021-02-28 21:57:30 -05:00
server.py	Add log function	2021-02-28 20:51:29 -05:00

readme.md

Awesome YouTubers voting system

How to vote a YouTuber?

It's as easy as clicking one of the two options that are located at the right-most part of the YouTuber's name on the list. You'll be redirected to the Awesome YouTubers voting system website. You'll see the name of the YouTube channel and the vote you gave it. This is anonymous and does not require authentication.

If you think the YouTuber is awesome, you can upvote the channel. If not, you can downvote the channel. When you upvote a channel you sum 1 to its calification, whereas when you downvote it you substract 1 from its calification. The score the YouTuber has appears next to the icons. The value starts at 0 and goes above and below it according to the votes.

How does it work?

Each YouTuber has two options (upvote and downvote) on the YouTuber's name line. The options each YouTuber has are linked to the Awesome YouTubers voting system website (see the source in this folder) by the name of the YouTuber. When you click an option, the website opens with the YouTuber's channel name and the vote you gave it (upvote = +1; downvote = -1). Your vote gets automatically sent to a database when the scores are stored. They then get printed in the readme.md file by referencing the image url.

Motivation

Despite having already a discussion about YouTubers (specifically the ones that according to the community should be removed from the list for x or y reasons) this voting system makes it easier, anonymous, and fair to decide if a YouTuber should be on this list. All the YouTubers added get revised by me (I check whether the information the contributor provided matches and I watch some videos looking for well explanations, good audio and video quality, coverage of the topics it explains, among others), but, of course, I'm only one person, so I think being able to receive opinions from all users is a good way to filter and have truly awesome content based on the community's opinion.