Awesome-Mirrors/awesome-youtubers
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/JoseDeFreitas/awesome-youtubers.git synced 2024-10-01 05:06:03 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update information

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jose De Freitas 2021-02-28 20:57:05 -05:00
parent 82fff5b2d2
commit d6a7579d0c
1 changed files with 8 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
voter/readme.md
View File

@ -4,31 +4,28 @@
It's as easy as clicking one of the two options that are located at the right-most part of the It's as easy as clicking one of the two options that are located at the right-most part of the
YouTuber's name on the [list](../readme.md). You'll be redirected to the Awesome YouTubers YouTuber's name on the [list](../readme.md). You'll be redirected to the Awesome YouTubers
voting system website. You'll see the name of the YouTuber and the vote you gave him, as well voting system website. You'll see the name of the YouTube channel and the vote you gave it.
as a prompt to write the reason why you choose to upvote or downvote the YouTuber. If you don't This is anonymous and does not require authentication.
want to provide any, don't type anything, though it's recommended to have an
idea of your chose. This is anonymous and does not require authentication.
If you think the YouTuber is awesome, you can upvote the channel. If not, you can downvote the If you think the YouTuber is awesome, you can upvote the channel. If not, you can downvote the
channel. When you upvote a channel you sum 1 to its calification, whereas when you downvote it channel. When you upvote a channel you sum 1 to its calification, whereas when you downvote it
you substract 1 from its calification. The vote the YouTuber has appears next to the icons. you substract 1 from its calification. The score the YouTuber has appears next to the icons.
The value starts at 0 and goes above and below it according to the votes. The value starts at 0 and goes above and below it according to the votes.
## How does it work? ## How does it work?
Each YouTuber has two options (upvote and downvote) on the YouTuber's name line. The options Each YouTuber has two options (upvote and downvote) on the YouTuber's name line. The options
each YouTuber has are linked to the Awesome YouTubers voting system website (see the source each YouTuber has are linked to the Awesome YouTubers voting system website (see the source
in this folder) by the name of the YouTuber. When you click, the website opens and you get in this folder) by the name of the YouTuber. When you click an option, the website opens with
prompted to write why you decided the vote you are giving (if you don't want to tell, just the YouTuber's channel name and the vote you gave it (upvote = +1; downvote = -1). Your vote gets
don't type anything). When you click on "Submit vote" your vote (upvote = +1 or downvote = -1) automatically sent to a database when the scores are stored. They then get printed in the
and your opinion get sent to a database when the scores are stored. They then get printed in [readme.md](../readme.md) file by referencing the image url.
the [readme.md](../readme.md) file for others to see.
## Motivation ## Motivation
Despite having already a [discussion about YouTubers](https://github.com/JoseDeFreitas/awesome-youtubers/discussions/32) Despite having already a [discussion about YouTubers](https://github.com/JoseDeFreitas/awesome-youtubers/discussions/32)
(specifically the ones that according to the community should be removed from the list for x or y (specifically the ones that according to the community should be removed from the list for x or y
reasons) this voting system makes it easier, anonymous, and fair to decide the place a YouTuber has reasons) this voting system makes it easier, anonymous, and fair to decide if a YouTuber should be
on this list. All the YouTubers added get revised by me (I check whether the information the on this list. All the YouTubers added get revised by me (I check whether the information the
contributor provided matches and I watch some videos looking for well explanations, good audio and contributor provided matches and I watch some videos looking for well explanations, good audio and
video quality, coverage of the topics it explains, among others), but, of course, I'm only one person, video quality, coverage of the topics it explains, among others), but, of course, I'm only one person,