diff --git a/voter/readme.md b/voter/readme.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..416d890
--- /dev/null
+++ b/voter/readme.md
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Awesome YouTubers voting system
+
+## How to vote a YouTuber?
+
+It's as easy as clicking one of the two options that are located at the right-most part of the
+YouTuber's name on the [list](../readme.md). You'll be redirected to the Awesome YouTubers
+voting system website in the section of the YouTuber you selected. You'll see the name of the
+YouTuber and the vote you gave him, as well as a prompt to write the reason why you choose to
+upvote or downvote the YouTuber. If you don't want to provide any, you can click on "Prefer
+not to say", though it's recommended to have an idea of your chose. This is anonymous and does
+not require authentication.
+
+If you think the YouTuber is awesome, you can upvote the channel. If not, you can downvote the
+channel. When you upvote a channel you sum 1 to its calification, whereas when you downvote it
+you substract 1 from its calification. The vote the YouTuber has appears next to these icons.
+The value starts at 0 and goes above and below it according to the votes.
+
+## How does it work?
+
+Each YouTuber has two options (upvote and downvote) on the YouTuber's name line. The options
+each YouTuber has are linked to the Awesome YouTubers voting system website (see the source
+in this folder) by the name of the YouTuber. When you click, the website opens and you get
+prompted to write why you decided the vote you are giving (if you don't want to tell, you can
+click on the "Prefer not to say" button). When you click on "Submit vote" your vote (upvote
+ = +1 or downvote = -1) and your opinion get sent to a database when the scores are stored.
+They then get printed in the [readme.md](../readme.md) file for others to see.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Despite having already a [discussion about YouTubers](https://github.com/JoseDeFreitas/awesome-youtubers/discussions/32)
+(specifically the ones that according to the community should be removed from the list for x or y
+reasons) this voting system makes it easier, anonymous, and fair to decide the place a YouTuber has
+on this list. All the YouTubers added get revised by me (I check whether the information the
+contributor provided matches and I watch some videos looking for well explanations, good audio and
+video quality, coverage of the topics it explains, among others), but, of course, I'm only one person,
+so I think being able to receive opinions from all users is a good way to filter and have truly
+awesome content based on the community's opinion.